Spain

Latin American Socialism Comes Home To Roost in Spain

Spain's progressive tax offensive vs. Madrid's rebel government

|

In the 1960s, Spain sent a curious new export to its former colonies in Latin America: communist priests who took up arms against national governments. Take the case of Manuel Pérez Martínez (1943–1998), a Spanish cleric who arrived in Colombia in the late '60s, where he joined and eventually led the National Liberation Army, an extant Marxist-Leninist guerrilla outfit founded in 1964 under Fidel Castro's auspices.

In recent decades, Latin America returned the favor by exporting to the mother country its own collectivist concoction, 21st century socialism, albeit with considerably more success. While the peninsular clerics of yesteryear floundered in their attempt to impose communism on skeptical New World nations, Hugo Chávez's brand of "neo-Bolivarian" politics has made deep inroads in Spain, to the extent that its adherents are now co-governing the country.

In the November 2019 general election, the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) won the largest share of the vote (28.25 percent) but lacked the number of parliamentary seats necessary to form a government. Its leader, Pedro Sánchez, who had led a minority government since June 2018, had to rely on the tacit support of Catalan separatists in order to form a coalition with Podemos ("We Can"), a party well to the left of the socialists created in 2012 whose leadership has been deeply involved with Venezuelan Chavismo. 

According to the Spanish daily newspaper El País, the Center for Political and Social Studies Foundation (CEPS, its acronym in Spanish), a now-defunct think tank tied to Podemos politicians that promoted "wealth redistribution," received 3.7 million ($4,543,000) in political consulting fees from the Venezuelan regime between 2002 and 2014. Podemos leader Pablo Iglesias, who was on the CEPS governing board, worked for the organization from Caracas in 2006 and 2007, when Chávez was at the height of his power. 

"Living in a country like this is very interesting," Iglesias once pontificated. Venezuela "is producing so many changes and undergoing such a great transformation that it can become a democratic example for the citizens of southern Europe." He even went as far as suggesting that it was "fundamental" for a Chávez-led Latin America "to invade Europe." Iglesias tried to distance himself from Chavismo as Venezuela reached 10,000 percent annual inflation levels and 4.6 million of its citizens sought refuge in neighboring countries. Then, in January 2020, he became Spain's second deputy prime ministera type of vice presidentand the minister of social rights. 

The PSOE-Podemos coalition is not only Spain's most left-wing government since the country restored democracy after dictator Francisco Franco's death in 1975; currently, it's also the most leftist government in the entire European Union (E.U.). As you would expect, this has brought about a barrage of progressive pet projects; in a taste of things to come, Iglesias' party added the feminine adjective unidas or united to its name after merging with the Izquierda Unida ("United Left") coalition in 2019. Once in office, one of the government's priorities has been to rewrite the Spanish constitution with "inclusive language." 

The rule of hard-line Spanish progressives has also meant a torrent of debt, public spending, and tax increases. In the midst of the pandemic, which hit Spain particularly hard given its reliance on tourism and small businesses, debt levels climbed to a record €1.29 trillion ($1.53 trillion) in August, a figure that exceeded 100 percent of GDP. In October, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that Spain's public deficit would be an enormous 14.1 percent of GDP in 2020, its highest in recent history (although not quite as high as the 15.2 percent deficit in the United States.) The government's budget for 2021 also includes record levels of spending after the executive raised the ceiling on non-financial expenditures by over 50 percent. 

In part, Spain's spending spree will be subsidized with 140 billion ($172 billion) of E.U. money, part of a "recovery fund" agreed upon last July at an emergency summit in Brussels, where the so-called Frugal Four countriesthe Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, and Austriawere pitted against Spain and other Club Med nations that demanded rescue packages and debt mutualization by means of Eurobonds. 

In the heat of the debate before the final deal was reached, Wopke Hoekstra, the Dutch finance minister, enraged the media by suggesting that the E.U. investigate Spain's supposed lack of financial means to deal with the crisis. Sánchez responded with several Twitter lectures on Europe's obligation to choose solidarity over individualism. At the height of its global power under the Habsburg dynasty, Spain ruled the Netherlands; now, its public spending depends on Dutch largesse. Where some see decline, Iglesias celebrates "the end of neoliberalism and austerity." 

The Spanish government has also taken advantage of the current crisis to impose drastic tax hikes. These include a "tax harmonization" schemea euphemism for getting rid of fiscal competitionthat would end the freedom of autonomous communities, the largest political and administrative units in Spain, to set their own policies in terms of wealth, inheritance, and income taxes, the last of which consist of both a national and a regional rate. 

Clearly, this is a central government power grab at the expense of the Community of Madrid, which recently became the country's largest regional economy after surpassing Catalonia; its per capita GDP levels are also the highest in Spain. Successive governments in Madrid, where a coalition led by the conservative Popular Party is now in power, have opted not to impose a wealth tax on citizens holding at least 800,000 ($982,000) in assets (not counting €300,000 or $368,000 for the value of a family residence). And although Madrid also charges some of the country's lowest rates for inheritance and income taxes, the region raises €900 million ($1.1 billion) more in taxes per year than the far more interventionist Catalonia according to economist José María Rotellar. 

