Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

[Updated at 2:35 P.M.] WDBJ7 Killer Wanted Revenge for Charleston Massacre, Idolized Columbine Killers, Claimed Racial Discrimination

Had HR dispute with murdered former colleagues.

Robby Soave | 8.26.2015 2:45 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Fox News
(Fox News)
Fox News

An unidentified man opened fire on a WDBJ7 news crew, killing a TV reporter and a cameraman.

The attack happened during a live broadcast from Moneta in central Virginia, and was caught on tape. To watch a recording of the shooting, follow this link. (Warning: The video is extremely disturbing.)

The victims were 24-year-old reporter Alison Parker and 27-year-old cameraman Adam Ward. Parker lived with her boyfriend, who called her "the most radiant woman I ever met" in a statement on Twitter. Ward was recently engaged.

According to Fox News:

The incident occurred at 6:45 a.m. at Bridgewater Plaza in Moneta, Va., according to Franklin County Sheriff Department spokesperson Phillip Young. Earlier, police had reported there were three victims, according to WSLS.

WSLS said police are still looking for the shooter and hope to have a description out to the public shortly.

The shooting occurred live on television while Parker was conducting an interview outdoors about a planned anniversary celebration at Smith Mountain Lake, with Ward filming. As the camera panned to Parker and her subject, multiple shots rang out and several screams could be heard. As the camera fell to the ground, an blurry image suspected to be of the gunman came into view on the screen.

Here is a screenshot of the alleged shooter, who is still at large.

[Updated at 10:25 a.m.] The killer is thought to be a disgruntled employee of WDBJ7.

The third victim was Vicki Gardner, head of the local Chamber of Commerce, who was being interviewed by Parker at the time of the attack. She was shot in the back and is currently in surgery.

Parker's boyfriend, Chris Hurst, was her evening co-anchor. They had kept their relationship relatively private. Ward's fiancee also worked at the news station, though today was supposed to be her last day. The couple had plans to move away in the near future, according to roanoke.com.

[Updated at 11:35 a.m.] The alleged killer posted a Vine he made shortly before (and during) the shooting. That Vine was posted to the Twitter account of Bryce Williams, a former reporter for WDBJ. He reported under that name, but his real name is Vester Lee Flanagan, according to NBC. He is presumed to be responsible for the murders.

[Updated at 12:15 p.m.] Even though Williams' Twitter account was suspended, it's still possible to view his horrifying video of the murders. It's impossible to overstate how deeply disturbing the video is, so please take that under advisement before you go looking for it. Some news sites, including (warning: very graphic content) The Daily Caller, embedded versions of it in their stories. Proceed at your own risk.

[Updated at 12:20 p.m.] WDBJ7 is now reporting that Williams was injured from a self-inflicted gunshot wound during a confrontation with police, but is not dead. He is in critical condition.

The third victim, Vicki Gardner, is in stable condition.

[Updated at 12:50 p.m.] Jeffrey Marks, general manager of WDBJ, provided some additional details on Williams (real name Vester Lee Flanigan), during a live broadcast. Here's my transcription of his remarks:

Vester was an unhappy man. We employed him as a reporter and he had some talent in that respect… He quickly gathered a reputation as someone who was difficult to work with. He was sort of looking out for people to say things he could take offense to. Eventually after many incidents of his anger coming forward, we dismissed him. He did not take that well. [Police had to be called.] He filed a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission… about members of the staff making racial comments. He was African American. None of them could be corroborated by anyone. We think they were fabricated. We talked to all our employees… we got nothing about that. The EEOC dismissed the claim out of hand.

[Updated at 2:05 p.m.] The shooter succumbed to his self-inflicted injuries and is now dead, according to The Washington Post. Police are scheduled to begin a live press conference at any moment.

[Updated at 2:35 p.m.] Before he died, Vester Lee Flanagan faxed ABC News a copy of his 23-page manifesto in which he cited revenge for the Charleston church massacre as the motivation for his attack:

In the 23-page document faxed to ABC News, the writer says "MY NAME IS BRYCE WILLIAMS" and his legal name is Vester Lee Flanagan II" He writes what triggered today's carnage was his reaction to the racism of the Charleston :

"Why did I do it? I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…"

"What sent me over the top was the church shooting. And my hollow point bullets have the victims' initials on them."

It is unclear whose initials he is referring to. He continues, "As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!" He said Jehovah spoke to him, telling him to act.

Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho, and calls him "his boy," and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. "Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. That's my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount that  and Dylann Klebold got…just sayin'.

In an often rambling letter to the authorities, and family and friends, he writes of a long list of grievances. In one part of the document, Williams calls it a "Suicide Note for Friends and Family".

--He says has suffered racial discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying at work. --He says he has been attacked by black men and white females. --He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man

"Yes, it will sound like I am angry…I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace…."

"The church shooting was the tipping point…but my anger has been building steadily…I've been a human powder keg for a while…just waiting to go BOOM!!!!".

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Jared Fogle's Arbitrary Punishment

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsCrime
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (738)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Let the wild ideological speculations begin!

    1. GR8IPAZ   10 years ago

      Let the exploitation of the incident begin.

      1. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

        Didn't take more than 30 minutes for Terry Mcaullife to jump on that horse.

        1. Chipwooder   10 years ago

          Yep - that's my governor!!!

          Obviously, he's found some hidden way to profit from gun control laws. Terry McAuliffe don't take a dump, son, unless there's graft to be had.

        2. EndTheGOP   10 years ago

          Is everybody happy they elected Obama so he could bring the country together?

          Dumbest president since W Bush.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Homegrown ISIS.

    3. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Over at Huffpo, they're blaming the NRA. They're going completely apeshit.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        Whenever something bad happens, everyone does more of whatever they did before.

        1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          Needz moar harder!

        2. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

          Which means we should be... snarkier?

          1. mad.casual   10 years ago

            Not enough woodchipper!

          2. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

            nice

          3. Citizen X   10 years ago

            I'm trying, i'm trying!

            1. SQRLSY One   10 years ago

              I blame the news media... News person did this? NEWS MEDIA is to be blamed, obviously!

              "Killing the messengers" has been a human problem for a long, long time. Now the messengers are killing US!

              "Dog bites man", "Man bites dog", now, "Doggedly persistent NEWS HOUND kills!"

        3. Paul.   10 years ago

          Whenever something bad happens, everyone does more of whatever they did before.

          There is genius in this comment.

          1. Citizen X   10 years ago

            There is comfort in routine...

        4. Bodica Slayer of Woodchip   10 years ago

          Hillary said THIS MUST STOP. So, I guess she's gong to pass a law prohibiting black, gay guys from owning guns.

          1. Hyperion   10 years ago

            It's much more likely that what's going to stop, is Hillary. I can't wait.

            1. Bodica Slayer of Woodchip   10 years ago

              I take it you're no HRC fan, Mr. Drudge. . . .

          2. Chumby   10 years ago

            It takes a village reporter to kill a village reporter.

      2. Restoras   10 years ago

        they're blaming the NRA

        Why? For not advocating harder for open carry?

        1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          CUZ EVERY GUN A MERICA IS ONLY HERE BECAUSE NRA SO BLOOD OF ANY DEATH IS ON THEIR HANDS!11!one!

          Roughly.

          1. Chumby   10 years ago

            This is the reason I joined the NRA. /sarc

        2. Bodica Slayer of Woodchip   10 years ago

          Isn't the NRA public relations spokeman a gay Chinese guy from the SF Bay Area? I believe his name is Chris Leong or Jeong or something like that . . .

          I guess Hillary doesn't want minorities to own guns. They might be uppity and unmanageable the next time she opens an internment camp or something.

          1. CJR   10 years ago

            Chris Cheng. Neat guy. http://www.topshotchris.com/about.html

          2. HolgerDanske   10 years ago

            Don't forget one of their other spokes people, Colion Noir, a black lawyer from Texas.

            He got a lot of hate for stepping off the ideological plantation. So much that he had to buy his poor mother a gun to keep herself safe, when her address was leaked by one of his critics.

      3. Zeb   10 years ago

        Seriously? What the fuck is wrong with people? Can't "crazy asshole" even be enough of an explanation?

        1. Restoras   10 years ago

          No, because it's only guns that make people crazy assholes, not that people can be crazy assholes on their own.

        2. JWatts   10 years ago

          "Can't "crazy asshole" even be enough of an explanation?"

          You're talking about the posters at The Huffington Post. Clearly they are firmly in the set of "crazy assholes". They aren't likely to blame themselves, are they?

          1. Cecil de Lionchipper   10 years ago

            I think "crazy assholes" is a personal goal for regressives.

        3. Ceci n'est pas un woodchipper   10 years ago

          Of course not, because if a crazy asshole never finds a gun he just sits in a corner next to a knife, a baseball bat, and a 5'4, 125 lb. anchorwoman helplessly wondering what to do.

        4. Bodica Slayer of Woodchip   10 years ago

          C'mon what the hell is wrong with you? You already know it's NEVER enough of an answer.

      4. SimonJester   10 years ago

        Also, if you look closely at the picture, he is clearly not of European descent. So they have to, quickly, blame an approved evil doer before too many questions are asked.

      5. JW   10 years ago

        Over at Huffpo, they're blaming the NRA. They're going completely apeshit.

        Doesn't everyone hear the dulcet tones of Charleton Heston in their heads over and over, telling them to pull the trigger?

        1. Trouser-Pod (The blowhard)   10 years ago

          the dulcet tones of Charleton Heston

          Now, there's an album for the collection play list!

      6. John C. Randolph   10 years ago

        Black reporter goes berserk, murders two white media workers, HuffPo leftards grasp at straws to blame the patriarchy, white privilege, and all responsible, trained gun owners who could have stopped the perp had any of them been present.

        Fuck the HuffPo, fuck Arianna for starting that cesspool of idiocy, fuck every last leftard who frequents that site, but above all: fuck that narcissistic nutjob who considered himself entitled to murder two people and wound a third just because he was all butthurt over losing a job.

        -jcr

        1. Devil's Candy   10 years ago

          You had me at, "Fuck Arianna", and I'm not picky about the context.

    4. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Williams was injured from a self-inflicted gunshot wound during a confrontation with police, but is not dead.

      Well that's too bad.

      It would be a real shame if the cleaning crew for his room accidentally unplugged something.

      1. Drake   10 years ago

        He died later.

    5. EndTheGOP   10 years ago

      Thankfully the piece-of-shit took the cowards way out and saved the taxpayer the millions of dollars it would cost to prosecute and house him. Good riddance.

  2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    Fox News commenters are hilarious lunatics:

    Why has all this gotten substantially worse under this administration? Hmmmmm

    Goddamn Obama, mind controlling psychopaths into murdering reporters.

    And this folks is why Illegal Immigrants have got to go...

    Trump wins again...

    ....????....

    1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      What would the "jump to conclusions mat" for the internets look like? Obama, Mexicans, NAZI, terrorists?

      Or, would that all be in one square?

      1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        Right wing: Obama, Muslims, Mexicans, Libruls, Hollywood corruption of our children's morals, the notorious lesbian pornographic comic Fun Home.

        Left Wing: BUUUUUUSH, white men, neo-confederate, Republicans, Reagan, tax-cuts

        1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          IT WUZ MEXICANS WITH THEIR SPESHUL @A RIGHTS - TOLD YOU THIS WAS COMING. WAS GOES AROUND...COMES....IN THE BUSH....FUCKIN' MIGRANTS!!1111one

        2. RBS   10 years ago

          You left out "Teabagger", "Teanderthal" and "losertarian".

        3. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

          For the right-wing there has to be something in there about "pretty women on the tv who disagree with me" and "the gay menace."

          1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

            In Britain left-wing would have to include something along the lines of "IT'S THATCHER WUT DONE IT!"

            1. SusanM   10 years ago

              In Soviet Union, left wing flaps YOU

            2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

              The British say "wot," not "wut."

              1. Bodica Slayer of Woodchip   10 years ago

                What?

          2. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

            "pretty women on the tv who disagree with me"

            I think you mean "whores."

            1. Libertymike   10 years ago

              John and Irish covered that topic with regard to Megyn "of course there is no connection between my short dresses exposing my gorgeous gams and my qualifications" Kelly.

              1. JWatts   10 years ago

                Nobody is denying that Megyn Kelly's very shapely gams are a strategic asset. John took the odd leap of faith and insists that she must have slept her way to the top, while readily admitting he had no evidence. It's pure sexism/speculation on his part.

                1. Ceci n'est pas un woodchipper   10 years ago

                  That's utterly retarded. She's a TV anchor. She's hired to be attractive, have a pleasant speaking voice, be able to read convincingly from a teleprompter, and do a little bit of improv from time to time. None of these qualifications preclude her being an intelligent person, but I'm just saying that you could be the smartest overweight hare-lip in the world and you're never getting a job in front of a camera.

                  1. Pulseguy   10 years ago

                    ......and that makesh shme really shad....

                  2. The Blind Gawd Luvia   10 years ago

                    Explain Rosie O'Donnell, then.

                    1. perlchpr   10 years ago

                      Satan is real?

                2. Bodica Slayer of Woodchip   10 years ago

                  Plus, she used to be one chunky monkey. And men don't like fat women.

        4. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          NRA REEPING WHAT THEY SEWED!!!!111 BODIES PILED HIGH ENOUGH YET, WAYNE LA PETER?

        5. Akira   10 years ago

          I'm no fan of Reagan, but... I've observed this leftie hatred of him, and it's downright bizarre. It's like it's a religion and Reagan is their Satan figure.

          Here's what I don't understand: he was president WAY the fuck back in the '80s. Since then, there have been plenty of occasions when there was a Democrat president and Democrat majorities in both houses of Congress. So why is Reagan still to blame for so many of the nations ills? What did he do that they couldn't have undone when they had the chance?

          1. Mark6   10 years ago

            Hell, Obama is still blaming "policies left over from the Bush administration" for his fuck ups, but he didn't change them which leaves him an intact excuse the media will parrot.

          2. JWatts   10 years ago

            "So why is Reagan still to blame for so many of the nations ills?"

            It's a token of faith with a certain mentality that the US was a Garden of Eden before the great corrupter Reagan brought upon the downfall. To present facts to the contrary is about as useful as showing dinosaur fossils to a hard core Creationist.

    2. RBS   10 years ago

      Mahem2015 6 minutes ago
      The Reporters probably voted for the Liberal Democrat Governor who is extremely against the Right to Carry. "What Goes Around, Comes Around'

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        There are decent arguments for right to carry, but arguing that armed victims would have prevented ambush murders like this one isn't one of them.

        P.S. haven't watched the video, doubt I will.

        1. Haven Monahan   10 years ago

          The shooting was over in a couple of seconds. Even if the victims had been carrying, it most likely wouldn't have changed a thing.

          1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

            I laugh every time I see that handle, btw. That farce will never not be funny to me.

          2. JWatts   10 years ago

            I watched the video. It's clear that the victims went from completely unaware to lying on the floor. There was never a chance to defend themselves.

            1. Mark6   10 years ago

              Unaware to the extreme! He approached with gun in hand, pointed at the reporter, for quite sometime before he started shooting and all three were totally oblivious.

          3. CptNerd   10 years ago

            It's beginning to look like news crews will need another member, not just interviewer, cameraman and soundman, but also trigger man...

            (or woman, you haters)...

