Marijuana

House Tells the Feds to Respect Medical Marijuana Laws (Again)

Congressional support for marijuana federalism seems to be rising.

|

YouTube

Today the House of Representatives voted to extend the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment, which bars the Justice Department from spending money to block implementation of state medical marijuana laws, for another fiscal year. Last year the measure, which was included in the omnibus spending bill that Congress enacted in December, passed the House by a vote of 219 to 189. Today the vote was 242 to 186.

"The majority of the states have said they want medical marijuana patients to have access to the medicine they need without fear of prosecution," says Rep. Sam Farr (D-Calif.), who cosponsored the amendment along with Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.). "For the second year in a row, the people's house has listened to the will of the people and voted to give them that access."

Today the House also passed amendments aimed at protecting state laws allowing production of industrial hemp and medical use of nonpsychoactive cannabis extracts. The votes on those measures were 282 to 146 and 297 to 130, respectively. A broader measure that would have applied to recreational as well as medical marijuana was rejected by a vote of 222 to 206.

"There's unprecedented support on both sides of the aisle for ending the federal war on marijuana and letting states set their own drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights," says Bill Piper, director of national affairs at the Drug Policy Alliance. "The more the DEA blocks sensible reforms, the more they will see their agency's power and budget come under deeper scrutiny." Today's votes follow last night's voice-vote approval of amendments aimed at cutting the DEA's budget and stopping it from indiscriminately collecting telephone metadata.

While the increased support for marijuana federalism is heartening, it is not clear whether the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment has had any impact beyond the Justice Department's avowed policy of prosecutorial restraint, which takes a dim view of targeting people who grow, sell, or possess marijuana in compliance with state law. "Despite Congress's clear intent in passing the amendment," Farr's office notes, "the Department of Justice did not stop prosecuting medical marijuana patients and providers."

In an April 8 letter to then-Attorney General Eric Holder, Farr and Rohrabacher emphasized that "the purpose of our amendment was to prevent the Department from wasting its limited law enforcement resources on prosecutions and asset forfeiture actions against medical marijuana patients and providers, including businesses that operate legally under state law." They urged Holder to "bring your Department back into compliance with federal law by ceasing marijuana prosecutions and forfeiture actions against those acting in accordance with state medical marijuana laws."

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

9 responses to “House Tells the Feds to Respect Medical Marijuana Laws (Again)

  1. …which bars the Justice Department from spending money to block implementation of state medical marijuana laws, for another fiscal year.

    THEN WE’LL DO IT FOR FREE.

  2. Simply put, the DOJ does not want to stop going after marijuana users because the drug war is their primary reason for existence anymore. If they lose the battle over drug legalization, then they will be ripe for downsizing.

    1. I mean, they could put all of their resources into fighting terrorism, but that means they would have to learn different languages and conduct tedious investigations, and be responsible if they fail. That sounds so hard.

    2. I’d be willing to keep the entire DEA and DOJ drug enforcement staff on the payroll, if they were repurposed into the “Government Accountability Unit”, charged with pursuing criminal, civil, and civil rights cases against federal, state, and local governments and officials.

      1. Nice example of never letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.

        1. Just firing them would be good. Siccing them on government officials would be perfect.

  3. A broader measure that would have applied to recreational as well as medical marijuana was rejected by a vote of 222 to 206.

    That narrow margin is the real news. Shouldn’t be long before this passes, too.

    Well, passes the House. Who knows what that steaming pile of garbage Harry Reid will tell that spineless lump of crap Mitch McConnell to do with it in the Senate.

  4. You mean Obama’s DOJ doesn’t give two shits about the people who elected him?

  5. The astute observer will note that it is called the Drug ENFORCEMENT Agency, not the Drug ERADICATION Agency.
    Or as I prefer the DEAth agency.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.