Brickbat: Fishing Expedition

A judge in Minnesota has signed a warrant demanding that Google turn over information on everyone who searched for the name of an Edina resident or any variation of that person's name between Dec. 1 and Jan. 7. Police say they believe someone might have used Google to find a photo of that Edina resident and forge a passport used to steal money from the resident's credit union account.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Senator Franken pleads for Technocratic Dictatorship:
"Gorsuch, continued Franken, seemed insufficiently committed to empowering the federal bureaucracy's production and enforcement of its own regulations:
?"One of the ways in which your views are distinct from Justice Scalia's is in the area of administrative law. Just this past August, you wrote an opinion in which you suggested that it may be time to reevaluate what is known as the Chevron doctrine. Now, in broad strokes, the Chevron doctrine provides that courts should be reluctant to overrule agency experts when they are carrying out this mission, like when the F.D.A. sets safety standards for prescription drugs. This principle, outlined by the Supreme Court, recognizes that our agencies employ individuals with great expertise in the laws that they are charged with enforcing, like biologists at the F.D.A., and that where those experts have issued rules in highly technical areas, judges should defer to their expertise."
http://www.dailywire.com/news/.....t-kraychik
Yeah, no, that's not what Chevron deference is - it's not deferring to the expertise of the experts who made the rules, it's deferring to the interpretation of the administrators as to what that rule means. Like for example, when the Corps of Engineers and the EPA interpret "navigable waters" and "waters of the nation" to include not just major rivers but minor rivers that feed the major rivers and the creeks that feed those rivers and the ditches that feed the creeks that feed the rivers and the downspout on your house that feeds the ditches that feeds the creeks that feed the river. The rain that falls on your house is not "navigable waters".
it is, if we say it is...FYTW!
Hey, maybe Google wasn't even keeping search logs.
Tweeting Toward Oblivion
https://tinyurl.com/mj6bnty
or you could just fuck off and let him do what he wants within the law...
I think I'll just keep pointing out that the emperor has no clothes if it's OK with you, and even if it's not OK with you, so you can fuck off as well, Trumpkin.
just as Barbara replied I'm amazed that a student can earn $9412 in four weeks on the computer . site here ??O FAST JOB FAST CASH