Ban on THC-Infused Gummy Bears Advances in Colorado
The bill also covers candy shaped like fruit or people but not moons, stars, hearts, or marijuana leaves.

A bill that received initial approval from the Colorado House of Representatives on Friday would ban marijuana edibles in the shape of fruits, animals, or people. This is the latest attempt by Colorado legislators to prevent accidental ingestion of cannabis by children who mistake THC-infused foods for ordinary treats. Like the other measures, it probably will not have much of an impact on the problem it is supposed to address.
Marijuana edibles are aleady clearly labeled as such, and a rule that takes effect on October 1 requires that all packages bear a universal symbol: an exclamation point above the letters THC inside a diamond. Other rules require that edibles be sold in child-resistant containers. But what happens if a child comes across an edible after it's removed from the package? A 2014 law requires that edibles have a distinctive appearance outside the package "when practicable." But implementing that rule for the wide range of edibles, which include liquids, soft candies, granola, and other items that are difficult or impossible to mark, proved impracticable. In 2014 the state Department of Public Health and Environment floated the idea of banning all edibles except for tictures, lozenges, and hard candies but quickly withdrew the recommendation after strong objections from the industry.

The latest proposal is aimed mainly at THC-infused gummy bears and fruits, which are popular with adults but have raised concerns because outside the package they look exactly like the conventional versions. Since the bill, H.B. 1436, applies only to edibles shaped like fruits, animals, or people, gummy candies that look like marijuana leaves, geometric shapes, moons, stars, hearts, etc., would still be allowed. The practical impact is therefore likely to be minimal. This bill is more about eliminating products that make legislators uncomfortable than it is about preventing accidental ingestion.
Marijuana-related calls to the Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center (RMPDC) more than doubled after legalization, from 109 in 2012 to 227 in 2015. Last year 49 of the marijuana calls—about a fifth of the total—involved children 8 or younger.
Marijuana still accounts for a tiny fraction of the 50,000 or so calls the RMPDC receives each year. Although the RMPDC does not report outcomes, data from the Washington Poison Center suggest they are rarely serious. Children's Hospital in Aurora (a Denver suburb) counted 19 admissions of children who had ingested marijuana from 2009 through 2014, or an average of about three a year.
The most straightforward solution to this problem, of course, is to make sure that marijuana edibles are kept away from children. If that does not happen, the fact that gummy candies are shaped like stars instead of bears is not going to make much of a difference.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The problem is that individual gummy bears sometimes have 100 mg of THC. That would be a disaster if eaten all at once. The limit needs to be an amount that would not send a kid to the emergency room, maybe 7 mg. Healthy buzz, no freak out.
Why do you hate SugarFree (aside from all the good reasons)? Requiring that low a dosage would put him in hyperglycemic shock before he got his buzz on.
Maureen Dowd, is that you?
Serious question: Can you elaborate on why a kid in such a situation needs to go to the ER? Doesn't THC have extremely low toxicity? I'm just not sure what could be done other than a stomach pumping (if you catch it early enough) and/or sedation to keep the kid from freaking out.
It's not life or health threatening, but the kid will likely be very disoriented and afraid. The parents may not know exactly why the kid is acting weird, so they take the kid to the ER.
The parents may not know exactly why the kid is acting weird
You've already established that these hypothetical parents are morons, there's no need to reinforce the point. Although I'm sure CPS will teach them their lesson after the kids are diagnosed in the ER and taken away from them at gunpoint.
I know when I'm disoriented and afraid, I want to be in a sterile, new environment surrounded by strangers.
+1
They could switch the Muzak to the Brand New Heavies.
See you in hell, candy boys!
You eediots.
Oh wow, hash gummies, I want some.
http://www.Complete-Privacy.tk
Silly anonbot, hash gummies are for KIDS!
A 2014 law requires that edibles have a distinctive appearance outside the package "when practicable."
Obviously the solution is to color all edibles fluorescent yellow.
This is all so the cops can ID the the edibles.
But what happens if a child comes across an edible after it's removed from the package?
The kid shoots it with the loaded gun she found?
Then chases it with some bleach.
This story gives me an idea.
Deer antlers with cristmas lights won't help anything.
Well, fuck.
People 100 years from now will regard this law the way we regard laws against monkeys performing in public on Sundays.
Total and complete ban?
My experience with edibles has been underwhelming.
Always after me Lucky Charms!
That photo does not depict Gummy Bears, but rather Sour Patch Kids
(at least the thing on the left- the thing on the right looks like some half-half offspring of the 2)
neither have the clear-gelatin appearance of the genuine article
Why not just make the candies marijuana leaf shaped or naughty-bits...adult themes. What need is there to make cutesie candies that attract children.