CIA to Citizens: No, You May Not See Osama bin Laden's Porn. If He Had Any.
The limits of FOIA
Not long after Osama bin Laden was killed, reports appeared claiming that the Al Qaeda leader—or someone in his compound—had a big pornography collection. But if you were hoping for a glimpse at the stash, or even just confirmation that it exists, the government won't help you:

David Covucci, a blogger for the men's Web site BroBible, decided to try a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CIA on May 26 to get the stash. The agency, in a lightning-fast response dated June 4, said:
"With regard to the pornographic material Osama bin Laden had in his possession at the time of his death, responsive records,"—ready?—"should they exist, would be contained in operational files," which are exempt from the FOIA.
What's more, CIA information and privacy coordinator Michael Lavergne continued, "To the extent that this material exists, the CIA would be prohibited" by federal law, "from mailing obscene matter."
The CIA's full letter to BroBible is here. Oh, well. "To the extent that this material exists," maybe it'll turn up on WikiLeaks.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
FOIA exemption Section F, Subsection Y, paragraph T, clause W - material that the CIA hasn't finished with yet, so wait your turn!
So, Jesse, when can we expect you to eulogize Vinny Musetto? Or have I missed it?
The agency, in a lightning-fast response dated June 4, said:
"With regard to the pornographic material Osama bin Laden had in his possession at the time of his death, responsive records,"ready??"should they exist, would be contained in operational files," which are exempt from the FOIA.
Can we get a subpoena to identify the agency employee in question?
Or do we have to take them in front of a grand jury?
Turn about's fair play, right?
P.S. My real name is Ken Shultz. That's spelled K-E-N S-H-U-L-T-Z
S-c-h-u-l-t-z
I just lost it
Can we get a subpoena to identify the agency employee in question?
???
What employee are you looking for? This guy?
What, do you have Aspberger's or something?
No Ken, I don't. I read your comment several times and couldn't make any sense out of it*. So please, fill me in.
*I know what you are referencing, but it still doesn't make any sense, unless it is sarc, and I need to re-adjust.
We've been asked not to talk about it here.
Try popehat.
I read Popehat. That is why I wondered if it was sarc.
So you do have Aspberger's?
So he liked hijab snuff pron. Who doesn't, really?
Why would these be 'operational files'?
I get the second problem (no mailing) but you could always sent via a non-USPS carrier and charge for shipping. And a title list would not be in violation thereof.
"David Covucci, a blogger for the men's Web site BroBible, decided to try a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CIA on May 26 to get the stash."
This guy may have failed, but he is clearly an American hero regardless.
I'm guessing it's not as salacious as one might think considering that it's pretty well-known that Al-Qaeda operatives used digital steganographic techniques to hide communications in pornographic image files which were then posted to alt.binaries newsgroups..
Not well known enough, this is the first I've heard of it. (Not steganography, the fact that AQ was using it)
Oh usenet porn...
Guys, my guess is that the porn stash turned out to be 3 victoria's secret catalogs.
You think they are going to admit they engaged in a hyperbolic smear?
Backdoor Burka Babes 3
I met a bin laden from Riyadh
Whose porn tastes were quite bad
He jerked to hijabs
And wanked to niqabs
And shame on his family was had
This is why Virginia Postrel hates us.
Brazilian Fart Porn. That's my guess.
something camels something in hijabs?
That NY Post cover is full of win.
Wait... so all the CIA has to do is tape a nude shot onto all of it's documents and then they can't mail them as part of FOIA requests?
Sounds like a new strategy could really pay off. If they're looking for an out of the box thinker to run things, I'm up for the job...
So whatever bin Laden had, it was nastier than a John Stagliano movie?
well, ankles and foreheads...
Must be some really good pr0n that they want to keep it all to themselves.
While an amusing comment, the CIA just has an institutional tendency to hoard any kind of information and not want to share.
They aren't keeping it to themselves. They just giving it all to the SEC and NSF.
But I thought Lemmiwinks killed Wikileaks...
It probably included vacation pictures and video from Bill Clinton's Caribbean escapades.
Half of me still thinks they've got him alive somewhere. Maybe he's hanging out with George W. and Bandar Bush.