How to Legally Buy Weed In D.C. Without Actually Buying Any Weed at All
D.C.'s marijuana gift economy shows that markets exist whether we want them to or not.

The District of Columbia legalized recreational marijuana in 2015. Nearly three years later, I still meet people who don't understand how the law works—sometimes despite living in the city and enjoying cannabis. Almost no one visiting from outside D.C., meanwhile, seems to have any idea what people are and aren't allowed to do.
If you're in the nation's capital and you want to blaze while you're here, consider this post a loose introduction to our janky grey-market system.
The passage of Initiative 71 in 2014 made it legal under District of Columbia law (but not federal law) for people 21 and older to possess two ounces or less of marijuana, and for people 21 and older to grow up to six cannabis plants in their primary residence. Up to three of these plants can be "mature" at any given time. Initiative 71 also allows adults who are at least 21 to give—as in, for free—up to an ounce of cannabis to another adult who is at least 21. Consumption may take place only in private. No one may use, possess, exchange, or cultivate marijuana on federal property, of which there is quite a bit in D.C.
Under the law, D.C. not only lacks a retail recreational pot system, it forbids even informal pot sales. Individuals cannot sell cannabis to other individuals under any circumstances, nor can they exchange cannabis for other goods and services.
Nonetheless, in the 10 years I've lived here, it has never been easier to safely and quickly acquire cannabis from complete strangers. The trick, as several media outlets have recently reported, is that while D.C. residents cannot sell marijuana, they can sell other things for roughly the same price they would charge for marijuana. Then, after the transaction is complete, they can offer marijuana as a free gift to the person who bought the non-marijuana item.
Here's an example: Last month, some friends and I wanted to blaze after seeing Ron Funches at the DC Improv, so we pulled up the website for Red Eye Delivery, which is like Uber Eats except that it exclusively sells cookies.
I'm not talking about cannabis-infused edibles, here. These are regular ol' chocolate chip cookies, baked fresh every day from the same ingredients my grandmother used way back when. The difference between her cookies and Red Eye's cookies is that Red Eye's cookies cost $60 for a half dozen and you have to be 21 to order them.
An hour later, a delivery driver texted to say he was outside with our chocolate chip snacks. One of us went out, showed our ID, and picked up the order of cookies. After the transaction was completed, the driver presented us with an eighth of marijuana as a gift.
That sounds complicated, doesn't it?
The law is "as clear as they wanted to make it," says Joe Tierney, a D.C. resident who runs a guide to the District's pot scene called "Gentleman Toker." But it's still difficult for people to know if they've broken city law, or to what extent, until the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) drops the hammer like it did last weekend, arresting 22 people at a nightclub cannabis event.
"They certainly left up a lot up to interpretation" in terms of what's allowed and what isn't, Tierney says. "If you go to talk to Adam Eidinger [a prominent D.C. cannabis activist who spearheaded the push for I-71], he'll give you one answer, and if you talk to someone at the Metropolitan Police Department, they'll give another answer. Every lawyer you talk to will tell you something different."
Tierney maintains a running list of vendors who are "I-71 compliant" on his website, and he suspects all of them have been told by their attorneys that "some version of XYZ is perfectly legal."
In the first days of legalization, people held the equivalent of swap meets, sharing cannabis seeds and flowers. While many such events are now hosted at high-end nightclubs, Tierney says the really early events happened in peoples' backyards and empty restaurants.
Entrepreneurs who wanted to graduate from pot exchanges to making money tried collecting donations and then giving pot as a gift. The most well-known such company was Kush Gods, the owner of which has spent several years in and out of jail because he didn't seem to understand that he couldn't legally demand money in exchange for marijuana.
Since then, ganjapreneurs have gotten more sophisticated. Besides the buy-one-thing-get-another-free system, there are now regular pop-up events across the city at which marijuana is given to people who pay for admission. More is gifted to those who buy crafts and other goods once inside.
But the city has began to crack down on these events, even though technically no one is selling weed. "They've kind of made it clear in the past that if you're going to be really hot and in public, that's a problem," Tierney says.
The MPG has started conducting raids and arrests on the grounds that people are exceeding the legal possession limits. Officers have also objected to people exchanging non-flower products, though it isn't exactly clear in the law that edibles and concentrates are illegal.
"The cops are not giving us any real information to work with," Tierney says. "They can just say, 'This is the law, and we're going to interpret in the strictest way possible.'"
Not knowing whether your interpretation of the law will get you arrested is an obvious con. Having to sell stuff other than marijuana in order to actually sell marijuana is another. But Tierney also points out that the city is likely losing serious money because of this system.
"There's this path that's opened up to the middle class," Tierney says. "The city can't see how much money we're making off this, but there are roughly over 300 brands in the D.C. market." He believes the vast majority of those businesses are owned by women and African Americans, and that the city should make it easy for people to practice normal, regulated entrepreneurship. (In addition to legalizing possession, sharing, and home growing, Initiative 71 tasked the D.C. government with designing and implementing a tax-and-regulate system, but House Republicans effectively blocked the latter portion of the bill in December 2014.)
For consumers, the fact that you can't walk into a retail location and buy weed like you would any other legal good probably seems like the biggest hassle. But ever since the rise of the I-71 compliant vendor, my biggest fear has been getting ripped off. What if I buy your cupcake for $60 and then all I get is the cupcake?
