Brickbat: They Got Some Crazy Little People There


Steve Woolfolk, director of public programing at the Kansas City Public Library, is facing a charge of interfering with an arrest after attempting to keep an off-duty police officer from removing a patron from the library. The library was hosting a Truman and Israel Lecture by former diplomat Dennis Ross. At the request of the Jewish Community Foundation, private security guards, employed by the foundation, were present at the event. But library officials say their agreement with the foundation was that no one could be removed from the event without the OK from the library. Jeremy Roth-Kushel asked a question of Ross. After Ross answered, Roth-Kushel began to speak again, when one of the security guards, who were off-duty cops, tried to remove him. Woolfolk tried to step in and was himself arrested.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another for the long list...
Never ever _____________________________ a cop for ________________
I'll start:
Never ever hire hire a cop for private security.
Morning, how about never trust a cop.
Why do terms like *cop a feel* exist if not for cops being guilty molesting cunts.
Cops also have a very high rate of domestic violence, is that a 'feel'?
Let's not forget the people who hold their leash
I'll bite on the mad libs:
FIRE
INCOMPETENCE
You are so busted!
heh, heh heh...you said bust, heh heh,heh
Jew are so busted.
If you make a cop feel unsafe, he has the right to retreat to his safe space, which is defined by the Supreme Court as the space on the other side of the handcuffs he puts on you.
I figured it was the space he puts in your chest when the bullets pass through.
The man asked a question about the U.S. and state sponsored terrorism.
Given there were cops in the room, not the best idea.
"Psst, dude." *Points discretely over shoulder*
He made the mistake of asking a question with out knowing the consequences.
The Socratic method is to ask a question and then drink hemlock?
'I drank what1' still cracks me up. And ,once again,your most likely having an adult beverage while I have coffee. [ shakes fist at the screen ].
adult beverages all around!!!
Jack Butler:
You wanna beer?
Ron Richardson:
It's 7 o'clock in the morning.
Jack Butler:
Scotch?
aren't police officers not allowed to do police stuff when they're off duty?
You guys didn't mention the kneecapping
FYTW. They're cops even when they're not.
I'm surprised anyone bothered to ask a police official rather than going to the real power source: the union representative.
When you're a cop, you're a cop 24-7. Even when the cop is being paid by a private party, the cop is free to disregard the terms of his contract. Laws don't apply to a cop, why should contractual obligations?
Yet another example of why you don't call a cop unless you expect their misguided interpretation of the law to be enforced.
If you want someone killed, call a cop.
No. Or perhaps your forgot being a current (off duty or on) or FORMER police officer is a 50 state license to conceal carry.
This type of thing is a disturbing indicator of the direction we're headed as a country.
What's the JCF's position on this? Do they approve? It was their security.
At the risk of being Eddie-like, I'll respond to myself:
Awful lot of lawyer words to say "The police are wrong."
Responding to yourself is acceptable, as long as you don't continue to thread. That way it's an extention of the original post and doesn't look like an ongoing conversation.
There are rules to this.
Just once I'd like to see an organization say they don't take the situation seriously.