Airbnb: Public Enemy No. 1?
Many people don't seem to be taking it all that seriously.

New York passed one of the nation's most onerous anti-homesharing laws last year, but residents don't seem to be taking it all that seriously.
There were more than 55,000 Airbnb rentals in the Big Apple on the final night of 2016, the San Francisco–based homesharing service reports, up from about 47,000 on December 31, 2015. That made New York City the world's top Airbnb destination on New Year's Eve, despite the state law that prohibits the advertising of short-term rentals and the threat of $7,500 fines.
It was a fitting end to 2016, a year that saw more people than ever before using homesharing applications such as Airbnb and HomeAway, even as many states and cities cracked down on the practice.
Other cities have been less straightforward about it. In Chicago, short-term rentals are technically legal, but only if homeowners agree to let city inspectors search their property without warrant, for any reason, at any time. Beyond that, the homesharing ordinance passed by the Chicago City Council is so complicated as to be "literally incomprehensible," according to a lawsuit launched by some residents of the Windy City.
Efforts to restrict homesharing are often premised on the idea that government action is necessary to prevent unscrupulous landlords and careless renters from degrading neighborhoods. But that's an argument for enforcing existing anti-nuisance laws, not a reason to create new restrictions on what otherwise law-abiding residents can do with their own property. If renters—either the traditional sort or those using online platforms—are destroying property or threatening neighbors, they should be held accountable. Blanket bans on short-term rentals punish everyone in pursuit of stopping a few bad actors.
Enforcing short-term rental bans also takes police resources away from other, more important duties. Cops in Nashville, Tennessee, refused to enforce an Airbnb ordinance, saying they preferred to focus on stopping actual crime. State judges later ruled the regulation unconstitutional.
New York's ban on homesharing survived a legal challenge last year, but Chicago might not be so lucky. The city is facing a pair of lawsuits, with court dates set for later this spring.
Legislators in Florida, Indiana, Texas, and other states are now crafting laws to prohibit short-term rental bans. That poses something of a dilemma for skeptics of the use of state power to usurp local government. States should be prudent when interfering in how municipal bodies conduct business, of course, but federalism is no guarantee of liberty.
Political fights over homesharing will continue, but the best check against abusive government rules against homesharing might be to do what lots of New Yorkers did on New Year's Eve: Ignore them.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Airbnb: Public Enemy No. 1?."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just as I said on the other Saturday morning article, about food foragers in Maine, it's a problem that only government recognizes, that only government thinks only it can solve, and that is caused by government.
Where is the harm that constitutes true harm? At most, if one recognizes a property interest in curb-side parking for property owners, then the only harm is with renters trespassing on parking spaces. But plain old visitors do the same, and so would long term renters. Whether a room or house is rented out for 30 days to one person, or to 30 people one day at a time, there's no difference in the parking.
Any complaint over the noise of people shuffling in and out is overblown, since owners shuffle in and out too.
Fears of strangers nearby are shown false by asking nearby owners how many of their neighbors they actually know on a first name basis. Unless they know everyone with a block or two, I'd say they are surrounded by strangers, who by dint of permanent residence have much better chances of scouting nearby opportunities for robbery.
Whether a room or house is rented out for 30 days to one person, or to 30 people one day at a time, there's no difference in the parking.
I'm not so sure about that. If those 30 people are all showing up on the same day, their cars are going to occupy more than one space at the curb or in the parking garage. 😛
Of course, if the place is big enough to hold 30 people, it might also have a really big garage and/or driveway.
Are you being sarcastic. He's saying 30 people each renting different days of the month. Different people are presumably allowed no more access to the parking than they are to the apartment, which is only for their one day.
😛
Not to mention even in a 1 bedroom condo with a married couple you are likely to have 2 cars so each person can get to work. How many people do you know that need 2 cars on vacation? If anything parking should be less congested because a rental unit is almost always associated with a single vehicle and a permanent apartment is usually associated with multiple vehicles.
The Caviar of the South Finally Gets Its Due
Can the Cocktail Industry Fix Its Sexual-Assault Problem?
My guess? No.
The Wisdom of Don Rickles
Pot is ruining Denver's restaurant industry
Get on this, Jeff Sessions.
How a Homemade Blend Became One of America's Most Coveted Bourbons
New Mexico Outlaws School 'Lunch Shaming'
Why don't you have Robby's job?
I'm both too masculine and too bald.
Do you really want to not only unleash Crusty upon our nation's colleges, but have him paid to be there?
Utah's First Federal Surveyor Fled the Territory Fearing for His Life
Airbnb isn't public enemy No. 1.
Everybody that reads this blog knows that public enemy no. 1 is anything that gets in the way pf illegal immigration.
Given the exchange below, I suppose I should add the following:
; )
...and let us pray.
Why is airbnb necessary? Trespassers should be able to stay on your property without paying anyway. SQUATTERS ARE NATURAL LIBERTARIANS
Violating other people's right to make choices for themselves, like the right to decide who can and can't use your property, is incompatible with a free society. A free society is a society in which people's right to make choices for themselves is respected.
Squatting and trespassing are about ignoring people's property rights. There isn't anything libertarian about that. That isn't libertarianism. That's communism.
That would be sarcasm.
Then I invoke Poe's Law.
http://tinyurl.com/7wwukg9
SEIU shills for the union management and engages the membership to protest any threat to their cushy lives.
SEIU members work in hotels.
Airbnb is Public Enemy #1!
I am using it now & it's awesome! I've signed up for my account and have been bringing in fat paychecks. For real, my first week I made ?350 and the 2nd week I doubled it & then it kinda snowballed to ?150 a day! just folllow the course.. they will help you out
================> http://MaxNet80.com
Two Explosions Kill at Least 31 at Egyptian Coptic Churches on Palm Sunday
Donald J. Trump
? @realDonaldTrump
RADICAL. ISLAMIC. TERRORISTS ruin my golf weekend. Sad!
4:26 AM - 9 Apr 2017
https://tinyurl.com/k799dd8
see also: non-sequitur
Leave Britney alone?
No.
Fuck off.
I am using it now & it's awesome! I've signed up for my account and have been bringing in fat paychecks. For real, my first week I made ?350 and the 2nd week I doubled it & then it kinda snowballed to ?150 a day! just folllow the course.. they will help you out.
=========> http://www.jobmax6.com
Blanket bans on short-term rentals punish everyone in pursuit of stopping a few bad actors.protecting the profits of the politically connected hotel industry, protecting the turf of the municipal inspectors and oversight boards, and appearing to appease the complaints of high end condo owners who don't like their neighbors renting out units to the riffraff.
FTFY
Foremost, I really like Airbnb, and during my last move the ability to find a furnished condo for a monthly rate made life a ton easier. Ostensibly, the woman I rented from was also happy to have her condo occupied for an off-peak season month.
The real reason I am posting is to say yay to the "War on Airbnb." Maybe this will finally convince all the big city people that more government isn't always the answer, and that they really do like choice.
Probably not, but we can hope.