China's New Data Privacy Law Doesn't Protect People Against the Biggest Threat: The Government

The law just addresses use of individuals' data by private companies, carving out exceptions for government harvesting of data.


Over the last few years, China has established thousands of checkpoints in its western provinces, designed to surveil the ethnic minorities who must scan their IDs (and faces) regularly so their every movement can be tracked. China now also apparently cares very deeply about protecting citizens' data, this week passing a strict new privacy law designed to protect consumers from data collection by large tech companies.

Casting aside for a moment the jarring incongruity of a government fixating on data collection by big tech companies while ignoring its own authoritarian trampling on citizens' privacy rights, it's worth noting that the law, called the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), necessarily weakens big tech companies, forcing onerous regulations that they will now have to comply with.

While many observers have drawn comparisons between PIPL and Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the benefit to consumers may be a mixed bag if GDPR is any example. Europe's consent-based frameworks (where most consumers just read through yet another set of mumbo-jumbo legalese disclosures before robotically clicking "agree") sometimes fail to provide enhanced data privacy. Amusingly with GDPR, "a company that lacks the consent for their current data practices could also lack the consent to email people to gain their consent," Andrea O'Sullivan wrote for Reason back in 2018.

Still, limiting what data companies may collect and what said companies can do with the data once collected could feasibly be a boon to consumers—although China's law predictably contains large carveouts for the government to violate people's privacy for ill-defined national security purposes. PIPL—which is quite popular among Chinese consumers, who, like their Western counterparts, are in the throes of a nascent techlash moment—prohibits excessive collection of consumer data; requires that sensitive information be stored in China; requires that facial recognition surveillance tech be explicitly marked as such; and fines companies that violate the new law.

"The privacy rules threaten to severely curtail a raft of online commerce services that rely on personalized data to target consumers and peddle their wares," reports Bloomberg. "Drafts of the latest personal data law would tighten rules on user profiles that companies keep and the recommendations that apps can make."

This all comes against the backdrop of a regulatory crackdown on companies that list overseas, as well as allegations that the Uber equivalent DiDi has been mishandling customer data. China has also sabotaged domestic initial public offerings, threatened the online tutoring software sector, and foisted new onerous regulations on popular messaging platforms like WeChat.

"The vast majority of people in China don't expect to ever be part of police investigations, but they do expect to conduct most of their life through online services," so it provides useful protection for them, says Jeremy Daum, senior research fellow at the Yale Law School Paul Tsai China Center.

"I hope to see some initial citizen lawsuits to protect their own rights," says Daum. There have been "lawsuits about the use of facial recognition technology already, and the highest court recently issued detailed guidelines for when such suits should succeed. We might start to see them for collection or use of personal information beyond the minimum necessary to provide services, or for denials of service due to refusal to consent to such collection."

The law, which takes effect November 1, has big implications for multinational companies operating in China, as it will probably force them to direct a lot of time and attention to compliance.

But the upshot is almost too obvious to need stating: Protection of consumer data, while fine and good, means nothing if there's no true rule of law binding governments to privacy-protecting standards as well. If your country of 1.4 billion does a decent job protecting the rights of ethnic Han Chinese who support the Communist Party, well, bully for you. That leaves some 25 million people living in Xinjiang province—roughly half of whom are Uyghur—as well as other ethnic minorities scattered throughout the country, who are denied even basic privacy protections and due process, whose every step remains surveilled by an enormous government apparatus designed to capture and interrogate people if they engage in such milquetoast activities as refueling someone else's car with gas or refraining from using the front door of their own home. And that's assuming they're not one of the roughly 1.5 million who are denied basic freedom of movement by nature of being forced to live in internment camps.

Privacy protections for consumers are important, but it's the state, with its monopoly on force, that remains the most threatening potential privacy-violator of all.

NEXT: The Chair Makes Comedy Out of College’s Absurd Status Quo

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Why would totalitarian communist China have a data policy that protects people from the government?

    What kind of fucking LOL headline is this?

