Body Cam Footage of Police Shooting of 6-Year-Old Released
The cops have been indicted for murder. Both have been the subject of previous civil suits, and one was previously indicted for aggravated rape.


Footage of the fatal police shooting of 6-year-old Jeremy Mardis in Louisiana in September 2015 at the end of a police pursuit was released this week as part of the evidentiary hearing—two of the cops involved were indicted on murder charges for the killing. You can watch the video below.
Michael Edmonson, the superintendent of Louisiana State Police, called the footage "the most disturbing thing I've seen."
The marshals who shot at the car say they were unaware that a 6-year-old was in the car. CNN reports that the chase started when the marshals "witnessed an argument between a man and his girlfriend in front of a local bar."
Both marshals also had previous records, with one of them having been indicted for aggravated rape and both named in a number of civil suits alleging a range of misconduct. The defense lawyer for at least one officer insists there will not be enough evidence to convict his client for the killing.
Police appear to have never provided an official reason for the chase in the first place, and the boy's father, Christopher Few, was never charged in relation to any alleged wrongdoing that may have caused police to start the chase. CNN also reported that Few and one of the officers who killed his son had a previous relationship that investigators are proving.
While both marshals were indicted relatively quickly, the case, which involves white victims and non-white cops, illustrates the dangers of treating police violence as a problem purely or overwhelmingly about racial bias. Had Few not had his six-year-old in the car and the marshals managed to kill him, can there be much doubt that they would have fabricated a cause for the shooting if not for the entire interaction? Even with the six-year-old in the car, had police managed to kill the boy and the father, it's unlikely the case would have went to trial, as police would have been free to fabricate a story.
The seemingly unchecked power police officers have to initiate interactions and to control the investigation in the aftermath of violence, along with a nearly total lack of accountability and transparency in many jurisdictions thanks to local laws, state laws, and often union contracts as well, means anyone can become a potential victim of police.
Prosecutors say the presence of body camera footage facilitated the indictment. Watch it below:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The indictment is just the first step. Will the prosecutors deliberately fuck up the prosecutions as they have consistently done when they had to charge cops? Will they get this overturned on appeal?
Sorry, but until I see cops, lots of cops, doing hard time in the general inmate population, there is no justice.
Fuck you dunphy, wherever your lying ass is.
He's in bed with Morgan Fairchild after crushing it at the gym.
hth
Totality of the circs, bro
Smooches
CNN also reported that Few and one of the officers who killed his son had a previous relationship that investigators are proving.
My understanding was that one of them had texted the boy's mother, and Few told him to leave her alone, and then things escalated to the death of the boy.
No matter what else they do, law enforcement are not going to see body cams as a positive when they can provide video evidence of misconduct.
Two black cops have a personal beef with a white guy and recklessly shoots at his car, killing his child. Unfortunately, I doubt this story will have the staying power seen in other cases that better fit the narrative. I do already see a lot of people saying "Why didn't he stop the car! It's his own fault for putting his child in that position!", so at least a lot of these people who never find anything wrong with cops are consistent and not racist.
One of the things that went through my mind as to why he was running given the circumstances was that the cops had already threatened his life and he was hoping to get away.
I just witnessed the most appalling demonstration of racism.
I literally can't even.
I suspected that Amazon was no longer a retailer but a GOD. Only a god could assert such hubris.
Well look who decided to show up.
Apropos of this, I'm going to engage in a demonstration by commenting on EVERY ARTICLE until you come back permanently.
Are we officially opposing Johnson, yet?
SIV has doubts on his candidacy.
Is he the editor now?
I wish.
He wishes.
Everyone except the prog trolls.
Of the trolls, are we dominated by the progs, then? They do seem quite upset by the LP this time.
I'm in all of the crucifixion threads.
Not the cops, screw them. Crucifixion in the Pythonesque sense.
Don't worry- Eddie will climb up on the cross all by himself...
omg you're alive!
Well, life-like.
Man, in the video they sure don't seem to be in much of a hurry to assist the boy with the "faint pulse".
I'm completely, 100% against the death penalty.
I think the 8th amendment is one of the more important developments of the Bill of Rights.
I want to see these officers tortured to death slowly. On live television.
Crucifixion is the only way to go here.
What do you have against the boats?
Wow. Just. Wow.
(Eagerly bookmarks the Wiki page and contemplates a victim list...)