"I have heard of some rare occasions where vendors show you one thing and give you something else, but generally everyone is aboveboard because there's crazy competition," Tierney says. "You can't stay in business if you're not on point."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A caption, a veritable caption -- and no alt-text? What are we this morning, Mr Riggs, lamestream media consumers?
This just in. Employees at Red Eye's cookies just raided by DEA and arrested for violating federal drug laws. The owner said to the cameras as he was being beaten and hauled away "Thanks a lot Riggs!" No dogs survived.
Does this work for prostitution? Happy Ending Cookies wide open for business.
Use of the word "work" shows why it won't, err, work.
Somebody had to work to grow the pot.
It's kind of crazy that even with incomprehensible rules like this, at least they allow you 6 plants. Canada is only planning on 4, if the provinces even agree to it, and they are usually pretty lax about purely personal use, even as they keep cracking down on medical dispensaries for trying to get a leg up. They keep complaining that they're not ready (the "they" being the RCMP and provincial govs and their liquor control boards that want to basically maintain their monopoly on depressants) and haven't considered that all they have to do is legalize it and people will figure this out. And enforce actual erratic or bad driving and maybe try physical and mental roadside tests instead of drug tests?
Will this wink-wink, nudge-nudge, kind of evasion work in other fields? Someone already mentioned hookers...
How about min-wage laws? I want to sell affordable hamburgers, for example, and my local town has a $25-per-hour min wage. I hire my workers at $25, but "suggest" that they might want to "gift" me back, $10 or $15 per hour... If they don't, I find some OTHER reason to fire them, if they aren't earning $25 for me...
Just last weekend we were thinking of going to a weed event in DC at some bar. We ultimately didn't go because it would have been kind of a PITA at that time, but boy are we lucky we didn't. The thing got raided and most everyone there, including patrons were arrested and/or ticketed. Granted, they were selling weed, edibles, and oils as if they were in Colorado or something, just right out there. They were dumbasses and I'm so glad we decided it wasn't worth the trouble to make our way to it at the last minute.
http://wjla.com/news/local/22-.....-drug-bust
There have been a lot of weed events in DC lately. They are heavily advertised on social media and social activity sites (living social, eventbrite, etc.). Seems kinda dumb to me. Why would anyone be that open about it in an area with so many federal agents while weed remains illegal federally?
The DC system is working as intended.
Politicians can simultaneously say they are 'progressive' on drug issues while also being 'tough on crime' and they still get to use the power of the state to cut down any blade of grass that grows too tall while the cops can keep on keeping on with their abuse of authority to beat people and take their shit whenever they feel like it.
I can see what your saying... Raymond `s article is surprising, last week I bought a top of the range Acura from making $4608 this-past/month and-a little over, $10,000 this past month . with-out any question its the easiest work I've ever had . I began this five months/ago and almost straight away startad bringin in minimum $82 per-hr
HERE? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, http://www.homework5.com
Alt-text: "Soldiers of the victorious Green Army raise the green banner over the Sessionsreichstag, 1945."
You're getting your politics mixed up. Historically, it was the Nazis that were a rebellious, progressive, atheist, environmenalist, high-tech youth movement. Nazis promised free education, free health care, free government retirement programs, break up of big businesses that had become "too powerful", and redistribution of money; they were also fairly tolerant of drug use. The social, religious, and political conservatives of Germany were the Catholic monarchists; the Nazis hated them, like you would have.
Why, thank you, Mark, for taking the time to perform an in-depth psycho-analysis and critique of the joke I made after 30 seconds of thought based on the article photo's vague resemblance to the photo of Red Army soldiers raising the Soviet flag over the Reichstag.
Clearly, you put way, way, way more thought into my light-hearted jest than I did.
That's more mature plants in a single home than mature senators in Congress.
Say you didn't have a liquor license and decided to sell expensive cookies and along with the cookies you would also give your customers their choice of alcoholic beverages as a gift, how long dfobyou think you would stay in business? Calling your commercial product a gift is not some clever end run around the law, if it goes to trial they will have no difficulty showing that a business that openly sold marijuana thinly disguised as $60 cookies really sold marijuana. The ambiguity is how much effort the government wants to put into arresting people selling weed, not whether it's actually illegal.
Just think about "massage" parlors. Those get shut down even if they aren't offering extra services. If the law enforcement gets uppity, these arrangements are going to result in lots of arrests.
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.homework5.com
nice post.
Google Support
I can see what your saying... Raymond `s article is surprising, last week I bought a top of the range Acura from making $4608 this-past/month and-a little over, $10,000 this past month . with-out any question its the easiest work I've ever had . I began this five months/ago and almost straight away startad bringin in minimum $82 per-hr
HERE? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, http://www.homework5.com
Dear Cure Your Own Cancer with CBD Oil.
After trying it, it works, Today my supplier and I give the good friends.His contact: ( discreetsales2015 at g m a i l dot com )or/ +1 7 2 4 4 7 0 0 5 5 3
The doctors have been trying to cure my cancer for at least 11 years
Dear Cure Your Own Cancer with CBD Oil.
After trying it, it works, Today my supplier and I give the are good friends.His contact: ( discreetsales2015 at g m a i l dot com )or/ +1 7 2 4 4 7 0 0 5 5 3
The doctors have been trying to cure my cancer for at least 11 years