Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Facebook and Google Are Changing Elections

Zenon Evans | 11.4.2014 12:35 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | cc
(cc)
vox_efx_foter

Simple and personal are two things not often used to describe government. Internet giants like Facebook and Google want to change that for Election Day.

The Hill explains:

"While every election is important, the voting process can often feel complicated, with the information about how to head to the polls spread across multiple official sources," Google executive Anthea Watson Strong wrote in a recent blog post.

To simplify the process, Google is displaying state-specific details when people use search phrases such as "register to vote" or "how do I vote."

Searching on Google for "who is on my ballot" brings up a list of all the candidates running for the federal, statewide and local offices in any given area, while "where is my polling place" lists local polling places.

A Google page specifically set up for the elections — google.com/elections — lists the latest news and YouTube videos about the candidates as well as aggregated data about common political Google searches. 

Facebook users may have noticed the "I'm Voting" button, known as the "voter megaphone," at the top of their newsfeed today. It's been rolled out slowly each election season since 2008, and it's now visible to anyone 18 or over.

"Our effort is neutral," a Facebook representative tells The Verge. "While we encourage any and all candidates, groups, and voters to use our platform to engage on the elections, we as a company have not used our products in a way that attempts to influence how people vote."

Still, people have been wary of the social media site's influence since it conducted an apolitical psychology experiment by tailoring what shows up on a user's newsfeed. And, the vote button did, according to a 2010 study, account for around 600,000 additional votes that year. "If you're told your friends have voted, you're 0.39 percent more likely to vote than someone who hasn't," The Atlantic explains.

In general, social media and technology are playing a larger role in the way people participate in our democratic republic. "Sixteen percent of registered voters said they follow politicians on social media, compared with the 6 percent who said they did so in 2010. The leap has been even bigger among middle-aged voters. Of registered voters from 30 to 49, 26 percent said they follow politicians online and 40 percent of whom said they've used their phones to help keep up with news about the elections," CNN reports based on Pew Poll data released yesterday. 

Reason previously noted that another tech giant, Microsoft, has also put some skin in the game. They've predicting the outcome of the election. Guess who the big winners are.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "Taming the Messenger: New Threats to Press Freedom" with Nick Gillespie, Wed, 11/5

Zenon Evans is a former Reason staff writer and editor.

PoliticsCultureScience & TechnologyElection 2014VotingVoter TurnoutSocial MediaFacebookGoogleFree SpeechTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (30)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. HeteroPatriarch   11 years ago

    This is also why the government is trying to destroy the internet. They've spent years rigging the current system, they don't want to have to rig a different one.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    And Google and Facebook are telling me who to vote for.

    1. cavalier973   11 years ago

      It's a trap!

      1. cavalier973   11 years ago

        "Candy Crush" is not a real candidate! Even if it would be a cool name for a Congresswoman!

        1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

          I might pull the lever for her, IYKWIMAITYD.

    2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      FOE who should I vote for?

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        His mom.

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          I thought he had two dads?

          1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

            I am a time traveler from the past.

            1. A Secret Band of Robbers   11 years ago

              Rule 34.

              1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

                From the past, dummy. That means my parents are long dead.

                Geez, in my day people weren't so dense once they survived childhood.

                1. A Secret Band of Robbers   11 years ago

                  Whatever. I don't know where all the Time Corps took you on your joyride. As far as I'm concerned, you time travelers are all perverts.

            2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

              Which past? and prove it by telling me what Hitler's favorite colour was?

              1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

                White.

                1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

                  Damn you Fist!!!! Are you typing these responses via Arpanet? that would explain your timeliness in the links somehow.

                  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

                    There, I gave someone 20 minutes to post something.

  3. cavalier973   11 years ago

    I'm not "middle-aged"!!

    Am I? How could this happen?

    1. A Secret Band of Robbers   11 years ago

      The leap has been even bigger among middle-aged voters. Of registered voters from 30 to 49

      brb screaming until I pass out

      1. kinnath   11 years ago

        Fuck. I'm too old to be middle-aged now. When did that happen?

      2. Timon 19   11 years ago

        Wait, what? What happened to 40? Since when was 37 ever middle-aged?

        Jesus! Aaahhh!

    2. toolkien   11 years ago

      I'm not middle aged. I plan on living to 117. It's that simple. I learned how to move metric goalposts from the government.

    3. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

      I've been resigned to middle age for a while now...beats the next stop "elderly" or "senior citizen".

      1. A Secret Band of Robbers   11 years ago

        I'm too cute to be middle aged!

  4. PM   11 years ago

    It's hard to imagine the sort of apathetic retards who live on Facebook actually going out and voting, for which we may offer thanks to the deity of our choosing.

    1. cavalier973   11 years ago

      ...for which we may offer thanks to the deity of our choosing.

      ....

      Obviously not a Calvinist.

      1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

        "For which we thank God, who has already damned the wicked inhabitants of that modern day Sodom, Amsterdam."

        /My Dutch relatives.

  5. Entropy Void   11 years ago

    "If you're told your friends have voted, you're 0.39 percent more likely to vote than someone who hasn't," The Atlantic explains.

    Zero point three nine percent.

    Hardly seems worth it.

  6. Libertarian   11 years ago

    "... the voting process can often feel complicated, with the information about how to head to the polls spread across multiple official sources," Google executive Anthea Watson Strong wrote in a recent blog post.

    To simplify the process, Google is displaying state-specific details when people use search phrases such as "register to vote" or "how do I vote."

    Searching on Google for "who is on my ballot" brings up a list of all the candidates running for the federal, statewide and local offices in any given area, while "where is my polling place" lists local polling places.

    Thank you, Google, for making it easier for idiots to vote.

  7. a better weapon   11 years ago

    I somehow managed to talk a die-hard democrat out of voting today. He was bullying a friend into voting and said 'you can't bitch and moan and then not do something and vote.'

    I defended him by saying the point that has been made here numerous times, "it's statistically pointless to vote, and a no vote is perfectly valid. It means you don't support either candidate."

    He posted a picture of McConnell and said "not voting = voting in a republican senate."

    My response: "... and you proved my point. They can always expect your vote. They can now arm more local law enforcement agencies to suppress minorities, bomb countries we aren't at war with, and print money to prop up their wall street buddies. Sure they're cool on some points, but they don't have to listen to you about the things you don't like, do they? If millions and millions of people who always voted stayed home, it would force them to actually listen to you wouldn't it? The opportunity for a turnout wave would be too much. Luckily for them they dont, because they can count on your vote. Unrequited love is a bitch."

    Even with my pot-shot at the end, the point got through. It was a truly rare experience for me, and wanted to share.

  8. Mahasin Handal   10 years ago

    i think that somewhat strange.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!