Apple Finds It Has Many Friends in Encryption Fight Against FBI
Big names in tech file briefs in support.


Twitter, Reddit, AirBnB, eBay, Google, AT&T, Facebook, Kickstarter, LinkedIn, Yahoo, Amazon, Microsoft, Mozilla, Cisco Systems, Snapchat, Pinterest, and others: It's a veritable checklist of every single major tech company, social media, and online service that works directly with consumers. And they're all taking Apple's side in the company's attempt to resist a judge's order that it help the FBI hack into an iPhone.
Last week Apple filed its motion to convince a judge to vacate an order that the tech company code a tool that would weaken the security of San Bernardino Terrorist Syed Farook's work phone so that the FBI could attempt to "brute force" its security code to gain access. Now the amicus briefs are rolling in to support Apple. and they're significant. Via the Christian Science Monitor:
Many of the briefs say that a ruling against Apple could set a precedent that would open the door to the FBI asking for technical assistance to unlock more iPhones seized in criminal cases. Others argued that a US government victory in the case could impact human rights, free speech, and the public's willingness to download software updates.
What's more, Salihin Kondoker, a San Bernardino resident whose wife was injured in the shooting, and David Kaye, the free speech rapporteur for the United Nations, sent letters urging Judge [Sheri] Pym not to force Apple to create software that would help the FBI access data on Syed Rizwan Farook's iPhone. Mr. Farook, along with his wife Tashfeen Malik, carried out the December terrorist attack in California that left 14 people dead. Police shot and killed the couple after the attacks.
Apple has listed all the briefs in support of the company here. Families of some victims have called on the judge to enforce the order on the basis that there might be something on the phone that could help prevent another terrorist attack. Law enforcement agencies also (of course) have filed to encourage the judge to enforce the order, pushing the argument that it would only affect this one phone and that it's not an actual encryption "back door."
Given that all the big-hitters in the tech industry seem to disagree, it will be interesting to see what the judge ultimately decides. Officials have already lost one case in New York, and even legislators are skeptical of the FBI's position.
Want to know why you should care about the government mandating that private companies weaken encryption? Read here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
http://fortune.com/2016/03/04/.....ncryption/
Right-leaning members of France's lower house of parliament, the National Assembly, were able to amend the penal reform bill to include a law that would fine smartphone makers up to $385,000 and imprison their executives for as many as five years, if they don't provide access to data in connection with terrorism investigations. The full bill, which includes several other components, including sentencing guidelines for terrorists, will be voted on by the National Assembly on March 8. If passed, it would then need to pass the Senate and signed into law by French President Francois Hollande.
And then Apple stops selling phones and tablets in France.
It should turn over all the data it can get. Sorted bitwise.
That would compress awfully well?
France has seriously gone full retard since the shooting, haven't they?
Hollande is channelling his inner P?tain.
Do you have a link to where the Pay Up, PB thing started? I've tried to find it no luck. I'm on intermittently so I missed it, but very curious. Thanks.
Here's the bet: http://reason.com/blog/2016/01.....nt_5801307
Pl?ya Manhattan informs Palin's Buttplug that he lost: http://reason.com/blog/2016/02.....nt_5871880
Palin's Buttplug said he couldn't find a link to donate, so I checked and saw there was on one the grey bar above and decided that I would tell him about it, LMGTFY style. PB disappeared off the face of the earth for a while, so I changed my handle and put the link to the donation page for the URL and decided to use it until I got verification that he has paid up.
Don't play innocent with us.
There's a lot to be said about open-source encryption as these things develop.
If the security of your data relies on an executive sitting in a fourth floor corner office and/or an amendment passed in a lower house of parliament, then you're not secure.
And then Apple stops selling phones and tablets in France.
Oh, so it would rise to the level of an RFRA-issue then.
Pinterest? I was on the side of Apple, but now I am not so sure...
Pinterest is a confusing concept to me. ... It's like some kind of massive cork board that you tack bullshit onto, for ???reasons?
StumbleUpon or GTFO.
It's where people with no creative impulses go to signal to other people with no creative impulses how creative they would be if they had creative impulses.
Genius! Best description of Pinterest I've ever seen.
It always struck me as a place where people virtually glue-gun lace to stuff.
You said gun. This is not a safe space.