California Legalizes Marijuana
Six states have now decided to tolerate cannabis consumption without a doctor's note.

Today, two decades after California became the first state to legalize marijuana for medical use, voters in that state finally got around to letting people consume cannabis for fun. With 16 percent of precincts reporting, California's legalization initiative, Proposition 64, was favored by 56 percent of voters, and A.P. is calling the race.
California is by far the most populous state to legalize marijuana. Approval of Proposition 64, which creates an uninterrupted pot-friendly zone along the West Coast, by itself more than triples the number of Americans who live in jurisdictions that see fit to tolerate cannabis consumption without a doctor's note. That development will dramatically increase pressure on Congress to accommodate states' rejection of marijuana prohibition.
Proposition 64 lets adults 21 or older possess up to an ounce of marijuana in public, share up to an ounce at a time with other adults, and grow up to six plants at home, where they may keep the produce of those plants. Those provisions take effect right away.
The initiative charges the California Department of Food and Agriculture with overseeing marijuana growers, the Department of Public Health with overseeing manufacturers and testing facilities, and the Department of Consumer Affairs with overseeing distributors and retailers. The departments are supposed to begin issuing licenses in 2018.
Marijuana will be taxed twice: $9.25 per ounce collected from growers plus 15 percent of the retail price. Proposition 64 explicitly allows deliveries to consumers and on-site consumption at businesses licensed for that purpose. Both of those options will be subject to approval by local governments, which also can ban marijuana businesses entirely and regulate (but not ban) home cultivation.
In other respects, Proposition 64, whose backers brag that it includes "the toughest regulations of any adult-use marijuana proposal submitted to date," is pretty restrictive, forbidding many forms of advertising, setting detailed packaging and labeling requirements, and treating possession of any amount greater than an ounce as a misdemeanor punishable by a $500 fine and up to six months in jail. The same penalties apply to sharing any amount of marijuana with adults younger than 21, which includes passing a joint among college students.
Proposition 64 was supported by Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and at least six other members of California's congressional delegation, including two Republicans. It was opposed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a reliably gung-ho drug warrior, but not by California's other senator, Barbara Boxer, who said before the election she was inclined to vote for legalization. In contrast with 2010, when a legalization initiative fell a few points short of passage, newspaper that took a position also tended to favor Proposition 64—15 to 10, by Ballotpedia's count.
Supporters of Proposition 64, whose leading donor was former Facebook president Sean Parker, raised more than $22 million, while the opponents managed only $2 million or so, most of it from Julie Schauer, a retired Pennsylvania art professor who sees eye to eye with Harry Anslinger on the subject of marijuana and murder.
"This is the most important moment in the history of the marijuana legalization movement," says Marijuana Majority Chairman Tom Angell. "California is the sixth-largest economy in the world and is hugely culturally influential. Most importantly, this vote will dramatically accelerate the end of federal marijuana prohibition."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Smoke weed every day.
Let's see how Cali fucks this up.
They already did.
Your website is broken!
For all of the seemingly competent coders you seem to have among your readership, you think you'd have a better comments section. 😉
Since the relevant thread is besquirreled:
It's OK, Hillary. Let it all out. Crusty is here for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YO5icNGn0
Ha! I won my bet with Suell! And Obamacare is doomed! And there will be epic amounts of lefty butthurt for years!
The first tears are beginning to trickle in:
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-.....ker-afraid
my shit was deleted... how interesting which is very common for agile.. my shit gets deleted often
I had two posts on this thread early on when the thread was empty and my thoughts are now gone...
not that anyone should ever give a single fuck what agile thinks but? is subtle thread engineering cake going on ... in a LIBERTARIAN world?
Server squirrels are under a heavy load tonight.
nope. bro.
nope... I posted love for my brothers and sisters....
my shit was cleaned out....man
They don't want me here and my voice will take another direction, man
A mighty stream of butthurt on this livestream of Trump headquarters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qrj_lx2O7w
I predicted this 30 years ago.
In case anyone missed it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-tYWopFHjY
"What are you talking about? It never hurts to dress up like a Nazi! Americans love Nazis.
Don't they?"
Wrong time and place for a Michael Jackson costume.
as i fade away please watch what happens here....
hello
I wonder how easy it will be to collect these taxes. I'm assuming there's going to be a lot of under reporting of revenues.
I believe Reason loves everthing but my voice and I will divorce them from me and today is the slice of me from them but reason loves a pile of supr cool people and before I go i offer my love into the brains and elbows of these super montsters= sweet drab love and planet twinkies of death... I will now go off and live an entirely new life this day forward.... fuck computers and moniters and keyboards
This stuff kills me. People fighting to legalize pot yet will zealously support banning anyone smoking a cigarette within a 100 miles of them because of concerns about second hand smoke. Marijuana has 3 times the carcinogens of tobacco. The reason states are legalizing it is obvious, tax revenue.