Libertarian Party History: 2004, the Year The Guy No One Thought Would Win The Presidential Nomination Won
Historical analogies can be difficult, but we do know that Libertarian Party delegates can do unpredictable things.
The media has been treating former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson as a near sure thing to win the Libertarian Party presidential nomination for months now. He is the only one running with major real world political experience, and in 2012 he won the Party their biggest vote total ever at 1.27 million.

Since Johnson announced that he wants former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld as his running mate, outsiders might reasonably assume that such a comparatively powerhouse team for a third party would not be passed by.
Johnson himself is generally scrupulously careful to point out that it is not a sure thing, and that he must win the votes of a majority of the 1,000 or so delegates likely to be in Orlando Memorial Day weekend for the Libertarian Party National Convention.
Politeness toward the prerogatives of the delegates is likely part of that, but if Johnson knows his L.P. history he knows he does face a real risk.
Candidates can come in to a Libertarian Party national convention with pretty much no one, including them, thinking they had much of a chance, and walk out a winner.
It happened in 2004, when Michael Badnarik won his majority on a third ballot, beating the only two people thought serious contenders, former rock n' roll promoter and film producer Aaron Russo and radio talk show host Gary Nolan.
I wrote about that story at length as it happened in a Reason article called "The Libertarian Party Stays the Course."
Excerpts:
The delegates voted for the man who was the most like them, who presented in the most professional way the modal opinions and views and style of a Libertarian Party activist—quiet, intense, no deviation from the catechism, more concerned with eternal ideological and philosophical verities than the political events of the day…
[Michael] Badnarik, who had been driving around the country visiting libertarians locally in a '99 Kia Sophia with the help of dedicated sidekick Jon Airheart, a former University of Texas student impressed with Badnarik's ability to sell the libertarian message retail, was thought of as a distant third at best. At times, as both Badnarik and Airheart told me, they'd find themselves with less than 10 bucks cash in the campaign kitty as they sold Badnarik's lectures and book and kept sending out e-newsletters asking fans in cyberspace for funds just so they could gas up and drive to the next town, the next state convention, the next campus lecture.
As of the beginning of April, his campaign—which he began on President's Day 2003—had collected around $33 thousand, compared to Nolan's $99 thousand as of the beginning of May….Badnarik himself was too tapped out even to afford a room at the upscale convention hotel, driving in instead from a Days Inn across town….
Now the LP has as its candidate a great Cinderella story—a man who quite literally was not expecting or prepared to win. He was out of money, had no campaign staff besides the loyal Airheart, and could afford so few signs that between the second and third ballots newly minted Badnarik lovers had to use bumper stickers to convert now-useless Nolan signs into custom-made Badnarik signs. A day later, he's candidate for president of the United States…
Those wondering what can or might happen this year might want to read and think about the whole story.
The analogies between 2004 and 2016 can't be exact; 2004 did not see any former Republican state official or even returning L.P. candidate in the mix, and Gary Johnson is both of those; and first-round and second-round winner (without the majority he needed to cinch the actual nomination) Aaron Russo had elements, in this year's terms, of both John McAfee (brash and brassy say-anything alpha dude with independent notoriety) and Johnson (the closest thing in that mix to real political experience, having won 26 percent in a GOP Nevada gubernatorial four-way primary).
Who might this year's Gary Nolan (somewhat prominent radio talk show host) be? Or this year's Michael Badnarik, the quiet, serious, slightly on the edge-of-respectability movement libertarian lecturer, and eventual victor?
Perhaps there are no meaningful analogies to be made. But it does go to show that Libertarian Party delegates can be unpredictable and there are no sure things until they vote.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I recall actual LP people commenting on Michael Badnarik being a little out-there politically.
Angry Berks.
Wait, you only have two "r"s in "Warren," what's going on?
Shhhhhh, it's all right. Just close your eyes and relax. Everything is fine. Sleep now.
I saw that movie, it was a crazy allegory on the European Refugee crisis. Totally didn't know it was going to happen. Not that awesome of a movie, but the political symbolism was fantastic.
I viewed it as xenophobic apologist tripe. It was mexicans... the pigs were mexicans. And they were destroying the youth of america. It was disgusting, and the movie was awful.
The worst thing I've ever done as a parent was take my kids to see that movie.