            1. freedomlover   10 years ago

              In my neck of the woods they need a police escort. It's become the fashionable thing to rob them:

              http://wn.ktvu.com/story/28085.....ring-story

              http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03......html?_r=0

              And, we all know, how CA goes, so goes the nation:

        2. Ceci n'est pas un woodchipper   10 years ago

          True, but I'd make the argument that existing regulations precluding open carry and restricting concealed carry (assuming the shooter didn't have a CCW permit) didn't prevent the ambush murder. There might have been a 1% chance one of the victims could've gotten a shot off if they were all carrying, but there was no chance at all if they were unarmed, which I'm also assuming.

          1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

            Exactly this. Much better take on it.

          2. Curtisls701   10 years ago

            Additionally, shooters might be a little less tempted to even attempt this sort of thing if they knew there might be someone shooting back.

            1. Marshal   10 years ago

              Although if they're going to kill themselves anyway probably not. There are circumstances where more guns can deter murder, but this is on the extremely unlikely end of the scale.

              1. Devil's Candy   10 years ago

                I think the deterrent effect still applies to many of these cases. My reasoning is that most such perps want a body count and then to off themselves or suicide by cop. If they were facing the very real prospect that their tirade could be embarrassingly be cut short by one or more armed bystanders, then i think many would hesitate, and/or go elsewhere - like a confirmed "gun free zone", perhaps a theater, school or gov't building.

              2. Bruce D   10 years ago

                Actually, it is because suicide is usually the perp's escape route that more guns is a deterrent. What the perp does not want is to be shot and incapacitated, therefore being denied the opportunity to escape via suicide.

    3. Zeb   10 years ago

      Why has all this gotten substantially worse under this administration? Hmmmmm

      So just as stupid and paranoid as the gun control freaks, but for different stupid reasons.

  3. Illocust   10 years ago

    Fuck, she wasn't even reporting on anything dangerous. That makes it so much worse. The reporter in the warzone or the hurricane has accepted they might get killed. Freaking anniversary plans are supposed to be boring and unglamorous.

    I hope they take this guy alive.

    1. Mark6   10 years ago

      Why, so they can kill him later?

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        So he can spend years fearing his eminent demise on death row, or spend the rest of his life without being able to take a piss without permission.

      2. R C Dean   10 years ago

        Hopefully he'll die real soon now, and save us all a lot of money and bother.

  4. Warty   10 years ago

    Fuck, she was only 24 and he was only 27. Unbelievably shitty.

    Here is a screenshot of the alleged shooter

    Since he's holding the gun in the pic, shouldn't it be legally safe to drop the "alleged" there?

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Holding A gun. Allegedly.

      1. JWatts   10 years ago

        Lawyer: "My client used to work for the station. He was taking a jog in the area and decided he' head over to see his former associates. When he arrived he saw a smoking gun on the ground and picked it up. That's clearly what the video shows"

    2. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      Fuck, she was only 24 and he was only 27.

      Come on, Warty. What goes around comes around. They were members of the liberal media!

      1. Citizen X   10 years ago

        Where's John to claim, with no evidence, that the reporter slept her way to her position?

        1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

          She was pretty, wasn't she?

          1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

            Therefore.....a witch!! BURN HER!

            1. Citizen X   10 years ago

              Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?

            2. Devil's Candy   10 years ago

              No ducks were weighed in the making of this opinion.

          2. Citizen X   10 years ago

            IT'S SO OBVIOUS HOW COULD YOU ALL BE SO NAIVE

        2. Mark6   10 years ago

          She was shacking with her co-anchor...career advancement?

          1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

            John?

            1. Episteme   10 years ago

              John?

              She turned him into a John!

              (He got better...)

          2. Citizen X   10 years ago

            Or maybe it sometimes happens that two people who spend a lot of time together hit it off and form a relationship? Nah, let's just assume the cynical one!

            1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

              Do you think an attractive woman could get a job on television if she was not humping people? Who would want to see an attractive woman on television?

              1. RBS   10 years ago

                All I know is the women on my local stations keep getting bustier.

                1. Restoras   10 years ago

                  push-up bras with more padding.

                  1. Episteme   10 years ago

                    Of course, after this, they'll likely all be wearing bullet-proof bras with more padding instead and so look that much bustier...

              2. Sudden   10 years ago

                I've put in my application to be a recruiter for spanish language weather stations.

                1. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

                  I've put in my application to be a recruiter for spanish language weather stations.

                  Even if it paid peanuts, that would be the best gig in television, hands down.

              3. Mark6   10 years ago

                See "To Die for" Nicole Kidman shows how it's done!

        3. mad.casual   10 years ago

          Where's John to claim, with no evidence, that the reporter slept her way to her position?

          Isn't there some sort of moment of silence or 24 hour rule before that's observed capitalizing on multiple homicide to, out of the blue, assert that John is a dick?

          1. Citizen X   10 years ago

            The waiting period is waived in the event of a "liberal media" reference.

    3. Rich   10 years ago

      Nope. He *appears* to be holding *a* gun.

      Which he will turn on himself as soon as he know the jig is up.

      1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

        The "jig" - was he black!?? RACIST MUCH!!!

        /another griefer's struggle

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          Obviously an Hispanic who was bullied and slurred too far!

    4. Idle Hands   10 years ago

      My girlfriend knew the girl pretty well apparently it couldn't have happened to a better person, which while irrelevant makes it even more senseless.

      1. Matrix   10 years ago

        Wait, what? The first part seems to indicate that the woman was terrible "it couldn't have happened to a better person"... but then "even more senseless" seems contradictory.

        I dunno. Just clarification is what I'm looking for.

        1. Idle Hands   10 years ago

          Sorry was stating she was a great person.

          1. Matrix   10 years ago

            Thanks. Usually when I hear something tragic like this and someone says, "couldn't have happened to a better person", they are usually being sarcastic and saying that the person had it coming or deserved it or something along those lines.

        2. Warty   10 years ago

          He means that she was a nice person.

        3. Illocust   10 years ago

          I think he means better as in the girl was a good person.

        4. Hyperion   10 years ago

          I assume he meant happen to better person in the opposite way of it's typical usage.

  5. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    I can't even muster a snarky comment because that would be too shitty even for me. Ugh. RIP, people. And catch this motherfucker and....put him away forever. Fuck.

  6. Eric Bana   10 years ago

    Why the f*** did he shoot them? Was there even any f***ing reason at all?

    1. Citizen X   10 years ago

      Psychopaths gonna... do psycho shit, i guess.

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        BAN THEM!!

        1. WTF   10 years ago

          No, no, ban whatever tools the psychopath used!!11!!! BAN THEM!!1!!!!

      2. blcartwright   10 years ago

        you call him a psychopath

        but the station describes him much like a typical SJW, quick to look for offense in anything

    2. tarran   10 years ago

      His breakfast smelled of Friday, perhaps?

      1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

        I blame Bok and Payne then.

    3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      When they discover the motive, it won't make any sense to normal people. He did it because he's crazy.

      1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

        He did it because he's crazy.

        While you are most assuredly correct, the "I heard he once voted for Obama, but you won't hear the libs talk about that!" narrative is more important.

      2. Berserkerscientist   10 years ago

        This is the wrong way to look at it. "Everyone believes they are justified." This is step #1 in understanding why people do things. "They are crazy" is just not helpful. People with mental illness simple believe things that aren't true (eg, this guy is out to get me, this person is a robot), but their motivation is very clear.

    4. Illocust   10 years ago

      Normally these guys go somewhere specific a building that can be locked down. This is the first one I've heard of just running down the street killing people. God I hope this doesn't inspire others. Their death tolls could get so much higher if they can keep on the move ahead of the cops.

    5. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      Via Twitter:

      Per @WTOP - @GovernorVA says police suspect gunman of WDBJ reporter & photographer was disgruntled former station employee

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        Makes sense. You don't murder someone on TV unless you're trying to make a point.

        1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          That's really creepy, and I'm sure you're right. Ugh

        2. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

          Paging R. Budd Dwyer.

          1. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

            Paging R. Budd Dwyer.

            That was the single most awful thing I've seen on TV.

          2. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

            Paging Christine Chubbuck. She's a reporter who killed herself during alive broadcast back in 1974.

            1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

              during alive broadcast

              For the first part, anyway.

            2. sasob   10 years ago

              Was she overweight - as in kind of a chubby fuck?

      2. Brian   10 years ago

        "Disgruntled" is how we say "insane with anger" now, apparently

        1. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

          Random thought, why is gruntled (chrome thinks it is misspelled) such an unpopular word?

          1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

            Right? Why do we diss gruntle?

            1. SimonJester   10 years ago

              Nobody likes Gruntle's mother. Not even Beowulf.

              1. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

                *narrows gaze*

          2. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

            It is similar to "grundle."

          3. tarran   10 years ago

            Gruntle is a verb that means to grunt or grumble a lot.

            Milton in Office Space is someone who gruntles throughout the movie.

            The prefix 'dis' means utterly or completely given away to doing something.

            Thus someone who is disgruntled is someone who is devoted to grumbling and bitching.

          4. SugarFree   10 years ago

            It is from a form of dis that doesn't mean "the opposite of" but rather a usage that means "even more so." And gruntle means issue a series of small grunts.

            1. SugarFree   10 years ago

              Should have refreshed. [gruntle]

            2. WTF   10 years ago

              This is why I come to H&R, for all the learning.

              1. tarran   10 years ago

                Today I learned about a new class of word modifiers, the frequentative.

            3. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

              http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gruntle

              to put in a good humor

              Who do I believe!?

    6. Catatafish & Woodchips   10 years ago

      It's being reported that he was a former station employee who got fired or some such.

      You know, a perfectly good reason to snuff out two lives.

      What. A. Dick.

      1. Catatafish & Woodchips   10 years ago

        Goddammit refresh fail.

    7. Seamus   10 years ago

      Of course there was. It was because of the ridiculously easy access to handguns that we have in this country. And white racism, which drove Vester Lee Flanagan to desperation.

      1. Bruce D   10 years ago

        I take it you're being sarcastic. But in case you're not, The perp went through the background check and waiting period. How much more difficult are we going to make owning a firearm?

        It sounds a lot more like black racism than anything else. Search terms: FBI UCR homicides by race.

  7. See Double You   10 years ago

    Tweet from Governor McAuliffe:

    McAuliffe: I believe we're in pursuit of the suspect. We know who it is. We believe it's a disgruntled employee at the station. What a tragedy.

    1. Citizen X   10 years ago

      McAuliffe is participating in the pursuit himself?

      1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

        Like when "we" ("my" team) wins a game. "Oh, I didn't know YOU played..."

        1. Citizen X   10 years ago

          I hate the unjustified plural. WHO IS "WE," KEMOSABE?

          1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

            Exactly. We agree on this....

            *stares at CX*

            1. Citizen X   10 years ago

              Nothing else, though.

            2. CptNerd   10 years ago

              We prefer the "royal 'we'."

              As opposed to the Brooksian "Royal wee"...

  8. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    Now I don't much feel like having lunch. Thanks, murderer.

  9. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    "Let the wild ideological speculations begin!"
    Here goes:
    Every person who knew this guy will say that he recently started acting strangely and saying violent things. They all ignored it and did nothing.

    1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      Fail. Not ideological.

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        Actually it demonstrates his extreme right-wing bias since he's blaming mental illness rather than the accessibility of the gun.

        1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          ^^this

    2. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      If you SEE something, SAY something!

      "He was a pretty quiet person. Mostly kept to himself."

      It's always the quiet ones.

      Except when it isn't.

  10. Restoras   10 years ago

    It's shit like this that make me want to risk conceal carry.

    1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Yeah, this. I don't CC for a variety of reasons. Then stuff like this happens...GAAAAAH! It's infuriating. People suck.

      1. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

        Yeah, this. I don't CC for a variety of reasons

        I don't carry either. I keep a readied weapon at home, to be sure, but I've never felt the need to go about armed in public. It's easy enough where I live, and owing to my military background, I'm even exempted from the otherwise mandatory class. Most of my friends carry, and who knows, I may one day too. It's just low on my list of priorities.

        Why don't you carry?

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      Concealed carry is fine as long as you're not the first one targeted. These poor people didn't have a chance to react.

      1. Restoras   10 years ago

        Very true.

    3. Restoras   10 years ago

      The chances that I'd get caught are almost zero. However, the penalty is excessive if I were to get caught. Still, sitting defenseless on a train and in an office can be unnerving.

  11. SIV   10 years ago

    In other news:

    Porn-Sniffing Dog Helped Bring Down Subway Star Jared Fogle

    1. some guy   10 years ago

      SOILER: The dog supposedly sniffs out electronic media, regardless of the content.

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        SPOILER... maybe.

        1. UnCivilServant   10 years ago

          You know digital content of an illegal nature has a different aroma to the bits.

          1. some guy   10 years ago

            Or maybe the dog just smells... residue...

      2. Restoras   10 years ago

        That's a John-level misspell. Well done.

        1. Citizen X   10 years ago

          We call that a "johno."

        2. some guy   10 years ago

          I'll admit to a certain amount of pride when I saw it.

          1. SimonJester   10 years ago

            I assumed that "Soiler" was a tag equating to "You gonna shit yoself!"

  12. Hyperion   10 years ago

    Over at the FluffPo, now that they've tired of blaming the NRA, they're having a mass group orgasm because the shooter appears to be white.

    1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      GOD BE PRAISED!

    2. See Double You   10 years ago

      From the pic of the shooter, I can't tell what race he is. I suspected he would be white, but he almost looks hispanic.

      1. Restoras   10 years ago

        White hispanic?

        1. Mark6   10 years ago

          maybe a white islamist

          1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

            perish the thought!

      2. Mike M.   10 years ago

        Given that the station already knows exactly who the guy is, if they don't reveal his identity pretty damn soon, it virtually guarantees that he's not a white guy.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Sad, but true. They're probably popping champagne corks right now if the guy was any sort of right winger.

          1. Mike M.   10 years ago

            They probably knew who it was within minutes of analyzing the footage, and tried contacting him immediately and of course failed.

            So there's absolutely no reason whatsoever for them to withhold this information from us. Come on WDBJ7, you may as well just go ahead and tell us who the fuck this guy is already. We're going to find out eventually anyway.

            1. Hyperion   10 years ago

              If he's a deranged leftist or a Muslim, they're going to hold off as long as possible.

              1. Pulseguy   10 years ago

                Even if he is a leftist he will be called a right wing lunatic. The Arizona shooter, hard left, called by everyone a right wing lunatic.

            2. JWatts   10 years ago

              "So there's absolutely no reason whatsoever for them to withhold this information from us. Come on WDBJ7..."

              Oh yes there is. They fired a disgruntled employee. Someone gets shot a few days later. So now they assume it's him (and it probably is). But the image is pretty damn blurry, so they could be wrong. And they open themselves up to a massive law suit if they're wrong. Plus it's easy to jump to conclusions and really shitty to the person you publically accused if you are wrong.

              On the other hand, you've got a murderer running around with nothing to lose.

        2. Pulseguy   10 years ago

          I've read where they identify the guy and identify him as an African American who was angry and always confronting people over microaggressions because he is black. We'll see if that is true.

      3. Hyperion   10 years ago

        When I first saw it, I mean it's pretty distorted, but it appears he has the sort of beard Muslims sometimes have, or Amish. But it's just too difficult to tell. It's so distorted looking, the guy might be wearing a mask. Maybe it was an Amish Muslim wearing a mask?

        1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

          Maybe he put on his Billy The Kid Holdup? outfit from last halloween and that's a handkerchief.

    3. rts   10 years ago

      Scanner traffic indicates police are looking for a black male.

      Scanner

      1. SimonJester   10 years ago

        Rascists! How dare they look for someone who matches the description and pictures!

