Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Prisons

The Dreadful Criminal Justice System That Destroyed Kalief Browder

Three years in prison without a trial, often in solitary, contributed to young man's suicide.

Scott Shackford | 6.8.2015 11:55 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | ABC7
(ABC7)
Khalief Browder
ABC 7

Elizabeth Nolan Brown linked to a piece at The New Yorker this morning about the suicide of Kalief Browder, 22, who spent three years at Rikers Island, often stuck in solitary confinement, without ever seeing a trial. The journalist, Jennifer Gonnerman, originally dove deep into Browder's case back in October, and it's worthy of a read.

The thing to understand about Browder, as is often the case when we hear about abuses within the criminal justice system, is that his situation is not as anomalous as some people think. Browder is not really an outlier, though his case may seem particularly outrageous. The New York City courts have a particularly bad reputation for not remotely having anything resembling speedy trials. From a report in 2013 from WNYC:

Over the past decade, as New York City's backlog of felony cases has grown, so too has the time defendants are spending behind bars before trial. The average pretrial detention in a felony case was 95 days in 2012 — up 25 percent from a decade earlier, despite a drop in new felony cases, according to a recent report from City University of New York researchers. And some defendants spend significantly longer behind bars. Of the people who spent time in jail during 2012, about 3,200 were behind bars for a year or more awaiting their day in court, according to city data.

The context for that reporting was for the case of Donavan Drayton, who was arrested and charged with murder and spent five years behind bars before getting his trial. He was acquitted.

Gonnerman's obituary for Browder describes a man whose mind was absolutely destroyed by his experiences. After all the suffering, physical abuse, and delays in prison, his case was eventually dropped due to lack of evidence. The prosecutors delayed the case for years, and he refused to take a plea deal. Attorney Paul V. Prestia is suing over the case and told Gonnerman he believes prosecutors deliberately dragged their feet in order to try to get a plea rather than deal with a trial:

Prestia, in his lawsuit, alleges "malicious prosecution," charging that Johnson's prosecutors were "representing to the court that they would be 'ready' for trial, when in fact, they never were." Prestia said, "The million-dollar question is: When did they really know they didn't have a witness? Did they really not know until 2013?" He suspects that, as he wrote in his complaint, they were "seeking long, undue adjournments of these cases to procure a guilty plea from plaintiff." The city has denied all allegations of wrongdoing, and Johnson, when I asked about these accusations, said, "Certainly if there is something uncovered that we did wrong, I will deal with that here. But I don't expect that to be the case."

Of political note, presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) knew of Browder's situation and mentioned him in campaign speeches when talking about criminal justice reform. On Sunday, Paul both Tweeted and posted on Facebook condolences to Browder's family. Here's what Paul recently said about Browder in a speech in New Hampshire:

"So when you see people and you see some of this anger at people in the streets and you're like, 'Why are they so unhappy?' Think about Kalief Browder and think about how his friends must feel about American justice, how his parents must feel and about how his community feels," Paul said Saturday in Concord, N.H. "If we become the party that cares about the Sixth Amendment as much as we do the Second Amendment, we're going to dominate."

Since stories like Browder's and Drayton's have come out, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio and chief Judge Jonathan Lippman have announced reforms to speed up trials. States are now also considering rules to restrict the use of solitary confinement, particularly on teens. Watch ReasonTV on solitary confinement below:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Is Obamacare's Medical Socialism Working?

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

PrisonsPolice AbuseNew York CityInnocenceCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (77)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Cdr Lytton   10 years ago

    New York Mayor Bill de Blasio and chief Judge Jonathan Lippman have announced reforms to speed up trials.

    Just plead out.

    1. Spencer   10 years ago

      works in china. confess and you get out in a year- make us prove it and you get the death penalty.

      1. dannye   10 years ago

        It's the American version of self-criticism.

        1. Quixote   10 years ago

          It is especially nauseating to see the "hard on crime" politicians responsible for our failed criminal "justice" system making hypocritical speeches in which they pretend to speak "on behalf of all New Yorkers" and the like. For some insight into everyday business at Rikers Island, see the description of the intake process there at:

          http://www.manhattanchronicles.....Island.php

        2. MSimon   10 years ago

          Gillespie says don't discuss this: http://popehat.com/2015/06/08/.....eason-com/

      2. db   10 years ago

        Dr. Girlfriend: And these are our holding cells, although ?nterland must have much larger facilities, being a whole country and all

        Manservant: ?nterland has...no prisons.

