Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Ukraine: Arresting Dissidents, Eager for U.S.'s Military Support

Let's think more than twice about fighting Ukraine's battles.

Brian Doherty | 2.10.2015 6:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Trouble is, still, a-brewing in Ukraine (see our P.M. links both today and yesterday) and prominent Republican candidate Ted Cruz seems to think it is our sworn duty to provide the Ukrainians with weapons to fight their enemies foreign and domestic, while the Obama administration is seriously considering it.

Stephen Walt in Foreign Policy gave some intelligent reasons yesterday why we shouldn't get involved in any way in a shooting war with Russian-backed rebels in Ukraine (yes, there are people who managed to live through the Cold War and to feed themselves daily who actually think getting us involved in any way in a shooting war even one step removed, supposedly, with Russia is a fine idea).

Walt's argument is based on the notion that Russia is not in fact an expansionist power getting out of control, but one spiraling downward fighting for continued relevance and influence:

It is lingering fear, rather than relentless ambition, that underpins Russia's response in Ukraine.

Moreover, the Ukraine crisis did not begin with a bold Russian move or even a series of illegitimate Russian demands; it began when the United States and European Union tried to move Ukraine out of Russia's orbitand into the West's sphere of influence. That objective may be desirable in the abstract, but Moscow made it abundantly clear it would fight this process tooth and nail. U.S. leaders blithely ignored these warnings — which clearly stemmed from Russian insecurity rather than territorial greed — and not surprisingly they have been blindsided by Moscow's reaction….

…..arming Ukraine will only make things worse. It certainly will not enable Ukraine to defeat the far stronger Russian army; it will simply intensify the conflict and add to the suffering of the Ukrainian people.

Nor is arming Ukraine likely to convince Putin to cave in and give Washington what it wants. Ukraine is historically linked to Russia, they are right next door to each other, Russian intelligence has long-standing links inside Ukraine's own security institutions, and Russia is far stronger militarily. Even massive arms shipments from the United States won't tip the balance in Kiev's favor, and Moscow can always escalate if the fighting turns against the rebels, as it did last summer.

Most importantly, Ukraine's fate is much more important to Moscow than it is to us, which means that Putin and Russia will be willing to pay a bigger price to achieve their aims than we will. The balance of resolve as well as the local balance of power strongly favors Moscow in this conflict. Before starting down an escalatory path, therefore, Americans should ask themselves just how far they are willing to go….

Our brave Ukrainian supposed allies gave an interesting sign of how devoted they are to American notions of freedom this week, by arresting a journalist for encouraging draft dodging. Not exactly (modern, at any rate) American values on freedom of political expression:

Ruslan Kotsaba — a television journalist from the western region of Ivano-Frankivsk — was ordered held in custody for 60 days pending investigations, his wife, Uliana, wrote on Facebook.

A senior official at Ukraine's SBU security agency, Markian Lubkivskyi, wrote online that Kotsaba was detained on suspicion of treason, an accusation that carries a possible 15-year jail sentence.

Kotsaba published a video on YouTube last month denouncing a new round of military call-ups by Kiev to boost its forces fighting pro-Russian rebels in the east.

"I would prefer to go to prison than to participate in this fratricidal war," Kotsaba said in the footage, which was viewed more than 300,000 times.

"I refuse to be drafted and call on everyone who is called up to refuse," he said.

May the U.S. also refuse to be drafted into this conflict.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Newsweek Twitter Feed Hacked by ISIS Supporters, GOP's Alabama Problem, Democrats' Presidential Choice Problem: P.M. Links

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

PoliticsWorldUkraineRussiaCold WarForeign Policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (56)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Gojira   10 years ago

    There's some aggressive faggotry afoot in Ukraine.

    I've wanted to say that all day since reading it on 4chan.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      If we must intervene, what we should do is simply tell Russia that we're going to pressure Germany to go whole hog and militarize some more. Incidentally, it's not at all clear that Germany isn't a greater conventional military power than Russia right now.

      That should be the extent of our intervention. Then we tell Germany we did that, after eavesdropping on Merkel some more.

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        So...let's you and him fight?

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          I'd kick his ass.

      2. newnamename   10 years ago

        And what makes you thing that Germany would respond to US pressure?

  2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Fuck it, let's do this thing! Nuclear war, cars wired with exploding gas tanks, mutants, the whole nine megatons.

    1. Libertarian   10 years ago

      The bomb in the baby carriage
      Was wired to the radio

  3. Winston   10 years ago

    Can someone explain to me why what Putin is doing to the Ukraine is okay but what the US is doing to Cuba is wrong?

    1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Putin ended an embargo against Ukraine?

      Who knew?

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Are we invading Cuba?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        I get it now! Winston is obviously referring to the snub given by the Academy to Cuba Gooding Jr.'s performance in Selma!

