Rent control

A Legal Challenge to New York's Latest Rent Control Laws

Government growth and abuses are not challenged nearly enough.

|

Government growth and abuses are not challenged nearly enough. This results in a proliferation of bad policies that restrict freedom without achieving the policies' stated goals. As such, there are reasons to celebrate when someone steps in and challenges bad rules. Case in point: a legal challenge to New York City's Rent Stabilization Law, or RSL—a regulation that reduces both the supply and quality of rental properties.

This RSL was enacted 50 years ago. Since then, it's been revised and strengthened many times, most recently in June 2019, with the stated goal of providing affordable housing to low-income families, protecting tenants, and maintaining socioeconomic and racial diversity in the city. Noble causes—wrong way to achieve them. For one thing, when you have had legislation on the books for five decades and still struggle with the same problems, you should rethink the strategy of addressing the problems with legislation.

A large economic literature shows that a result of rent control is that landlords, unable to keep up with the costs and deflated revenues, often end up losing their properties to mortgage lenders. Other landlords slack off on maintenance, letting buildings or units fall apart. Many property owners also end up selling rental property to builders who then convert the units into owner-occupied housing, shrinking the overall supply of rentals.

Rather than learn from the research, the latest changes to RSL double down on a misguided policy, making it more difficult for property owners to increase rents after they upgrade their properties or after the properties become vacant. The impact on new landlords who acquired property under the previous rule, hoping to renovate and earn higher rents, is dire: They've incurred the costs of renovation but are now prohibited from raising rents to recoup these costs. Unsurprisingly, as the profitability of owning and operating these properties has taken a hit, the dollar volume of rental-apartment building sales has fallen.

Well, some brave souls are pushing back against this counterproductive policy. Community Housing Improvement Program, the Rent Stabilization Association of New York (an association of 25,000 property owners and agents responsible for approximately 1 million housing units), and individual property owners have challenged the constitutionality of the RSL. The groups formed a website, which explains they are suing the city because "the overly burdensome regulatory scheme violates the Due Process and Takings clauses of the United States Constitution."

These concerned property owners argue that the RSL is unconstitutional on four separate counts:

First, the rule violates the Takings Clause of Constitution's Fifth Amendment, as it deprives property owners of their core rights to exclude others from their property and to possess, use, and dispose of their property.

Second, the law represents an uncompensated regulatory taking of private property, again violating the Takings Clause.

Third, advocates of the suit told me that the law violates the Constitution's guarantee of due process because it is not rationally related to any legitimate government interest. In fact, the government doesn't even bother to argue that the RSL is a means to protect low-income families but rather that it's simply meant to protect tenants who are lucky enough to find a stabilized apartment.

Finally, they are suing because the New York City Council makes housing emergency proclamations every three years without any meaningful analysis of whether a housing emergency actually exists that would be improved by "regulating and controlling residential rents." Such declarations made in this way violate due process.

A federal district court recently heard oral arguments on the defendants' motions to dismiss the case based on previous court rulings. The defendants include New York state, New York City, and the tenant-advocacy groups hoping that the judge would use precedents established during the previous attempts to end the RSL. This suit has a better shot than its predecessors did, however, because the plaintiffs are making very different legal claims about the amended law and the prior decisions upholding the RSL relied on legal principles that the U.S. Supreme Court has subsequently rejected.

The bottom line is that the fight against New York City rent control may start to come more into balance. If this lawsuit fails, there's always the Supreme Court, which could bring relief to the entire country by preventing state and local governments from treating privately owned rental property as if it belongs to the government.

COPYRIGHT 2020 CREATORS.COM

NEXT: Restrictions on Personalized License Plates "Offensive to Good Taste and Decency" Likely Unconstitutional

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Hii……Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page. Click For Full Details.

  2. Why should rental property be treated any differently than anything else when it comes to the government acting as if it’s the owner of everything? There’s very little the government doesn’t regulate “in the public interest” to the point where they’ve long forgotten they don’t actually own everything. This is this whole “stakeholder” thing where everybody has the idea that just because they have a personal interest in how things are run, they have a legal interest. Keep your damn hands to yourself, it ain’t your stuff.

    1. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new…QAz after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.

      Here’s what I do…………………………..► Click here

    2. But…but…You didn’t build that!

  3. Glad to see nyc and other large cities get fucked. Hope they lose tenants and money and eventually turn into prisons for the far left.

    1. Glad to see nyc and other large cities get fucked. Hope they lose tenants[.]

      I don’t. They might move here.

  4. How dare you? Righteous people know the best way to orchestrate an economy is through voting and regulation. How else could we possibly determine the right price for rent and other things?

    Personally, I want The People (through Democratically-elected government) to control calorie counts on food. We have a human right to bowls of ice cream with only 7 calories.

  5. “…Second, the law represents an uncompensated regulatory taking of private property, again violating the Takings Clause…”

    How this is NOT in violation of the Takings Clause is a mystery to me. My copy of 5A doesn’t have any carve-out for those who own real estate as opposed to any other good.

  6. Don’t ever, ever, ever, ever, challenge government’s control.
    Control is what keeps America from being a despicable capitalist state by our obvious betters.
    What’s wrong with you people?

  7. start now benefitting on the web at home. start making extra $500 always by dealing with the web at home. i’ve gotten $18528 multi month once more from this apparent unpretentiously created profession. This development is realy lovely and offers me excellent low help pay dependably. every person could now have the potential to makes more pay onlinesuccessfully by on a very simple stage take after requirements on this affiliation…>>>GOOD LUCK…….Click For Full Details.

  8. If you want to buy cheap RC cars for yourself or another person and you do not know which is the best one to choose, don’t worry. These are cars that can be used by anyone no matter how old you are. best rc cars under 100 can also be a nice birthday, Christmas or any other occasion present. https://top-mom.com/best-rc-cars-under-100/ – There are even addicts who can’t miss racing with these cars.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.