  13. See Double You   10 years ago

    The guy coldly walks up to the victims and fires 6-7 shots. A complete sociopath. I really hope he doesn't get to take the coward's way out.

    1. Distilled Animal Spirits   10 years ago

      Yes I hope not. But forgive me for hoping he gets severely injured resisting arrest.

    2. JWatts   10 years ago

      Personally, I don't want to waste $10 million of tax payer's money on a trial, 3 mandatory appeals, 20 years on death row and an execution. Better to spend $5K on a quick burial.

  14. Mike M.   10 years ago

    The killer is thought to be a disgruntled employee of WDBJ7

    In order words, they already know exactly who it is. So why the fuck don't they just tell us?

    1. LarryA   10 years ago

      Because it might not be? They catch up to the employee and he has evidence that proves he wasn't the one, it's pretty hard to undo splashing his face all over everywhere.

      1. Mike M.   10 years ago

        Oh bullshit. They know exactly who the fuck it is. It's a guy they just recently fired and they recognize him from the fucking footage.

        1. Zeb   10 years ago

          Still best to be sure.

          But I guess someone has to engage in wild speculation and pretend they know everything.

        2. Pulseguy   10 years ago

          I rarely can recognize anyone from footage. I might recognize someone because of a distinctive hat or sweatshirt, coupled with some physical characteristics that resemble someone, but positively identifying someone from grainy footage....not all that easy.

  15. Beezard   10 years ago

    It's fascinating how life is always coming up with new and interesting ways to terrorize the living.

    1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Flesh-eating bacteria! Face-eating meth addicts! Ebola! The dude you just fired!

      Life is dangerous, and always, always fatal.

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Don't forget Flakka, it's sweeping the country and it's really scary!

      2. SimonJester   10 years ago

        Life is a fatal STD.

  16. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    Whatever happens to him, we can rest soundly knowing his family members will issue a public apology.

  17. Idle Hands   10 years ago

    Ugh gov. Mcauliffe is already using this to pass more stringent gun laws.

    1. SIV   10 years ago

      Needz moar "the right does it too"

    2. Drake   10 years ago

      I can only hope it costs that piece of shit his career in VA. Would it be better if the guy had used a sword or axe?

  18. Illocust   10 years ago

    They need to catch this guy alive and make him watch from a jail cell as every embarrassing piece of dirty laundry he ever had is aired on national television. Seriously, humiliate this bastard. If he wet his bed at eight years old make sure people in Canada know about it. The dorky outfit he failed to get laid in for prom, show it in primetime with a voice over from his date about what a absolute loser he was. When a guest want to talk about his motivations talk about the time he thought England was a state. Make the S.O.B. a laughing stock.

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      Cruel and unusual.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        Only applies to the government. His victims' coworkers with the media megaphone don't have to follow that standard.

    2. SIV   10 years ago

      I hope they kill him.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        Too quick. No suffering or realization that he's being punished.

        1. Citizen X   10 years ago

          It can take a long time to bleed out from a gut shot.

          1. Illocust   10 years ago

            Not with the way police shoot.

            1. Lord at War   10 years ago

              If they aim at his head, the closest they'll get is his gut...

    3. Pulseguy   10 years ago

      Not a bad strategy. It might stop other losers from thinking they can come off looking heroic and dangerous. Which is what I think they must believe.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        That's the other thing. People are curious and want to learn more. It our nature. So if we are going to give this guy coverage the least that can be done is make sure that the next psycho views him as a loser not someone to be imitated.

  19. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    Now I have this strange urge to go to the range this afternoon. I truly am a horrible person....although I only shoot paper, and refuse to use targets shaped like people.

    Thank God someone from the government will use this opportunity to try to ensure that people like me have a harder time getting, keeping and using guns.

    FUCK YOU IN ADVANCE.

  20. See Double You   10 years ago

    The gun the guy used looks weird. Maybe it's distorted in the photo?

    1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Pretty sure it's an automatic assault rifle with an eleventy-round clip and a thingy on it with cop-killer bullets . All of which should be banned.

      1. Animal   10 years ago

        Don't forget the shoulder thing that goes up.

        1. Ron   10 years ago

          and a compass in the stock

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      The entire photo appears very distorted. Look at his face. It look surreal.

  21. Hyperion   10 years ago

    Wow, the guys fiancee was filming this when he was shot. Very sad. There's not really much that can be done, though. Psychos will get weapons whether they are legal or not, and how do you protect against that? You can't. It's not a perfect world, bad things happen.

    1. Tony   10 years ago

      They just happen a lot more in the US than any other civilized country. I'm sure the vast difference in the number of guns has absolutely nothing to do with it.

      It is nice to have an issue we can just chalk up to the cruelty of nature, though, then wash our hands and move on.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        It's nice that you and your ilk politicize every tragedy. Where would we be without you all?

        1. Tony   10 years ago

          Define politicize, idiot. Should we only talk about issues when they aren't relevant to anything happening?

          1. See Double You   10 years ago

            Meaning you use every bad thing that happens to advance your agenda, asshole.

            1. Tony   10 years ago

              I only have an agenda for the purpose of addressing the problems in the world. What do you do?

              1. Restoras   10 years ago

                I only have an agenda for the purpose of addressing the problems in the world

                Problems according to whom?

              2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

                I only have an agenda for the purpose of addressing the problems in the world. What do you do?

                HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                You're such a narcissist. Everyone thinks their ideas will address 'the problems of the world.' If your only evidence of your righteousness are your own narcissistic delusions, then you're basically just a Donald Trump level egoist bumbling around idiotically while pretending you're doing good work.

                1. Tony   10 years ago

                  I may be a narcissist but I was under the impression that everybody here was always talking about their ideas for fixing the world's problems.

                  1. Restoras   10 years ago

                    I may be a narcissist but I was under the impression that everybody here was always talking about their ideas for fixing the world's problems.

                    No, actually, you have that almost exactly wrong. Most people here talk about their ideas for letting people figure out the answers to their problems, on their own.

                    But, I understand that you are reading comprehension challenged and not likely to see the difference.

              3. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

                The very first post you made in this thread was a bitchy piece of snark with reference to inadequate gun laws, which you speculate would have prevented this tragedy. Sure, Tony, that's in no way political. It's just happenstance that it's a major tenant of the left, it's only leftists bringing it up, and it's brought up after every incident before the bodies are even off the pavement. We excoriated idiots above who jumped on the concealed carry issue, but when you push for gun control it's just an icebreaker.

                If you're not going to exercise any decorum at least be honest about it.

          2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

            Tony, did you know that the homicide rate in America heavily correlates with how many Democrats there are in a given area? In fact, it's a much higher correlation than the number of guns.

            What lessons can we draw from this, and do you think every time there is a shooting I should politicize it by posting this graph and noting the odd correlation?

            In California, every 3% increase in Republican voters results in a 50% lower homicide rate.

            That's how you politicize an issue, Tony. I hate that you made me do this.

            1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

              Oh, and before you try and pull the "BUT REPUBLICAN STATES HAVE MORE MURDERS" card, the murders in those states overwhelmingly occur in urbanized areas with large African American populations, which generally vote like 90% Democrat. That's why Louisiana has a high murder rate, despite the fact that most of the state is pretty safe. New Orleans has a murder rate approximately 4 times higher than the state average, which heavily skews the numbers.

              So Tonester, why can't people who are part of your political party stop committing so many murders? If this country only had Republicans and libertarians, our homicide rate would be lower than Norway's.

              1. Tony   10 years ago

                The correlation, in high-income countries, between the prevalence of guns and the prevalence of gun violence is well-established in literature, not to say obvious fucking common sense.

                1. Restoras   10 years ago

                  So, you only care about rich people?

                2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

                  The correlation, in high-income countries, between the prevalence of guns and the prevalence of gun violence is well-established in literature, not to say obvious fucking common sense.

                  Except that's not true.

                  More fundamentally, Dr. Kates and Dr. Mauser demonstrate that other developed nations such as Norway, Finland, Germany, France and Denmark maintain high rates of gun ownership, yet possess murder rates lower than other developed nations in which gun ownership is much more restricted.
                  For example, handguns are outlawed in Luxembourg, and gun ownership extremely rare, yet its murder rate is nine times greater than in Germany, which has one of the highest gun ownership rates in Europe. As another example, Hungary's murder rate is nearly three times higher than nearby Austria's, but Austria's gun ownership rate is over eight times higher than Hungary's. "Norway," they note, "has far and away Western Europe's highest household gun ownership rate (32%), but also its lowest murder rate. The Netherlands," in contrast, "has the lowest gun ownership rate in Western Europe (1.9%) ? yet the Dutch gun murder rate is higher than the Norwegian."

                  1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

                    Dr. Kates and Dr. Mauser proceed to dispel the mainstream misconception that lower rates of violence in Europe are somehow attributable to gun control laws. Instead, they reveal, "murder in Europe was at an all-time low before the gun controls were introduced." As the authors note, "strict controls did not stem the general trend of ever-growing violent crime throughout the post-WWII industrialized world."

                    1. Restoras   10 years ago

                      This is money.

                      The reason that gun ownership doesn't correlate with murder rates, the authors show, is that violent crime rates are determined instead by underlying cultural factors. "Ordinary people," they note, "simply do not murder." Rather, "the murderers are a small minority of extreme antisocial aberrants who manage to obtain guns whatever the level of gun ownership" in their society.

                      Therefore, "banning guns cannot alleviate the socio-cultural and economic factors that are the real determinants of violence and crime rates." According to Dr. Kates and Dr. Mauser, "there is no reason for laws prohibiting gun possession by ordinary, law-abiding, responsible adults because such people virtually never commit murder. If one accepts that such adults are far more likely to be victims of violent crime than to commit it, disarming them becomes not just unproductive but counter-productive."

                  2. Ron   10 years ago

                    thanks for the info I just downloaded their study. this is why I come here there is often something new to learn

                3. WTF   10 years ago

                  You really are a dishonest little shit, aren't you 'Tony'?

            2. WTF   10 years ago

              So, we just need to eliminate Democrats to seriously reduce the homicide rate. Off you go, Tony!

              1. Restoras   10 years ago

                It seems that what we need to eliminate are European countries that don't fit into his narrative.

            3. bacon-magic   10 years ago

              I love you.

        2. Lord at War   10 years ago

          C'mon... "tony" is probably 5'6"- he needs the dead bodies to stand on.

      2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        In Switzerland, every adult male owns a gun.

        Serbia is also third in the world in gun ownership with a homicide rate of only 1.2 per 100,000.

        So...facts, Tony.

        1. some guy   10 years ago

          France has a gun ownership rate 1/3 that of the US, but a firearms death rate something like 1/100 the US. Meanwhile Mexico has much fewer guns and more deaths. Tony doesn't even have correlation on his side in this one.

          It's almost as if the US is a cultural outlier compared to the rest of the world and gun ownership rates are irrelevant...

          1. Drake   10 years ago

            Mexico has fewer legal guns.

      3. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        Care to guess how many gun laws the murderer broke? Why didn't your laws work, Tony? Why did you let these people die?

        1. WTF   10 years ago

          We need to outlaw guns, which will eliminate them and keep murderers from getting any, just like outlawing drugs has eliminated drugs and prevented addicts from getting them.
          /Tony derp

      4. Citizen X   10 years ago

        Switzerland isn't a civilized country?

        1. Tony   10 years ago

          Quite--the gun toters are thoroughly trained by the government. I guess America is just relatively morally corrupt, or something.

          1. some guy   10 years ago

            Explain France, Tony. Explain Mexico. Explain why there's no significant correlation between gun ownership rates and gun death rates. I keep bringing this up and you spouting rhetoric that is not supported by any facts.

          2. Restoras   10 years ago

            I've been to the shooting range this year 10X more than my BiL who is an armed government agent.

            Who's more dangerous?

        2. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

          HEY?!

      5. WTF   10 years ago

        Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag puke piece o' shit, or did you have to work on it?

      6. Restoras   10 years ago

        It is nice to have an issue we can just chalk up to the cruelty of nature, though, then wash our hands and move on.

        What else would you chalk it up to?

      7. Zeb   10 years ago

        Yes, the number of guns has something to do with it. Happy?

        It is still fucking insane to clamor to give up your right to armed self defense.

      8. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        He should've ambushed them with a knife, like the civilized Chinese do.

        1. mad.casual   10 years ago

          Or a meat cleaver, AK-47, or vest full of high explosives like any civilized, self-respecting cultural crusader.

      9. SimonJester   10 years ago

        As soon as you show up I stop reading. Nothing good comes fro your posts. Ever. Usually you are only 50% the problem, but still, whenever you show up everything turns into a bitchfest.

        You ruin everything and your ought to be embarassed of your reputation.

      10. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Bullshit again, Tony. It's all you know. Brazil has some of the strictest gun laws on the planet, it's nearly impossible to legally own a gun there unless you're in law enforcement. Yet their murder rate by guns is way higher than in the USA. Perhaps you can explain that, Einstein?

        1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

          Not developed!

          One thing you see them do is arbitrarily determine what is and isn't developed so they can claim America has a high homicide rate compared to 'developed' countries.

          I've been to Russia and most of Russia is pretty developed. But they arbitrarily determine it isn't developed (despite its PPP per capita GDP being similar to Greece and other Eastern Eastern European countries like Estonia) so that they can avoid factoring in a country with strict gun control that has a murder rate 4 times higher than America.

          1. JWatts   10 years ago

            Those Cherry's won't pick themselves. You've got to slice that data with a razor blade to bring the "true" data out, don't you know.

      11. Catatafish & Woodchips   10 years ago

        Tony, I'm asking you this honestly. With approximately 300 million firearms in private hands in this country, what exactly is your "solution" to this "problem?"

        1. Restoras   10 years ago

          He won't answer you honestly, so I'll answer for him.

          Confiscation.

          1. Ron   10 years ago

            the question to the answer is who will be brave enough to do the confiscating?

      12. Distilled Animal Spirits   10 years ago

        Tony, would feel great if Williams had stabbed them...

      13. Seamus   10 years ago

        You don't think Mexico and South Africa are civilized countries? RAAAAACISSSSSTTTTT!!!!

    2. See Double You   10 years ago

      It is interesting that the left has such an obsession with gun control. If they were consistent, they would be calling for more "car control" every time someone dies in an auto accident.

      1. Tony   10 years ago

        I call for car control. Massive investment in self-driving technology and high-speed rail.

        Of course if you were consistent you'd call every seat belt and air bag and drivers license and crash safety technology an affront to god-given liberties.

        1. See Double You   10 years ago

          No. The correct comparison is to ban cars altogether or to at least severely restrict their availability.

          But you and the control freaks like your cars, so you don't want them banned.

          1. tarran   10 years ago

            Notice, though. that his favored transportation technologies are only of use to the ultra-wealthy? I guess the poor can walk.

          2. Tony   10 years ago

            When have I called for a ban on guns?

            1. tarran   10 years ago

              You've called for effective gun control laws in the past. Limiting gun ownership to government officials is pretty ineffective, so I assumed you wanted to disarm everyone.

              If I am wrong, and you are only a supporter of *ineffective* gun control, the kind that allows the deputy who is in the KKK to sell guns to his buddies while disarming poor black people, then I apologize.

              1. Tony   10 years ago

                I think the NRA has won for now. I just think they, and you who support their radical liberty position, should own up to the consequences. But asking libertarians to own up to consequences is like asking toddlers to do so.

                1. tarran   10 years ago

                  But asking libertarians to own up to consequences is like asking toddlers to do so.

                  Oh my God! If I were a psych professor, and I wanted to demonstrate projection in action, Tony's comments would be my go-to exhibit.