Was Michael Badnarick related to Chuck Bednarik?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/22/.....index.html
So enforcing the laws that are currently on the books = The 1938 pogrom against European Jewry occurred when anti-semitic mobs burned synagogues, destroyed Jewish-owned stores and killed scores of Jews,
How did Tony get to be the mouthpiece for Libertarians?
/facepalm
Didn't you hear? Open borders and the importation/subsidization of millions of 3rd worlders is the epitome of all things Libertarian.
If you disagree, well, fuck you. Nazi.
Always fighting for little guy, eh Tony? Tell me again how the draft and protectionism help the peons.
Sorry. Meant Troy not Tony.
Never apologize. It's a sign of weakness.
Can't believe it, but I Tony deserved an apology for that.
Never say never. It's a sign of weakness.
Never say weakness, it's a sign of weakness...damn!
Um, by that logic shouldn't we also insist that all drug laws are strictly enforced?
If you didn't know the context, you'd might say this was from a drug raid.
I am pretty sure that is from the raid on The Black Sky. Little did he know that his death would spawn the annoying creation of an unlimited amount of ninjas.
If every law on the books was strictly enforced, "pogrom" would be the mildest of epithets hurled at the government.
Can somone explain this to me...Not having the ability to buy something means you are a slave.
Do you know who else was a slave?
Don't know haha. Just asking. My sister told me that. I don't get the logic. She thinks if we have to pay for absolutly everything we are not actually free.
Britney Spears?
God you guys must be all drunk. 😛 Stupid libertarians. Hahaha Im jk
Damn, I bought a Bluetooth speaker today and probably just woke up the whole hotel.
It looks like someone burned her eyes out of the socket with a hot poker.
What about Ke$ha???
Channing Tatum works as well.
Haha. Fuck you and your videos old mam.
You're a slave to Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.
I expect Johnson to win the presidential nomination, but I wouldn't be surprised if Weld lost the VP contest.
What?? The?? Fuck?? Are?? You?? Talking?? About?? Boom sauce.
Everything I said or will say has been redacted. Thank you for your support.
If any actual Libertarian Party delegates are reading these comments my opinions, FWIW, about the top 3 are:
1. Gary Johnson: sellout squish is putting it mildly. I understand why he was nominated in 2012 (I wish the LP hadn't) but he has only gotten much worse. If GayJay is your nominee I'll cast my vote for Trump in protest. Hell, Trump is more libertarian too.
2. Austin Petersen: I like him. I could vote for him if I decide to vote.
3. John McAfee: If nominated I'd support him enthusiastically and definitely contribute and vote for him. He'd be your best nominee since 1988.
Fuck the Fair Tax. That is a bad and losing issue. Do you want an overreaching federal bureaucracy (is there any other kind) monitoring every transaction and enforcing compliance? You're asking for a socially engineered VAT and a "cashless society" .
Trump is more libertarian? Seriously? On what issue?
Trump ia yuggggee man. You must vote for him..
Foreign policy and drug legalization?
Trump isn't more libertarian or libertarian period on either foreign policy or drug legalization.
Look, I understand that Gary's been going off the reservation a bit. But you're just flailing in blind hatred with dumb accusations like "less libertarian than Trump."
Trump is more libertarian than Johnson on exactly one issue that I can think of, the incredibly narrow issue of "should government force cake baking?"
Freedom of association is an "incredibly narrow" issue?
Presented without comment: Muslim Cleric denies making fatwa against Mickey Mouse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkAepzH8NE0
And if you're having trouble sleeping, try listening to this lefty windbag:
https://youtu.be/nTuBCt5F68Y?t=15m30s
The most amazing thing about the Libertarian Party Convention in Orlando is how they are closing both Disney and Universal that same weekend, over concerns from minorities and LGBT representatives who were offended at the possibility that Libertarians might try to come to the theme parks.
Badnarik is how I first learned about allodial titles.
I gave GJ money, but I gave Badnarik my (only ever) ballot.
I was no longer involved in LP by 2004, but AFAIcouldT then, Badnarik was nominated out of spite. The Russo & Nolan backers had such animosity toward each other, Badnarik was a kind of I'll-show-you negative compromise. He wasn't well known enough in the race up until the to have developed much in the way of negatives.
Badnarik gave a great speech at the convention. Too bad the LP apparatchiks asked him to done it down and spout LP catechisms in the general election.