Eric Garner's Death Won't Even Show Up in FBI Stats on Police Homicides


Reason has previously noted that for 2013, violent crime in the United States is down, killing of police officers (and violence directed toward police officers) is down, but homicides by police that were subsequently ruled justified were up. Law enforcement officers killed more than 400 people in 2013.
But that number is known to be incomplete. The FBI tracks justified homicides by police, but participation is voluntary. There is no actual national tracking of deaths at the hands of police unless they are to determined to be crimes and therefore show up in violent crime statistics. We don't have a real, credible number of how many people the police kill every year. So The Wall Street Journal attempted to compare numbers from law enforcement agencies with the numbers on the FBI's reports between the years 2007 and 2012. They found more than 500 deaths at the hands of law enforcement agencies unaccounted for in the FBI's reports. They conclude "it's nearly impossible to determine how many people are killed by the police each year":
The reports to the FBI are part of its uniform crime reporting program. Local law-enforcement agencies aren't required to participate. Some localities turn over crime statistics, but not detailed records describing each homicide, which is the only way particular kinds of killings, including those by police, are tracked by the FBI. The records, which are supposed to document every homicide, are sent from local police agencies to state reporting bodies, which forward the data to the FBI.
The Journal's analysis identified several holes in the FBI data.
Justifiable police homicides from 35 of the 105 large agencies contacted by the Journal didn't appear in the FBI records at all. Some agencies said they didn't view justifiable homicides by law-enforcement officers as events that should be reported. The Fairfax County Police Department in Virginia, for example, said it didn't consider such cases to be an "actual offense," and thus doesn't report them to the FBI.
The State of New York does not participate in the reporting program, according to the Journal, and therefore 68 homicides by New York City Police Department officers between the years 2007 to 2012 are not even in the FBI's count. It also means that Eric Garner's choking death at the hands of officers from the NYPD will not show up in the numbers next year when the FBI releases its statistics for 2014.
Read the Wall Street Journal analysis here.
Reason is your voice in debates about politics, culture, and ideas. Our annual Webathon is underway and your tax-deductible gift will help us fight against big government, crony capitalism, the drug war, and so much more. For details on giving levels and swag, go here now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Al Sharpton and Eric Holder and their media allies brought a renta mob to Ferguson over a much more debatable police killing. Now we have this in Sharton's backyard. Lets see if Sharpton and Holder and the renta mob show up and if the media publicizes this.
If they don't, then I think my theory that they only publicize and protest borderline or legitimate use of force cases because the point is to divide people on racial lines is proven by experimentation.
I believe Sharpton did show up on this when it happened. This actually preceded Michael Brown's shooting and arguably set the stage for the reaction in Ferguson.
Don't hold your breath.
I am not Riven. I am not. I think they only publicize cases they think will get white people to defend the cops. And this is not one of those cases.
I went back and checked and Sharpton did indeed participate in protests back in July when this happened.
There's no upcoming election to rally black voter turnout now.
Didn't stop them in Ferguson.
Ferguson was exactly positioned for a pre-election racist narrative. The damned grand jury dragged its feet.
I might be wrong, but we can check back with each other in a few days to verify. I predict little upheaval on the Garner fiasco.
Who cares about Sharpton. He's a worthless lowlife.
But if the Justice Department doesn't get involved in this, then I'm not sure exactly what the hell it even exists for.
Right now it exists to punish Obama's enemies and to cover for his sorry corrupt ass by any means necessary.
Ya, what a lame rant. There are plenty of things to criticize Sharpton about, for being a racial vampire for one, but you are simply wrong about your rather non-sensical point.
At what point does it start making sense for people (especially those of color) to shoot cops first and ask questions later? Not only because actual danger might eliminate some of these situations, but also because you might actually have a better chance of being exonerated by a sympathetic jury than you have of escaping with your life in some police encounters.
If "citizens" got the same self-defense standard as cops then we'd be allowed to open fire as soon as we saw a badge. They're all armed!
(especially those of color)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....yon_colors
There used be a color called 'flesh' that was close to my February skin color and was used for GI Joe action figures in the '60s. I think Crayon should reintroduce it under a new name. Marketing is not my forte.
As a person of color I say never...
Say, can someone donate in the following names?
* Dr. Zaius of Earth
* Khan of Ceti Alpha V
* J sub D
Why don't you do it you stingy bastard?!?
Because I already donated? Where's your sperm sample?
He donated last year. They let Mangu-Ward use it to have a baby.
I find that unlikely, because she's still alive. His sperm is a known toxin.
And the fact that they're different species.
Why does that matter? Is Spock just some optical illusion?
I'm not supposed to know that, John! I don't want to know of the existence of any of my (probably) hundreds of illegitimate offspring. Plausible deniability, man!
Paternity suits galore. Buried alive. Buried alive.
ProL, ProL, ProL...save your strength. These sperm have sworn to live and die at my command two hundred years before you were born. Do you mean NutraSweet never told you the tale? To amuse your lawyer, no? Never told you how the sperm bank picked up my "deposit", lost in space from the year 1996 with myself and the ship's company's sperm in cryogenic freeze?
Wait a second. I'm not the Chekov here.
Inside your mom. Like always. Duh.
She doesn't read Reason.
I will not donate in the name of Dr. Zaius. I hate every ape I see, from Chimpan-A to Chimpanzee.
Dr. Zaius will make men free by exterminating them systematically.
Ooh, rock me Dr. Zaius!
At what point does it start making sense for people (especially those of color) to shoot cops first and ask questions later?
Just as soon as "I was in fear for my life" becomes an incontestable Get Out of Jail Free card for civilians. In other words, NEVER.