Hardly devoted to the Laffer Curve, the Republican Left of Catalonia, the pro-Catalan independence party that allowed Sánchez to become president, recently accused Madrid of practicing "fiscal dumping." The Spanish government proceeded to accelerate its plans to enforce minimum wealth and estate tax rates across the entire country. Madrid's regional government, however, is fighting back. 

Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the Popular Party president of the Community of Madrid, stated that "if Catalonia wants fiscal harmonization, they should reduce their own taxes," a reference to that region's notoriously high taxation levels. According to Javier Fernández-Lasquetty, Díaz Ayuso's finance minister, if Madrid were to charge the same tax rates as Catalonia across the board, each household would pay an additional €2,001 ($2,455) per year in taxes, the equivalent of an average monthly salary and 21 percent more than what a typical family spends annually on leisure and culture. Spain's socialist government, Fernández-Lasquetty argues, has launched "a fiscal aggression against the residents of Madrid." 

The majority of European countries that had wealth taxes in 1990 have abolished them since they found them to be counterproductive, but Spanish progressives have failed to learn this lesson. They insist on targeting assets that, like real estate, are already taxed (necessarily, a property tax taxes wealth). In the case of actual returns, wealth taxes "add an extra layer of income tax" that imposes the highest rates on people with the lowest returns, while even those who lose money are forced to pay, as the Cato Institute's Chris Edwards writes

Beyond the wealth tax debate, the current tussle between Spain's central government and the Community of Madrid contains all the elements of the country's old struggle between centralized absolutism on the one hand and, on the other, free institutions based on local government and limited state power, what 19th century scholar William T. Strong called "the struggle between constitutional liberty and royal prerogative." Beginning in the 11th century, as commerce thrived and towns grew, the rulers of northern Spanish kingdoms began to grant fueros, a word that refers either to general law codes or to municipal charters for specific towns. 

The fueros, which granted the members of particular communities legal protection for themselves and their property, grew out of the earlier Visigothic governing principle that, as legal scholar Leonard Liggio wrote, "the king must live on his own resources" and respect the independence of the nobility, clergy, and freemen, who resisted overbearing taxation. In a parallel fashion grew the Cortes, representative assemblies and proto-parliaments that often could withhold money from the kings as they deemed fit. In fact, the Basque provinces of Gipuzkoa, Biscay, and Álava only paid money to the Castilian kings to whom they were nominally subject as extraordinary donatives. 

Reconquering Spanish lands from the Moors involved a strong centralization of power; acquiring and administering a global empire under the Habsburgs and their Bourbon successors made this tendency overwhelming. The medieval liberties embodied in the fueros were gradually lost, but the autonomous communities' tax autonomy under the current Spanish constitution is a remnant of Spain's old tradition of liberty. Like their absolutist royal predecessors, however, today's progressives are intent on crushing fiscal freedom wherever it can flourish.

NEXT: Ron Paul Says He's Been Locked Out of His Account, but Facebook Says It Was a Mistake

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Coming soon to an America near you!

    1. The extreme youth unemployment in Spain has been a boon to the adult film industry. Personally, I think Spanish women are second only to Slavs in terms of beauty. Check out Alexa Tomas or Julia Roca if you don’t believe me.

      1. I should import a hot one to be my new home entertainment center.

        1. I am making over $9k a month working part time. I stored being attentive to different human beings inform me how much money they are able to make on line so I decided to lok into it.NDs well, it turned into all actual and has completely modified my life.

          That is what I do…. Home Profit System

          1. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple jobS to do and its earnings are much better than regular office XXX job and even a little child EDD can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
            on this page…..READ MORE

  2. You realize this is happening where we live, too, right?

    1. “That’s different because the GOP hirt my feelings!” – chemjeff

      1. I’d rather live under civil tyranny than uncivil liberty.
        Give me regulations or give me death!

        1. s/or/and/

          1. Yeah it`s Possible…Anybody can earn 250$+ daily… You can earn from 6000-12000 a month or even more if you work as a full time job…It’s easy, just follow instructions on this page, read it carefully from start to finish… It’s a flexible job But a good earning opportunity..… USA ONLINE JOBS

      2. He should eat his feelings instead of his cookies.

        1. Better, he should drink Drano.

    2. What’s wrong with you? Can’t handle a spicy Latina?

      1. They are all white these days.

      2. I teach ESOL to adults for vocational purposes and they always mispronounce that as “spicky” which is impossible not to laugh about.

  3. I guess these clowns weren’t happy that ETA has gone away.

  4. Yeah it`s Possible…Anybody can earn 250$+ daily… You can earn from 6000-12000 a month or even more if you work as a full time job…It’s easy, just follow instructions on this page, read it carefully from start to finish… It’s a flexible job but a good
    eaning opportunity.. Here is More information.

  5. “”after dictator Francisco Franco’s death in 1975;””

    Is he still dead?

    1. Yes, and that joke will soon join him, alas.

    2. He alive in the mind of every Spanish leftist.

  6. Chinese censorship comes home to roost in the US.

  7. I’m always waiting for this decades next example of why socialism fails utterly and completely no matter who tries it or where.

