Another Johnson/Weld PAC in Action, via Cato Institute Founder Ed Crane
Repurposing his PurplePAC, Crane hopes for seven figures contributions from wealthy libertarians to show Americans they have an option that's "socially tolerant, skeptical of militarism, and for the free market."
Edward Crane III, one of the founders of the Cato Institute and its leader for decades, earlier this election season was running a SuperPAC called PurplePAC that was dedicated to helping Rand Paul with his presidential bid with the Republican Party. (I reported yesterday on another SuperPAC operator whose Concerned American Voters was supporting Paul's presidential run and is now supporting his Senate re-election run, Matt Kibbe, and his new pro-Johnson/Weld operation AlternativePAC.)

After the Libertarian Party over the weekend nominated former Republican governors Gary Johnson (of New Mexico) and William Weld (of Massachusetts), Crane has announced he's switching PurplePAC over to their support.
Crane showed me a copy of an email he's sending to some especially wealthy people he knows with an interest in liberty, which reads in part:
I hope you'll consider endorsing Gov. Johnson for President. You probably know Bill Weld. This is a terrific, first-rate ticket. As the Wall Stret Journal put it earlier this week, "an honorable alternative" to having to vote for Trump or Clinton. Gary and Bill would both be happy to meet with you in Memphis at your convenience. My Purple PAC is supporting them so, happily, there is no limit on your potential generosity. Time to dig out from under the embarrassment of the current state of American politics.
In a phone interview today, Crane said he has not yet nailed down any big figure commitments but is hopeful they lie ahead. He's only sitting on around $200,000 right now, he says, not nearly enough for what's needed.
One big money man in the libertarian space is former Cato board member Fred Smith, CEO of Federal Express; Crane figures both since his name is being floated as a VP for Trump and because he still is running a huge business vulnerable to political punishment that he might be a hard sell for big money for the Libertarians, though he intends to try.
"We're going to need seven figure contributions to make a real difference," Crane says. He hopes, within the letter of SuperPAC law which does not allow any discussion of money given or changing hands or strategic use of same around candidates, to help broker meetings between potential libertarian moneybags and the candidates.
Crane used to essentially run the L.P. back in the 1970s, and has a deep understanding of L.P. activist peculiar concerns and protection of their own radical prerogatives. (He walked out of the Party in 1983 when delegates refused to support for president what he saw as the reasonable, respectable real world candidate, Georgetown Professor Earl Ravenal, in favor of Party activist David Bergland.)
"I would have bet anything that would not have nominated [Weld]," Crane says. Weld squeaked by with 50.5 percent support, which Crane jokingly called "a goddamn landslide," on a second ballot.
But he's glad they did, and says it "doesn't make a lot of difference" whether those particular Libertarian delegates don't accept Weld's libertarian bona fides. "The big money is not that picky," Crane says. "They are successful for a reason, so they are reasonable about this sort of thing."
Besides, Crane argues, "Weld is pretty damn libertarian on broad issues. Socially tolerant, noninterventionist in foreign policy, against crony capitalism and is a successful businessman in addition to being a successful attorney. He's a hell of an asset, and this ticket has more real administrative experience than either Trump or Clinton."
What Gary Johnson says so often is true, Crane says: getting in the polls in order to get into the debates is key to unlocking floodgates of big money. "Once people see their choice is not just between a couple of crooks, and there is a political philosophy out there represented by a political movement that a plurality of Americans, agree with: socially tolerant, skeptical of militarism, and for the free market," Crane thinks they will come around. That combination is "not otherwise available" to them unless they know about Johnson/Weld.
Tomato magnate Chris Rufer told The Hill he intends to give over a million for Johnson/Weld though both Crane and Kibbe say he hasn't yet expressed that directly to them.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Isn't that part of the goddamn problem?
"The big money is not that picky,"
It's also clearly no longer that effective. If it was, Jeb Bush would be GOP nominee.
If Jeb! had done better, yet still come up short, he could have been the Libertarian Party nominee! It's the Year of the Center-Left Republican in the LP.
I find it rather amusing that the Libertarian party has become the last-ditch hope of the Beltway establishment, and the Republicans are now the party of the radical insurgancy. If you live long enough, I guess you'll eventually see everything.
I think you're mixing up III w Jr.
No, looks like I was.
Doherty is a commenter SPLITTER.
DEATH TO SPLITTERS.
Johnson-Weld makes me moist.
You are applying it for too long.
OT: I'm a regular, fairly long time poster here, but I created a dummy account to ask of ye noble reason commentariat a question concerning a matter of great personal import and sensitivity. I know that a number of you have considerable mad legal skillz, so I hope you might be able to advise. Straight to the point, I would like to to find out how to best proceed with seeking a divorce. I am willing to share whatever details necessary except any that might blow my cover. I am not looking for pro bono; just guidance on who to contact, what to expect, how much financial pain I'll feel and for how long as well as when to keep my mouth shut. In case you haven't yet surmised, I am posting on HyR and am therefore a dude. Any advice will be appreciated.
