Book Reviews

Undoing Drugs

Harm reduction invites a radical reconsideration of the way the government deals with politically disfavored intoxicants.

|

After the concept of "harm reduction" spread from European pioneers to American activists in the 1980s and '90s, journalist Maia Szalavitz notes in her new history of the movement, it "terrified drug warriors." With good reason: "If the drug war was to be judged on its capacity to reduce harm, rather than on the number of arrests and drug seizures, it would almost certainly have to be declared lost."

As a rejoinder to "Just Say No" and "zero tolerance," harm reduction is readily understandable, intuitively appealing, and ultimately devastating to the prohibitionist cause. It refocuses attention from drugs to drug-related harm, distinguishes between the damage done by drug use and the damage done by drug laws, and requires weighing the costs of those laws along with their purported benefits. As Szalavitz shows in Undoing Drugs: The Untold Story of Harm Reduction and the Future of Addiction, that's a powerful combination.

Harm reduction opens the door to relatively modest but previously unthinkable programs such as needle exchange, heroin maintenance, and supervised consumption facilities, each of which can be defended as an improvement on the status quo. At the same time, harm reduction invites a radical reconsideration of the way the government deals with politically disfavored intoxicants.

Szalavitz illustrates the subversive potential of harm reduction by describing how the views of its leading promoters evolved as they accepted the idea and tried to apply it consistently. People who initially thought abstinence was the only viable alternative to life-destroying addiction became more tolerant of other approaches, based on the premise that "any positive change" should be welcomed. People who initially accepted prohibition or tinkered around its edges became full-throated abolitionists. The movement's final fruition will depend on whether politicians are capable of similar reflection.

NEXT: Brickbat: Public Nudity

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Harm reduction invites a radical reconsideration of the way the government deals with politically disfavored intoxicantssubstances. Ivermectin comes to mind.

    1. Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home.HGo Start bringing up to $65,000 to $70,000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.

      Here is I started.…………… VISIT HERE

      1. Seriously paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily. simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.

        Try now……………… READ MORE

        1. Sarah getting Paid up to $18953 in the week, working on-line at home. I’m full time Student. I shocked when my sister’s told me about her check that was $97k. It’s very easy to do.QEd everybody will get this job. Go to home media tab for additional details……

          So I started……… READ MORE

        2. Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…TEq And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.

          Try it, you won’t regret it!……… VISIT HERE

      2. This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started HAu with 25 persons company now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.

        Join this right now…………… Visit Here

    2. I guess…if you have the four stomachs of a cow and a metabolism to match and you need heart de-worming. Otherwise, I wouldn’t know about the harm reduction part.

      1. This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business TFb with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.

        Join this right now…………… VISIT HERE

  2. Victimless crimes are not crimes. End the welfare loophole (i.e., public welfare) and decriminalize drugs.

    1. Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Haj Start bringing up to $65,000 to $70,000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.

      Here is I started.…………… Visit Here

  3. Still, what good is harm reduction without an agreed-on understanding of what constitutes “harm”, and what good is it without a simultaneous consideration of benefits?

  4. Fuck harm reduction.
    It may be “less bad” than the current drug war but it’s still the progressives’ drug war that they started early in the 20th century.
    It is definitely not “libertarian” in any way.

  5. Harm reduction opens the door to relatively modest but previously unthinkable programs such as needle exchange, heroin maintenance, and supervised consumption facilities, each of which can be defended as an improvement on the status quo. At the same time, harm reduction invites a radical reconsideration of the way the government deals with politically disfavored intoxicants.

    Perhaps also genetically-modifying the plant of the drug so it kills pain and not people? And splicing it with kudzu growth gene to make it plentiful and cheap as candy? Wouldn’t that be the ultimate in harm reduction?

    Notice my text is at a normal cadence and in no way resembles a Lou Reed song.

Please to post comments