    That reason has championed this in the US with the election of democrats is truly sad, but telling.

    1. I haven’t heard much about Venezuela in the last year. Has it fallen apart yet, like was predicted a year ago? Food riots, revolution, insurrections, middle class flight? Will journalists ever give us the story or is Princess Meghan’s latest photo op more important?

      1. There’s no sense in keeping your worst failure in front of the public’s eyes. Out of sight, out of mind. Since the average wages of Venezuela are well under a buck a day, it’s best to just shut up than to try to argue against the obvious.

        Also definitely don’t mention that in it’s best recent year, Spain’s unemployment bottomed out at 14%. Yea for workers party. Which explains why Obama talking about Spain was even more rare than his mention of green jobs in his second campaign.

        But of course nobody takes credit for this one. Spain refers to this as “structural unemployment”, which means ‘don’t blame me just because we have run the industry out of the country with absurd taxes’. 25% corporate, 45% personal, 21% sales tax, 35% social security [plus 30% corporate share].

        1. If (fifty) five percent appear too small…
          be thankful I don’t take it all….
          cause I’m the Taxman… yeah, the Taxman

    2. Yeah, but one of these times they’re gonna get the right people in charge and they’re gonna get it right. You just wait and see.

  8. At this point I have to think Reason is being deliberately obtuse, seeing socialism in Spain but not, you know, in the US.

    1. That’s different because a fat cop had a stroke and the progs at Reason can purge their GOP enemies now.

  9. In the heat of the debate before the final deal was reached, Wopke Hoekstra, the Dutch finance minister, enraged the media by suggesting that the E.U. investigate Spain’s supposed lack of financial means to deal with the crisis. Sánchez responded with several Twitter lectures on Europe’s obligation to choose solidarity over individualism.

    That’s an interesting little nugget of information right there.

  10. Hurrr durrrrr Reason was mean to Trump so they’re commies hurrr durrrrrr!

    1. @u not with u

    2. Man. You get really mad when people disrespectful your bae Biden.

      I’m falling you Jeff Jr from now on.

      He will now be known as fatwit.

      Carry on your decline into authoritarian principles.

      1. *taps flag, loser disappears*

        1. No. You’re still there.

        2. Yes, disappear. Forever.

    3. Reason was mean to Trump

      Spain puta. Spain. Your obsession is muy embarazosa

      1. It’s called heading it off at the pass, cabron.

    4. When you look at the reasons why, yeah…

  11. So, corporate control of the government is ok but the government directing things like services that can hold people hostage for (care, warmth, safety) and if not directed by the government the company can hold-off help, providing it to the highest bidder, that’s not ok? Ok, got it.

    When you guys blither blather about socialism, it’d be so very nice if you understood the word.

    Socialism is the complete control (or very near complete control) of the economy by the government. Health Care isn’t that, saying that companies can’t harass their employees isn’t that, preventing the illegal crushing of collectivization isn’t that and taxing the wealthy isn’t that, no matter what you claim.

    The stratification of income has been the hallmark of the last 40 years of western civilization, in lock-step with the downward spiral of the future of the middle-class. Wealth taxes aren’t designed to be confiscatory, they never were, and never really functioned that way. They were and are put in place to incentivize companies to invest more deeply in their workforce than the titular leadership.

    Some day, you guys will get it. Just not today.

    1. “The stratification of income has been the hallmark of the last 40 years of western civilization, in lock-step with the downward spiral of the future of the middle-class.” Brought to you by Socialists everywhere and their bigger and more powerful and ever expanding governments, all enabled by their central banks. The only “success” of Socialism has been it’s ability to blame all the ills it causes on Capitalism.

    2. so if socialism only wrecks a few key sectors of the economy, that’s fine?

      high income taxes are designed to prevent productive workers from becoming wealthy.

  12. One of the questions I have for the folks at Reason is this, you don’t believe the lies Trump (and his GOP cronies) tell about the election, or birther-ism, or , why do you believe the nonsense about socialism?

    The DJA is up 3000 points since Biden’s victory, a pace that only INCREASED after the Dems won the Senate last week. The market is pretty good and grasping the financial impact of political changes, if THEY don’t see some sort of catastrophe looming, why do you think you know better?

    Furthermore, given Obama/Biden’s record on being pretty tame with respect to regulation (the CFPB was a long overdue change), again, why would you (or your right-wing readers), buy the crap that somehow the US is going to become a socialistic state? Because we want some improvements to the social safety net and a more fair distribution of capital accumulation? My god… what a concept!

    1. Fuck off slaver.

    2. stocks were up because investors were banking on stimulus. adding a few trillion to the national debt is great for stocks, in the short term. and everyone counts on someone else holding the bag in the long term.

  13. “In the 1960s, Spain sent a curious new export to its former colonies in Latin America: communist priests who took up arms against national governments.”

    You know who else sent priests to Latin America to upend national governments? Oh wait, that was Spain too.

  14. After all, it worked so well in Venezuela…

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.