Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Supreme Court

Rappers Killer Mike and T.I. Urge SCOTUS to Protect 1st Amendment Rights of Suspended High School Rapper

A high school senior was suspended for recording a rap song.

Damon Root | 12.22.2015 10:11 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Credit: C-SPAN

On December 1, 2014, the audience attending oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court got to enjoy a rare treat. Chief Justice John Roberts began reciting lyrics from the rap star Eminem. "Da-da make a nice bed for mommy at the bottom of the lake," Roberts said, quoting from the song "97' Bonnie & Clyde." "There goes mommy splashing in the water, no more fighting with dad."

Roberts' unusual performance came about in response to the case of Elonis v. United States. At issue was the prison sentence handed down to a self-described "aspiring rapper" who posted multiple violent revenge fantasies on Facebook, including accounts of him murdering his estranged wife and murdering his co-workers. In addition to those original compositions, Anthony Elonis also posted the Eminem lyrics later recited by the chief justice. In the end, the Supreme Court threw out Elonis' conviction.

Thankfully, it now appears as if the chief justice might get another opportunity to show off his rap skills. Yesterday a group of well-known rap artists, including Killer Mike, T.I., and Big Boi, joined an amicus brief urging the justices to hear the case of Taylor Bell v. Itawamba County School Board, an important First Amendment case out of Mississippi with rap music at its center. "The Government punished a young man for his art," the brief states, "and, more disturbing, for the musical genre by which he chose to express himself."

In 2011 Bell, then a high school senior, was suspended for "harassment, intimidation, or threatening other students and/or teachers" after he posted a rap song to Facebook and YouTube. The song irked school officials because it discussed the sexual misconduct charges leveled against two coaches by some of Bell's classmates.

To be sure, Bell's song does feature plenty of violent imagery and profane language—all standard stuff for this genre of music. And yes, some school officials got offended by the lyrical content. But so what? Bell wrote the song, recorded the song, and posted the song on his own time, entirely outside of school grounds. What's more, Bell never actually threatens anybody in the song, a fact that the school itself quietly conceded by never bothering to call the cops to investigate him. In effect, Taylor Bell was punished for exercising his First Amendment rights outside of school.

The Supreme Court should listen to Killer Mike and take the case.

Related: "Gov't Tried to Shut Down Rap in Straight Outta Compton, and They're Still Doing It"

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A.M. Links: Hillary vs. Trump, Half of Georgians Killed by Police Were Either Unarmed or Shot in Back, Number of Migrants Entering Europe Exceeds 1 Million

Damon Root is a senior editor at Reason and the author of A Glorious Liberty: Frederick Douglass and the Fight for an Antislavery Constitution (Potomac Books). His next book, Emancipation War: The Fall of Slavery and the Coming of the Thirteenth Amendment (Potomac Books), will be published in June 2026.

Supreme CourtMusicFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (3)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rt. Hon. Judge Woodrow Chipper   10 years ago

    since when do minors have rights?

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    It's been a while since Texas Instruments has been relevant.

  3. Quixote   10 years ago

    Please, Mr. Root, let's not be silly. Posting coarsely provocative trigger-speech under the shield of "rap lyrics" is no more permissible than engaging in inappropriately deadpan mockery under the pretext of "academic parody." Given the illegality of doing that when one isn't even a student, it's hard to see how disciplining (which, after all, is a way of educating) an actual student under these circumstances could possibly violate the so-called "First Amendment." See the documentation of America's leading criminal "satire" case at:

    http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

    The Supreme Court didn't grant cert in that case, for very clear reasons, and they shouldn't grant it in this case either. Or should micro-aggression be legalized too? Please let's get with the times and move on with changing mores in this great nation of ours, instead of posting complaints that sound almost like propaganda for the "freedom to engage in criminally offensive speech" movement.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Seattle's Delivery Minimum Wage Failed Drivers and Raised Costs

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 12.20.2025 7:00 AM

Jake Tapper on Terrorism, Executive Power, and Venezuelan Boat Bombings

Nick Gillespie | From the January 2026 issue

Was There a Woke War on White Millennial Men?

Robby Soave | 12.19.2025 4:10 PM

Jimmy Lai Is a Martyr for Freedom

Billy Binion | 12.19.2025 3:54 PM

Trump's Designation of Fentanyl As a 'Weapon of Mass Destruction' Is a Drug-Fueled Delusion

Jacob Sullum | 12.19.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks