DOJ Announces 'New Policy' of Acknowledging Fourth Amendment
Will require agents get warrants for devices that track mobile phone locations.

The feds and law enforcement agencies across the country have been using devices called StingRays to track down mobile phone users. More importantly, not only have they not gotten warrants for their use, they've been concealing this information from the courts (and obviously therefore from defendants and their counsel).
In May, the Department of Justice announced it was mulling over some possible changes to make StingRay use more transparent. They've finally pulled the trigger this week. Federal agents will have to obtain a search warrant (and therefore make its use a matter of public record) in order to use StingRays to track location data. From Wired:
Civil liberties groups have long asserted that stingrays are too invasive because they can sweep up data about every phone in their vicinity, not just targeted phones, and can interfere with their calls.
Justice Department and local law enforcement agencies have refused to confirm that the devices can interrupt cell service for anyone in their vicinity. But earlier this year, this issue was confirmed in a warrant application requesting approval to use a stingray, in which FBI Special Agent Michael A. Scimeca disclosed the disruptive capability of the devices to a judge. …
The new Justice Department policy around the use of stingrays allows for exigent circumstances or exceptional circumstances, whereby law enforcement agents can use the devices without a search warrant in emergency situations when obtaining a warrant is not practical. But the DoJ will be required to track and report the number of times the technology is deployed under these exceptions.
The new policy states that these devices also may not be used to collect the contents of any communications or any data saved on smartphones and requires the deletion of any extraneous data gathered by the devices daily.
While this new policy covers only federal law enforcement, it's also been established that the FBI was partly responsible for pushing municipal law enforcement agencies to keep use of StingRay devices a secret, complete with non-disclosure agreements. Will those go away now, too?
Below, ReasonTV on the secretive use of StingRay surveillance by law enforcement:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The good news about this: If your lawyer knows to ask about the Sting Ray, the charges will get dropped immediately.
given only 9 states require a warrant, I am sure the local police will be more than willing to help the DoJ skirt the rule.
http://reason.com/archives/201.....e-tracking
and I am sure they have a plan for the other 9 states.
While this new policy covers only federal law enforcement, it's also been established that the FBI was partly responsible for pushing municipal law enforcement agencies to keep use of StingRay devices a secret, complete with non-disclosure agreements. Will those go away now, too?
No.
Any other questions?
I would guess feds will continue now to use local law enforcement as surrogates to get past this new policy.
They don't have to. They merely follow the secret policy which allows Stingray use, regardless of publicly-stated policy.
No word from "Jar Jar" Johnson as to whether his DHS agents will adopt this new regime.
So the federal clowns have taken the oath, if you believe them, this citizen doesn't.That being said, what's with the rest of the law enforcement mob, the state and local types, who do not seem to be effected by this 'New Policy' of Acknowledging Fourth Amendment. Indeed, what of the "local" that is non federal mobs.
In the perhaps jaundiced view of this citizen,neither the word of The Feds, that includes any and all thereof, nor the sacred word, same not having been voiced so far as I can see of locals, being worth the matches needed to set them alight.
I would guess feds will continue now to use local law enforcement as surrogates to get past this new policy.
Yes.