        1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          It was transcendent.

          1. Beautiful Bean Footage   10 years ago

            If the Academy wants real actors to keep coming back, they need to stop playing with us. We ain't gonna play with them no more.

            /Kanye

      2. Winston   10 years ago

        Who is this "we"?

        I'm referring to how it is bad that the US supported an invasion to overthrow, then plotted to kill, and embargoes, a country very close to its border ruled by a foreign supported dictator who overthrew an US-allied regime.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Fair enough. On the other hand, I don't think the situations are entirely comparable.

        2. Winston   10 years ago

          Oh and Cuba has an important US Naval Base there too. I suppose if Castro took over Gitmo libertarians would be defending US attempts to retake it rather than condemning Gitmo as an illegal lease forced upon Cuba by American imperialists.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            That only gets you the Crimea in your analogy. The rest of it is a land grab.

            1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

              Also his use of present tense is pretty much bullshit.

              1. Winston   10 years ago

                ?

                1. Winston   10 years ago

                  7:11 was to HeteroPatriarch.

                  That only gets you the Crimea in your analogy. The rest of it is a land grab.

                  And if the US used that situation as an excuse to overthrow Castro and ensure a US-backed regime was in power would libertarians defend it?

                  1. Suthenboy   10 years ago

                    Winston, why do you keep asking us about the Libertarians in your head?

                    The answer to your question is 'I don't fucking know'.

                    Personally, I wouldn't have too much of a problem with anyone ousting a murderous communist regime that keeps the Cuban people in slavery and poverty and misery.

            2. Suthenboy   10 years ago

              "The rest of it is a land-grab."

              Sorta, but not exactly. Crimea is Russia's only warm water port. Without it they are landlocked part of the year. This is intolerable for them. Right or wrong they were going to get the Crimea back at any cost, Putin or no Putin.

              The rest of it is about making sure the Crimea is secure. They can't defend it from the east and they don't have any other approach to it except through Ukraine. Russia's only warm water port would be a tiny island surrounded by Ukraine. They need a land approach and the only place that can happen is eastern Ukraine, so they are taking it. And they are going to take it.

              I would say to anyone that unless they are willing to get into an all out war with Russia, possibly starting a world war, leave it alone.

        3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          I'm referring to how it is bad that the US supported an invasion to overthrow, then plotted to kill, and embargoes, a country very close to its border ruled by a foreign supported dictator who overthrew an US-allied regime.

          Ok, but what does that have to do with your original "are you still beating your wife" question?

          1. Winston   10 years ago

            They think that Putin is acting in the national interest and has a legitimate grievance while the USG does not act in the national interest and has no legitimate greivances.

            Also the implication that Russia is right to have a sphere of influence while the US is wrong to.

        4. Emmerson Biggins   10 years ago

          Rothbard would agree with you.

          1. Winston   10 years ago

            No shit!

      3. Winston   10 years ago

        Are we invading Cuba?

        Russia isn't invading Ukraine either, if you believe them that is.

  4. Sevo   10 years ago

    "It is lingering fear, rather than relentless ambition, that underpins Russia's response in Ukraine."

    Uh, I'd more likely call it Russia's continuing paranoia, but I still don't want the US to get involved beyond jaw-boning.
    Let Obo yap his face off, I don't care.

  5. JeremyR   10 years ago

    Uh, seriously? Putin wants to rebuild the Soviet Union. He's annexing everything he thinks he can get away with.

    I mean, seriously, Russia being afraid of Ukraine (Or Georgia before it)? Yeah, sure.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      He can want to do that all he wants, but there is a point where that's not going to work. Russia's conventional strength is quite limited, and there are countries in Eastern Europe that likely won't play ball with further incursions. Heck, they may not go along with this one if it looks like total annexation is the result. Not to mention the U.S. I'm a citizen, and I have no fucking idea what we might do.

      1. Homple   10 years ago

        You know who else did total annexations until other countries wouldn't play ball with him....

        1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          Saddam Hussein?

        2. Sevo   10 years ago

          Genghis Khan!

          1. Wasteland Wanderer   10 years ago

            KHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNN!?

        3. Beautiful Bean Footage   10 years ago

          Every Roman emperor?

    2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Putin? Maybe. Vladimir Zhirinovsky? Definitely.

  6. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

    I hope Groovus Maximus is okay.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Ditto, though I trust he has plans within plans within plans for dealing with this eventuality.

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        I'm trying to convince my company that having a staff doctor would be cheaper than paying for Obamacare for everybody. He could come back and do that job if he wants it.

      2. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

        I'm not entirely sure that scrawling "become Ukrainian strongman dictator" on a cocktail napkin constitutes a plan.

