Fines

New Orleans Magistrates Get a Cut of Fines and Bail Money, and That's a Problem

Two federal court rulings cite a significant conflict of interest.

|

New Orleans magistrates who fund their own courts using a cut of the fines and bail they order defendants to pay have a financial conflict of interest and violate defendants' due process rights, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in not one, but two federal court cases. These decisions follow a pair of federal rulings from a year ago in which two judges for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana ordered New Orleans magistrates to stop jailing defendants who couldn't afford to pay fees or up-front bail costs.

Orleans Parish Magistrate Henry Cantrell was accused of typically setting a minimum bail of $2,500 for defendants and threatening defense attorneys who sought bail reductions. One defendant sat in jail for two weeks trying to collect the money. A second defendant was unable to pay bail and stayed in jail for more than a month before being freed. It just so happened that Cantrell's court got a chunk of any fines and bail money it collected. The court used that money to fund its operations.

Last year, Cantrell told the federal courts he had changed these practices and was no longer simply demanding large bail amounts that defendants couldn't pay. But he also appealed last year's rulings, asking the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to rule that setting the bail amounts and also funding the court with bail proceeds did not violate the due process rights of defendants.

On Thursday, a three-judge panel on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals flatly rejected Cantrell's request. In a 14-page ruling, the judges explained that if a magistrate needs bail money to fund court systems, he is incentivized to extract bail money from defendants. While Cantrell didn't pocket the money himself, these bail bonds paid for up to a quarter of some courts' budgets. Judge Gregg Costa wrote Thursday's decision affirming the lower court's ruling on bail: "Judge Cantrell has a direct and personal interest in the fiscal health of the public institution that benefits from the fees his court generates and that he also helps allocate."

This ruling focused specifically on the magistrates' demands of cash bail and their financial stake in making people pay. Last Friday, a separate 5th Circuit panel ruled that these same magistrates also have a conflict of interest when determining whether a defendant can afford to pay the fines and fees. That decision noted that when the collection of fines and fees goes down, it directly impacts the courts' operations, causing cuts in services and salaries. The magistrates then respond by trying to increase the collection of fines and fees to keep the courts operating.

Essentially, New Orleans funding its courts on the backs of the defendants that appear before that court is a huge problem. If the courts don't get money from the defendants, it won't be able to function. Costa bluntly notes toward the end of his ruling that the obvious solution to the conflict of interest is to not send these fees directly to the Judicial Expense Fund. Louisiana state law does not require the courts to be funded in this fashion. He concludes:

"[I]t may well turn out that the only way to eliminate the unconstitutional temptation is to sever the direct link between the money the criminal court generates and the Judicial Expense Fund that supports its operations."

Read yesterday's ruling here and last week's ruling here. Read more here about the financial struggles facing the New Orleans courts due to their dependence on fines and fees to pay for operations.

NEXT: Pro-Democracy Activists Joshua Wong and Agnes Chow Arrested in Hong Kong

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. New Orleans was, if not is, as corrupt a place as I have encountered in the United States. A number of years ago, I had a quick trip through town because the local authorities provided a police escort — closing intersections as we proceeded — for a trip to a Sunday morning tee time.

    I was astounded. When I asked a government official what was occuring, he said, ‘this is just a courtesy we can provide, and we’re happy to do it.’

    When I told the story to someone else, later, that person (not a government official) said such abuse of power was not uncommon and occurred for two reasons: (1) ‘they can’ and (2) ‘it shows everybody who is boss.’ That guy then told me New Orleans police officers were paid less than an adequate wage so that they all would be on the take and therefore easily controlled by the elected officials.

    The first guy — the government official who arranged the police escort to a golf game — was indicted a few years later.

    1. Those damned Republicans!

    2. I guess it’s a good thing there’s nothing corrupt about accepting this type of “courtesy”

      1. You figure I should have leapt from the speeding vehicle, you half-educated clinger?

        1. It might have made the world a better place, Rev.

          1. It appears I must try to find a way through life without the approval of intolerant, ignorant, right-wing slack-jaws.

  2. I recall walking out of court with a lawyer that a moving violation would be taken under advisement, and if I was a good boy for a year, would be removed from my record, but I still had to pay the fine.

    The lawyer explained a third went to the police, a third to the state, and a third to the judges’ retirement fund. Let’s remove all conflicts and send it to the state general fund, then the state send money back with no weighting given to how much a city or county contributes via fines.

  3. Now do traffic fines that fund the police department.

  4. I am getting $100 to $130 consistently by wearing down facebook. i was jobless 2 years earlier , however now i have a really extraordinary occupation with which i make my own specific pay and that is adequate for me to meet my expences. I am really appreciative to God and my director. In case you have to make your life straightforward with this pay like me , you just mark on facebook and Click on big button thank you…

    check this lin-k >>>>>>>>>> http://www.Mesalary.com

  5. “New Orleans Magistrates Get a Cut of Fines and Bail Money…”

    Who says crime doesn’t pay?

Please to post comments