Libertarians Should Go See Moonlight
The year's best movie shows the consequences of drug war authoritarianism without lecturing the audience.


I had already prepared myself for the disappointment of La La Land beating out Moonlight for the Academy Award for best movie. I saw both movies and thought Moonlight was superior in all the ways that matter to me—strong characters, powerful storytelling, and emotional impact. But Hollywood loves itself above all things, and I was prepared for another Crash versus Brokeback Mountain train wreck.
When La La Land was initially declared the winner, I simply shrugged and started shutting everything down for the night. It was only by circumstance that I powered down my computer first and still had the television on when the mistake was revealed. It was a happy surprise to me that Moonlight won, and I just wanted to take a moment to recommend anybody who identifies as a libertarian to go so the movie if they haven't yet.
If I were to describe a movie as being about a young gay black man coming of age in an extremely poor Miami neighborhood surrounded by drug culture, violence, and bullies, it may be a natural inclination to expect something very preachy and full of "Something must be done about this!" messages.
That's not Moonlight. What makes Moonlight work is that it's almost the exact opposite. It throws the viewer into the life of young protagonist Chiron and has the confidence to let us come to terms with the combination of awfulness and hopefulness of his experiences. It's a deeply personal story informed by the real world experiences of the two men behind it.
What does this have to do with libertarianism? Government institutions are shown as failing Chiron, and there's no effort to present these systems as part of the solution. School does nothing to protect him. And when he finally acts out in frustration when the violent bullying becomes too much, he finds the criminal justice system ready to come crashing down on him.
There is no lecturing about this institutional failure. It's presented as a lived-in experience. The story of Moonlight trusts the viewer to understand its deeper meaning. It's not complicated, but it is subtle. That the time jump between teen Chiron and adult Chiron includes a prison stint is handled almost like an aside.
But the movie is far from hopeless, and it's not a tragedy. This is not Brokeback Mountain recast in an urban setting during the crack epidemic. It's challenging and at times very difficult to watch play out (particularly if you were, for disclosure's sake, a gay man who also grew up dirt poor in Florida and had a mother with drug issues), but Chiron does find a path that suggests a way toward personal happiness even as it embeds him further into a life operating through some shadowy options (I'm trying not to spoil too much).
Consider Moonlight to be the film equivalent of the personal stories Reason shares about those who have been granted mercy from harsh mandatory minimum sentences. When we look at the cruelty of the drug war, the use of police in schools, and the failures of prohibition and their disparate impact on minorities, it's easy to want throw out data and just hope that makes an impression. Moonlight attaches it all to a story and invites the audience to live through the consequences of this harsh dynamic partly created by government officials (at the demand of their constituencies) without judging them and putting them on the defensive. The movie illustrates a fight for self-determination and personal happiness in a harsh environment where authority is stacked against the protagonist—something every libertarian should be able to identify with.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Unless it's got splosions and pew pew there's no point in going to a theater to watch a movie anymore.
Lego batman actually has a person saying 'pew pew pew' everytime a gun/laser/weapon fires. Also, there are explosions.
Well, seems like preaching to the choir.
If there is one thing that libertarians of any stripe agree on, it's that the drug war is wrong. The only argument is how evil it is, ranging from very to extremely.
I loved moonlight. Watched it with my 13yo cousin who loved it also. So lucky not to be born into that.
The left who will praise moonlight will also kick and scream over Betsy Davos, because poor black Chiron should stay in poor black schools.
"The left who will praise moonlight will also kick and scream over Betsy Davos, because poor black Chiron should stay in poor black schools."
That's quite quotable.
No way in hell the "libertarians" on this site are going to see a movie with a black gay protagonist.
The Crying Game is one of my favorite movies
And i'm pretty sure Blade was pretty gay. And Awesome.
"And i'm pretty sure Blade was pretty gay."
Wait, hold up. What?
I used to watch Glee, which was pretty much a gay singing show.
I quit that show their politics just got overbearing. I no longer watch anything made by Ryan Murphy.
Moonlight made way less money then Hidden Figures, meaning even black people didn't want to watch it. The 80's and 90's are long gone, drug themed movies go to the graveyard now.