    2. Winston   10 years ago

      Wonder if he still thinks that the Ukraine is a beacon of liberty.

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        I'm sure he still thinks it's a beacon of hot poon.

      2. Sevo   10 years ago

        "Wonder if he still thinks that the Ukraine is a beacon of liberty."

        I didn't get that from him. It seemed he was offered a hell of a deal and didn't have to put up with US medical regs.

    3. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      Wasn't he taken hostage by some Ukrainian babe?

      1. Sevo   10 years ago

        "Back in April, the Ukranian model became an online phenomena when photos of her doll-like features and Barbie proportions went viral around the world."
        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....03350.html

        1. Scarecrow Repair   10 years ago

          You could at least have posted Daily Fail links instead of HuffyPosty:

          'Human Barbie' Valeria Lukyanova goes cosmetics-free (almost) in candid selfies


          'Human Barbie' is punched and strangled by two men outside her home after 'two-year hate campaign by strangers'

          1. Sevo   10 years ago

            Hey, what Bing gives me, I use...

        2. F. Stupidity, Jr.   10 years ago

          She's pretty hot, but I'm turned off by her missing genitalia.

  7. JeremyR   10 years ago

    And also, didn't we kind of guarantee Ukraine's security when they decided to give up nukes?

    Between this and Libya, no on else is going to give up their nukes in the future...

    1. Sevo   10 years ago

      JeremyR|2.10.15 @ 8:12PM|#
      "And also, didn't we kind of guarantee Ukraine's security when they decided to give up nukes?"

      Fortunately, it was one of those 'we'll think about helping you out' deals that negotiators offer when they know damn well it's not gonna get through congress.

      1. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

        In other words the "You fucked up, you trusted us" reason.

        Of course that means, in the future, other countries will not trust us in negotiations.

  8. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

    the Ukraine crisis did not begin with a bold Russian move or even a series of illegitimate Russian demands; it began when the United States and European Union tried to move Ukraine out of Russia's orbitand into the West's sphere of influence

    Stopped reading right there. What a load of shit. Typical peacenazi. America had as much to do with Ukraine's revolution against despotism as it did with the instability in the CAR: none. The people had enough. Russia is solely responsible for this mess they are the aggressor, end of story. As awful as the Ukrainian government's jailing of journalists is, they are still the good guys.

    America should not be arming Ukraine, but the USG allow arms to be sold to them. European countries are the ones that should be sending arms to Ukraine. Let them take care of their backyards for once.

  9. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

    "Walt's argument is based on the notion that Russia is not in fact an expansionist power getting out of control, but one spiraling downward fighting for continued relevance and influence:"

    Those are not mutually exclusive conditions. A power which is backsliding often engage in military adventurism to regain the perception of relevance and prestige.

    ".....arming Ukraine will only make things worse. It certainly will not enable Ukraine to defeat the far stronger Russian army; it will simply intensify the conflict and add to the suffering of the Ukrainian people."

    Ukraine, lie back and enjoy your rape.

    It is one thing to say the US has little influence over what happens in Ukraine without escalating into a level we don't want to get to, but offering this kind of apologia for Russia's aggressions is just morally craven.

  10. Reverendcaptain   10 years ago

    Every country on Earth now knows that a treaty with the US promising border security is worthless. That has consequences. Why the hell would anybody trust the US anymore?

    Another element that isn't mentioned here is that by the US ignoring it's treaty and providing no aid of any value, there really is a rise of a fascist element now fighting in the east to push out the Russians. Does anybody think they and their new recruits aren't going to demand a bigger voice in Ukraine when this is all over?

    Reason likes to pretend that doing nothing is always the best choice. Well, doing nothing means something. Just ask the folks in Rwanda that were cut down while we sat on our hands.

  11. Azathoth!!   10 years ago

    You know, I understand anti-interventionism. Don't stick your nose in where it's not wanted.

    What I don't understand is ignoring your allies when they're asking for help. Help that you promised to provide.

    Who would ever associate with us then?

    This strikes me as a policy that would leave us ever more isolated and despised as we break our promises to allies, trading partners and treaty partners.

    It sounds almost exactly like a policy that does nothing more than undermine us, undermine the idea that liberty is important--or even coherent.

    In short, in appears to be another policy grafted on to make libertarianism unworkable. What a shock.

  12. lesliewcole   10 years ago

    Start working from home! Great job for students, stay-at-home moms or anyone needing an extra income... You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection... Make $90 hourly and up to $12000 a month by following link at the bottom and signing up... You can have your first check by the end of this week.........
    visit this web-site...
    ???????????? http://www.netcash50.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Growing Ranks of Military Homeschoolers Get Defense Department Support

J.D. Tuccille | 6.4.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Road Hard

Charles Oliver | 6.4.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!