Facebook Is Shuttering Its Face Recognition System
Privacy advocates applaud the move.

Meta, now the parent company of Facebook, announced that it is shutting down its facial recognition system that identified and tagged photos loaded onto the social media company's platform.
"This change will represent one of the largest shifts in facial recognition usage in the technology's history," notes a statement from Jerome Pesenti, the company's vice president for artificial intelligence. "More than a third of Facebook's daily active users have opted in to our Face Recognition setting and are able to be recognized, and its removal will result in the deletion of more than a billion people's individual facial recognition templates." The company said that it had made the decision to shutter its facial recognition system in the face of growing "concerns about the place of facial recognition technology in society."
The fact that the company was fined $5 billion by the Federal Trade Commission in 2019 to settle privacy complaints—including concerns over facial recognition—and settled a class action suit earlier this year for $650 million over violating Illinois' consent requirement for using biometric information, very likely played a role here too. As the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit noted in its 2019 ruling in the Illinois case:
Once a face template of an individual is created, Facebook can use it to identify that individual in any of the other hundreds of millions of photos uploaded to Facebook each day, as well as determine when the individual was present at a specific location. Facebook can also identify the individual's Facebook friends or acquaintances who are present in the photo. Taking into account the future development of such technology…it seems likely that a face-mapped individual could be identified from a surveillance photo taken on the streets or in an office building.
The concerns about the place of social recognition technology are well founded. For example, Facebook photos have been scraped without permission by the surveillance company Clearview AI, which has sold its tracking and surveillance services to numerous local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.
"Facebook getting out of the face recognition business is a pivotal moment in the growing national discomfort with this technology," Adam Schwartz, a senior lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties organization, told The New York Times. "Corporate use of face surveillance is very dangerous to people's privacy."
Corporate face surveillance is dangerous because government agencies could one day demand access to all of the data amassed by companies in order to institute essentially a turnkey authoritarian surveillance regime. "Facial recognition is the perfect tool for oppression," write Woodrow Hartzog, a professor of law and computer science at Northeastern University, and Evan Selinger, a philosopher at the Rochester Institute of Technology. It is, they persuasively argue in Medium, "the most uniquely dangerous surveillance mechanism ever invented." Real-time deployment of facial recognition technologies would essentially turn our faces into ID cards on permanent display to the police.
With respect to the future deployment of such technologies, the Facebook statement observed that facial recognition's "long-term role in society needs to be debated in the open, and among those who will be most impacted by it." Yes, it does.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"long-term role in society needs to be debated in the open,
But that ain't gonna happen.
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FGh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP1
Facebook did an about face about face recognition?
A rather two-faced decision.
[facepalm]
These are 2 pay checks $78367 and $87367. that i received in last 2 months. I am very happy that i can make thousands in my part time and now i am enjoying my life.ghj Everybody can do this and earn lots of dollars from home in very short time period. Your Success is one step away Click Below Webpage…..
Just visit this website now…… Visit Here
It recognized that it had to save face
It? Is that your lefty fucktard way of implying corporations aren't people?
After Frances Haugen's 15 minutes, maybe Faceplant realized that being able to recognize some faces isn't worth the effort.
Weingarten broke it.
Meta is making a virtue of necessity. Teenage Facebook users are expected to drop by 45% over the next two years--according to Facebook's internal research. Instagram was supposed to save them from the graying of Facebook, but posting by teenagers on Instagram has dropped by 13% since 2020. Meta is losing market share with teens to TikTok and Snapchat, and privacy concerns are part of the "problem".
https://www.theverge.com/22743744/facebook-teen-usage-decline-frances-haugen-leaks
What we're seeing Meta do is a reaction to market forces, in other words, and the market forces in this case are teenagers making choices. If Meta doesn't change its strategy or generate new businesses, the writing is on the wall. If young people aren't signing up for your platform, advertisers aren't interested. It didn't matter if a show like Longmire was among the most popular on TV. If the audience isn't young, their consumer tastes have calcified, and advertisers won't pay a premium for access to them. They already have a favorite shaving creme.
Deprived of the ability to make acquisitions in the present political environment, Meta is forced to tailor their products to appeal to teens, and that's a problem. Instagram is a giant locker room full of bullies that want to give you a wedgie. I strongly suspect that what falls under the guise of "bullying" these days (op social media) isn't so much about being girls being fat shamed or boys being made fun of for being effeminate. It's teens being afraid of committing cancel culture microaggressions.
Why would teens be eager to subject themselves to that--especially when that isn't as much of a problem on Snapchat?