I'm sorry to hear that and don't have any legal advice.
But I wanted to tell you that your handle is a masterpiece.
Oh, Eddie. This is just rich.
Heh. I will confess... it's not me.
Good one, I guess.
I always told my girlfriend we'd get married when gays were afforded the right. As of last summer I have been happily single.
"I'm not gonna get married until gay people can get married, because I'm gay."
Eddie? With a woman?
Please!
I have no experience in this arena. Good luck.
I suppose if you want a divorce, the thing to do would be to get a lawyer licensed in your state. Bring your wallet.
Anyway, I'm very sorry to hear about this.
Best for you if you're in a no fault state and don't have any children. If so, suggest to your soon to be X that you use the same lawyer to save money.
Ok, here's general advice. Go find a lawyer specializing in divorce and ask them. Search your state bar's referral or look in the damned phone book.
It'll cost as little or as much as you/your spouse want it to cost and how bitter you two are. Since you're posting under a new anonymous handles, I would assume quite a bit. If you haven't already, maybe consider opening a non-joint account for your own money.
As for when to keep your mouth shut, maybe right away until you've talked to a lawyer or do something stupid like leaving "Divorce made simple" on your computer or a list of divorce attorneys on your phone. Change your passwords/PINs and for gods sake, make sure your phone auto locks.
One piece of advice:Don't ask a bunch of internet assholes for legal advice. There are professional assholes in your own jurisdiction (I hope not Florida) you should consult.
Here is some advice. You better post some advice for yourself under your real username. Otherwise, we are gonna figure out who you are by process of elimination.
Two books worth reading:
Divorcing: The Complete Guide for Men and Women
by Mel Krantzler and Melvin Belli
Screw the Bitch: Divorce Tactics for Men
by Dick Hart
One you leave on the coffee table, the other in the bathroom.
Actually, you had better not leave the other unattended.
I actually kinda thought the notion that tons of terrorists were being snuck across the Mexico border were pants-shitty. Apparently I was at least partially wrong.
It's still really a question of scale, but that doesn't mean the electorate will see it that way. This probably made Trump pop open a big bottle of champagne that he won't drink.
The question is how badly do we want to put a stop to it.
"socially tolerant"
You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.
From Merriam-Webster.com, second definition of "tolerate":
"2
"a : to allow to be or to be done without prohibition, hindrance, or contradiction
"b : to put up with "
..."[learn to tolerate one another]"
Damn. It seems like everyone and their grandma now has a PAC.
...
"You get a PAC! And you get a PAC! And you get a PAC! Everyone gets a PAC!"
Edward Crane III, one of the founders of the Cato Institute and its leader for decades, earlier this election season was running a SuperPAC called PurplePAC that was dedicated to helping Rand Paul with his presidential bid with the Republican Party.
I assume he chose the name "Purple" because "herpdy derpy derpa derp libertarian is part-red (Repub) and part-blue (Dem) so that equals purple"?
If so, he should have used violet. Purple technically isn't a "real" color; at least, it doesn't have its own frequency/wavelength on the color spectrum. "Purple" also makes it seem like we're just "knockoff" wannabe Repub/Dems by combining their colors. So fuck that. The color violet may give the impression of red + blue, but it's its own color.
/nitpick
Violet *is* on the opposite end of the visible spectrum from red, I believe.
Right, violet is an *actual* color with (extremely slow-moving) wavelength. What we call "purple" is just a mix of red and blue.
Whatever. Just ignore my nitpicky dumb ass.
I'll give you extremely slow-moving.
[Aims patented violet laser beam at Clint's crotch]
Lavender Pac is much more relaxing
Should've just cashed in on recent public events with "Purple Rain PAC"
What about a Color Purple PAC?
Purple Drank PAC?
"Purple drank is a slang term for a concoction which includes a prescription-strength cough syrup used in a manner inconsistent with its labeling as a recreational drug."
Wait, so it's labelled as a recreational drug, but it's being used as a cough medicine instead?
Purple Haze PAC - "Don't know if it's day or night, but I know that giving money to me would be right."
You got me blowin', blowin' my dough
Is it the Libertarian Moment, or just legalized dope?
You could always complain on its Wikipedia Talk page....
It's full of this shit:
And a massive flamewar about someone "removing a nutritionist as a 'competent' source"...
A Wikipedia talk page? Why would want to I get into lengthy tedious arguments with people on the Internet?
Wait a minute...
And Pluto isn't really a planet 🙂
Nerd Fight!
Planet IX is.
Meh.
I prefer Team Orange.
What are we, Dutch?
Or something.
Go team!
