Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Body Cameras

Police Body Camera Appears to Catch Baltimore Officer Planting Drugs for a Search

This is why law enforcement should not have control over whether footage is released.

Scott Shackford | 7.20.2017 5:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Baltimore Police footage
(Baltimore Police footage)

Baltimore Police body camera footage publicly released this week that appears to show an officer planting drugs at a crime scene, offered not one but two important takeaways.

Law enforcement officers should not determine whether body camera footage can be publicly released. This is exactly the type of behavior that we should worry will be concealed under Pennsylvania's new law that presumptively treats police recordings as though they are exempt from public records disclosures.

Much less discussed was the suspect, whose heroin possession charges were dropped by prosecutors after the release of the footage. The man had been in jail for more than six months because he couldn't scrape together the cash for bail in a system badly in need of reform.

When the public defender's office released the camera footage yesterday it very quickly became national news.

The officer's apparent intent was to use his body camera to capture finding drugs in a baggie in a soup can during a search. The body cameras used by Baltimore police, however, have a buffering system that takes 30 seconds of video without audio prior to the officer actually turning the camera on.

This footage showed the officer placing the baggie in the soup can, with two officers watching. The three officers walk away from the scene. With the camera on the officer is back at the scene appearing to look over a few things before finding the can and the drugs.

Baltimore Sun reporter Justin Fenton highlighted the video on Twitter yesterday before reporting the story:

Footage shows officer placing drugs in trash; goes out to street, turns on camera, returns. Cams save 30 sec prior to activation, w/o sound pic.twitter.com/5ZW128lWFM

— Justin Fenton (@justin_fenton) July 19, 2017

The officer has been suspended and the two others put on administrative duty while the police investigate what happened. While it appears that the officer is planting the drugs at the scene, the police commissioner noted that it's also possible they had found the drugs earlier and then decided they needed to "recreate" finding the drugs with the body cameras operating.

It probably doesn't need mentioning "recreating" a discovery of drugs on camera, for whatever reason, is still fundamentally dishonest behavior.

The suspect had been in jail since January, with his bail set at $50,000. How much taxpayer money was spent keeping this guy locked up? For that matter, how much money will taxpayers end up paying when he sues the city of Baltimore?

And what will happen to the case in which the suspended officer testified, apparently even after prosecutors were made aware of the drug "find" footage?

An unusual team of Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) and freshman Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) announced today their Pretrial Integrity and Safety Act. If passed, it would set aside $10 million in federal grants to encourage states to reform their bail laws and an additional $5 million to create a national pretrial reporting program to collect data on how the systems work on a state and municipal level.

The bill calls for bail to reflect the risks those arrested present to the public and prevent people from being stuck in jail cells solely because they cannot afford to pay.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sessions Problems, Real Medical Costs, LA 92 and O.J.'s Juice: The New Fifth Column

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Body CamerasPolicePolice AbuseBaltimoreJailWar on DrugsDrugsCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (29)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Number 7   8 years ago

    Reason writers should spend more time in the comments, I think we covered this 4 days ago.

    1. Longtobefree   8 years ago

      But you didn't get paid for it.

  2. Number 7   8 years ago

    The suspect had been in jail since January, with his bail set at $50,000. How much taxpayer money was spent keeping this guy locked up? For that matter, how much money will taxpayers end up paying when he sues the city of Baltimore?

    That's why they need more assets forfeitures, to pay for stuff like this.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    While it appears that the officer is planting the drugs at the scene, the police commissioner noted that it's also possible they had found the drugs earlier and then decided they needed to "recreate" finding the drugs with the body cameras operating.

    It's also possible a soup can sans a drug stash made the office fear for his life. This excuse will be allowed to stand even though for obvious reasons it cannot be. This should taint every conviction with this guy's name in the evidence chain or his having given sworn testimony.

    1. MSimon   8 years ago

      If I was searching that trash strewn lot I'd fear for my life.

  4. ChipToBeSquare   8 years ago

    Sooner or later we'll figure out the proper way to have a class of people who are exempt from our moral and legal standards. I can just feel it

  5. junyo   8 years ago

    Well, since I'm certain this is the first and only time this has happened, past arrests/convictions still remain a valid justification for cops shooting people, and differential policing of entire communities.

