Arizona Rejects Marijuana Legalization
Voters approved medical marijuana by a razor-thin margin in 2010.

Yesterday Arizona voters, who approved medical use of marijuana by a razor-thin margin in 2010, declined to take the additional step of legalizing the drug for recreational purposes. With 68 percent of precincts reporting, the legalization initiative, Proposition 205, was opposed by 52 percent of voters.
Proposition 205 would have allowed adults 21 or older to possess up to an ounce of marijuana in public, grow up to six plants at home, keep the produce of those plants at home, and give other adults up to an ounce at a time "without remuneration." It would have created a Department of Marijuana Licenses and Control to oversee the commercial production and distribution of marijuana products, with licensing preference given to operators of existing medical marijuana dispensaries, and imposed a 15 percent tax on the retail price.
Proposition 205 was supported by two Arizona congressmen, Raul Grijalva and Ruben Gallego, both Democrats. It was opposed by two other congressmen, Trent Franks and Matt Salmon, and by Gov. Doug Ducey, all Republicans. Supporters of the initiative raised $5.2 million, while opponents raised $5.6 million. The chief donor to the opposition campaign was Discount Tire, which is based in Scottsdale.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Could we just have actual legalization? You know, without some damn "control board" or "only 2 plants" or some other garbage? Seems like "you can't sell or give it to minors" is enough. Do we really need to be prosecuting people for giving 1.5 ounces to someone?
The zipline of tall cliffs routes the ghost of thom? will thom be erased?
Do portraits eclipse the massive code of odd travelers who push the pyramid buttons? how the fuck does agile know
I think it's going to pass on the next go-around. There are many retirees that must have said NO!