You made your bed, Facebook. Time to lie in it.
Longmire was good.
There's a long response here which I'm too lazy to get into, about how the establishment media and tech companies now collude to smear their competition until they get on board with a centrally approved censorship paradigm.
I hope my point is getting across about how Meta seems to be suffering because of woke cancel culture. The reason they're losing teens may be because teens are afraid of being bullied, but what they're likely to be bullied for on social media is for microaggressions. You can hardly say anything on social media without committing some sin against the woke, and the bullies in their high school are like PC Principal--only they're teenagers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhV7ZxsXHjc
One of the problems Instagram is having is that when teens to make posts, they mostly just share them with specific friends. One of the upsides of Snapchat is that your posts disappear after a while, so people can't form a social media mob to harass your for it long after the fact. Snapchat forgets. Meta wants speech codes because the advertisers want them and they're afraid of the Democrats at the moment. Meanwhile, the PC mob appears to be destroying their appeal to their most important customer base.
I wasn't countering your statement, I was only pointing to the fact that whenever a competitor pops its head above the parapet, the usual suspects are there to try to knock it down.
Can you really trust a devil-may-care platform that becomes a haven for Qanon types who are deaf to the remonstrations of Media Matters and the scolding of the New York Times?
The media doesn't hate Twitter & Facebook, they want it to be the ONLY platforms because they've dug their claws into it and now sit on their "fact-checking" boards. Who sits on Snapchat's fact-checking board? This cannot stand.
And the media is watching Snapchat, very... very closely... and judging quietly.
Oh, and in case the implication of the above isn't clear. Snapchat is starting to the regular social networking route. They're creating persistent "stories" which will be... *cough* algorhithmically promoted. And the cycle continues.
"Why would teens be eager to subject themselves to that-"
Teens crave validation and conformity.
“I strongly suspect that what falls under the guise of "bullying" these days (op social media) isn't so much about being girls being fat shamed or boys being made fun of for being effeminate. It's teens being afraid of committing cancel culture microaggressions.”
And you strongly suspect this based on what? Did you actually discuss it with any teenagers?
Did you actually discuss it with any teenagers?
Did you?
Facial recognition is the perfect tool for oppression
It is also the perfect tool for liberation from oppression because it is a key element of self-sovereign identity - identity that is truly owned by you and not subject to any government or corporation or other intermediary.
Stupid is as stupid posts. When Big Brother can track your every move, BB can manipulate you and your environment - prison without walls - by disallowing travel, purchases, entry, commerce, etc.
Or maybe that's your idea of utopia, Mr useful idiot.
That's cute that you think that corporate and government surveillance will go away now that Clearview can only buy one last data dump from Faceobook.
You didn't read the fine print. You gave up ownership rights to your image back in the 17th update to the TOS in 2012.
And will give them up again in 2013.
The important thing is that everyone has access to their constitutional right and vital access to facebooks. Without which life cannot exist.
Oh please, they're lying. Sure they'll shutter "face recognition" probably because of masks but what's next? Feature profile recognition? Ambulatory structure recognition? Why bother with static images when they have so much data on video?
Long story short, they've found something that provides more data they can milk for money. Let's face it, sorry, everyone has the faces and they've done the aging on babies so they've got a fair starting point. It's more about spotting the lame or soon to be lame because that knee replacement that you hadn't yet noticed is good money. Not today but one day soon.
Oh please, they're lying. Sure they'll shutter "face recognition" probably because of masks
Oh, yeah, I just took it to mean they'll stop offering it to users to opt into for free. The training dataset is more than large enough and they don't make any money sifting through it for non-paying users.
Best case scenario is that it's like the kiddie porn situation where they'll continue to sift through the photos on behalf of other agencies, they just won't know explicitly what they're looking for.
That's just one take but there are many more. It ain't virtue and as libertarians it shouldn't be. The trick is finding their easy out to collecting other data. It's always about the "other" since even the twitterati has the same data.
I would have thought that facial recognition only enhances Facebook's abilities to target advertising to its 'users.'
It helps identify January 6 attackers. They should keep it.
That will surely be an attractive feature to law enforcement agencies. Facebook wants to use software to make advertising more effective. Perhaps facial recognition software paired with corporate logo recognition software.
Will Rogers: "I never meta man I didn't like....until I logged onto Facebook."
Hey I am Isa Bella Nadra Card Centre marketer. We provide Online Nadra Card Centre services also provide Pakistan passports Renewal and Nadra Nicop Nadra Card Centre
I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and ddot it.....!how buy exipure