It's not the black and gay that's the problem, it's that there's no lecturing about institutional failure.
I heard Richard Spencer cried when he saw this movie.
you're thinking of "Yentl"
Well, in my case you are right. I'm glad to hear that the movie is good, and doesn't preach, but I have enough tragedy in my own life that I don't feel the need to watch more, thanks. There are limits,to my masochism. That the film doesn't (apparently) depict The State as a Force For Good in this poor man's life is extraordinary, but we all know perfectly well that the Liberal Establishment won't see the lesson, much less learn from it. No, we must pour yet more money into badly run inner city schools, because God forbid we admit that the problems are systemic.
*spit*
I watch mostly junk. Every once in a while a really serious film like EVELYN or AMAZING GRACE sneeks in there, but not often. It seems to me that most of what is seriously wrong with the world could be at least ameliorated if we took the solutions that Hollywood supports, and did the opposit.
Let me say off the bat that I before reading this article I didn't know about Shackford's lifestyle choice and I don't agree with it. It has always seemed wrong and unnatural to me. Turning off your computer for the night? What if you get up and have to fire off a quick email? Or check Drudge? Wrong on so many levels.
Also, this article is just chock-full of spoilers.
What if you get up and have to fire off a quick email?
These euphemisms...
Phrasing!
I send so many emails that I had to get a new keyboard.
Hold on. Is *that* why Hillary needed the email server in her closet?
RE: Libertarians Should Go See Moonlight
Other movies (although dated) libertarians should see is "Joy" and "The Free State of Jones."
Excellent examples of not giving up or surrendering to the powers that be.
I would add "The Pursuit of Happyness".
Great movie.
Also Armageddon. Not to give too many spoilers, but it shows how government institutions come up short and must rely on the private sector to make 800 feet. IN SPACE.
"The Free State of Jones."
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/.....180958111/
Wow, sounds like an amazing, interesting story. Can't believe I'd never heard of this story before.
Deathproof/Grindhouse.
Badass and armed women stomp a psychopath. They don't ask for help or permission.
Terminator 2: Judgment Day
I'll add it to the list.
When confronted with stories like this, my wife insists that it presents a case for improving the institutions that failed. My persuasive powers have not been sufficient to convince her that these institutions can't be fixed - The only solution is to make victimless crimes legal, and allow as much choice as possible when it comes to schools, etc.
If a business lasts as long as these govt programs have, much less draws in as much money, you don't describe it as a failed business.
"The only solution is to make victimless crimes legal [...]"
Eh, that doesn't really work.
First, you have to change public perception such that it isn't a "crime", even if it legally still is. Then, once you have cultural inertia on your side, you can go after getting the legal status changed (whether by the courts or legislature).
That's what we see in just about everything. Adultery, miscegenation, birth control, abortion, sodomy? between straight people, sodomy between gay people?, and now pot-legalization. The cultural change and acceptance has always preceded the legal change. In many cases the SCOTUS steps in to push things along at the end, but in most cases it doesn't get ahead of the curve (Loving v. Virginia is one of the few cases where it did).
So yeah, starting with the premise to "make victimless crimes legal"? Doesn't actually sway most people. What does is arguing that (morally speaking) they aren't crimes to start with.
________
?Remember, while "sodomy" is largely understood to refer exclusively to buggery these days, it used to be more broadly understood as any sexual act other then penis-in-vagina.
?And yeah, splitting these two is relevant. Decriminalization of sodomy for straights and gays didn't always go hand-in-hand.
"When confronted with stories like this, my wife insists that it presents a case for improving the institutions that failed. "
Yes. For every person who may interpret such a story as being a refutation of corrupt laws and of the big state, ten more will see it as a failure of necessary institutions that simply require more funding and more authority.
This is exactly my criticism of The Wire. It's loved by both libertarians and Liberals, and usually for very different reasons. I never took to it because the message I got from it--and confirmed by creator David Simon--was one of "theory good, implementation bad, + capitalism evil", as opposed to admitting the corrupt nature of the actual theory. You still hear this argument from every color of statist, "Oh, they just rolled it out badly."
