Police Mag Calls Marilyn Mosby 'The Wolf That Lurks'
No love for the prosecutor in the Freddie Gray case
How do police unions feel about Marilyn Mosby, the prosecutor who charged six Baltimore cops in the death of Freddie Gray? Well, here's the current edition of the New York City Sergeants Benevolent Association's Frontline magazine:

The author of the cover story is Sergeants Benevolent Association chief Ed Mullins, a man who once called a cutback in marijuana arrests "the beginning of the breakdown of a civilized society." Here's a sample of his Mosby piece:
Mosby insisted that she was a lifelong supporter of law enforcement, proudly boasting that she came from five generations of police officers and saying that "law enforcement is pretty much instilled within my being."
What she did not say was that her mother, a former Boston police officer, violated the department's drug abuse policy in 2006 and spent 45 days in rehab. When she again violated the policy, she was allowed to resign rather than be fired in February 2008.
And there is more!
Her father, also a police officer, was fired from the same department in 1991 amid accusations that he and his partner were robbing drug dealers at gunpoint. And her uncle was canned from the Boston PD in 2001 after testing positive for cocaine.
What family legacy was she upholding?
What does it take for the head of a police union to criticize a cop? Well, if the officer has a kid who wants to put other cops in jail…
To read the whole issue—including an item where Mullins praises Joe Biden for "getting it"—go here.
[Via Justin Fenton.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Police organizations often use the term 'benevolent' in their names. Do they even know what that means?
It's Latin for FYTW.
They should put that on the side of their cars. It's more honest and accurate than 'To Serve and Protect.'
They confused it with malevolent.
That makes more sense. They should just change trade their uniforms for Imperial Stormtrooper armor and end the charade. From what I've seen they have similar shooting accuracy.
They're very benevolent... to themselves. Anyone else, not so much.
Unfortunately, that's true. Did you hear about those police recruits who where marked down when they said they wouldn't give special treatment to other cops or family members if they pulled them over? They don't even pretend to have integrity.
It's honesty, which is a kind of integrity.
That's actually the point. The association is benevolent to the police. That's literally what it means.
Not any more than the bomb thrower Left knows what "non-violent" means.
More importantly: Would Crusty Juggler?
She's a prosecutor, so I'm not sticking up for her. Whatever one thinks of the indictment itself, her conduct has not inspired confidence that justice will be had.
^^this
If they'd title it "Attention Whore", I'd fully approve.
Fuck tha police anyway, BTW.
Yes but I'm enjoying seeing the kings men getting the commoner's treatment.
They actually named the cop magazine Frontline? Damn. Just damn.
'Stormfront' was already taken :sadface:
The family does seem to have an interesting history.
Class act Ed Mullins must be aware that the prosecutor in any other circumstance would totally have his back and that the only reason she didn't this time was because of the overwhelming evidence against them?
Way to burn your bridges, class act Ed Mullins.
Maybe this will lead to a more hostile relationship between the po-po's and the prosecutor's office in the future.
We can only hope
Only when race riots are afoot.
Mullins is in NY saying "Whose your daddy!"
Mosby is is Boston.
"Her father, also a police officer, was fired from the same department in 1991 amid accusations that he and his partner were robbing drug dealers at gunpoint. And her uncle was canned from the Boston PD in 2001 after testing positive for cocaine."
Good thing we have Ed Mullins to keep people like this from being fired nowadays.
robbing drug dealers at gunpoint
I'm confused. Isn't that what police are supposed to do?
No, it's more of a perk.
Too subtle? It's what drug enforcement units do all day as part of their official duties.
I think the problem is that they weren't giving the state their cut.
No no no, the cops are supposed to kidnap the drug dealers at gunpoint, then other people come in and loot their property later while the dealers are in a cage. We call it civilization.
Oh, right. Order of operations is so important.
Drug dealers are too dangerous and might be armed. Better to go after regular people and steal their cash and property without ever charging them with a crime. Now, that's civilized.
You're all wrong. This behavior is hardly restricted to drug dealers.
So confusing... if I understand correctly: She's a bad person and should be shunned because her dad was the kind of bad cop that she dares to prosecute?!?!
Alternately, I assume Mullins is implying that if her dad had been a good, reputable cop then she would know better than to prosecute bad cops?
Scum of the Earth.
Apply as needed.
I shouldn't be surprised. But I am a little bit.
What do you want to bet that the local police benevolent society in Boston helped keep her crooked cop parents out of jail?
That's sort of what I was trying to say.
This asshole has no idea that he's part of the problem.
Cops deserve the benefit of doubt and the presumption of innocence that's routinely denied to us non-cops. It's only fair.
The Wolf is Loose
So, is all that information he just put out public record? I would think an officer failing a drug test, and ending up in rehab would be considered private medical information.
That's a very good point. Authoritarian assholes love a good leak on their "enemies".
"The Wolf That Lurks"
Bad mystery novel?
No, a serial killer novel.
I thought maybe Duran Duran were releasing their comeback album.
This is actually WORSE than that - hard to comprehend, I know.
Mom took us kids to a Duran Duran concert for God knows why. I don't think she was really into it, and we really weren't. I was a high school freshman or sophomore and plumb tired after school, the show was late in the evening, and I ended up wedged between two rows of seats napping through half the show.
And they didn't arrest your mom for child abuse??!!!
The humanity....
I may be giving the police too much credit for cleverness, but given how popular the sheep/sheepdog/wolf metaphor is among police types, it could be interpretted as a really subtle threat.
The wolf* that lurks.
* A bullet-riddled Golden Retriever
The Wolf that Lurks = cops being held accountable to the same laws they claim to enforce.
Got it. Thanks for the clarification, Chief.
He's the hunter, which means he fucks young children I think.
I suspect he fancies himself to be the woodsman, the prosecutor is the wolf, and the poor innocent HEROES being charged with murder are red riding hood. Basically, he's a douchebag.
Who's grandma then?
Us taxpayers. Because no matter how this turns out, we're the ones who will be forced to pay for it.