        Dr. Girlfriend: How progressive!

        Manservant: The Baron has instated the death penalty for all infractions of ?nterlaw.

        1. Jay Dubya   10 years ago

          +1 Monarch butterfly

  2. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    Every prosecutor who kept putting off the trial for years, every judge who allowed it, and every CO who participated in throwing this kid in solitary and ruined his life should be charged with murder.

    1. Pepperjack   10 years ago

      You forgot to include the 3 years of pretrial detention.

      1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        I thought I did when I said the prosecutors who put the trial off for years (and the judges who allowed it) should be charged.

        Fuck all of them.

    2. thom   10 years ago

      Don't all of these people swear an oath to support the Constitution of the United States? At a certain point, somebody had an obligation to just unlock the door for him and let him go...

      1. VicRattlehead   10 years ago

        Yeah but they arent required to read it, how fucking stupid is it to swear an oath to something you didnt read and have to low of an IQ to understand

        1. BDub   10 years ago

          Truer words.....

      2. Whole Card   10 years ago

        "But, but, the bureaucracy can't be responsible, bureaucracies aren't people!"

        /derp

    3. LessIsMore   10 years ago

      No. Wrongful imprisonment, 6th amendment violation, breach of duties, firing, fines, investigations into NYC procedures and incentives, etc. - all that I'm fine with for those folks.

      But we need to be fair here. You don't want people to be able to be charged with murder for this kind of thing, when someone commits suicide. Remember the idea of 'unintended consequences'? This attitude would inevitably be turned into a monster as it would be applied to dissimilar, unjust situations.

    4. Suicidy   10 years ago

      Murder requires intent to kill. Technically manslaughter would be more appropriate. As this represents more of a negligent. homocide. But yeah, I would throw those assholes in the can for at least the three years they unconstitutionally incarcerated him.

  3. DEATFBIRSECIA   10 years ago

    Don't hold your breath waiting for any other presidential candidate to make a peep about Browder.

    It won't happen.

    1. Catatafish   10 years ago

      Actually, I disagree. Hillary is so fucking disingenuous that I can definitely see her suddenly trying to make criminal justice reform "her issue."

      1. John C. Randolph   10 years ago

        The only thing stopping her from doing so right now is that it's not polling high enough. That geriatric twat would even turn against her wall street cronies if 60% of likely primary voters wanted to end corporate welfare.

        -jcr

    2. C. S. P. Schofield   10 years ago

      I sympathize. I don't necessarily read the entire article before spouting off either.

      However, from the article :

      "Of political note, presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) knew of Browder's situation and mentioned him in campaign speeches when talking about criminal justice reform."

      1. DEATFBIRSECIA   10 years ago

        From my post: "any other presidential cadidate"

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

          Not CSP's finest moment, especially given the dickish tone of his comment.

          1. Jay Dubya   10 years ago

            reading comprehension failures in service of inaccurate bitching about reading comprehension failures is as vital to the internet as ethernet cable and cat pictures.

            you would think every comment were fucking Walden as often as it happens.

          2. BDub   10 years ago

            Agreed. As if to say, "Hey! guys!, here is an issue we can seem to care about that will gives us plenty of political pull with tha blacks!"

  4. Spencer   10 years ago

    Writ of habeas corpus be damned.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    End all plea bargaining and see what happens to your precious criminal justice system.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      From the original article on the subject last October:

      In 2011, in the Bronx, only a hundred and sixty-five felony cases went to trial; in three thousand nine hundred and ninety-one cases, the defendant pleaded guilty.

      It would be chaos. I wish I could say the prosecutors would drop stupid non-violent offense cases and concentrate on actual crimes, but I know better than that.

      1. Suicidy   10 years ago

        The defense attorneys should conspire against the prosecutor"s office. No more plea bargains. Even if only half go along it will bring the DA to his knees.

    2. Gene   10 years ago

      The fucking thing would implode in less than a year.