                  1. Restoras   10 years ago

                    You have to remember, in Tonyworld individuals are not responsible for their own actions. Bad outcomes are the result of bad policies, bad laws, or bad Top. Men.

                    This is why they are obsessed with government control of everything.

                2. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

                  I just think they, and you who support their radical liberty position, should own up to the consequences.

                  Just as soon as you fess up to your collective sins in helping create murder capital fiefdoms of lefty social policy. But asking socialists to own up to the consequences, toddlers, and all that.

                  1. tarran   10 years ago

                    Just as soon as you fess up to your collective sins in helping create murder capital fiefdoms of lefty social policy

                    No. We shouldn't wait.

                    The consequences of our radical liberty position is that on the whole people will be safer and happier, but occasionally some nut job or criminal will commit a horrible crime.

                    Leave the denial of tradeoffs or costs to the emotionally stunted like Tony or Cytotoxic.

                3. Zeb   10 years ago

                  The NRA is anything but radical. They are very conservative and very cautious.

                4. Catatafish & Woodchips   10 years ago

                  Only Tony would think "individuals should be responsible for the consequences of their own actions" constitutes a "radical liberty position."

                5. Distilled Animal Spirits   10 years ago

                  "Radical liberty position" aka, morality

                6. bvandyke   10 years ago

                  I'll take their "consequences" any day over being disarmed and at the mercy of the Gov.

              2. Mark6   10 years ago

                You just explained the genesis of gun control!

            2. Hyperion   10 years ago

              Oh, this is how you leftists work. You get beaten up on an issue and don't get your way, so you back off some and say you didn't say things that you said before. Then you're more reasonable because you can't get it all. So you just go back towards inching your way back in the same direction. You want for ALL guns to be confiscated from citizens. You'd love to see it, but you would sound even more foolish and impotent than usual, so you just talk pure bullshit. You sound exactly like every poster on HuffPo, unable to think outside of the group, and totally insincere. If you said what you actually believe, like you sometimes do, you'd sound like a raving lunatic. You know, threatening your fellow citizens with cruise missiles and other such insane drivel.

        2. tarran   10 years ago

          In Tonyland, a person who calls for abortion to be legalized is someone who thinks abortions should be mandatory.

          1. some guy   10 years ago

            Gay marriage too.

        3. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

          Tony|8.26.15 @ 10:56AM|#

          Define politicize, idiot. Should we only talk about issues when they aren't relevant to anything happening?

          Here's your definition, idiot: piling up the corpses to mewl about your useless pet projects. You're no better than Trump.

        4. Restoras   10 years ago

          Massive investment in self-driving technology and high-speed rail

          Because why? Because you don't like people making their own decisions about where to go and when, and how fast and with whom?

          Progtards like you are obsessed with control. It's pathological.

          1. Tony   10 years ago

            Because driving cars is one of the most dangerous things people do, and it results in an unacceptable number of deaths and injuries, all preventable by available technology requiring only some shifting of resources. People will still be able to go wherever they want, and faster than before.

            1. Restoras   10 years ago

              You actually believe that technology will eliminate all deaths by car accidents? Isn't it more likely that you will just switch the type of human error that causes human deaths?

              1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

                Eliminate, no. But reduce.

                But unlike Tony, I don't see improvements or innovations as ends in and of themselves, just sensible trade-offs when and where they makes sense. The trade-off of relatively cheap and fast travel more than offsets the potential loss of life due to accidents. Gun ownership is a more nebulous benefit redounding to a free liberal people and maintaining some semblance of sovereignty which cretins like Tony trim and hedge at every opportunity. Yes, there is a trade-off. Murders occur. We are not always a harmonious species. But America would be a much less liberal society if we attempted to stomp out every potential source of danger or abuse. We could eliminate murder by guns just as easily as eliminating illicit substances if we bent the whole of American society to that end, in the process eliminating the fourth first and fourth amendments along with the second and suspending any constraints on police. And the Tonies of the nation would be jubilant watching doors kicked in and offenders pulled out into the streets and shot.

                1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

                  Meant to work in the obvious parallel between gun control and drug prohibition: it doesn't work halfway. Prohibition fails. Either it's houses ransacked and offenders shipped off to the gulags, or criminals will always have access.

        5. mad.casual   10 years ago

          Of course if you were consistent you'd call every seat belt and air bag and drivers license and crash safety technology an affront to god-given liberties.

          Government mandated? I do.

          Otherwise, you want to keep your gun locked away in a safe where no one can get at it ever and drive around without a seatbelt or airbags? Have at it.

      2. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

        Guns are a check on their plans of enslaving us. We all know it. We shouldn't refrain from saying whenever they bring up gun control.

        1. Mark6   10 years ago

          Amen!

    3. Warty   10 years ago

      This particular murder would have been just as easy to do with a machete or an axe or something. These poor fucks didn't have a chance.

  22. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

    Why does it so often seem like the importance of a story is driven by whether the action was caught on camera?

    Talk about perverse incentives.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      Actually seeing (or hearing) a person die is very emotional: it reminds us of our fragile existence.

      1. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

        There's certainly a cognitive bias at the heart of it somewhere.

        Hot Cognition is what you're talking about, but there's probably also Framing and Attentional bias at work, too.

        Condolences to the victims, but if someone caught a celebrity torturing a dog to death on camera, people would be paying attention to that instead.

        It isn't just these kinds of terroristic perverse incentives that we continue to suffer from either. Michael Bay keeps getting his films funded because the way people think continues to fail in predictable ways.

        1. SimonJester   10 years ago

          You mean Hot Cognition isn't the name of a strip club for nerds?

          1. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

            If you wanted to start a strip club in Silicon Valley, you could do a lot worse than naming it "Hot Cognition".

  23. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

    Gawker solutions:

    citizendefarge bay_estrian
    8/26/15 10:30am

    Now seems like the perfect time to talk about gun control, before people forget (which is exactly what the NRA and gun manufacturers hope for).

    We need gun control. We need fewer people with guns. "MORE GUNS" is clearly not the answer. Since "bad guys" aren't getting their guns from "the bad guy gun store", limiting guns will help solve this ridiculous fucking problem.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      Yeah. Limiting the availability of guns will stop senseless killings. Only guns kill people. Nothing else.

    2. Illocust   10 years ago

      Can people wait even a day before turning this into politics?

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        We should ask Mike M that question.

    3. tarran   10 years ago

      Oddly enough in Mexico, there is a 'bad guys' gun store.

      Two of them in fact: the national police and the army. Naturally to get a gun to protect one's self, one has to deal with the bad guys gun store.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        A third: the U.S. government.

        1. tarran   10 years ago

          Well, the U.S. government does approve every arms sale to the Mexican government by American gun makers, so the we can say that the AR-15's slaughtering innocents in Juarez do come with Obama's seal of approval. 😉

          1. See Double You   10 years ago

            Oh, I was thinking of Operation Fast 'n Furious, or whatever it was called.

    4. Zeb   10 years ago

      Yeah, the only reason most Americans don't want massively more gun control is because they are distractable idiots and forget that sometimes people commit horrible murders. Couldn't possibly be that most people don't agree with the more extreme gun control agenda.

    5. Free Society   10 years ago

      We need gun control. We need fewer people with guns. "MORE GUNS" is clearly not the answer. Since "bad guys" aren't getting their guns from "the bad guy gun store", limiting guns will help solve this ridiculous fucking problem.

      That's why there are more guns than ever and less violent crime than ever. Reasoned arguments don't work on these people. They feel that they are right.

  24. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    Where's that yard sign about respecting your neighbor's personal beliefs and not using your gun to stop their home's robbery?

  25. Warty   10 years ago

    "arrest imminent"

    McAuliffe said the incident is a reminder that Virginia needs to more strictly control firearms.

    "There are too many guns in the hands of people who should not have guns," said McAuliffe, who supports universal background checks.

    Fuck you, McAuliffe. Classless fuck.

    1. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

      It's ok, only a matter of time until we find out the shooter stole the gun or already passed a background check.

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        So you're saying we need stricter background checks and laws that hold people responsible for not locking up their guns?

        /Tony

    2. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      What a shameless asshole.

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        It's hard to imagine someone being more of a political hack than McAuliffe. I don't think it's possible. He didn't invent political hackery, but he certainly embraced it. It is the essence of his being.

    3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      At 5 AM this morning, who knew that this guy should not have had a gun?

    4. See Double You   10 years ago

      Did McAuliffe have information which indicated that the shooter obtained his gun because of some "flaw" in the law? Are "universal background checks" even relevant here?

      Oh, who am I kidding. Fuck you, McAuliffe.

      1. Mark6   10 years ago

        Since when does a Liberal have to have information before running his mouth

  26. Warty   10 years ago

    WHSVnewsVerified account
    ?@WHSVnews
    The #WDBJ shooting suspect's name is Vester Lee Flanagan, not Lester as reported by other outlets: http://bit.ly/1i1AQ1f

    1. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

      that name. so Appalachia.

      1. SIV   10 years ago

        I never would've guessed the Negro did it. Seriously. I had this pegged as white-on-white crime.

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      Compare.

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNWAWyMUsAAbE-p.jpg

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNV-X6VWoAA1fdt.jpg

      1. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

        That second dude doesn't match the descrip:

        "He was described as a light skinned black male, with brown eyes and black hair, 6 foot 3 inches tall and approximately 250 pounds.

  27. psCargile   10 years ago

    Wonder if it was the guy that drove the news van and finally had enough of their shit.

  28. Mike M.   10 years ago

    Yep, and Flanagan is apparently driving a tan or cream Charger.

  29. Warty   10 years ago

    Holy shit he's tweeting. Posted a video of the shooting.

    I filmed the shooting see Facebook

    1. Warty   10 years ago

      holy fucking shit

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        Fuck that guy.

      2. Catatafish & Woodchips   10 years ago

        Jesus Christ.

    2. See Double You   10 years ago

      Holy fuck.

    3. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

      fucking bastard

    4. tarran   10 years ago

      Jesus. He just stood there.

      You could see the reporter was uncomfortably aware of him standing there while she did the interview.

    5. lap83   10 years ago

      Twitter's already suspended the account

    6. grrizzly   10 years ago

      I didn't even want to watch the first video and then I clicked on this one.

    7. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Suspended. Fucking hell, though. Disgusting piece of shit.

    8. rts   10 years ago

      Mirror

      1. JWatts   10 years ago

        Thanks

    9. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

      She ran after getting shot 2-3 times. He must've chased her down after killing the cameraman and shooting the interviewee. Twisted.

  30. Mike M.   10 years ago

    Light-skinned black male, with brown eyes and black hair, 6 foot 3 inches tall and approximately 250 pounds. Armed and dangerous (needless to say).

  31. Warty   10 years ago

    Bryce Williams ?@bryce_williams7 7m7 minutes ago
    I filmed the shooting see Facebook
    358 retweets 26 favorites
    Reply Retweet 358 Favorite 26
    More
    Bryce Williams ?@bryce_williams7 7m7 minutes ago
    Adam went to hr on me after working with me one time!!!
    223 retweets 12 favorites
    Reply Retweet 223 Favorite 12
    More
    Bryce Williams ?@bryce_williams7 8m8 minutes ago
    They hired her after that???
    186 retweets 8 favorites
    Reply Retweet 186 Favorite 8
    More
    Bryce Williams ?@bryce_williams7 8m8 minutes ago
    EEOC report filed
    199 retweets 14 favorites
    Reply Retweet 199 Favorite 14
    More
    Bryce Williams ?@bryce_williams7 9m9 minutes ago
    Alison made racist comments

    And then his cell phone videos of him shooting. Fucking fuck.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      Christ.

      I hope that's a really terrible troll. But it doesn't look like it from the history.

      Twitter just suspended the account, unsurprisingly.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        Pretty sure he's the real deal.

        HLN has posted the guys face, finally, although they keep calling him Vester Flanagan when it is likely this Bryce Williams guy.

        1. WTF   10 years ago

          Bryce Williams was apparently his on-air name.

          1. See Double You   10 years ago

            You're right. I though local news reporters simply used their real names.

            1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

              Unless your first name is "Vester". Bad handle. Bad human.

    2. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Perceived racism.

    3. Illocust   10 years ago

      Well this media shit storm is going to 'fun'. God damn insane fuck.

      1. Sudden   10 years ago

        Dorner all over again.

        Remember the "angry white man" epidemic of the early 90s personified by Michael Douglas' character in Falling Down? With Dorner and now this combined with everything else, is is possible that we have the angry black man epidemic now?

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          The Dorner name sounds familiar, but I don't remember the story. One sentence summary?

          1. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

            disgruntled ex-cop. manhunt with drones throughout CA. couple old hispanic ladies shot to shit for driving a similar vehicle.

            1. Illocust   10 years ago

              Oh wow, I didn't know he was black. I didn't follow that story very closely.

            2. W. Chipper Dove   10 years ago

              'Similar vehicle' meaning a truck, iirc. Completely different make and color.

            3. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

              Except the vehicle they were driving was nothing like the Dorner's.

              The cops basically just panicked with a car drove by slowly (delivering newspapers).

        2. Haven Monahan   10 years ago

          What? A disgruntled black ex-employee shoots multiple white co-workers before turning gun on himself?

          Google "Hartford Distributors Shooting".

          The media can't ignore this one.

    4. lap83   10 years ago

      He sounds seriously mentally ill. It'll probably get him a lighter sentence, unfortunately.

      1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

        Might get him life in max security rather than the death penalty, but I wouldn't call that "light".

        I just hope he's taken alive.

        1. SIV   10 years ago

          Why do you want him taken alive?

          1. Free Society   10 years ago

            Decades of cruel existence in a federal max security is worth something.

            1. SIV   10 years ago

              Federal?

              The killer forfeited his right to live.

              1. Free Society   10 years ago

                Of course he did, he forfeited all of his rights. But it's not like max security is a happy existence. I for one would rather die than be condemned to a life sentence in such a place. Albeit, I don't know that this killer feels the same. A rational justice system would let the family of the murdered determine the appropriate punishment, if it ever gets to trial that is.

    5. Free Society   10 years ago

      "This person said something racist. I therefore am allowed to kill them."

      You gotta admit, visiting violence on purported racists gets a lot of ethical legitimacy these days.

      1. WTF   10 years ago

        They othered him and oppressed him with their white privilege, so it's understandable he struck back at them.

      2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        I'm going to go out on a limb and say this guy was just bugfuck crazy and determined she was a racist based on non-existent evidence, just like he determined the man was evil because he reported him to HR.

        1. WTF   10 years ago

          Well yeah, I think that's a pretty good bet. Of course, no one can ever just be bugfuck crazy, there has to be a political narrative to advance, after all.

        2. Free Society   10 years ago

          Probably. Not to say that racial offendedness will garner this killer any leeway in a potential trial, but that sort of thing does happen more generally. A cousin of mine lived in the inner city of Nashville when he was in high school. He was relentlessly bullied because he was just about the only white kid at his school. One day he called one of his bullies a nigger.

          The bullies followed him home from school, now empowered by some sense of racial justice their numbers swelled, and they beat him unconscious in his own front yard in front of his mother. My aunt and uncle filed a police report and spoke to the school about the incident. Both the police and the school administration basically told the parents that their son got what he deserved for calling someone a nigger. Social justice.

        3. Drake   10 years ago

          I'm guessing her racism involved her unwillingness to fuck him.

          1. Drake   10 years ago

            Or her boyfriend's unwillingness.

  32. Warty   10 years ago

    Facebook

    Apparently this dude was an anchor.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      I saw the cell phone video before the killer's account was suspended. My God, that was chilling.

