The Rise, Fall, and Rise Again of Solitary Confinement

Life inside the Supermax archipelago


To read Reason's special issue on mass incarceration, click the pic.

Jean Casella and James Ridgeway have published an interesting history of solitary confinement at Longreads (*). Established in late-18th-century America by jailers who saw it as "a kinder and more effective alternative to more viscerally cruel punishments," solitary grew increasingly popular in the antebellum reform era of the mid 19th century. But the practice attracted harsh criticism as its psychological effects became clear, and by the 20th century it was far less common. Its comeback began with the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois, which opened in 1963, developed a "Long-Term Control Unit" where prisoners were held in isolation, and in 1983 became the country's first "supermax" prison, where solitary confinement is the norm.

As mass incarceration took off, so did the Marion approach to punishment. "Throughout the 1980s and 1990s," Casella and Ridgeway write, "the idea of units or whole prisons designed for 'total control' rapidly gained traction." Soon, most the country's prisons and jails had

developed a solitary confinement unit of some kind. In the five-year period from 1995 to 2000 alone, the number of individuals held in solitary increased by 40 percent, and by 2005—the most recent year for which figures are available—a U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics census of state and federal prisoners found more than 81,622 people held in "restricted housing." The census figures do not include individuals in solitary confinement in juvenile facilities, immigrant detention centers, or local jails; if they did, the numbers would certainly be higher, likely exceeding one hundred thousand….

Far from a measure of last resort reserved for the "worst of the worst," as many proponents claim, solitary confinement has become a control strategy of first resort in most prisons and jails. Today, incarcerated people can be placed in complete isolation for months or years not only for violent acts but for possessing contraband—including excess quantities of pencils or postage stamps—testing positive for drug use, or using profanity. In New York, about 85 percent of the thirteen thousand terms in disciplinary segregation handed down each year are for nonviolent misbehavior. The system is arbitrary, largely unmonitored, and ripe for abuse; individuals have been sent to solitary for filing complaints about their treatment or for reporting rape or brutality by guards.

Sometimes solitary confinement represents a sort of institutionalized paranoia:

About half of the people held in California SHUs ["Secure Housing Units"] may have committed no offense at all; instead, they are held in solitary because of the gang "validation" process, in which anyone deemed an active gang member is sent to an initial six-year term in the SHU, which can be extended to decades. Gang validation can take place based in large part on anonymous accusations. Commonly, these anonymous charges come from validated individuals in the SHU, for whom the only hope for early release has been summarized as "parole, snitch, or die." People have also been suspected of gang membership simply by possessing the book The Art of War or making reference to prison activist George Jackson.

Read the whole thing here.

(* The website describes the article as both a "longread" and a "brief history," but I don't think you should blame the authors for that.)

NEXT: You've Got to Fight! For Your Right! To Green Bean Casserole!

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. So, if you all absolutely insist that somehow a prison paid for by taxation is somehow either not a violation of NAP or it’s a “necessary” violation of NAP, and that the death penalty is somehow wrong, then what do you do with some strong man bent on murder other than solitary confinement?

    Now, of course, true justice is repayment to the victim of what was taken, with interest for the inconvenience of it all. So, a dollar for a dollar, an eye for an eye, a life for a life. Under true justice, the murderer would be convicted and owe their life to the victim’s family. Then, as it is their debt to do with as they like, the victim’s family can either take full repayment (so the murderer dies) or partial repayment (money, work, whatever) or they can “forgive” the debt entirely.

    For those of you whining about how that would let a bunch of murderers loose, it very well may, though most families would likely require massive compensation for their loss. Either way, it would be much more than our system where you get 3 hots and a cot for 20 years on the victim’s family’s dime and then released.

    Again, it’s not my debt. I don’t have a say as to whether or not it’s paid. That’s up to the victim’s family.

    Look at that, actual justice and no violations of NAP necessary…

  2. Its comeback began with the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois, which opened in 1963, developed a “Long-Term Control Unit”

    Gotta love these catchy euphemisms governments come up with. “Lon-Term Control Unit,” “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques,” “Enhanced Security Screening,” “Kinetic Military Action”…

    Here’s a hint: if you find yourself having to come up with some kind of weaselly descriptor for the awful shit your doing in order to make it sound nicer, then maybe you shouldn’t be the awful shit in the first place. Just a thought.

  3. The technology is so developed that we can watch videos, live streaming, TV serials and any of our missed programs within our mobiles and PCs. Showbox
    All we need is a mobile or PC with a very good internet connection. There are many applications by which we can enjoy videos, our missed programs, live streaming etc.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.