Alcohol

Fresno Officials Vote To Restrict, Redistribute Booze Licenses

Instead of deregulating like other cities, Fresno is trying to drive small alcohol vendors out of its market

|

Last month, local lawmakers in Fresno, California, voted to squeeze the number of alcohol licensees in the city.

The Responsible Neighborhood Market Actpassed by the Fresno City Council and set to take effect next week, is designed on its face to take alcohol licenses away from some smaller retailers—including those that sell alcohol the council deems too inexpensive—and give those licenses to larger retailers the city council prefers.

"Part of the law requires new stores that want to sell alcohol to buy two licenses from existing stores (depending on the size of the new store, it could be more) and retire one of them to help reduce the oversaturation of licenses in Fresno," city news site GWire reports.

"Say we have a habitual bad player that keeps selling alcohol to minors, or keeps selling malt liquor for 99 cents, they've been warned and then we confiscate that license," Councilmember Luis Chavez said last month.

California lawmakers and regulators already (rightly) have the ability to suspend or revoke the alcohol license of bad actors that repeatedly sell alcohol to minors. So this Fresno ordinance is really about something else: namely, trying to boost the number of grocers in the city by cracking down on liquor stores and others that offer inexpensive alcohol for sale.

As GWire explains, council members who voted for the ordinance want to strip those licenses and offer them as a carrot "to entice neighborhood markets with fresh fruits and vegetables to come in."

Since those hypothetical markets would want to sell alcohol, the council's solution is to rob Peter (licensed liquor stores) to pay Paul (grocers selling fruits and vegetables).

But Fresno lawmakers don't want just any grocers. Chavez, for one, knows exactly the type of grocery store he wants in Fresno. 

"We're trying to shrink down the supermarket model to more of a compact version of that," he explains.

What could possibly go wrong when lawmakers—rather than consumers and grocers—are the ones deciding what size and style of grocer is right for a neighborhood?

Lots, as I detailed in a column two years ago on a Tulsa, Oklahoma, effort to reduce or eliminate the number of dollar stores in the city. Dollar stores, I wrote, were "just the latest target of advocates who want to improve food offerings by limiting them."

If you're gathering that the basis of the Responsible Neighborhood Market Act stinks, you're onto something. Its impact probably will, too. Some developers, for example, worry the law could actually prevent some grocers from opening. The ordinance also protects existing liquor stores and inflates the value of their existing licenses, to the detriment of new market entrants and consumers, who will have to pay higher prices.

Even in normal times, there's little or no evidence laws similar to the new Fresno ordinance have had any positive impact.

For example, in a column last month in which I derided "the folly of lawmakers who believe they can legislate" our food choices away, I detailed the failures of various attempts to force consumers to make subjectively better food choices around the world, including Denmark's failed (and repealed) so-called "fat tax," Los Angeles' counterproductive ban on new fast-food restaurants in South Los Angeles, and a failed Minneapolis effort to force corner stores to stock fresh produce.

Many businesses that serve alcohol have been hammered during the pandemic by orders to halt or limit sales or seating capacity. Consequently, many state and local governments have rightly embraced deregulation of alcohol sales during the pandemic in order to help these vital and struggling businesses to survive.

Clearly, the bulk of the Fresno City Council believes the prevalence of licensed alcohol sellers in the city is evidence of some sort of problem. But where the city council sees a problem, I see sellers who enrich city coffers by buying licenses, sell highly taxed alcohol beverages to meet consumer demand, and employing taxpayers who contribute to the state and local economy.

In order to emerge from the pandemic, we need more cities and states around the country to get rid of senseless and burdensome regulations. But instead of doing that, local Fresno lawmakers have decided to make it more difficult for small businesses to thrive there.

NEXT: The Atlanta Sex Toy Magnate Who Can't Stop Picking Fights

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Linnekin would do better to lay out the scheme, and since he didn’t I will. Restricting liquor licenses makes them more valuable to the businesses that get them, and when government can choose who gets them, it generates campaign cash and other favors (come on in anytime for a free drink) to the politicians. So the politicians essentially extract some of the value of being able to sell alcohol in the city, costs which are passed on to the alcohol consumer in higher prices.

    This is just like the taxi medallion scheme which has created a lot of unhappy taxi medallion owners thanks to the free market entrance of Uber and Lyft (ride sharing, not taxi) services.

    Government should be protecting our freedom of free markets, instead of rigging the market to fatten their wallets, along with the rich guys who buy the favors from them. I don’t blame the rich guys buy the favors, I blame the politicians who are selling out the public, and shouldn’t be IMHO.