Color is a percept. All colors are real. It doesn't matter whether it's produced by violet light exciting some of the long- and short-wavelength cones, or by a combination of red & blue light doing the same, or by an electrode in the brain.
"One big money man in the libertarian space is former Cato board member Fred Smith, CEO of Federal Express; Crane figures both since his name is being floated as a VP for Trump and because he still is running a huge business vulnerable to political punishment that he might be a hard sell for big money for the Libertarians, though he intends to try."
I'm not a professional fundraiser, but is it a good idea to discuss with a journalist how you're thinking of hittiing some rich dude up for money but you're worried he'll be too much of a pussy to support you?
What are the Koch Bros, chopped liver donors?
I hope for Mr. Crane's sake he doesn't hit up for a contribution any of the bamboozled billionaires who put $130,000,000 on Jeb Bush. It would be dispiriting to see the head honcho of the Cato Institute running down the street chased by an angry plutocrat waving 5 iron.
Bamboozled Billionaire Buffoons Bought Bush
Big money got a mighty voice
Big money make no sound
Big money pull a million strings
Big money hold the prize
Big money weave a mighty web
Big money draw the flies
It goes round & round too, I've heard, on a tumble of the dice.
l'd love to have a tomato magnet: think how easy it would be to make salsa.
I, on the other hand, am gonna stay the fuck away from Chris Rufer.
You missed a chance to include "Johnson" and "tomato" in the same joke.
So did you 🙂
What do you take me for, some boor who posts dirty jokes on the Internet?
Don't you see what's happening here, people? Why would a tomato magnate donate to a libertarian candidate?
What does he want to get legalized?
If only libertarians can be more like establishment republicans with a little lefty SJW thrown in for charm, we'll know the libertarian moment has finally arrived.
"can be more like establishment republicans with a little lefty SJW thrown in for charm socially liberal and fiscally conservative."
FTFY
God dammit. You meant socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Strike tag fucked up.
At this point, fiscally conservative means you want to conserve the fiscal policies we have, which is not attractive to me.
I'm glad that at least one party this cycle is offering a non-Republican candidate who is talking serious proposals to limit the government. Thank you GOP for choosing Donald J Trump as your nominee. #NeverJohnson
#NeverJohnson? The Hillary campaign is that way...
...is the kind of joke a more than unusually immature 13 year old would make.
Wut.
The whole Donald J. Trump platform boils down to: "Give me power and I'll make all those bad things go away."
The only thing I hope Trump makes go away, for 20 to life preferably, is HRC.
Does... Does he throw her into a woodchipper, or tie cinderblocks to her feet and toss her in a river?
Don't care. I have become unreasonable (drink) in my hatred of HRC. Cement shoes and no legal process to ensure her rights is fine by me.
I would vote for Bernie Sanders if he promised that his DOJ would indict Hillary.
HRC is going to be our next president, if we're lucky.
If we're lucky it's DJT and the dissolution of any small government potential for at least a generation. Not that it's done too well recently.
If we're UNlucky.....
You were right the first time.
If we're lucky both HRC and the Trump will co-president the hell out of this country?
Ignore the idiot.
Lighten up, Frances
Fuck off, troll.
Repurposing his PurplePAC
Jeez, these euphemisms nowadays
Our news media has lied to us and run interference for President Obama for the past eight years -including virtually burying the Fast and Furious Scandal, the White House misuse of the IRS, and the politicization of the Justice Department. The media trashed every journalistic principle to protect Obama because they agreed with him, because he was the First Black President, because they had fallen in love with him and didn't want to admit what a terrible mistake they'd made.
They threw away their integrity. They betrayed their responsibilities. They sold their souls - and now the Devil has come to collect his due and his name is Donald Trump.
PJMedia link
Sorry, should be in quotes, not my words
I didn't recognize him without the beard, but I guess writing a book called "The Art of the Deal" should have been a giveaway.
OT: A woman clad in a burka attacked a Georgia homeowner with an American flag
Ibrahim--whose eyes were only visible--walked up to [Arno's] mailbox and "pulled the flag out of it." Armed with the flag--which was attached to a four-foot long PVC pipe--Ibrahim then advanced on Arno "in a threatening manner swinging the post and flag at her, hitting her with it," according to a Lawrenceville Police Department report. As Arno's two children sought to help their mother, Ibrahim "was able to get one of her shoes off" and struck Arno's teenage daughter in the head. ... Arno expressed frustration that Ibrahim is not facing a hate crime charge.
"Hate crime"?! Are you LGBT*? Black?
Voting for the LP at this point is like voting for Hillilary, Bernie, or Trump.
Now I get to vote for six Democratic Party,Authoritarian, Statheist's.
Oh Joy !!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVM1nUmDHHc
Johnson is doing this to save the GOP's principles.
He's a fucking ballsy genius imo.
Please please tell me that this typo, Wall Stret Journal , was not in the email sent out to potential donors.