Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Police

Man Sues Police Department After Video of His Tasing Goes Viral

Sean Williams is suing the Lancaster Police Department after he says a tasing violated the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

Zuri Davis | 7.5.2018 11:45 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A Pennsylvania man is suing the Lancaster Police Department and one of its officers after a video of him being tased from behind went viral. As Reason previously reported, Officer Philip Bernot instructed a seated Sean Williams to put his legs "straight out," which he did. Bernot then told Williams to cross his ankles. When Williams tried to, Bernot shocked him with an Electronic Control Device (ECD).

Williams' lawsuit, which seeks $75,000, alleges that Bernot told Williams to keep his legs "straight out or you're getting tased." It then states that Bernot tased Williams even though he complied "without resistance."

The Lancaster Police Department is also accused of violating Williams' civil rights by using excessive force and discriminating against Williams because of his race. The lawsuit claims the nature of the tasing was a violation of Williams' Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The lawsuit also cites Lancaster County arrest statistics to establish "a history and pattern of intentionally discriminating against African Americans and other minorities."

According to a police report, the incident began when someone called about a disturbance involving Williams. The caller accused Williams of going after them on the street. The first officer to respond to the call instructed Williams to sit down "several times" as Williams demanded his Social Security card from one of the females in the group.

Bernot eventually took over. The subsequent events were captured on video by a bystander and posted on Facebook.

Following the initial incident, the Lancaster District Attorney tweeted that an investigation by the police department was underway. The office later announced that it was involved with the investigation "in a limited capacity" and would discuss the findings with the public.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: He Was Assaulted by Three Teens at Work, But He's Going to Prison for Defending Himself

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

PolicePolice AbusePennsylvaniaCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Hugh Akston   7 years ago

    Once again Reason undermines the case for self defense by casting aspersions on cops who clearly feared for their lives while tasing an unarmed dude sitting on the sidewalk.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    The office later announced that it was involved with the investigation "in a limited capacity" and would discuss the findings with the public.

    [voice trails off...]

  3. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

    "", alleges that Bernot told Williams to keep his legs "straight out or you're getting tased." It then states that Bernot tased Williams even though he complied "without resistance."""

    Having watched the video. Williams crossed his legs and did not keep them straight. Simon did not say to cross your legs.

    Seems like a perverse game of Simon Says where Simon shocks you.

    1. Citizen X   7 years ago

      Who says cops have no sense of humor?

    2. Last of the Shitlords   7 years ago

      He probably was off balance and did it without thinking to keep from falling over.

  4. Longtobefree   7 years ago

    SO - - - - - - - -
    Taxpayers lose, lawyers win.
    And the cops keep on as usual.

    Nothing to see here; move along, move along

  5. KWlib   7 years ago

    A measly $75k? C'mon man, you can do better than that.

  6. Crazy mick   7 years ago

    Yeah but the real outrage is pro athletes not standing up for the anthem.

    1. Exsqueezeyou   7 years ago

      Crazy Dick says, "Yeah but the real outrage is pro athletes not standing up for the anthem"...because they think they do not need to conform to the same free speech restraints that any other employee would have to and thereby forcing their customers to endure their protests against the best interests of their employers and even themselves. FTFY

      How many of those players took a knee outside the Lancaster Police Department as a show of solidarity and commitment to the struggle on their own fucking time and dime? The players could sign some pig socks and give the proceeds to the victim here.

      TDS is no joke and those afflicted cannot tell any funny ones. Know the symptoms.
      https://www.urbandictionary.com /define.php?term=Trump Derangement Syndrome

      The man deserves compensation lest anyone misunderstand my sympathies.

      1. Happy Chandler   7 years ago

        They enjoy the same rights as any employee with a collectively bargained contract that specifically spells out the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees, with a process for arbitrating disputes with management.

        1. spec24   7 years ago

          There contracts guarantees them the right to protest the anthem pre-game? I'd love to see that fucking contract. Gee... you'd think if that was ACTUALLY the case we'd see some lawsuits for breach of contract after they made it clear it would no longer be tolerated. Must be because THEY NEVER HAD THAT RIGHT!

          Good luck protesting while on your job. Give me a break.

      2. Crazy mick   7 years ago

        Whoa there cowboy. I happen to think anthem protests are counterproductive but they have the rights accorded to them in their negotiated contracts it isn't a big deal to me either way. But cops beating or killing people for no legitimate reason is a much bigger deal unless you suffer from Trump worshipping syndrome

        1. spec24   7 years ago

          No one was beat or killed here, clueless wonder.

  7. Mindscape   7 years ago

    They told him to put his legs out SIX times. Once he had them kind of out, they told him to cross them. He then pulled them back in and didn't cross them. Cops ask suspects to put their legs out and cross them because it makes them less of a risk to take off running. He clearly heard their orders and ignored them. He was either planning to run or was just being a obstinate dickhead. Either way, enjoy the volts.