  6. Gaear Grimsrud   8 years ago

    Why am I not surprised?

  7. ToCa81   8 years ago

    Damn now the police are even recording themselves doing shady shit. They should be fired and thrown in prison for sheer incompetence alone.

    1. croaker   8 years ago

      I see no reason to pay for their upkeep when I'm sure some Saud prince needs three harem eunuchs.

  8. Aresen   8 years ago

    If you plant it, they will come.

  9. chemjeff   8 years ago

    Good Lord this is awful. I feel so bad for the innocent guy.

  10. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

    Lol at spending money to encourage police departments to reform. Put these three cops in jail. That is a lot cheaper and sends a more powerful message.

    1. croaker   8 years ago

      So would a woodchipper.

    2. Duke of url   8 years ago

      This^

      (Will never happen).

  11. Jacks61   8 years ago

    How many more cases do these officers have amazing footage of their drug "finds"? They've done once that we know of, all of his cases are now suspect.

    Big ol can of worms right here 😉

    1. croaker   8 years ago

      "So even if it is indeed true that they simply staged a re-creation of finding the drugs, these officers have not only destroyed their own credibility, they have single-handedly destroyed the credibility of every piece of video where BPD officers find contraband without a clear lead-in that negates the possibility of it being staged," Rocah said. "That's quite a day's work."

      1. MSimon   8 years ago

        And EXCELLENT work it was.

      2. Dan S.   8 years ago

        So were those re-creation-al drugs?

  12. Duke of url   8 years ago

    "........while the police investigate what happened" .

    I feel so much better now.

  13. Duke of url   8 years ago

    These 'hero's' should receive whatever his sentence would have been, and then some.

    1. dantheserene   8 years ago

      At a minimum, six months in stir for each of them.

  14. Duke of url   8 years ago

    Publicizing crooked cops is good.
    Publicizing crooked cops whom are retarded, is even better!

  15. AlgerHiss   8 years ago

    The thing is, the planting of evidence is probably so common, we'd be terrified with the truth.

  16. Longtobefree   8 years ago

    "........while the police investigate what happened" .

    Because it is not like there is video evidence or anything.

    Does Baltimore have perjury laws? Is perjury a federal crime? Will the cops ever actually be indicted? Will unicorns get the vote? Who is John Galt?

  17. KerryW   8 years ago

    OK, now that they know there is the 30-second buffering before the camera turns on, they'll just do the evidence planting more than 30 seconds before they turn it on.

    Body cameras need to be on all the time, apparently.

  18. ThomasD   8 years ago

    " the police commissioner noted that it's also possible they had found the drugs earlier and then decided they needed to "recreate" finding the drugs with the body cameras operating."

    Because manufacturing evidence is perfectly acceptable.

    Cops hate cameras, even to the point that they will say things that render otherwise credible evidence unreliable.

  19. mica   8 years ago

    Freakin insane, the police commissioner is already giving an out for the scum officer, recreating for the camera, are F'ing kidding me!! The Mayor needs to fire that clown A S A P!

  20. LEAPGuyAZ   8 years ago

    Trust me, it takes a cop with big cojones to report another cop for doing something wrong. The three officers who walked away were apparently aware he was going to do something wrong, and they didn't want to be involved. I removed two sheriff's from office, one for stealing a saddle in Montana, and one for being a drunk and falsifying reports.

    It was never a good career move and I ended up leaving the agency, but somehow I just can't handle someone in power who takes advantage of their elected position. Many times law enforcement and people in EMS forget who they work for, us. If you take an oath, they stand by it. The ONLY thing a man ever really owns, is his word. If your word is no good, how good can the man be?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

The Criminal Justice System Was Found Guilty in the Karen Read Trial

Billy Binion | 6.21.2025 6:30 AM

Obama Adviser Jason Furman on Biden, Neoliberalism, and Keynesian Economics

Nick Gillespie | From the July 2025 issue

The Federal Government Owns Too Much Land. Selling It Helps Rural Communities.

Jack Nicastro | 6.20.2025 5:37 PM

A Judge's Order Freeing Mahmoud Khalil Is Yet Another Loss for the Trump Administration's Immigration Agenda

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.20.2025 4:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!