I'll be satisfied enough if they end up serving anything like what any non-cop would get for shooting up a car for no good reason and killing a kid.
I'll be surprised if they end up serving anything like what a non-cop would for shooting up a car, without killing a kid.
I'll be surprised if they end up serving anything.
Like you, I'm anti death-penalty because I don't trust the state to not misuse that power. The only exception I'd be willing to make is for government employees depriving people of rights under color of authority. But you'd probably need a special parallel court system for those cases and somehow figure out how to keep the employees of that court from becoming careerists.
figure out how to keep the employees of that court from becoming careerists.
Some sort of death penalty would probably square that problem away.
You mean. . .the Censor?
I'm not against the death penalty, but this doesn't rise to it, in my opinion. I don't see any way you could argue that the cops acted with malice of forethought in killing the kid.
They just need to go to prison as long as the law allows for this type of reckless disregard for human life.
They acted with malice aforethought in trying to kill the father. It's a pretty long-standing rule of law that if you try to kill someone and "accidentally" kill a different person, that you didn't intend to kill that specific person doesn't knock it down from first degree murder.
Yep. The doctrine of transferred intent.
"Malice Aforethought"
No, I am not going to watch the marshals kill a child.
Yeah I don't need that kind of rage on a Friday.
But it would be just fine on a Wednesday, Hitler?
Tuesdays. It's a good primer for execution Wednesdays.
The frustration isn't with the shooting. In the video that happens right away. It's watching portly law enforcement professionals stand around doing nothing for 10 minutes or so while two fellow human beings sit helpless and bleeding.
I had to stop watching the blue death videos a long time ago. The compulsion to act was getting too strong.
The cops have been indicted for murder. Both have been the subject of previous civil suits, and one was previously indicted for aggravated rape.
HIGHER STANDARDS! HEROES!
Bet that shit was expunged from their employment record by the union...
Okay, riddle me this: How come no politician cams?
Anthony Wiener.
(shudders)
And where've you been? Working or some boring crap like that?
Do you really want the people's business all over twitter?
Fuck yeah, I do. Besides, just who would we vote for in such a scenario?
+1 dead girl and 1 live boy
The marshals who shot at the car say they were unaware that a 6-year-old was in the car.
Firearms training 101. If you're unaware of your target, you don't pull the trigger.
A car is kind of like a man's home (yeah, I went there). You don't fire blindly through the doors and windows, hoping to hit the perpetrator, do you?
Well, ok, bad example, because the cops do in fact do this. But y'all know what I mean.
Both marshals also had previous records, with one of them having been indicted for aggravated rape and both named in a number of civil suits alleging a range of misconduct.
Yet somehow these filthy subhuman slimy fuckers are let loose into society with guns and badges and the explicit directive to "police" us. These are those we let decide kill us on a whim with no consequences at worst, and kidnap and imprison us if they're feeling charitable.
Fuck. The police. All of them. The good and the bad. And they're all ugly.
"You're a bad person. You do bad things and you smell bad. And you should feel bad."
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go? to tech tab for work detail,,,,,,,
------------------>>> http://www.4cyberworks.com
So, my takeaway from this that Black Lives Matter and that...oh they were white? Nevermind.
*walks away whistling a spritely tune*
"Had Few not had his six-year-old in the car and the marshals managed to kill him, can there be much doubt that they would have fabricated a cause for the shooting if not for the entire interaction? Even with the six-year-old in the car, had police managed to kill the boy and the father, it's unlikely the case would have went to trial, as police would have been free to fabricate a story."
Does Krayewski get his omnipotent soothsaying directly from George Soros' BLM or is it simply ingrained? I have no desire to defend any cops, but maybe the author would more happily see his kind of justice served in some other types of government. I think Reason should refute this author.
Huh? Look at the following paragraph:
Does Krayewski get his omnipotent soothsaying directly from George Soros' BLM or is it simply ingrained?
No need. A familiarity with police shootings is all that's required. "Past performance is no guarantee of future results, but its the way to bet."
"had police managed to kill the boy and the father, it's unlikely the case would have WENT to trial"
Try "gone" next time, Ed. Yw
The next step is for white people to have a riot, loot a bunch of stores, and beat up a bunch of random black people. We'll get national attention for our grievances and Congress will pass a law that says it's OK for whites to kill whites, but it's not OK for black to kill whites. That's how it works, right?