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        Yes it was.

      2. Sudden   10 years ago

        Any links elsewhere on the web?

        1. rts   10 years ago

          Mirror

          (Although it may not be complete)

        2. Mark6   10 years ago

          infowars.com

    2. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

      Which presumably means he was clean enough to pass a strict background check.

  33. Warty   10 years ago

    And now his twitter account is gone. You don't want to see the video, trust me.

    1. tarran   10 years ago

      It's not gory.

      Just malevolent.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        He's holding the Glock at her for 20 seconds while he decides whether he's going to go through with it. And then the look on her face after the first shot...

        1. tarran   10 years ago

          Was he? I didn't observe the gun until just before he fired the first shot.

          1. RBS   10 years ago

            The first video on his twitter feed started with him pointing the gun at her.

          2. Warty   10 years ago

            There were two videos on Twitter. I think the Facebook one shows the whole thing.

            1. tarran   10 years ago

              I only watched the one with the shooting. I think I came late to the party - as twitter was disabling the account.

              1. Warty   10 years ago

                Well, liveleak has it. I actually don't recommend watching it, for the record.

                1. Sudden   10 years ago

                  They've taken it down too.

                  I sorta still wanna see it even with the warnings.

                  Because it is important to see what evil lives in this world.

                  1. Warty   10 years ago

                    It looks like it's still up. I think their server is just getting crushed.

                  2. Sudden   10 years ago

                    NM it is up. The initial loading issue may have been something different.

                    That video is surreal. How did no one stop when the gun was first pointed at them?

                    1. Warty   10 years ago

                      Tunnel vision. I imagine doing a live interview takes a lot of concentration. And why would she expect anything bad to happen?

                    2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                      How did no one stop when the gun was first pointed at them?

                      Yeah, that part was really strange, but I'm guessing they're used to looking focused while on camera even while crew are doing stuff in their periphery.

          3. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            It looks like he accidentally stopped recording and then started recording again. there are (were) two video the earlier (shorter) video shows the gun pointing at various people then it stops, then the second one starts and it's some waving, but nobody notices. Then the shooting starts.

            1. Warty   10 years ago

              I think the video was split because of a twitter max length restriction.

              1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                That'd be a good explanation too.

      2. Akira   10 years ago

        One of the most disturbing parts to me (besides the fact that it's a murder of two human beings) was the expression on the other anchor's face when they cut back to the studio... She was just shocked, and you could tell that she knew that two of her co-workers, who she probably say every day, just got killed. Then she nervously spewed out this line that was something like "well I'm not sure what happened there, but we'll let you know as soon as we find out what those sounds were."

        She knew what those sounds were.

    2. Illocust   10 years ago

      Hopefully twitter kept a copy of the video before deleting the account. That will be brilliant evidence during his trial.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        I'm sure lots of people made copies. The facebook account is gone now too.

      2. lap83   10 years ago

        evidence for the insanity plea

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          Insanity plea means you didn't know you were committing a crime due to mental illness. For example, you shot your wife because you thought she was an alien here to suck out your brains. Being a sick mother fucker who shoots someone out of revenge for petty 'grievances' doesn't fall under the insanity plea. He knew it was a crime and he knew it wasn't self defense.

          1. lap83   10 years ago

            "Being a sick mother fucker who shoots someone out of revenge for petty 'grievances' doesn't fall under the insanity plea."

            No, but filming it and acting like nothing is wrong could qualify

            1. See Double You   10 years ago

              No, it won't.

            2. RBS   10 years ago

              I would argue the opposite.

    3. Zeb   10 years ago

      Does it make me a bad person that I sort of do?

      Don't get me wrong. I certainly don't get any thrill particular pleasure from it. It leaves me feeling a bit queasy. But i find things like that compelling in a strange way and hard to look away from. I'm kind of the same way with 911 video.
      I think it has to do with the fact that I haven't personally experienced anything as horrible as that and I am fascinated by things like that that happen often enough but are completely outside of my personal experience.

      1. SIV   10 years ago

        Does it make me a bad person that I sort of do?

        Jesus Fucking Christ, NO.

        I'm debating whether asking that question makes you a bad person. Wanting to see the video doesn't.

        1. Zeb   10 years ago

          I wasn't actually seriously questioning my own moral character.

          1. Citizen X   10 years ago

            WELL YOU SHOULD.

  34. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    And his news alias was Bryce Williams because apparently Vester Lee Flanagan too country for Roanoke?

    1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

      No, it sounds like a crazy person name. Sane people go by two names, not three.

  35. Mike M.   10 years ago

    Well, since it was a black guy and he killed white people, it goes without saying that this event will get flushed down the memory hole within the next 24-48 hours, including by the oh-so-politically-correct Reason of course.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      Fuck you.

      1. Mike M.   10 years ago

        Fuck you.

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      Shut the fuck up you fucking idiot. Do you ever stop and think and realize what a whiny pussy fucking moron you are? Do you get embarrassed? Fuck you.

      1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

        You said this better than I did. I just tried to go shorter.

        1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

          Sometimes brevity is the soul of wit. Sometimes not.

    3. Zeb   10 years ago

      Well, you are consistent and predictable, anyway.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        Well there's been no, "If Block Insane Yomamma had a son," comment yet. But maybe I'm jinxing it.

        1. SIV   10 years ago

          "If Obama had a son he'd look like Vester"

          1. Zeb   10 years ago

            But less fat.

            1. SIV   10 years ago

              Maybe he takes after the wookie?

      2. Sudden   10 years ago

        He sorta has a point. I brought up Dorner earlier and half forgot about it and the other half didn't know Dorner was black. Dorner's allegations of racism within his employer (LAPD) were of the same nature as Flanagan's here. Dylann Roof becomes a story so big that a longstanding icon of southern culture becomes thoughtcrime. This story may disappear down the memory hole like Dorner before it apparantly has.

        1. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

          Dorner's story was of him being disgusted with police brutality, reporting it and then being ostracized for doing so.

        2. Zeb   10 years ago

          I think there is a distinction to be made between "not getting blown out of proportion like some other story was" and being memory holed.

    4. Illocust   10 years ago

      There was multiple videos and an anchor got shot. It also can be tied into the leading topic of the day because the shooter cited 'racism' as his motivation.

      This isn't going anywhere soon.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        Remember what I said about people doing more of whatever they did before after a tragedy? That goes for self-pitying pencildick peckerwood morons too.

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          Huh? Are you calling me names or Mike?

          1. Warty   10 years ago

            Mike. I'm definitely not trying to insult you. Mike, on the other hand, deserves every insult that can be heaped on him.

            1. Illocust   10 years ago

              Oh carry on then. He hasn't shown an ounce of decency in this thread.

              1. Citizen X   10 years ago

                He'd have to have some to show any.

        2. Zeb   10 years ago

          "peckerwood" is now my favorite racial epithet.

      2. TheZenomeProject   10 years ago

        A sociopath and narcissist that's fascinated with SJW topics and the RaseWarz? I wonder why!

      3. Mike M.   10 years ago

        Black on white crime and racism is pretty much the biggest no-discussion zone in the American liberal media today. No subject in the world is more utterly terrifying to them, not even Islamic terrorism.

        I predict that by this time tomorrow it'll be like this never even happened. We'll see.

        1. TheZenomeProject   10 years ago

          The difference is that this lunatic was brazen enough to put all of his motives right in social media. To me everyone in the media has no choice but to discuss it, there's nothing unknown about his motivations, and no narrative to create. He stated them to the world right before he put the bullet in his own head.

          1. Illocust   10 years ago

            And he shot an anchor during a live broadcast. Everyone watching the show saw it happen giving it immediate exposure. The anchor means that there is one news org that considers this a big freaking deal they won't forget soon, and all the other anchors on tv empathize with the victim, increasing the importance of the story in their minds.

          2. Mike M.   10 years ago
          3. Mike M.   10 years ago

            Motives which I promise you are being wiped off that social media right now as we speak, if they haven't been already.

          4. Sudden   10 years ago

            Same with Dorner. But how many people remember even remote details of that, even while it lasted for weeks?

          5. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

            Trump will do say something stupid today or tomorrow and that will be the focus of media attention for a week. This one will be completely forgotten by friday.

        2. Warty   10 years ago

          Hey peckerwood, were you born stupid or did you have to work at it? Is your mother still alive? If so, how can she stand the shame of having produced something as stupid and self-pitying as you? Fuck off, moron.

          1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

            Stupidity this brazen takes time and effort. Nobody is born that big a moron.

      4. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Ok, I'm very confused. I'm hearing the guy was black and he shot white people. So how can it be racism. Surely you must mean those two very white looking people were actually black and the shooter was white?

        1. Zeb   10 years ago

          At least in the shooter's mind, the motivation seems to have had something to do with other people's racism. Which is the only possible reason his news reading career wasn't more successful.

        2. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

          Their white privilege forced him to do it.

      5. JWatts   10 years ago

        "This isn't going anywhere soon."

        No, I doubt it. Donald Trump has probably already made a public comment. Whatever The Trump comment, it will get 24/7 coverage for at least a week.

  36. Warty   10 years ago

    So. Is this the first selfie murder?

    1. lap83   10 years ago

      Maybe we'll finally get some much-needed legislation to ban selfies

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        All I'm asking for is some sensible selfie regulation here.

        1. WTF   10 years ago

          If selfies are outlawed, only outlaws will have selfies.

  37. Free Society   10 years ago

    They identified the shooter as Vester Lee Flanagan, a former reporter at that station who was fired and went by the on-air name of Bryce Williams

    1. Free Society   10 years ago

      http://heavy.com/news/2015/08/.....-arrested/

      1. JWatts   10 years ago

        So, he faxed a 23 page document to the News Station.

        "ABC News said it received a 23-page fax from someone named Bryce Williams prior to the shooting. The content has not been revealed, and ABC said it has shared the fax with police."

        So, he created a manifesto of some kind.

    2. Free Society   10 years ago

      Apparently he had a history of accusing his colleagues and coworkers of racism. Including the ones he killed today

      1. WTF   10 years ago

        If only they had recognized and admitted their racism, instead of using their white privilege to deny it.

        1. Free Society   10 years ago

          #PreventableViolence

          1. WTF   10 years ago

            #CheckYourPrivilege

      2. 68Whiskey   10 years ago

        Except apparently this woman was never his "coworker." He was shitcanned in 2013, she was hired in 2014.

        So fuck you, Vester. Fuck you in the ass.

        1. sasob   10 years ago

          Being gay, he might have enjoyed that actually.

        2. blcartwright   10 years ago

          from his tweet "and then they hired her?" I think she may have been his replacement

  38. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

    Hey, maybe this asshat can be cellmates with Dylann Roof.

    1. Sudden   10 years ago

      REALITY SHOW WAITING TO HAPPEN

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        Naaah, 10 minutes of footage before Roof is swirlied to death.

        1. Sudden   10 years ago

          I dunno about that. Roof got taken in custody alive. I'd put my money on that level of crazy over the guy that offs himself in the end.

  39. rts   10 years ago

    Scanner just said to stop looking for suspect and vehicle... so either dead or in custody.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      WHSVnews ?@WHSVnews 5m5 minutes ago
      #BREAKING Reports: Alleged #WDBJ shooter Vester Flanagan has shot himself: http://bit.ly/1WSnGE0

  40. Warty   10 years ago

    WHSVnewsVerified account
    ?@WHSVnews
    #BREAKING Reports: Alleged #WDBJ shooter Vester Flanagan has shot himself: http://bit.ly/1WSnGE0

    That's the end of that.

    1. Illocust   10 years ago

      God damnit. Still think they should go on a smear campaign against him. Not as satisfying as if he was watching from a jail cell, but pissing on his grave is the next best thing.

      1. Zeb   10 years ago

        Is there really much worse to smear him with than that he was a crazy fuck who murdered some innocent people for no good reason?

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          He wouldn't be embarrassed by that. It makes him sound important and like a badass. He needs to be smeared like a kid with home haircut and a stutter asking the feminist club president for a dance. Humiliate him publicly and on primetime until he's the butt of every second rate comic's jokes.

          1. Zeb   10 years ago

            Yeah, sure. I don't care. But I don't think that will do any more good than banning guns or apologizing for my white privilege.

    2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Not surprising. And I'm fine with that. So long as he's no longer a threat to others.

    3. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      Vester Flanagan

      The Irish menace strikes again.

    4. SIV   10 years ago

      We can still ban Kwanzaa and MLK Day. Change a bunch of street names to Nathan Bedford Forrest Avenue and Robert E. Lee Drive.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        Fuck off, idiot.

    5. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Hell. I clicked in the faint hope that he had survived the self-inflicted wound, but no.

    6. SimonJester   10 years ago

      Coward. May he be reembered as a coward now and forward.

    7. Zeb   10 years ago

      Good. Revenge and torture fantasies are great and all, but a clean, quick end to it all seems better.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        The news is now saying he's in critical condition, not dead.

        1. Zeb   10 years ago

          Oh well. I gotta go be productive for a while now.

  41. american socialist   10 years ago

    The problem, of course, is that the cameraman and reporter weren't carrying loaded bazookas while they were interviewing their interviewee. Next time I see Anderson cooper on the screen he better have an assault rifle slung over his shoulder. You know-- for his protection.

    1. lap83   10 years ago

      "The problem, of course, is that the cameraman and reporter weren't carrying loaded bazookas while they were interviewing their interviewee."

      That would have been awesome and their families would probably prefer the outcome. Oh, right you're being sarcastic because you'd rather they die so you'd have an excuse to take people's guns away.

      1. RShackleford   10 years ago

        *claps*

    2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Another classy, predictable idiot. Bravo.

    3. Warty   10 years ago

      Exactly, comrade! One day soon all gun lunatics will be packed off to glorious reeducation camps to work off their debt to glorious socialist America.

    4. Jordan   10 years ago

      No, the problem is that they forgot to report from a gun-free zone, obviously.

      1. Krieger's Waifu   10 years ago

        And they should have been nicer to their black colleague. More sensitivity training needed.

    5. Hyperion   10 years ago

      You people are hopeless. You have it set in your naive mind that what would make us safer would be to confiscate all guns. But even that will not stop a deranged killer bent on destruction. The person is already on a suicide mission at that point, so they're going to get a weapon no matter what.

      Maybe as soon as your socialist utopia arrives and everyone gets a free pony, people will stop getting killed, by other citizens. Instead they'll be killed by government goon squads like has happened in every other socialist paradise. I'll take a few random shootings over 20 million people being summarily executed. But you, you think it won't happen to you. You guys always think that way until it's too late.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        But, those 20 million would have deserved it! They were counterrevolutionaries!

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Exactly

    6. OneOut   10 years ago

      "Next time I see Anderson cooper on the screen he better have an assault rifle slung over his shoulder. You know-- for his protection."

      Cooper is a card carrying member of the leftist intelligista.

      He has armed bodyguards like Bloomberg and Pelosi as they telll hoi polloi to disarm.

    7. blcartwright   10 years ago

      At first we thought it was an ambush, but then the shooters own video showed that he held the gun on the victims for at least 20 seconds before opening fire and killing them.

      If a third person came upon the scene and saw the murderer holding his gun on the intended victims, there would have been an opportunity to intervene and save two lives.

  42. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    He must have ran her down after killing the cameraman since she took off after getting shot. If she had a gun on her, maybe she could have pulled it out and used it in self defense while he was shooting the cameraman and interviewee.

    1. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

      Yep.

  43. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   10 years ago

    The evil in this world suffocates me. Seeing shit like this.. being able to do nothing but watch as a passive waste. It's sapped my will to live.