Thank you for sharing, Scott. Think I will go watch it this weekend.
Speaking of the drug war and libertarians, Danish officials have created a way to trace bitcoin transactions, leading to arrests and convictions in the Danish War on Drugs.
Seems it will necessarily come out in court in the United States.
You see the Danish War on Drugs isn't like the American War on Drugs...
And while they were at it, the Danes used blasphemy laws, on a non-Muslim.
Just part of their grand scheme to out all internet trolls.
Well now I regret even more not having seen it. Thanks a lot, Scott.
What if I told you a technology exists for seeing a movie after it has stopped playing at movie theaters?
Tell me more, CMW!
It's a witch! Burn zim!
We watched it streaming last night -- after the Oscars. The luxury of being in the Pacific time zone. A good movie.
I'd planned watching it instead of the Oscars last night and then spent most of the evening knocking out chores I should've taken care of before Sunday evening.
Ah well. I'll add it to my media todo list.
EASTERN TIME RULES, PACIFIC TIME DROOLS.
Many movies show the shiftiness of public institutions failing various groups or people. Until the masses connect the dots it will only matter to libertarians to spot these things.
Also. Who gives a fucken rat's ass about whether a movie gets an fricken Oscar?
I'll reserve judgment until I see this movie, but in my experience, the shiftiness of public institutions as portrayed in movies ends up being a call for better and more oversight-ey public institutions.
Precisely.
My wife is afraid of school choice because a reduction of school funding could reduce money for special education.
Never mind that we have friends who aren't getting the special education they need and might benefit from a charter school.
Texas funds special ed kids at a much higher rate than typical kids. I can't imagine that schools would risk losing those kids. I also would think charter schools might target that market.
I don't care if your protagonist is gay, as long as it's not about him being gay. You're queer get over it. I know I am.
"Libertarians should... " is a great way to start a sentence.
No one is a little skeptical that after the #oscarssowhite hashtag last year and muslim ban this year, that an all cast african movie and a muslim won awards? The first muslim? I will see Moonlight, though I haven't yet, and I'm sure it's great. But it seems too coincidental to me. This years hashtag was #oscarssomale. I'm all for winning every award based on merit, but if next year the best male actor is transgender, I'm not going to be surprised. Just the fact that hollywood didn't give itself all of the awards about a movie that is about hollywood is a miracle in itself.
It never seemed a coincidence when all the winners forever were white straight dudes?
This is my first visit on your blog. Your article is well written and informative.
Antiquariat Jaipur
Antiquariat Jaipur India
??????O I can see what your saying... Raymond `s article is surprising, last week I bought a top of the range Acura from making $4608 this-past/month and-a little over, $10,000 this past month . with-out any question its the easiest work I've ever had . I began this five months/ago and almost straight away started bringing in minimum $82 per-hr .?.......??????? ?????____TRUMP.IS.HERE..___???????-
Moonlight was good, but I liked 'Lion' better.
I think the Academy just decided that they had given enough awards to Indians lately and wanted to give one to a movie about being black and gay this year, because of politics.
That doesn't mean it's a bad movie though. it's a good movie, the acting performances are great. it's not really about the drug war though. It's really just a sublte rendition of one quiet black kid from the hood's coming of age story.
I liked Lion better though - it does a really great job of depicting the shock of long-forgotten childhood memories resurfacing. I don't know why they ran Dev Patel as supporting actor because he's obviously the lead, and he's great. The look on his face when he starts to remember is just perfect.
It was soooo boring.
??????O I saw the receipt that said $6460 , I did not believe ...that...my mother in law woz like they say actualy earning money in their spare time from their computer. . there aunt started doing this for under thirteen months and recently cleard the depts on there mini mansion and bourt a great Aston Martin DB5 . go to this website.... ?.....??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-
Most of us want to have good income but dont know how to do that on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn huge sum, but whenever Buddies try that they get trapped in a scam/fraud so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the page. I am more than sure that you will get best result.
!!@@~
Best Of Luck for new Initiative
???????????????????????????????????????????????? http://www.moneytime10.com