Police Abuse

Jury Says Jail Officials Should Face Charges for Prisoner's Dehydration Death

Man died after seven days without water in Milwaukee County's jail.

|

Terrell Thomas
Family photo

A jury is recommending seven Milwaukee County jail employees should face charges for the horrific dehydration death of an imprisoned man denied water for a week in 2016.

Terrell Thomas, 38, was imprisoned in a solitary cell with his water deliberately shut off by jail officials, who claimed they had done so because he had attempted to flood a previous cell. But this left him with no water to drink for seven days. His death was ruled a homicide by medical examiners.

Prosecutors in Milwaukee County took the unusual step of putting together an "inquest jury" to see if they felt there was probable cause to charge any jail employees with crimes for Thomas' death. A decision by an inquest jury does not bind prosecutors to any sort of action. It's simply an advisory.

After hearing testimony for a week, jurors decided that there was probable cause to charge seven corrections officers at the jail with felonies for abuse, neglect, or ill-treatment of prisoners. It will be up to District Attorney John Chisholm to decide whether to charge them or not. He can decide to charge just some of them. He can also decide to charge others beyond these seven.

Jail officials had been attempting to portray Thomas' death as a communication issue, with several people testifying that they had no idea that Thomas' water had been shut off in his cell. But on Monday jurors were told that jail officials had subsequently turned water off to other prisoners' cells as a form of punishment. This happened after Thomas died of dehydration. What happened to Thomas might not have been an isolated incident. From The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel:

Earlier Monday the jury heard that in the weeks after Thomas died jail officials ordered the water shut off for two other inmates in the disciplinary pod of the Milwaukee County Jail.

Those two inmates were punished for covering their cell windows, jail logs show.

A prosecutor called the practice "torture," which was doubly shocking because it followed the death of Thomas.

In addition, jail policy allows water to be turned off only when a prisoner has flooded a cell, not as punishment for misconduct. This additional information certainly challenges the claim that Thomas' death was the result of poor communication with no malicious intent.

In the meantime, in related news, a captain with the county's corrections department abruptly resigned over the weekend. He was not one of the seven people targeted in the inquest considered by the jury. He testified in the inquest, though, that he saw Thomas' water get turned off and told his commander. He says he received "no directive" from her. She disputed the captain's claims and said he was trying to make her the "bad guy." The commander, Maj. Nancy Evans, is one of the seven people named by the jury as potentially criminally responsible for Thomas' death.

And over the weekend, another inmate in the Milwaukee County corrections system died. This was not in the county jail, but the county-run House of Corrections. That death is still being investigated and few details have been released.

NEXT: Democrats Push for National Ban on LGBT Conversion Therapy

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Don’t wanna be a thug, don’t force us to deprive you of water for a week and then refuse to take responsibility after you die of dehydration.

  2. In the future they’ll do the opposite and go for waterboarding….sorry….enhanced disciplinary techniques.


  3. He testified in the inquest, though, that he saw Thomas’ water get turned off and told his commander. He says he received “no directive” from her. She disputed the captain’s claims and said he was trying to make her the “bad guy.” The commander, Maj. Nancy Evans, is one of the seven people named by the jury as potentially criminally responsible for Thomas’ death.

    Ouch. I’m sure she just didn’t hear him, right?

  4. A jury is recommending seven Milwaukee County jail employees should face charges for the horrific dehydration death of an imprisoned man denied water for a week in 2016.

    Seven sounds like a good start. Good news that the Thin Blue Line doesn’t always extend to corrections officers.

  5. He testified in the inquest, though, that he saw Thomas’ water get turned off and told his commander. He says he received “no directive” from her.

    I’m not one of them fancy legal eagles, but isn’t the combination of knowing that Thomas’ water was shut off and not following up to make sure the water was turned back on negligent?

    1. I’m legal-eagle-adjacent, and it sounds to me like negligence is the most charitable possible interpretation.

  6. In addition, jail policy allows water to be turned off only when a prisoner has flooded a cell, not as punishment for misconduct
    Sounds more like a guideline, actually.

    Follow up – anybody know the original charges against Terrell Thomas? Google is fixated on a football player by that name.

    1. According to this earlier Shackford story, he was charged with shooting someone, then driving to a casino and shooting a gun there, possibly while suffering from a bipolar episode.

  7. Sounds like the jury might not have given prosecutors the cover they wanted.

  8. Unfortunately, gross negligence, reckless disregard, endangerment, those sorts of things that would get us mundanes thrown under the jail don’t normally apply to our betters, you have to prove malicious intent. Isn’t that right, Hillary?

  9. You can’t expect prison guards to know how many days a particular person can survive without water.

    Be reasonable.

  10. So who runs this concentration camp? Maybe he/she is the first one to prosecute along with the governing authority. Then we can get to those following orders.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.