    3. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

      Really. One year's probation or roll the dice on six years in prison? The prosecutor's conviction rate is what counts.

      1. Landon-V-Kroll   10 years ago

        Right ON the MONEY. Actual innocence or guilt - truth or fiction - they MEAN NOTHING before these americunt systems - broken and bankrupted of every value. I'm CURRENTLY LITIGATING A VERY SIMILAR TYPE OF CASE - and WOULD HAVE been a SUICIDE - had I not BEEN WHITE AND ABLE TO FIGHT because of that - ROR'd and FREE TO DEFEAT the CRIMINALS in the system working as PROBATION OFFICERS AND PROSECUTORS.

  6. Florida Man   10 years ago

    If he didn't do anything wrong, then why was he in jail? He just saved the taxpayers a ton of money by not having to arrest him and try him again during his next crime spree.
    /average voter

    1. retiredfire   10 years ago

      Well, the article explains, in detail, what he did wrong...oh, wait, sorry.
      But it gave the report of what Johnson said...oh, wait, they didn't tell you who Johnson was.
      I don't know which was more of a miscarriage - this criminal case or the idea that this was any kind of reporting.

    2. Landon-V-Kroll   10 years ago

      Typical Florida TARD... Can't wait TIL YOUR SON/DAUGHTER/SELF/FRIEND ends up merely ACCUSED... Cannot wait. You'll WHINE AND WHINE... "oh THE SYSTEM..." Go hide under your trailer florida goober

  7. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

    What happened in the late 70's and early 80's when NYC had twice the crime rate it does today?

    1. Warty   10 years ago

      Rudy Giuliani fixed that by having the police crack down on dangerous minorities, I believe.

      1. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

        Right, but how did they handle the court cases then? They must have had more than now. Did it take as long to get them to court back then?

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          There's no time for such foolishness, you idiot. STOP AND FRISK SAVED AMERICA

        2. JD the elder   10 years ago

          I get the impression that at a certain point the authorities kind of threw up their hands. I recall reading that one of the things that set Bernhard Goetz off was that he'd been mugged, and one of the muggers got arrested, and Goetz spent longer in the police station than the mugger did.

        3. retiredfire   10 years ago

          They probably spent the requisite amount of money on prosecutions, which is how law-and-order types do things.
          Now, the money needed is siphoned off on vote-buying schemes, as demoncrap politicians are wont to do.

    2. JW   10 years ago

      From what I recall, Wojo and Harris took care of most of the problem.

      1. Episiarch   10 years ago

        You joke, but I used to see Abe Vigoda walking his stupid little dog on East End Avenue all the time when I lived there. And I can't tell you how many times I would see or sit near Steve Landesberg in Cafe 79 on 79th Street.

        1. JW   10 years ago

          It's sad that almost half \of the cast is dead, but we'll always have Abe, Right?

          [Checks http://www.abevigoda.com ....] Yes!

          1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

            Nice fishing, JW.

  8. A Self-Identified $park?   10 years ago

    Well he's dead now so no use crying over spilt milk. Who's up next, Johnny?

    1. VicRattlehead   10 years ago

      yeah "At this point what difference does it make"

  9. Shawn Wilson   10 years ago

    But that's the entire point of the justice system, isn't it, keeping niggers from getting uppity and thinking they're actually people on par with whites?

    1. Flaming Ballsack   10 years ago

      race huslt ler! whit epeople get unjust parking ticket sso its the same thing! why do you hatew hite people?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        Leave the posting while fucked up on dimethyltryptamine to our dear friend Agile Cyborg, ok?

        1. Flaming Ballsack   10 years ago

          censorship! youre ane vil commie!!a!

  10. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

    Whenever I complain about the lengthy sentences attached to crimes, someone always says "Well, people usually just plead down, so it's actually not that bad." Fine then; how about the legislature changes all the punishments to which a person is originally charged to those for which they plead to? The more cumbersome the process and punishment becomes for the defendant, the more valuable pleading becomes to the criminal justice system as a bargaining chip. Don't think reform will come from the "justice" end of things.