    1. I can't wait for next week's article bemoaning North Korea's emigration policies.

      1. Fantastic work-from-home opportunity for everyone… Work for three to eight a day and start getting paid in kSx the range of 17,000-19,000 dollars a month… Weekly payments Learn More details Good luck…

        See……………VISIT HERE

      2. I just bought a brand new BMW after having made $6375 this past one month and just over 12k last 4 week. This is the best and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started this few Weeks ago and almost immediately started to bring home minimum 74BUCKS p/h… Read More

        1. My last pay test was $9500 operating 12 hours per week on line. my sisters buddy has been averaging 15k for months now and she works approximately 20 hours every week. i can not accept as true with how easy it become as soon as i tried it out. This is what do,…………… READ MORE

    2. Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $65,000 to $70,000 a month.AFj I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.

      You can check it out here……... VISIT HERE

  2. China's New Data Privacy Law Doesn't Protect People Against the Biggest Threat: The Government

    This can't be true. I was told that communism is all about the individual.

    1. Since I started with my online business, I earn $25 every 15 minutes. It sounds unbelievable XRv but you won’t forgive yourself if you don't check it out.

      Learn more about it here....... VISIT HERE

  3. China is an ostensibly communist country whose government has matured into a de facto fascist state as communism does when confronted with reality. It has no use for personal privacy from the government.

  4. "I hope to see some initial citizen lawsuits to protect their own rights,"

    I expect to see an expansion of the camps in Xinjiang province.

  5. China? Laws? Laughable.

  6. Of course, as I've noted before, China's emerging data protections are largely BETWEEN PRIVATE ACTORS including corporations, and the government still has great access to personal information.

    Oh, huh. I wonder if the US has passed a singular piece of legislation that is widely touted as the keystone to the internet in the past 25 years that selectively protects data between private entities while exempting the government.

  7. How do you say "Feature, not bug" in Chinese?

  8. Haha, what the fuck kind of article is this? Does Ms. Wolfe realize that China is a police state that laughs at the concept of rule of law? What the fuck.

    1. The target audience of the present online casino received a dose of new opportunities and competitors in the form of inexperienced players official source. From this year, the world of casinos change greatly and I have not been used to all aspects that I had to study from the beginning.

  9. Reminds me of the CCPA, California left government entities huge exceptions.

  10. I was watching a youtube video where the speaker (I won't name him here) intimated that China was a relatively benign entity, engaging peacefully with the world, and investing in foreign nations through the mechanism of enlightened economic trade, and didn't "interfere" with other nations.

    I pointed out "Taiwan" and it was brushed off in the comments as being a purely internal affair.

    I didn't even begin to try to explain that China (like every other nation on the globe) doesn't "invest" in any foreign nation unless its in its direct national interest.

    o China building a port in Africa: Enlightened economic engagement with no secondary benefit to China's strategic standing in the world.
    o US proposing a pipeline in Afghanistan: US Imperialist trickery to expand its hegemony over the middle east through control of natural resources.

    1. Well, PRC did sell all those machetes to Les Genocidaires in Rwanda a few months before the actual genocide. THAT was pretty “giving” if them….

  11. How can they us facial recognition to track their citizens when they all look the same? (just kidding.... just don't use an American AI)

    1. 'One in a million still a problem in a country with 1.5 billion people.

      We searched for Jackie Chan and the AI returned 50,000 hits. That's not right.

  12. China is a communist dictatorship....I'm not sure what you seriously expected.

    1. I just bought a brand new BMW after having made $6375 this past one month and just over 12k last 4 week. This is the best and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started this few Weeks ago and almost immediately started to bring home minimum 74BUCKS p/h… Read More

    2. Trade with America was supposed to make China more like America.
      Isn’t that funny now?

  13. Great article Liz; now tell us exactly how the government is not in full control of the "corporations".

    1. I disagree it was a "great article". Liz failed to point out, the CCP members don't want to be spied upon, which is why the law exists in the first place. Just think like a CCP member: what would it be worth to you, to know the many places your rival CCP member went with Uber, or maybe his contact list? As for spying on anyone, the CCP reserves the right to do that, and private companies will comply with CCP requests for their data on their users.

      1. What this means: any CCP member with a friend in the security agencies can find this out about all the others, but spying _back_ is banned.

  14. And in fake news from 1939:
    “New German law doesn’t do enough to
    protect Jews.”

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.