    1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Here you go.

    2. See Double You   10 years ago

      Yes, what happened was horrible. But you need to keep things in perspective. While many perceive an increase in violence (due mostly to the ubiquity and instantaneousness of social media), the reality is that violence is at its lowest levels since ancient times.

      1. Zeb   10 years ago

        Lowest levels ever, most likely.

    3. lap83   10 years ago

      I sometimes find that small pleasures help. For example, it's National Dog Day, so here's a gif of a puppy playing with a bone http://tinyurl.com/py4eqzp

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        And another puppy-related item which may improve your mood.

  44. Jordan   10 years ago

    Looks like Tony, Mike M, and american socialist have all dropped some derp in this thread. Just need shriek and Jackand Ace to check in to complete the dipshit collection.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Someone sounded the NRA signal. It's like the global warming and Koch brothers signals. They all summon the same morons.

    2. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

      The Dipshit Collection, presented by the Franklin Mint. Every month, you'll recieve a new dipshit for the low, low price of just $9.99 plus shipping and handling. Collect them all today! Trade them with friends, or display them for your family. The Dipshit Collection from the Franklin Mint. Order yours today!

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        The Shreek coin is sure to be a favorite.

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   10 years ago

          The Shriek coin is actually a greenback.

        2. Lord at War   10 years ago

          The shriek coin has 8% gold- which only cost $600/oz

    3. Mike M.   10 years ago

      I'm stating nothing but facts. An angry black guy got fired from his job for some reason, blamed all his problems in the world on whitey, and decided to take out some whiteys as his last final act on the big stage. Anyone take issue with any of these facts?

      He was the same exact same kind of piece of shit as Dylann Roof, except with the races reversed. The only difference is that we're all supposed to pretend that this only goes in one direction. Fuck that. I'm not playing that game, and anyone who doesn't like it can go fly a kite.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        "blamed all his problems in the world on whitey"

        Not a known fact.

        "decided to take out some whiteys as his last final act on the big stage"

        Not "some" whiteys. Two people he knew that he thought wronged him. Roof shot up strangers for being black and meant for it to be a political act, not a personal one.

        So there are two problems. Idiot.

        1. Mike M.   10 years ago

          Not a known fact.

          Bull fucking shit. The details on this guy are coming out now. He has been a royal pain in the ass and has been crying racism at all his jobs going back to at least 2000.

          Not "some" whiteys. Two people he knew that he thought wronged him.

          Uhhhh, he shot THREE people, moron. What about Vicki Gardner from the Smith Mountain Lake Regional Chamber of Commerce?

  45. John   10 years ago

    How long before we finally pass common sense gun control to keep guns out of the hands of journalists?

  46. Sudden   10 years ago

    All I know is twitchy is gonna find some interesting tweets in relation to this story.

  47. SIV   10 years ago

    The last few Tweets sent from Williams' account suggest a racial motivation for the attack.

    Report to re-education camp, Robby.

  48. Hyperion   10 years ago

    You know, I'm beginning to wonder. Why hasn't CNN given a description of the shooter? You can't tell much of anything from that photo. I mean, shouldn't part of their job be giving a description so that people who see the guy would be warned and maybe make a phone call?

    I'm almost starting to think that the shooter wasn't a white teabagger.

    1. Illocust   10 years ago

      Shooters dead.

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        Dead-American isn't a race, though.

      2. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Fucking CNN, so damn predictable. They didn't even release a description of the guy because they found out that he's black. Fuck CNN, they are not journalists, they're a bunch of politically biased hacks, just like all the other networks.

        1. lap83   10 years ago

          I suspect the focus on identity issues and gun control is all connected. It's not important to them whether or not gun control works, the goal is to take guns from certain people.

    2. lap83   10 years ago

      They've identified him, he was a former newscaster http://thinkprogress.org/justi.....hooter-id/

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Holy fucking shit is that ever going to ruin the proglotards afternoon.

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          Apparently not, they're spinning it as a story of male on female violence.

          1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

            Well that's fucking shameless.

  49. See Double You   10 years ago

    He took the coward's way out. Which further suggests he very well knew what he did was wrong.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      Wait, now HLN is saying he's not dead...

      1. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

        WHOA. My hopes are revived, along with him?

        1. See Double You   10 years ago

          IDK. The asshole is in critical condition, which means there's a high chance he won't make it.

          1. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

            Critical is better than grave.

            1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

              Better than Lou Reed.

            2. R C Dean   10 years ago

              Nah. Just die already.

        2. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Hopes for what? Just wait, the media will soft defend this guy and say that it happened because of racial injustice and that it's all whitey's fault. They know no shame, absolutely none.

          1. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

            He doesn't get to crawl out on it. Media can say what they like, it won't help when he drops the soap.

            1. Hyperion   10 years ago

              Oh, I know he's not going to get away it. I'm just saying that the leftist networks will soft defend him. They'll talk about the tragedy and say we need a conversation about more gun control and racial injustice. Whereas had the guy been white, they would have just screamed for more gun control and how bad the NRA and right wingers are, blahblahblah on and on, forever.

              1. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

                Something about civil society, we hate it when crazed mofos cheat human justice by committing suicide.

              2. Sudden   10 years ago

                They'll not bring race up at all. They won't go near racial injustice because stories like this need to be completely removed from race lest people realize things go both ways.

                The Dorner motive was entirely rooted in race but the conversation quickly got scrubbed.

  50. SIV   10 years ago

    Vester wrote a manifesto but the dumb motherfucker sent it to ABC News where it almost certainly willbe suppressed. I hope he posted it elsewhere.

    1. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Download, my pretties, like you've never downloaded before!

    2. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      They turned it over to the police, which is the right thing to do here. Fuck giving this coward more publicity than he already has.

      1. Sudden   10 years ago

        We should probably burn every copy of Mein Kampf then right? Because understanding what drives a man to horrific acts has no utility whatsoever.

        1. SIV   10 years ago

          JB has a lot of faith in Top. Men.

  51. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    History:

    Heather Myers ?@HeatherMyersSD6 12m12 minutes ago
    #Correction: Our ND hired and fired VA shooting suspect in FL in 2000. Fired for bizarre behavior and threatening employees. @SanDiego6

    1. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

      ND = news director?

      1. WTF   10 years ago

        No Dick?

  52. Warty   10 years ago

    WHSVnews ?@WHSVnews 5m5 minutes ago
    CORRECTION: State police say that #WDBJ suspected shooter Vester Flanagan is not dead, but in critical condition: http://bit.ly/1WSbR0l

    1. Free Society   10 years ago

      Let's hope he wakes up retarded, but not full retard, just retarded enough to sense his suffering and loss of his humanity.

  53. RBS   10 years ago

    The ThinkProgress take:

    This is often because while women can escape abusive partners by moving to a shelter or other save living location, they often can't change jobs as quickly, and this means their partners know where they can find them. It can lead to women feeling they cannot reject men's romantic advances for fear of becoming victims of violence.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      The only evidence I've seen suggests he was a paranoid sociopath. Perhaps he was rejected by Parker, but that's pure speculation at this point.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        She had a finacee. Unlikely he made a romantic move.

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          And he's gay, so definitely no rejection.

          1. Hyperion   10 years ago

            Damn, he's gay, black, and worked for thinkprogress? The left are having a totally shitty day I think.

            1. Illocust   10 years ago

              No, I don't think he worked for thinkprogress. He was just a reporter.

              1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                Ok, well, that probably came early on like a few other things that were likely misinformation.

                Just the fact that he's not a right wing gun nut whitey is enough make the left really depressed. They were ready to pounce all over it this morning. Right away saying that the NRA is to blame for arming another gun nut and that from the picture, it was obvious what his race is, meaning white.

        2. Drake   10 years ago

          So he and Parker wanted the same guy?

    2. WTF   10 years ago

      "Woman, man murdered on-air; woman hardest hit."

      1. R C Dean   10 years ago

        Sweet.

        In a bitter kind of way.

    3. Illocust   10 years ago

      Just how, how is this the take they see from this. I'd understand if they went full gun grabber or this is why we need more government funds for mental illness. But this is so fucking off topic it's not even funny. The man stated his damn motivation and it had nothing to do with her gender or a romance between them.

      1. R C Dean   10 years ago

        Especially considering he's gay.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          So has anyone seen this alleged 32 page fax that he sent?

        2. Illocust   10 years ago

          Yep, that pretty much nixes the romantic rejection motivation.

  54. Faceless Woodchipper   10 years ago

    I guess Reason will jump on this one soon. Looks like we'd better all wear body cams at all times.

    Sheriff's deputies fired after body cam shows false profanity accusation against Seattle bus driver

    http://www.rawstory.com/2015/0.....us-driver/

  55. Troy muy grande boner   10 years ago

    Watched the video at live leaks. My heart started pumping when the cameraman turned to his right and started his pan to the left because I knew this was coming.

    This wasn't insanity. The fucker raises the weapon and lowers it at least once. So he thought about what he was doing.

    1. Zeb   10 years ago

      It wasn't the kind of insanity that makes you not legally culpable, but it's still fucking crazy.

    2. Ceci n'est pas un woodchipper   10 years ago

      There's crazy as in talk-to-dogs-hear-voices crazy, and there's crazy like being so obsessed with yourself that you kill people for stupid, selfish reasons. Narcissism, for instance, is the latter. Being a pathetic man-child who murders people because your feelings are hurt is another example.

    3. Troy muy grande boner   10 years ago

      i was saying this is 1st degree murder.

  56. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

    Gawker's reasoned and clarifying take on the matter:

    RIP to the victims even though they may have been racist.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      Stay classy, Gawker!

    2. Citizen X   10 years ago

      Oh my god. I would take a Taco Bell shit on everybody who works for or comments at Gawker, but i'm pretty sure they already have people for that.

    3. Warty   10 years ago

      Like I said after the Dylann Root thing: in the phrase "racist murderer", we know which word is the curse.

      1. Sudden   10 years ago

        THIS

      2. Sudden   10 years ago

        Though in this case, Gawker is so adamant about the evil of the word racist that it carries enough weight to make the victim of murder almost deserving.

    4. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Is that for real? I don't travel to Gawker, so I need help knowing if this is a headline, a comment, what.

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        I got it from a screencap at Ace of Spades. Not going to give Gawker my traffic.

    5. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

      I like limegreensalads trolling over at Gawker.

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        I like Ken M trolling everywhere.

    6. lap83   10 years ago

      They probably tweeted that through gritted teeth

    7. Chipwooder   10 years ago

      Much as it pains me to be fair to Gawker, not everything on Kinja is Gawker, and this one doesn't appear to be related. Just some random asshole.

  57. See Double You   10 years ago

    This story particularly grips me because the female reporter was in a similar spot in her life as I am now: relatively young (she was two years younger than I am) and just starting her career. She (as well as the cameraman) was engaged; I've been married for only a short time.

    This event is very depressing.

    1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

      Maybe take a break from the internet today? Go have a picnic lunch with your spouse or friend. Just put your headphones on, close your eyes and listen to the entire Kinks catalog.

      This is a sad episode, but don't let it get you down. There is so much beauty and good in this world. Today is a good day to go and experience that.

      1. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

        Yep. I'm taking the rest of the week off and visiting Tucson with my girlfriend. Leaving my laptop at home.

        Do not let your life be ruled by brutality.

        1. Sudden   10 years ago

          Being aware of brutality, being incensed by brutality, and trying to understand brutality does not make one ruled by brutality. It only makes one fascinated with a fundamental part of the human condition, as fundamental a part as love and compassion.

  58. Swiss Servator, ...hat nichts   10 years ago

    I...I..got nothing.

    I am already feeling poorly, as I have been pushing too hard. I am going to go home, hug my wife and stay away from the intarwebz for the rest of the day.

    See all of you tomorrow.

    1. Free Society   10 years ago

      You should have been practicing your kagels.

  59. sloopyinTEXAS   10 years ago

    White lives matter?

    1. Libertymike   10 years ago

      This one does.

  60. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

    Turned my office TV to Headline News (the company won't pay for expanded cable, so no Fox or CNN). Right now, Nancy Grace is explaining to us that this was a premeditated act, and that his driving to the crew's location demonstrates intent. I take great comfort knowing we have Nancy's steady leadership and quiet wisdom to guide us through these dark times.

  61. space junk   10 years ago

    Let this asshole die in the hospital! He is not worth saving. He clearly didn't even value his own life or the lives of others.

    No sense in saving someone like this...

    Sad day for a lot of people that knew these victims.

    1. Sudden   10 years ago

      Disagree.

      Save him.
      Kill him again.
      But botch the execution for maximum suffering.
      And post it on social media.

      1. Berserkerscientist   10 years ago

        An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

        1. Sudden   10 years ago

          I cliche for a cliche leaves the whole world covered in derp

        2. sasob   10 years ago

          An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

          Only true if everyone had two good eyes. Unfortunately some have only one. So after any monumental eye poke out there would be people who still had one good eye.

          1. SimonJester   10 years ago

            In the land of the blind, the one-eyed derpterd still pretends to be a pirate.

        3. lap83   10 years ago

          because we're all murderous psychopaths...it must've been a prog that came up with that one

        4. Lord at War   10 years ago

          An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

          Only if you do it twice...

      2. space junk   10 years ago

        I could be down with this with one adjustment.

        Sell it on PPV and donate the money to the victims families.

    2. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

      Nope, I want him to recover from his injuries and go on to live a long, long life, every minute of it spent in a cage.

      1. Free Society   10 years ago

        I'd like him to only half recover from what I assume is a traumatic brain injury.

      2. space junk   10 years ago

        I see no need to pay for the cage, the meals, the reading materials, the lawyers or anything else.

        Fuck him!

        I can go with the solution from Sudden above though. At least for a short while.

  62. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    White lives matter?

    Belittler.

  63. helen567   10 years ago

    Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
    http://www.jobnet10.com

  64. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

    Before he died, Vester Lee Flanagan faxed ABC News a copy of his 23-page manifesto in which he cited revenge for the Charleston church massacre as the motivation for his attack

    So, what's the left wing equivalent of the Confederate flag?

    1. SIV   10 years ago

      WHYCOME THEIR AIN'T NO MISS WHITE AMERICA PAJUNT?

      /Warty

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      I think it's red with a hammer and sickle.

      1. CatoTheChipper   10 years ago

        The Che Guevara teeshirt.

    3. toolkien   10 years ago

      Martin Luther King Day?

      Or at least anything official named after Malcolm X?

    4. Cloudbuster   10 years ago

      Rainbow flag: http://www.ulmhawkeyeonline.co....._r.png#GAY flag 3563x2378

      Black Power flag: http://atlantablackstar.com/wp.....00x300.png

      If it's our turn to go on a silly crusade against symbols, why not those? The murderer was a gay black man. He was know to file false racial harrassment claims. In his suicide note he calls it revenge for the Charleston shooting.

      This is right at the feet of Obama, Sharpton and the rest of the racial grievance mongers.

      1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

        No, I vote for the word "microaggression". It's clear that an obsession with microaggressions killed these people, so now all SJWs have to repudiate the term and censor all references to it. Make it so.

        1. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

          I will now forever be "triggered" by the term micro-aggression because of the trigger man that pulled the trigger after claiming to be micro-aggressed.

      2. Free Society   10 years ago

        I agree. An entire generation of blacks, browns, gays, you name it have become class of people who might properly be called The Aggrieved. Real or not, rational or not, the sense of justice in these people is real, as perverted as it is.

        I think the first news station that settled this guy's EEOC suit out of court dodged a bullet, because the station who got his suit dismissed out of hand was subjected to some "social justice" in the truest sense of that bullshit term.

