Watched Cops Are Polite Cops: San Diego Edition
Body-worn cameras encourage both police and citizens to behave better

The Los Angeles Times is reporting that the wearing of body cameras by police in San Diego is having quite salutary effects. I mean, who knew that watching the watchers would change the behaviors of both the watchers and the watched? Well, actually I did. In any case, the LA Times reports:
The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.
Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.
By year's end, the department plans to have nearly 1,000 officers equipped with the small cameras, including patrol officers, gang-unit officers and motorcycle officers. Currently, 600 officers have the cameras.
The report to the council is based on preliminary statistics gathered for 2014 and January 2015.
"Body-worn camera technology is a win-win for both the officer and the community," Deputy Chief David Ramirez said in the report, set to be discussed at Wednesday's meeting.
Other police departments should stop resisting cameras (here's looking at you Boston) and equip their officers as quickly as possible for both the good of the police and their communities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good. Now make it a felony to turn off the cameras or delete footage.
Who enforces it? The cops?
IA
Right. Cops investigating cops. So nothing will happen.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. How else would cops be able to exercise their 5th amendment rights by not testifying against themselves?
The government has no rights. The government is granted power.
Ah, that explains it then.
Choose a job that doesn't require finding criminals and arresting them?
"Choose a job that doesn't require finding criminals and arresting them?"
Also: choose a job that doesn't require creating criminals and arresting them.
By "criminal" do you mean people who commit crimes against others, or people who commit crimes against the state? In my experience cops don't give a shit when a crime is committed against another person, but they are quite interested in crimes against the state. Being representatives of the state, they take that shit personally. But crimes with victims? Meh.
Are you saying Andy Taylor was a myth ? That cops are actually the enforcement arm of government ?
Better yet - make it a capital crime. Hold the "authorities," who are being paid to know better, to a higher standard than the average Shmoe.
How much can be attributed to better policing and how much to punks and criminals knowing they're on camera and not bothering to file the complaint?
It protects both sides.
Good point.
Does it matter? Win/win.
"Surprise,surprise,surprise!" - Gomer Pyle
Will they also get the truncheon if they don't?
"Stop-" [whack] "resisting!" [whack]
[sound of tazer]
"Will they also get the truncheon if they don't?"
They put the cameras on their bodies.
They do this whenever they're told.
use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%
That's great and all, but doesn't that also indicate the cops used unnecessary violence 46.5% of the time last year? Or is it the perps were more non compliant bc the cops didn't have body cams last year? Yeah, I'm not going with that either.
but doesn't that also indicate the cops used unnecessary violence 46.5% of the time last year?
That's how I read it.
And does that not suggest that cameras are really really a good idea?
Cameras aren't a bad idea, but I'm not as optimistic as you. As long as cops have immunity, they're going to milk it for everything they can. Cameras just mean we'll have more video of cops unjustly killing people, and nothing else will happen.
It does. Sarc is determined to find a reason to despair.
The unnecessary violence was 42% of the time. The other 4.5% was people that thought better of mixing it up with the cops after seeing there would be video evidence.
Cameras didn't save Kelly Thomas. Or convict the men who murdered him.
Didn't help Tamir Rice or James Boyd either.