    1. I quit working at shop rite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier So i try use.
      Here’s what I do……. WORK 24

      1. I getting Paid upto $18953 in the week, working on-line at home. I’m full time Student. I shocked when my sister’s told me about her check that was $93k. It’s very easy to do. everybody will get this job.Go to home media tab for additional details.

        See—->>> Visit Here

    2. Joe Biden appeared to clinch a victory on Saturday morning to become 46th president of the United States, closing out an election cycle that was dominated in the final months by debates around COVID-19, the economy, and police reform………..VISIT HERE FOR FULL DETAIL .

  2. City council is 6 dems, 1 repub. Supermajority screws you again.

    1. For our own good.

      1. I getting Paid upto $18953 in the week, working on-line at home. I’m full time Student. I shocked when my sister’s told me about her check that was $97k. Ajk It’s very easy to do. everybody will get this job.Go to home media tab for additional details.
        See—->>> http://bit.ly/Jobcash1

      2. Google pays for every Person every hour online working from home job. I have received $23K in this month easily and I earns every weeks $5K to 8$K on the internet. Abn Every Person join this working easily by just just open this website and follow instructions………….. Visit Here

    2. Figured it had to be Democrats.

    3. They’re not partisan offices.

      1. And yet these nonpartisan offices are held by democrats, who govern like democrats.

  3. Trump very upsat due to voting and ….READ MORE

      1. These bots are so undignified.

  4. Maybe one of the qualifications to run for office should be passing a test on Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson, maybe just common sense. In what world does a liquor store stay in business by selling what people don;t want, or by selling at a loss what people do want?

    Limited licenses for anything are a racket which ought to be prosecuted as the monopolistic practice they are. The only true monopolies are governments. It would be grand if citizens could bring anti-trust lawsuits again governments, at least for practices like this, but ideally just for existing as a monopoly.

    1. I quit working at shop rite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now Iq couldn’t be happier So i try use.
      Here’s what I do……. WORK24

  5. Rent-seeking. You want to sell alcohol in this town, you’re going to have to go through us and we’re going to wring every nickel out of you we can. Why should we give away for free that which we can sell?

  6. Red Trump City goes Nanny.

    Remind me again how the Reds are different from the Blues?

    I grew up next to Fresno. Always Red, but sometimes voting for Blue to get the Pork. Now that Reds deliver pork, they’re all Red now. But never really been big on social nannyism before. Lotsa Evangelicals and Catholics, but not the Pentecostals who hate the booze. Doesn’t make much sense.

    1. How old are you? The city council is 6-1 Democrat-Republican.

      1. Where do you get this information? The positions are not partisan and thus the members are not listed with letters by their names. Did you just make it up or do you have references?

        1. Saw another commenter mention it, went to the city council gov page and did some googling to double check. Took maybe 5 min.

        2. How is stealing from Peter to give to Paul not partisan socialism?

  7. Democrats vote towards re-enactment of prohibition.

  8. Lemme see, here…they want the liquor stores larger and less numerous, and the groceries smaller and more numerous? I got that right?

    1. They want to appear being busy while personally enriching themselves by pushing socialism. Fuck em.

  9. A “booze license?”
    I don’t think people need a license to get rip roaring drunk.

  10. This is enoug for me to Earn money at home on laptop ,Just work on laptop 4 to 6 hour par day and Make 50 Dollar Easily This is very nyc for me and my family………. Here is More information.

  11. FOR USA ] Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page. by follow details Here═❥❥ Read More

  12. NOPE!———>> Read More

  13. Joe Biden appeared to clinch a victory on Saturday morning to become 46th president of the United States, closing out an election cycle that was dominated in the final months by debates around COVID-19, the economy, and police reform………..VISIT HERE FOR FULL DETAIL .

  14. Stopped at Gorka.

    No one cares what a Nazi thinks… Read More

  15. Read following report to learn how a single-mom with 3 kids was able to generate $89,844 of annual income working in her spare time online from her home without selling…….. http://www.workstea.com

  16. NICE JOB FOR EVERY ONE CHEK DETAIL OPEN THIS LINK…Read following report to learn how a single-mom with 3 kids was able to generate $89,844 of annual income working in her spare time online from her home without selling. …… CLICK HERE FOR FULL DETAIL

  17. NICE JOB FOR EVERY ONE CHEK DETAIL OPEN THIS LINK by follow details Here═❥❥ Read More  

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.