        1. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

          Just watch, their will be a plethora of SJW shitbags on the interwebz defending and sympathizing with this guy like they defended the jihadists in Garland, TX.

      3. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        This is right at the feet of Obama, Sharpton and the rest of the racial grievance mongers.

        AND DYLANN ROOF KILLED PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THE CONFEDERATE FLAG!

        Way to sink to their level, guys.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          We have to ban something that symbolizes the left. What about Salon? That would be a good start.

          1. SimonJester   10 years ago

            I vote yes. Can we ban Clintons from public office, as well? Since, you know, we are just doing random shit.

        2. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

          It feels nice. Like sinking into a soothing hot tub.

        3. Free Society   10 years ago

          The confederate flag is a symbol of a defunct institution. Obama, Sharpton and the rest are actively planting seeds of fruitless racial conflict and false narratives, for personal and political gain, that almost certainly leads to bad things. To take another example, the cultural Marxists are ethically culpable for their spread of lies and much of the results of those lies, are they not?

          I'll grant you that it's problematic to directly correlate any one event directly to Sharpton or Obama or whoever, but I think the effects of their policies, words and deeds all contribute to the widely believed false narratives that actually fuels this violence. This shit doesn't happen in a vacuum.

          1. SIV   10 years ago

            You must forgive our millenia commenters. They're a little slow.

            1. Free Society   10 years ago

              I'm not ageist or anything... I have lots of millennial friends I swear!

            2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

              Progs would argue that the flag is 'actively planting seeds of fruitless racial conflict and false narratives' and 'that almost certainly leads to bad things.'

              They'd argue that flying the Confederate flag is evidence that you have bought into a fraudulent Lost Cause narrative that serves to justify continued black oppression.

              They'd be wrong, but their argument would be identical to Free Society's.

              1. Free Society   10 years ago

                Progs would argue that the flag is 'actively planting seeds of fruitless racial conflict and false narratives' and 'that almost certainly leads to bad things.'

                Talk about animism. Again the flag is an object, it's not a set of ideas or person promoting those ideas to other people. Is it really fair to criticize the Ku Klux Klan's role in lynchings because a very small proportion of it's members have been found to be murderers?

                Can we really assign any blame to neocon columnists, pundits and voters for the murdery foreign policy of the US? Of course not, we can only blame Boooooosh because of course he came to power in a complete vacuum of support and enacted his policies without any social or institutional backing whatsoever. Makes sense, thanks Irish.

      4. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

        I believe the word is collectivist, for advocates of collectivized rights and hatreds.

    5. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

      http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multi.....51120c.jpg

  65. Hyperion   10 years ago

    Oh noes! It's back!

  66. Hyperion   10 years ago

    So, is it a hate crime? I keedz, I keedz!

    1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      This is the only reason I wish he had survived: to see if the DOJ would charge him with a hate crime. That would have been interesting.

  67. Illocust   10 years ago

    Whelp, he was gay. There goes Huffington Post's angle that this was inspired by the female reporter rejecting him romantically. Maybe we can finally join hands and agree that these sick mother fuckers don't say anything about broader culture.

    1. Illocust   10 years ago

      Sorry, ThinkProgress not HuffPo

    2. tarran   10 years ago

      There is so much meat in this for the left wing and right wing collectivists to dine on. The carcasses could feed them for months!

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        Like their attention span is that long.

        1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

          Hey! TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

    3. Free Society   10 years ago

      Doesn't it? What about this population of people inculcated with the notion that racism is everywhere they look? Or that these purported racists (basically all white people are solid candidates) deserve whatever kind of aggression is meted out to them because of their supposed beliefs or comments? I think that's certainly reflected here, albeit filtered through the mind of a lunatic, but this is a species of intolerance that this particular lunatic almost certainly used to justify his actions.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        And if he didn't have that excuse he would have found another. Lone nuts who act on their own, will always find a reason that they were persecuted.

        This isn't terrorism. No one gave him a gun and training to murder others. He doesn't reflect on the wider ideology anymore than the church guy reflects on people tired of being called racists for no reason.

        1. Free Society   10 years ago

          And if he didn't have that excuse he would have found another. Lone nuts who act on their own, will always find a reason that they were persecuted.

          Correct, because he's a lunatic. But this is the one he settled and he isn't the first. Like after Ferguson Part 1, a gang of blacks murdered some white guy with hammers and tried to do the same to his pregnant girlfriend. They blacks involved were very open about their motivations; hating racist white people. But do you know why the authorities decided not to rule it a hate crime? Because they argued that the perpetrators had no way of knowing that he was of Bosnian stock, so it can't be an ethnic hate crime. That's like saying some random 1960's lynching couldn't have been motivated by ethnic hatred because the perpetrators had no way of knowing which part of Africa their victims ancestors hailed from.

          This isn't terrorism. No one gave him a gun and training to murder others. He doesn't reflect on the wider ideology anymore than the church guy reflects on people tired of being called racists for no reason.

          I didn't say it was terrorism and I personally haven't even come across that argument yet. But his motivation is what it is: a paranoid racial grievance cooked up and served by the media and lefty academia.

          1. Free Society   10 years ago

            *settled on

          2. Illocust   10 years ago

            I was using terrorism as an example of when the wider ideology can be held accountable for its members actions. I wasn't suggesting that anyone thought this act was a case of it.

      2. CampingInYourPark   10 years ago

        Hate crime?

        1. Drake   10 years ago

          No - the other kind of cold-blooded double-murder.

    4. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

      I dunno, one could make the argument that his tendency to look for reasons to be offended and use them to justify his own hostility was reminiscent of social justice culture in general, and that they have some responsibility for this.

      I mean, I personally wouldn't argue that, because he seems to have had a severe personality disorder and probably would have hurt somebody anyway eventually, but I can't exactly blame people who have been on the receiving of that sort of bullshit from taking the opportunity to turn the tables.

      1. CampingInYourPark   10 years ago

        Trump can cause people to beat and piss on homeless people. There's a cause for everything.

      2. Free Society   10 years ago

        I mean, I personally wouldn't argue that, because he seems to have had a severe personality disorder and probably would have hurt somebody anyway eventually

        Hell maybe if the perpetual racial grievance thing hadn't resonated so well with him, he would have instead been a murdering environmentalist but we can't know that. We can call it Schrodinger's Psychopath.

      3. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

        Is this about downtrodden-complex Germany in the 1930s?

      4. blcartwright   10 years ago

        maybe most SJWs have a severe personality disorder.

        Ask Gov. McAwful to ban SJWs, or liberals in general, from owning guns.

  68. SIV   10 years ago

    I'd like to see the unedited manifesto.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Where's the edited manifesto? Do you have a link?

      1. CampingInYourPark   10 years ago

        It's in the post

    2. RBS   10 years ago

      It sounds like a whole shitpile of stupid.

    3. Mike M.   10 years ago

      Good luck. I predict that thing never sees the light of day.

  69. Vampire   10 years ago

    Motherfuckin' piece of shit pussy motherfucker!!!!!!!!!! Fucking rotten pussy douchebag scum!!!!!!!!!!

    OMFG!!! WTF!!!!!! The families should do what they want to that scumbags lifeless pussy body.

    Those poor people and their families. What a tragedy.

  70. Cloudbuster   10 years ago

    There's a big chunk of the thread on Gawker speculating who the shooter is: white redneck teabagger, ex-boyfriend etc.

    I didn't see anyone voting for "Gay, black racial agitator claiming revenge for the Charleston shootings." Damn. That's awful inconvenient for them.

    And an odd omission, considering what a disproportionate percentage of murders are committed by black men.

    1. tarran   10 years ago

      The'll just blame the guns, and Reagan for closing mental hospitals.

      1. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

        They never blame any of these police guns that keep shooting people in the back. Somebody alert anti-choice whatzername, Stephanie, to this inconsistency on "the left." She'll shame them into changing their story, just you watch!

    2. Illocust   10 years ago

      Fuck we had a thread arguing muslim vs black when they didn't release his picture immediately, and even our regulars didn't guess that. No one actually expects the perfect progressive murdering pyscho to drop out of the freaking sky.

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        I made a joke about it being a masked Amish Muslim, because that picture was so distorted you couldn't tell anything. But 10,000 rabid lunatics at HuffPo could tell for sure that it was a white NRA gun nut.

      2. Troy muy grande boner   10 years ago

        Nobody expect hot big titted women to fall out of the sky.

    3. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Very similar on HuffPo. Most of the posts were either some variation of 'Thanks, NRA for arming another gun nut!', or 'Well, it's obvious from that picture the race is known, WHITE!'.

      And these raving, foaming at the mouth lunatics never admit they are wrong, they just dissipate until the next time and then start doing the same thing again.

  71. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

    I can't read 600 comments.

    I propose we have a contest for "worst Proggy editorial trying to 'explain' this shooting"

    It may take a week or more, but its got to cover all the bases = race, sexual orientation, institutional oppression (news orgs silencing minority voices), the failure of our mental health system, and how capitalism is probably to blame in some way.

    Did anyone find any immediate good examples starting to go down that road?

    1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

      oh, yeah, sorry - must also include "this is why we need Gun Control".

    2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      I expect an absolutely bonkers article from Brittany Cooper. I look forward to it with an eagerness I've never known before.

      1. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

        You're a sick American, Irish.

    3. Hyperion   10 years ago

      It's going to be fun. But in the end, it's all the fault of whitey NRA gun nuts, and we demand sensible gun control now!

      1. Tony   10 years ago

        Just how well do you expect "Let's completely ignore gun violence and any possible solution" to sell?

        Not only should this guy's race be of such great relief to you, but you should be praising the Sandy Hook killer daily for his role in firmly establishing that nothing will probably be done about it for a generation--just as you want.

        1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

          Pretty well given that support for gun rights has actually increased since Newtown, which was a much worse shooting, and has been steadily going up since the early 1990s. Even black people support more gun rights today, and they've historically had a lower opinion of the right to bear arms. Plus, increasing female gun ownership means there's no longer a gap between male and female positions on fire arm ownership, which has also caused a major increase in support for gun rights.

          It's cute that you're wondering how well that's going to sell given that it's sold 100% perfectly for the last decade and support for gun rights are now at an all-time high. You really never know what you're talking about, do you?

        2. tarran   10 years ago

          Tony, the only solution that works to end human violence is to exterminate all humans.

          Murder existed with rocks.

          The Aztecs built a murderous totalitarian empire that practiced genocide despite only having access to stone age weapons (literally - their soldiers wielded wooden clubs with obsidian blades embedded in them).

          Shockingly guns reduce violence, because it levels the playing field between criminals and oppressors and their victims.

          But they don't eliminate violence because some portion of humanity is predisposed to commit violence. Even your messiah, Barack Obama, has been known to crow how he is really good at killing people.

          So, I suggest you grow up and lose this infantile notion that your sky-mommy and daddy can prevent bad things from happening.

          1. Citizen X   10 years ago

            I'm starting to think Tony is a masochist who can only get off when he's being abused. He splashes some retardism into a thread and then sits in front of his computer in a gimp mask and assless chaps, quivering, just waiting for someone to tell him what an idiot he is.

            1. Marshal   10 years ago

              Think of it as martyrdom for cowards.

          2. Tony   10 years ago

            Such a psychopathic copout, and you know it too. "Guns reduce violence" is a lie. Guns aren't the only correlation that explains the US's high gun death stats, but the other factors are ones libertarians are in favor of completely ignoring as well (socioeconomic inequality).

            Vote for me, I'll do nothing about anything! At least I can take solace in being proved right that you all think that the status quo is the best available alternative--unless we can cut billionaires' taxes some more, perhaps.

            1. Citizen X   10 years ago

              "Somebody call me on my bullshit! Tell me i'm an idiot! Hurry, goddammit, it's about to *happen*!"

            2. foghornleghorn   10 years ago

              If poverty is the answer, then why don't my people up in the hills butcher one another?

              Inner city poverty ain't got shit on the poverty in the really rural places.

              1. Free Society   10 years ago

                If poverty is the answer, then why don't my people up in the hills butcher one another?

                If poverty is the answer then the left should be exocriating supporters of the welfare state which halted the 1% per year decline in poverty since it's inception.

                1. foghornleghorn   10 years ago

                  Well to Tony, if everybody just had a million dollars nothing bad would ever happen.

                  I mean this guy obviously killed these people because the reporter made more money than he did.

                  Dylan Roof obviously killed all those people because they made more money.

                  Adam Lanza was just jealous because some teacher had just bought a new Chevy and he couldn't.

                  The Boston Bombing fuckers wanted lollipops and couldn't afford them.

                  The gang bangers aren't competing for drug selling rights. No they are just mad because they'd rather make 15 bucks an hour but since they can't they'll just settle for a bout $5,000 a day, slinging dope on the street corner.

                  I mean, come on guys, the obvious answer is just give everyone free shit because everything is motivated by that.

            3. tarran   10 years ago

              Tony, a member of my ex wife's family used a gun to protect herself from a rapist. And I don't mean "someone she knew" rapist but the "ambushed and tried to drag her off to a darkened alley" type. The knowledge that my dad had a handgun and knew how to use it caused the Grey Wolves to stop their attempts to kill him and/or kidnap me and my brother.

              Both of those are examples of how guns reduce violence.

              You would prefer that my ex's relative be raped rather than have the means to defend herself. You would have preferred that my mom be widower or I and my brother be orphaned, or even perhaps murdered by a militia.

              Keep telling yourself that I am the psychopath you fucking quisling.

              1. Illocust   10 years ago

                Or hell, I'm a crippled female. If I carry pepper spray the guy will be back up and extremely pissed off before I've limped a quarter of a block. The biggest advantage of a gun goes to people like me who are weaker than everybody else. Criminal tend to be young males in good shape, they've already got a massive advantage over everyone else.

                1. tarran   10 years ago

                  If I carry pepper spray the guy will be back up and extremely pissed off before I've limped a quarter of a block.

                  I exptect that Tony that will blame the Republicans for insufficiently funding light rail so you have to walk more than 20 feet to get to a light rail station.

            4. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

              I love the poverty argument because "poor" Americans who kill each other are actually richer per capita than the country of Poland.

              I actually did the math once and African Americans have a combined GDP per capita $2000 higher than Poland and a homicide rate 19 times higher than the Polish homicide rate.

              So tell me, if poverty causes violence, why do African Americans have a murder rate almost 20 times higher than a country where the average person is poorer than they are.

              1. foghornleghorn   10 years ago

                They'll tell you that it's "relative" poverty. I've had this exact argument before.

                When I was 16 and working at Long John Silver's there was this website where you could put your annual salary in and it would tell you where you rank in the world.

                I was in the top 10% of earners.

                Now, I figure I'm probably one those awful 1%'ers that they cry incessantly about.

                1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

                  What I love about the left is that all of their idiotic arguments are an exercise in circular thinking and unfalsifiability. Example: Leftists will tell you black people in America have high homicide rates because they are poor. If you then point out that on a global scale they're way richer than groups of people with much lower homicide rates, they'll call you a racist because that means you must be saying they kill people because they're black.

                  It doesn't matter if you never said that and were just pointing out that the leftist argument is nonsense. They go straight to accusations of racism the minute their argument on the subject of black violence in America is refuted.

            5. kbolino   10 years ago

              Vote for me, I'll do nothing about anything!

              Why is it that you so desire for someone else to tell you what to do?

              1. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

                Crap! Is Pat Paulsen back? What next? Ross Perot? Angela Davis? Wavy Gravy?