    I had a talk with the girlfriend a few nights ago about theories of punishment, and how restorative justice should be the guiding factor in all punishment, with all other theories serving as ceilings, not floors. It's depressing how many good people think that the role of prison is to "keep the bad guys off the streets" and "pay back a debt to society". Unless they're serving a life sentence, the "bad guys" will eventually be back on the streets, and call me insensitive, but I personally was not hurt by the "bad guy" committing a crime. So please don't include me in that Chicago deep dish pie of credit-wielding society.

    1. Riven   10 years ago

      The thing that always strikes me as odd is the phrase "pay back a debt to society." It seems to imply to me that the books will be balanced when the felon is released, but considering how difficult it is as a felon/convict to reassimilate into the world, it doesn't seem very balanced to me. If they're supposed to have paid back their debt, then why is it totally cool to discriminate against people who have a record? How can that be held against them (and resultantly bar them from so. many. opportunities) when they've "done their time"?

      1. SimonJester   10 years ago

        I hate the system, so please don't read this as a defence.

        The "debt to society" still makes some sense for discriminate against those with a record. A credit card company can check your to see if you have gone into "debt" previously, and deny credit or raise rates based on that answer. This is really no different. Someone who has "gone into debt" to society has more risk, just as someone who hasn't paid their bills

        NB: I feel dirty writing such a defence. The system is as damaged at Leto's Joker, and needs to be torn down. However, the "debt to society" analogy isn't completely without merit.

      2. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

        Yep. Punishment just shifts from governmental to social. I don't like the San Francisco approach of not asking about criminal records, but I hope people will rationally evaluate whether someone's past conviction has any effect on future actions, or whether it's necessary to check in the first place. Of course, you could face a lawsuit for hiring negligence if you don't make an issue of someone's background. I don't know of any fair way to limit social punishment, so it's the government side that needs to change.

        1. Suicidy   10 years ago

          I've hired people with criminal records before. I try to look at it logically. I won't hire someone to handle money or financially sensitive records if they have convictions for theft related crimes. But I saw no problem hiring a fellow to write mirage loans just because he had a conviction for vehicular manslaughter. He still couldn't dp drive anyway. And it didn't interfere with him completing his duties.

          The problem is that too many people have an unreasonable prejudice that any criminal conviction invalidates an individual from all jobs. Ex-cons need jobs too.

    2. Nyarlarrythotep   10 years ago

      Up to this point, I've thought that deterrence is the only valid reason for punishment. Restorative justice...I guess, I don't know.

      1. R C Dean   10 years ago

        I think retribution is also a valid reason for punishment. Perhaps because it also supports deterrence, its not a separate reason.

        1. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

          I think retribution is a valid limit on punishment. Something shouldn't be a crime if there isn't an element of wrong, and a crime shouldn't deter past what someone "deserves". So, no disproportionate punishments in the name of rehabilitation, deterrence, or protection for society.

      2. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

        I think deterrence can be, but there are limits. After a person is in prison for six months, the deterrence factor goes down, as the person adapts. At a certain point, locking someone up for longer does little good, and any longer sentence has to be justified in some other way. Usually it's justified through "retribution" or prevention.

      3. marshaul   10 years ago

        But punishment doesn't work as a deterrence, according to all the available data. Or do you suppose good intentions are good enough?

  11. Hyperion   10 years ago

    Over the past decade, as New York City's backlog of felony cases has grown, so too has the time defendants are spending behind bars before trial

    An inevitable result of criminalizing everything.

  12. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Incentives? What are that?

  13. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    theories of punishment, and how restorative justice should be the guiding factor in all punishment

    This implies crime requires actual harm to another.
    That's just silly.

  14. scallywag   10 years ago

    How much was this down to mental illness? The result of a system that rewards the judicial system to find quick resolutions (aka plea bargains) before ever going to jail (never mind the fall even innocent men decide to 'practically' take) , the inability of the criminal system to handle the ever increasing incarceration rate, the targeting of minorities who often happen to be in the wrong economic bracket (who can afford bail)? The rich and connected who don't have to care? Or society in general who demand tough sentencing and tough crime laws without ever understanding who gets roped up in the criminal system: cause once you make it past the 'velvet ropes' society kisses you goodbye...

    http://scallywagandvagabond.co.....stem-fail/

  15. Tionico   10 years ago

    thecourts MUST put in place a hard policy of bringing an arraignment within some short time.. thirty days? and at that arragnment the accused must enter a pllea... guilty or not guilty, and the PROSECUTION must outline the key pieces of their case IN THE HEARING of the accused's counsel. In other words, within thirty days, both sides present the basic outline of their cases. If prosecution cannot identify witnesses and provide a rough outline of the expected testimoy, the accused walks free. THAT is the intent of "speedy trial".

