Ironically, the shooting death of unarmed black 18-year-old Michael Brown by white Ferguson, MO, police officer Darren Wilson is a distraction from the racist police brutality that ravages America.
Whether or not Wilson shot Brown unjustifiably, and whether or not Brown provoked the shooting by grabbing for Wilson's gun, the police — and the government officials who employ and arm them — are a big problem in this country. (The Eric Garner chokehold killing has none of the ambiguity of the Brown case.)
Unfortunately, it takes a shooting such as the one in Ferguson to spotlight the problem. And that presents its own problem. The claim that the police are routinely dangerous to innocent people — mostly blacks and Hispanics — appears to stand or fall with the headline case of the week. But that can't be the correct way to judge the bigger issue. As Jason Lee Byas writes,
The way people are talking about this case seems to imply that if Wilson's use of force was not in necessary self-defense, the police are out of control — and if it was, everything's fine.…
Even if Darren Wilson turns out to be a near-perfect moral exemplar, the police are out of control.
Reuben Fischer-Baum writes that the shooting in Ferguson has "drawn attention to a remarkable lack of knowledge about a seemingly basic fact: how often people are killed by the police."
The national government purports to keep count of "justifiable" police homicides, but that's apparently all. "'Unjustifiable homicide by police' is not a classification," Fischer-Baum notes.
Among the problems with the collection of data," he writes, is that the "FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program, which compiles the SHR [Supplementary Homicide Report], relies on voluntary involvement of state and local police agencies — a fact that may raise some questions about the integrity of the data."
Thus, he concludes, "the SHR's 'justifiable police homicide' number  is not a useful approximation of how many people are killed by the police."
The Wall Street Journal agrees:
A Wall Street Journal analysis of the latest data from 105 of the country's largest police agencies found more than 550 police killings during those years were missing from the national tally or, in a few dozen cases, not attributed to the agency involved. The result: It is nearly impossible to determine how many people are killed by the police each year.
The Journal quotes Columbia University law professor Jeffrey Fagan: "When cops are killed, there is a very careful account and there's a national database. Why not the other side of the ledger?"
Data do show that blacks are more likely than whites to fall into police clutches for drug and gunoffenses, even though whites are more likely to commit these victimless so-called crimes. Does anyone doubt that young black males walking down the street are more likely to have a police encounter than young white males are? If you doubt this, you're not paying attention.
The ultimate cause of this problem is that the police are the domestic armed troops of America's rulers — falsely called "representatives" — and the rest of us are the ruled. They know it, and we are increasingly coming to know it. Most of the "laws" they enforce against us violate our natural rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The chasm between rulers and ruled exists everywhere in the country, but it exists on a spectrum from the barely noticeable to the extreme. Obviously, it's most extreme in poorer black communities, where race and class prejudice sit atop the general disdain for the ruled. (St. Louis County, MO, has gone to outrageous lengths, as Radley Balko shows.)
Some critics of police brutality and racism assume that ending prohibitions on drugs and guns — both worthy ends, of course — would eliminate or reduce police abuse. I'm not convinced. Too many young blacks have been harassed or worse by cops claiming that the "suspects" appeared to be casing a store or engaging in some other suspicious activity having nothing to do with drugs or guns.
Repealing victimless-"crime" statutes is imperative, but we also must rethink the top-down model of policing. After all, London didn't get a police force until 1829. We could declare the experiment a flop and move on.
This article originally appeared at the Future of Freedom Foundation.