        3. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

          With all that is currently known about the shooter and how he acquired his firearm, maybe you can enlighten all us non-precog-types exactly what law would have prevented this particular multiple homicide?

          1. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

            Seriously.

            Why did I do it? I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15.

            More information needed of course, but sounds like he purchased it with some sort of waiting period/background check already in place.

            Unless he bought it on layaway or something.

            1. Illocust   10 years ago

              So now common sense means getting a psyche eval and giving a written essay on why you need it. This essay with reviewed by the right top men of course.

              1. space junk   10 years ago

                Exactly, the rules and procedures will be written by gun control activist types in governments (state and fed).

                Then what % of people will have their guns confiscated or have purchase denied?

                Plenty of killings have occurred in history without the use of guns. This guy was a victim status claiming, angry, non-getting along with the world asshole who wanted an excuse to exact revenge for what twisted patterns he obsessed over that ultimately took over his weak little mind.

                It would appear that his live was more focused on anger than happiness. When he was devoid of happiness to such a drastic level, he snapped.

                But this is a lot of what we see in society now days... People wanting to be activists and professional grievers. They yell, scream, violate property and lives without concern. They don't care about the happiness of others. They probably don't even know how to admire anything positive. They care about power over others in order to fill the vacuum in them.

                The problem is a lack of optimism and appreciation for life. The weapon is largely inconsequential. They can use anything as long as the end result is them getting their way.

              2. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

                "So now common sense means getting a psyche eval and giving a written essay on why you need it. This essay with reviewed by the right top men of course."

                Nonsense. Common sense means passing as many laws as possible to make as many prohibited persons as possible.

            2. Trouser-Pod (The blowhard)   10 years ago

              Unless he bought it on layaway or something.

              That occurred to me, as well. The Layaway murderer.

              Dear Lord....

        4. Free Society   10 years ago

          Explain the correlation you're claiming when gun ownership rates have never been higher and violent crime is near an all time low (in recorded history). That may not necessarily mean guns=less crime, but it almost certainly means guns=/=more crime. And yet you persist.

      2. Episteme   10 years ago

        In terms of the Gun Control angle, one thing that Charlie Cooke pointed out from reading through the parts of the manifesto released to the press was that the killer discussed the when and how of his legal purchase* (and thus presumable background check) of the non-automatic handgun used. Oops!

        (writing about how he went to buy the gun two days after the Charleston shooting)

    4. Illocust   10 years ago

      They've edited it now, but ThinkProgress was saying that he did it because the female reporter rejected him romantically. Making it a case of male on female violence. They kept with this narrative ignoring his own statements right up until it was revealed he was gay.

      http://thinkprogress.org/justi.....hooter-id/

      1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

        I glanced at the Gawker comments and its a hilarious back and forth debate about "OMG WHAT IS THE NARRATIVE HERE"

        there's a few people freaking out about how that its a black guy, and how its going to "unleash the racists" and they're weeping into their kambucha.

        All they care about is their little oppression stories. The "problem" with the jackie story was how it would give airtime to Rape Culture critics.... not that the media was completely complicit in pumping a fake narrative because they eat it up double fisted.

        1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

          "there's a few people freaking out about how that its a black guy, and how its going to "unleash the racists" and they're weeping into their kambucha."

          I love how they refuse to accept that their behavior basically empowers racists, because they have proof that the anti-racists shamelessly lie and obfuscate to serve their narrative, so nothing they say has any credibility.

      2. RBS   10 years ago

        Yeah, I nominate that one because they tried to shoehorn it into an issue that wasn't even close.

        1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

          To progressives, journalism is a series of cookie-cutters used to organize facts into pre-packaged narratives. anything inconsistent with the narrative is ignored, brushed aside, or excused as "complicating factors" which nevertheless highlight the importance of their original bullshit point.

          (e.g. "jackie's" real story was about how we need more funding for rape-support so fake-rape claimers get the treatment they need before they fuck everything up by making it a National news item)

      3. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

        Damn! Another looter-exploitable stereotypical generalization brutally murdered by an inconvenient fact! There oughtta be a law!

  72. space junk   10 years ago

    So ummmm..... Wonder how they will dispose of his body.....

    something chipper.... yada yada

  73. sasob   10 years ago

    It is unclear whose initials he is referring to. He continues, "As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE ?(deleted)!!!" He said Jehovah spoke to him, telling him to act.

    I guess Jehova neglected to tell him what the likely outcome of a race war would be between a less-than-fifteen-percent minority and the rest of the population. Sounds a lot like a certain dipshit activist in Houston who goes by the name Quannel X.

    1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

      If he felt like black people treated him like shit for being gay (which, considering his mental state, may have been purely imagined), maybe he knew exactly what the result would be.

  74. SusanM   10 years ago

    Does this even things up enough so they can put the battle flag back up again?

    1. tarran   10 years ago

      No. That flag of gay oppression of bakery owners, the rainbow colored flag, must go.

    2. SIV   10 years ago

      It should.

  75. Loki   10 years ago

    670+ comments and counting. Do I even want to know what kind of shit show is going on up there?

    1. tarran   10 years ago

      It depends.

      What's your opinion on Tony trying to confirm homophobic stereotypes about gays.

    2. Illocust   10 years ago

      It's actually not that bad, and gives a good timeline on how everything unfolded.

      1. Loki   10 years ago

        Yeah I realize now that this is the same blog post from this morning, just updated. I thought it was a separate post that already had nearly 700 comments. Usually that many comments = total shitstorm of derp.

  76. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

    Howcum no Manchurian Candidates are ever produced performing shenanigans exploitable to weaken or nullify the Sixteenth Amendment?

  77. AD-RtR/OS!   10 years ago

    Nothing says "reconciliation" like killing some "others" who might have dissed you.
    At least we won't have to worry about a disruption of his trial by the Black Lives Matter loonies.

  78. toolkien   10 years ago

    In short, if this has to be lumped in with another killing spree, it should be lumped in with that kid who stabbed all those people because all the hot chicks were rejecting him. Velcro Lee Blam-Blam was a narcissist just like the kid was - manifesto and all.

    It would nice if these people could just keep it short and sweet - "Good-bye cruel world" and a rag in the tail pipe or in a closed garage.

    I can only hope ABC sent a reply to his e-mail - TL,DR....

  79. scallywag   10 years ago

    According to Flanagan's suicide note, he saw himself as a victim of white man oppression and violence directed at black men, exemplified by the Dylan Roof shooting over the summer targeting black parishioners. Yet one wonders was today's killing a revenge for perceived sleights against his 'white' colleagues or the moral failings of a man who confused his own personal failings to that of a system purportedly stacked against the black man ...?

    http://scallywagandvagabond.co.....-shooting/

  80. Libertarian Barbarian   10 years ago

    White news media stirs and inflames racial tensions amongst blacks, black guy kills white news media...poetic justice if you ask me

  81. blcartwright   10 years ago

    "Vester was an unhappy man.? He quickly gathered a reputation as someone who was difficult to work with. He was sort of looking out for people to say things he could take offense to. Eventually after many incidents of his anger coming forward, we dismissed him. He did not take that well...He filed a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission? about members of the staff making racial comments...None of them could be corroborated by anyone. We think they were fabricated."

    sounds like a typical SJW

    1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

      Well, that and the fact that he was a gay, black paranoid social media narcissist. Between that and the grievance-wallowing, he's the perfect SJW. All those people so secretly happy to finally have a bona fide white supremacist neoconfederate killer in Roof are probably not seeing, much less appreciating, the irony.

  82. Lloyd Clucas   10 years ago

    Mr Soave:

    Thanks for all your usual good pieces.

    Just a note. I am appalled at the constant censoring of murders/beheadings and the like on TV and other media.

    Violence and death are horrific. So is the process. The consequences need to be seen in real life. I already have. So many others have not. SHOW IT!

    It ain't like in the movies or on TV. At least not usually. Ordinary people need to see it. Stop catering to the wussy crowd. I realize there are other considerations. I realize Reason didn't censor it. But those who do, and did here, should be called to account and labelled for what they are.

    When it comes to those who don't much care about others' privacy, media folks make fine choices for displaying real consequences of real violence. JUST DO IT. If the news victims really respected their profession, and I assume they did, I'd guess they would want it displayed, whether their families and loved ones would or would not. And I'll say nothing about their wimpy bosses -- local or not, they are an nationwide blight.

    As usual, society will be better for KNOWING, rather than being "protected" by Big Nanny -- public or private.

    I really DO feel for the victims. It is awful! But stop the censorship. Actually honor the dead!

  83. lovelydestruction   10 years ago

    I call bullshit. He knew them, he worked with them. This is workplace violence, however he wanted to dress it up.

  84. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

    According to the Washington Post, 645 were killed by police guns so far this year, and this is August. It makes you wonder what fraction of "gun homicides" are committed by cops hired to enforce victimless crime laws instead of protect individual rights. LEAP believes prohibition makes cops and civilians adversaries for no good reason. Reason could do an article on whether it is cops, guns or prohibition and tax laws that weigh most heavily in these body counts.

  85. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

    Remember the Unabomber? His manifesto was the typical looter collectivist message of wounded altruism and insufficient government coercion. Not only did it serve to expose the problem with most of these um... "disturbed persons," but also gave insights into the nature of the sort of thinking and beliefs that justify the initiation of force.
    Recall that when the Unabomber's message endorsing sacrifice and "suitable restraints" against technology hit the stands, his brother recognized the ravings and promptly identified the perpetrator. The Unabomber believes in: "More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual." This is clearly a social insect mentality with the political State and its drones as ruler and provider.

  86. Warty   10 years ago

    Years ago, when my dad's company was contracting and he had to lay off a lot of people and was expecting to himself be laid off, he ignored company policy and kept a pistol in his desk. You never know when you're going to fire the wrong person, you know?

  87. Hyperion   10 years ago

    I worked for a company around 10 years ago, we had this one IT employee, guy had been there forever. He was pretty strange to say the least. Apparently, he at one time had his office in a closet and stayed in there all of the time and would sleep most of the time. He was really socially awkward and didn't say much. The new director fired him. I guess he freaked out pretty badly and made some threats. The director was actually worried that he'd come back with a gun and start shooting people. Nothing happened though, never saw the guy again.

  88. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    About a year ago the company on the other side of the floor I work on fired an employee who apparently made some threats on the way out. For 6 months they had a guard in the hallway. They also went from a system where you could just walk in the door to one where you had to be buzzed in.

  89. toolkien   10 years ago

    Since I worked a job that was in an industry that could quickly turn borderline people into very angry people looking for retribution, I've given plenty of thought as to exit/safe room strategies once the "firecrackers" start going off. At my current job, we let someone go a few months ago who I was half convinced was either going to off himself when he got home or was going to come back to pay us a visit.

  90. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

    We had an employee in our department who went a little nuts. After he got fired, the "campus" went on lockdown. Which, as far as I can tell, consists of not opening the electronic pass keys doors for strangers. But if you're out in the parking lot - open game!

  91. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    I do this for a living, and I've never, ever been threatened nor kept a weapon at work, had a tire slashed, car keyed. Nothing. Fired hundreds of people, esp during the downturn '05-'10. Never had the first issue.

    But you never do know....

  92. Hyperion   10 years ago

    I doubt any normal sane person would shoot people over a job. They're already a ticking bomb just waiting to go off.

  93. bacon-magic   10 years ago

    If I get fired tomorrow I will say "thanks for the opportunity", grab my stuff and walk out the door. Whoop for joy when I hit the door, it's better to be free then to be tied down where you don't fit.

  94. freedomlover   10 years ago

    In an MPA class I took, the instructor showed us a film about this incident:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_postal

    where the term "going postal" came from. Then he told us that "bad management causes this". He didn't want us to be bad managers you know.

    So, are college professors lefties? You bet they are. So bad, they blame management for berserk behavior of an individual. Heck, my religious friends just blame God.

    Say, I do live near that wonderful city commonly referred to as Berserkeley. And they do have that world renowned college there. Might be something to it.

  95. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    This is precisely why I finally joined the NRA a couple years ago. My dad was a life member. I had no use for them. I forget what episode it was...but I finally said, "Fuck you, this will make people mad, so I'm joining."

    But only one year at a time so I can get that bitchin' NRA range bag every year! Make great tackle boxes for fishing.

    PS Wanna really piss off your gun-hating friends? Start buying them NRA memberships for Christmas. Only $25 or $35 (depending if you can get a discount), and the lulz last all year!

  96. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    Oh, and Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners, and a couple others. Just to try to help.

  97. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    SAF gets my donations. Very litigious, that outfit.

  98. Zeb   10 years ago

    Yeah, it doesn't just happen randomly when people get fired. There is something very wrong with such people to start with.

  99. freedomlover   10 years ago

    So, you read the shooter's remarks?

  100. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    That's funny.

    What's not funny in hindsight: buying your dandy hipster Indian friend a subscription to POZ and having it sent to his Richmond lawfirm's office.

  101. Zeb   10 years ago

    I had to stop giving to the NRA because they wouldn't stop calling me asking for more money. I might join again if there is some good swag.

    I put my NRA sticker over the apple logo on my Mac laptop. Seemed like the place for it.

  102. Drake   10 years ago

    Gun Owners of America is better and less politically correct.

  103. SIV   10 years ago

    It's good on the driver side rear window of your car. Except in a few big cities and at the border. Another good thing to have in your vehicle is a well-worn Bible visible and within easy reach. "Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Drugs" and dancing bear bumper stickers are bad.

  104. Zeb   10 years ago

    I think the other reverse printed one is on my car.

  105. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    ^^ this 🙂

    I have stickers on BOTH rear windows of the Jeep - cause I wanna be like the Valley Girl - "fer sure, fer sure!"

  106. SimonJester   10 years ago

    You fire people for a living?

    That might be the most perfect job ever.

  107. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    SimonJester? You're fired!

    /Trumpmanian

  108. bvandyke   10 years ago

    "IT", "strange","socially awkward"

    me thinks you have something against IT workers.....I'm pretty sure occupation was one of the key items from Rutger's list.....

    As someone in "IT" - the description fits more than you can guess at.

    /SARC

  109. Hyperion   10 years ago

    I've worked in IT for about 18 years. I've met 2 or 3 people like that, out of hundreds of IT workers.

  110. bvandyke   10 years ago

    I wish they worked where I did. Way, way to many introverted, awkward, IT workers in my past.

  111. Ron   10 years ago

    Join both and hedge your bets, thats what i did the day I heard bloomberg set aside 50 mil for his anti gun programs

  112. HolgerDanske   10 years ago

    "That's just it. Everyone reacts to stress differently. Some most people just get their shit, leave and go get another job. Others A tiny fraction go nuts."

  113. freedomlover   10 years ago

    No, no. Stress reaction is too simple.

    The real question is, why do people define themselves by their job? So much so, that some go berserk when they are forced out of one. It's just a job!

    Having fired, been fired and having both observed and experienced a wide spectrum of reactions to this, I've reflected on it for a long time. And, one observation always comes back:

    When we meet someone for the first time in American society, what's the first thing we say to promote conversation?

    So, what do you do for a living?

    We define each other and ourselves by our job titles.

  114. HolgerDanske   10 years ago

    Damn, I was playing with strike-through and posted instead of previewing it. In any case, FIFY.

    Give us an edit button?

  115. freedomlover   10 years ago

    I've worked where, after a lay off, someone came back and shot out the office windows that night.

    And, I've had a freaky-deaky, former IRS auditor that worked for me, get POd at someone, storm out of the office to never return and then mail veiled death threats to me.

    "When you're strange
    Faces come out of the rain
    When you're strange
    No one remembers your name"

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!