    1. Crazy mick   7 years ago

      Why are you on a libertarian site when you're clearly an authoritarian? They told him to jump for no reason and he didn't say "how high?" Therefore they can do what they want? Sound logic

      1. spec24   7 years ago

        Being a libertarian doesn't mean dropping your brain off at the front door as you clearly have. Yes, police are a tool of the state, so are the roads and the schools if you want to keep going on about it. That doesn't mean you can simply ignore those things and pretend they don't exist or just say "Well, dur, because them there's the tools of that thar state thing I don't have to follow any gawd don rules, duh."

        This wasn't a policeman overstepping his boundaries. This wasn't a policeman abusing his powers. The officer wanted the suspect to follow clear orders. The guy was too stupid to follow said orders. What SHOULD the cop have done? "Legs straight out or I'm gonna get really mad"? Yeah, I don't think people would be inclined to follow said orders. Would you have preferred the cop warned him to put his legs straight out or he'd shoot him? Or maybe a billy club upside the head?! I guess guys like you would just suggest if the suspect doesn't comply the cop should just drive away?!?!?!?! Maybe approach the suspect and pull his legs out for him. That's safe.

        You don't have the brain power to think this through. Your answer is "authoritarian" and you walk away. You're as mindless and ignorant as any statist. Logic indeed. The officer didn't say jump for no reason, you dolt. He told him to put his legs out for a reason. Or are you going to try and claim that any order an officer gives a suspect is "for no reason"?

        1. Randy Marsh   7 years ago

          Nah, dude. You're an authoritarian. The video is pretty clear.

  8. Colossal Douchebag   7 years ago

    Isn't someone going to arrest whoever shot the video?

  9. AD-RtR/OS!   7 years ago

    Why did this "unidentified female" have Williams' Social Security card?
    Sounds like there's a whole lot of "back story" here that is yet to come out.

  10. TheRedTomahawk   7 years ago

    I do not know honestly. The cop seems retarded. But arrest statistics are not a discrimination proof. Different groups of people do crime at different rates. Only idiots believe otherwise.

    1. Crazy mick   7 years ago

      Is there a point in your rambling that applies to a cop tasing a guy for no reason? If so please explain

      1. spec24   7 years ago

        Crazy mick to throw out some more idiotic fallacies. "Dur, I don't think there's a good reason so there's no good reason." Again, Lazy mick, what do you suggest? Perhaps you could start there instead of just repeating the same thing like an insufferable bore.

        The cop could perhaps offer the suspect some money to put his legs out. "Hey buddy, put your legs straight out and I'll give you a $20."

        Maybe the officer could threaten to tell his mommy. Or call him poopy-pants.

        Failing all of those great ideas, what should the officer do to get a suspect to comply in genius Crazy mick's world?

        Let's see... he did inform him that he would taze him if he did not comply. But I guess that falls under the idiot's definition of "no reason." You may disagree with cops threatening people if they don't comply, mick, but I would love to know how you think police would ever enforce the law in such a world.

  11. K-Von   7 years ago

    How's he going to sue? He was non-compliant to the clear instructions.
    He wasn't hurt. The officer released the taze almost immediately.
    I think the officer did the right thing.
    There was no physical exchange of blows, therefore he was not able to wrestle his gun away and do harm.
    He just got a mild taze for being a non-compliant jerk.
    Lesson here: Do what the officer tells you to do.

    1. gphx   7 years ago

      Step right into the train car. We're just going to a happy farm.

  12. clouds   7 years ago

    I am clouds from manchester, i hear how people are talking about The powerful spell caster called DR Ewan in regard of how he bring back ex lover, Winning lottery, getting pregnant and getting married to their dream lover and i also contact him to help me cast a spell in regard of my ex lover whom i love so much that left me 2yrs ago, but today my ex is back to me and we are happily married with 3kids and i am so much happy for the help i found in you DR Ewan. I and my family are very much happy and we are living large now, i am grateful and appreciate your good work . Thank you and may you live long to help people in problems. if you are going through any problem at all he will help you contact him on his email is covenantsolutiontemple@gmail.com or add him on watsapp +2349057353987 check out his webpage http://besthelptosaveyourmarriage.simplesite.com

  13. gphx   7 years ago

    Update: 'We have investigated ourselves and found ourselves innocent'

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Economy Doesn't Need Federal Jobs Data To Function

Jack Nicastro | 10.8.2025 10:20 AM

Conversion Therapy at the Court

Liz Wolfe | 10.8.2025 9:30 AM

TSA Watchlists Were Used as Tools of Political Warfare

J.D. Tuccille | 10.8.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: The Chicago Code

Charles Oliver | 10.8.2025 4:00 AM

Oregon's E-Cigarette Censorship Is Unconstitutional—and Makes No Sense

Jacob Sullum | 10.8.2025 12:01 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300