Lindsey Graham 'Nowhere Near' a Presidential Run, Lucky for Us All


In news that should be reassuring to sane Americans everywhere, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has poured cold water on reports of a potential run for president. Speaking on CNN's State of the Union, Graham stated that he was not prepared—at least right now—for the demands of a presidential campaign. From Politico:
"I know what it's like to run for president. I'm running for the Senate," Graham said. "I know what it takes to put an organization together, put the money together. I was with [Sen. John] McCain twice in this endeavor. I am nowhere near there. I am all-in running for the Senate." [emphasis added]
If true, this development should be celebrated by anyone who opposes perpetual war and respects the Bill of Rights.
As one of the proudest advocates of American interventionism, Graham's decade-long tenure in the Senate has included regular and repeated calls for U.S. involvement in conflicts abroad. He has claimed that ISIS is coming to kill all Americans and equated the 2003 invasion of Iraq with World War II.
But the civil liberties front is where Graham has shown his true hostility to the Constitution. Speaking in support of the National Defense Authorization Act in 2011, Graham gleefully came out in favor of allowing the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without trial. As Reason reported at the time, his exact words were, "When they say, 'I want my laywer,' you tell them, 'Shut up. You don't get a lawyer.'" (Video below.) That's a view that doesn't just conflict with the Fifth Amendment—it contradicts the basic protections of habeas corpus that have been an important part of the the Anglo-American legal tradition for centuries.
Of course, political theater has long required presidential hopefuls to deny their lofty ambitions until right before the formal launch of a campaign. Without access to his private communications, it's impossible to be sure Graham isn't secretly entertaining the possibility of a run. If only he thought Americans' communications deserved the same level of respect. Sadly, with Graham, that would be too much to hope for.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, in other words, "I'm running."
If Lindsey did run, would that make McCain the Vice President or the First Lady?
and Sheriff Joe as the head of Homeland Security
Lindsey Graham will never be president.
Don't say that. I've seen crazier people elected to office.
he's horrible human being,
Most people grow out of the insufferable douchebag stage as they get older. Not Graham.
Or McCain.
Well, to be fair.. or Harry Reid, or Nancy Pelosi, or Joe Biden... hey, I could go on all day here...
Graham probably has some skeletons in the closet.
And he doesn't want to come out from their company.
My guess is that Graham got a whiff of the fact that even conservatives find him completely insufferable.
That didn't stop McCain or Romney.
I think the citizens of SC forgot to remind him of that fact, fucking losers. And to think, I've been thinking about moving there, to a state full of people who voted for Lindsy fucking Graham, more than once!
Ann Barnhardt has some choice words for Lindsey Graham.
She was doing fine until she said "divinely ordained right". I just can't stand when people attribute freedoms to some higher supernatural deity. Sorry.
Oh, she is 'touched', indeed. But I hope you at least stuck around to the part where she burns a copy of the Qu'ran.
Yeesh. So that's the sound of 300,000 pairs of testicles getting pulled back into the abdomen?
I would give half of everything that I own right now, savings included, to see Graham dropped into ISIS territory, so that he could play fight the terrorist for real, up close and personal and have it filmed as a reality TV show.
It's a well known fact that Lindsey Graham shits his pants on the Senate floor an average of twice a week. You can tell it's happened again when John McCain is seen nearby huffing the fumes.
Lets jsut roll with the puncheso n this one dude.
http://www.Anon-Planet.tk
"That's a view that doesn't just conflict with the Fifth Amendment?it contradicts the basic protections of habeas corpus that have been an important part of the the Anglo-American legal tradition for centuries."
Since when do foreign terrorists qualify for American Constitutional rights? They are terrorists and unless they are to be tried as criminals on American soil and not as enemy combatants of the United States, they should not be afforded the same rights as American citizens.
I respect the content of this article but I disagree with the author's opinion regarding Constitutional rights for non Americans who are accused of terrorism.