    1. retiredfire   10 years ago

      Didn't read the New Yorker article, did you?
      I had to go to it after seeing your post because in my experience an arraignment happens very soon after an arrest.
      He was arraigned and, because he was on probation, he was held, to be released on a bond of $3,000 - a $300 payment to a bail bondsman, that his family couldn't scrape up.

      1. Landon-V-Kroll   10 years ago

        RetiredFire RAISES THE KEY POINT in all of it...
        MONEY.
        I was put through a nearly identical thing to Browder - BUT WAS WHITE, HAD MONEY - AND HAD PROOF OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE...
        Which it took THREE MONTHS for me to prove before a criminal court.
        And even at that - THREE MONTHS WAS ENOUGH to WIPE ME OUT - money, career, family, home, etc.
        I was accused - ARRAIGNED 16 DAYS LATER - while ON probation...
        And at the arraignment I BLEW THE COURT'S MIND AND EVERYONE IN IT...
        An OC Probation Officer ANN PUTNAM - real slow dummy - clearly LOST in the weeds most of the time - She thought she'd get over on me BY SPIKING MY DRUG TEST WITH POT RESIDUE before mailing it out.
        Oops...
        I had a BLOOD TEST FOR 33 MINUTES LATER...
        And then the court ordered an instant read urine - ALSO fully negative...
        And now it's a lawsuit that HAS MADE NEW NY LAW.

        HAD I NOT BEEN FREE ROR - I WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO THE WORK TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE.
        And - had I been FALSELY IMPRISONED - I'd have NOT waited - MY SUICIDE WOULD HAVE BEEN FIRST NIGHT IN A CAGE.

        Eventually THESE KIND OF MEGALOMANIACAL SCUMBAGS HAVE TO BE MADE TO ANSWER...
        And I'm the guy that's going to CRUCIFY THEM IN A WITNESS BOX real soon...

  16. marilynchandler741   10 years ago

    I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,

    ------------- http://www.jobnet10.com

  17. Josh M.   10 years ago

    I still don't understand why people can be held in prison for longer than 1-2 days without being tried and found guilty.

  18. AD-RtR/OS!   10 years ago

    Oh, sure, now de Blasio will work to reform the system he heads, as he's got the death of a(nother) minority on his hands.
    Color me unimpressed with his professed sincerity.

    1. Suicidy   10 years ago

      It's all part of the greater good. After all, o devote resources to rectify this situation would take away from his Marxist agenda. And nothing is more important than that, eh comrades?

  19. piyahibire   10 years ago

    Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
    This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.netcash5.com

  20. Andre Leonard   10 years ago

    The average pretrial detention in a felony case was 95 days in 2012 ? up 25 percent from a decade earlier, despite a drop in new felony cases, according to a recent report from City University of New York researchers.

    The Constitution provides for 'speedy trials'. It's the Judges and attorney's playing 'fast & loose, waiving a defendants right to a 'speedy trial' that's the real issue here..

    Justice delayed is justice denied. http://legal-dictionary.thefre.....+Amendment

  21. Wolf73b   10 years ago

    Prosecutors can keep you in jail for years as a means of coercing a confession.
    The executive branch ignores laws and makes summary decisions to create defacto citizens.
    The Senate conspires to hide the details of trade legislation until it is passed.
    Cities restrict gun ownership.

    Does it seem as though everything the founding fathers objected to is being implemented 239 years later?

  22. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    I always hope that happens when a local police chief/sheriff says "He didn't do anything wrong, but we'll investigate" in response to an officer shooting someone in the back, or the like.

  23. C. S. P. Schofield   10 years ago

    The one I wait for is when some fatuous official says "All procedures were followed." and a reporter or other citizen asks "So, when does the idiot who wrote the procedures get fired?"

  24. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

    I've often thought along similar lines. Perhaps one day we won't be disappointed, Schofield.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!