Los Angeles Sheriff's Department

L.A. Deputy Faked Evidence—but Was Still Used as a Witness in Criminal Cases for Years

Thanks to California's union-backed secrecy laws, prosecutors and defenders alike don't know about police misconduct.


Jose Ovalle
Los Angeles Sheriff's Department

A sheriff's deputy in Los Angeles was nearly fired for faking evidence in 2003. He's been a witness or potential witness in hundreds of criminal cases since then. In most cases the defendants were not aware of his background and thus never challenged him.

California's legally mandated deep secrecy about police misconduct is in the spotlight again, thanks to a Los Angeles Times investigation about a Los Angeles Sheriff's Department deputy named Jose Ovalle. In 2003, Ovalle was tasked with collecting and documenting evidence involving a gang fight at a detention center in Castaic where an inmate had been slashed. He couldn't find a bloody shirt that was part of the case, so he fabricated it by pouring taco sauce on a clean shirt, taking a photo of it, and submitting it into evidence.

Ovalle was caught, and the Sheriff's Department initially wanted to fire him. But ultimately they didn't, and he's still working, making $240,000 a year. And the sheriff's department didn't inform prosecutors of Ovalle's infraction, so they initially didn't know about his behavior when they were handling cases where he was a witness. According to the Times, he testified in 31 cases before prosecutors found out what he had done.

Prosecutors are supposed to inform defendants when a police officer's past misconduct could affect his credibility. But that's simply not how things work in California. State law keeps police misconduct records so secretive that even prosecutors cannot directly access them. Defenders have to request that judges to check an officer's record to see if there's anything relevant.

Most of the time, even this doesn't happen. More than 230 people were convicted in cases where Ovalle was a potential witness. Only a handful of defense attorneys attempted to inquire into Ovalle's background. In one case, the Times reports, a man who believed that deputies (including Ovalle) planted evidence to justify a search of his car asked for his history, and the judge rejected the request. He ended up pleading no contest to a misdemeanor firearms offense and was put on probation for three years.

The slow speed of justice in California discourages defendants with little money or time from delving into officers' backgrounds. It's a lengthy process that can take months. Many end up accepting plea deals.

And when defense attorneys do find out about Ovalle's past, it can compromise cases against some pretty sketchy guys. In one case, prosecutors ended up offering a plea deal to a known gang member facing more than a decade in prison after Ovalle's conduct was discovered. The man served eight months in jail instead. Since his release, he's been convicted of 10 additional crimes. In another case, a defendant with a lengthy criminal background had his entire conviction overturned after Ovalle's past came to light. That defendant is now in prison in Nevada for intentionally infecting a girlfriend with HIV.

Given this risk of compromising a case, it shouldn't be a surprise that prosecutors want better information about deputies with histories of misconduct. But law enforcement unions have been fighting every effort to make officers' disciplinary histories more transparent and accessible, even to other government officials. It may take a California Supreme Court ruling to determine whether the sheriff's department can pass the names of deputies with records of misconduct directly to prosecutors. There's also a bill winding its way through the state legislature that would open up police records in cases of official misconduct.

NEXT: The First Crackdown on Indecent Recordings

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Ovalle was caught, and the Sheriff’s Department initially wanted to fire him. But ultimately they didn’t, and he’s still working, making $240,000 a year

    Between sentence one and sentence two, something happened. I wonder what that was.

    1. Well he did his best to improve conviction rates. That’s gotta be worth a raise or 2.

    2. Dollars to donuts, the police union is what happened.

      1. Most unions are criminal organizations, and police unions are no exception.

  2. And the sheriff’s department didn’t inform prosecutors of Ovalle’s infraction, so they initially didn’t know about his behavior when they were handling cases where he was a witness. According to the Times, he testified in 31 cases before prosecutors found out what he had done.

    According to the prosecutors.

  3. Given this risk of compromising a case, it shouldn’t be a surprise that prosecutors want better information about deputies with histories of misconduct.

    Like in Orange County where the prosecutors and the dirty cops were working together to suppress exculpatory evidence, suborn perjury, use illegal methods of gathering evidence, fabricating evidence and framing innocent suspects? I’m sure they did want better information about deputies with histories of misconduct, that way they’d know exactly who to approach about joining their scheme.

  4. A sherriff’s deputy making $240,000 a year.

    Does that include overtime, or is it straight pay. Because wow.

    1. If he’s on the clock 24/7/365, with 124 time and a half hours a week, that’s still $19.89/HR.

      I should sue my high school guidance counselor for telling me that crime doesn’t pay.

    2. Yeah, but you’ve got to subtract the cost of taco sauce from that.

  5. I’m sure the deputies will be equally respectful of the privacy of ordinary citizens’ records, including records of alleged misconduct. /sarc

  6. I’m outraged!

  7. $240,000 a year. I can see why cops are willing to do *anything* to keep their jobs.

  8. This state is in desperate need of serious managers. The arrest rate in my city for homicide is 38% while our state police only tend to highway matters spending many hours sitting idle in front of construction crews every day all over the state. They make a real good dancing / lip syncing video though.

    Shame be upon conservative Americans for allowing this state to slip into the hands of morons. CA could be much closer to the world’s second biggest economy if not for the moronic voting pattern of the electorate. Get out here and help swing the vote and save this jewel of the union.

    1. Jewel? I think you’re polishing a turd. A bunch of us here in Sud Cali have decided to vote for broke be it bullet trains, hyperdupe, or free pizza for all. Got to set off all the implosion charges before it completely collapses and you can start cleaning up and start over.

  9. GET RESULTS IN PROFESSIONAL WAY WITHOUT TIME WASTING FOR ALL KIND OF EMAIL HACK.Change School Grades? Hack Banks? Erase Criminal Records? Hack Websites? Hack Database? Hack Drivers license? Hack Call Log? Hack Visichat and Flashchat Rooms? Hack FTP User and Pass? Hack Facebook,Whatssap,Twitter,Instagram,Webcam etc.Hack VB Forum? Hack WordPress Blog? Hack CC any Country? Hack Money Booker Account? Hack Liberty Reverse Account? Hack Paypal Account? Root Server? By Pass Google Phone Verification? Install Red on Linux Server? Hash Crack? DDOS Server? Retrieval of Lost Files and Documents CONTACT:
    Email: oneofonehack At G mail dot com
    Whats app contact:+15187400715
    Text num:+15186284630

  10. Reason number 254,379 why when I read about a cop being shot I say ” Who cares ? Because i sure don’t ” .

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.