Glenn "Instapundit" Reynolds Welcomes Our New Sex-Robot Overlords
Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, writes about super-realistic sex robots coming out of Japan like yesteryear's transistor radios. Among various criticisms of the trend is that human-robot sex will depress fertility rates even more than they already are.
Just as we've developed snack foods that appeal to us more than real food, perhaps we'll see robots that appeal to us more than real people. As weredefine "sex" away from reproduction, perhaps robosexuality will just be seen as another preference. Already, one in five people in the United Kingdom say they'd be willing to get down and "dirty with a droid." Presumably, as the sexbots get sexier, and the idea less unfamiliar, the numbers will go up.
Will humanity die out, though? Probably not. Katy Perry offers the path to human salvation. Although the singer has gotten flak for saying she doesn't need a man to have a baby, the fact is that new reproductive technologies make that largely true. By the time robot prostitutes are a going concern, it's likely that men won't need women to have babies, either. While some futurists are predicting robot prostitutes by 2025,artificial wombs may arrive at the same time.
So you may or may not like the new world of sex robots, but at least they probably won't wipe out humanity. And we can have robot nannies to raise the kids, too. But if we combine the two roles in one machine, would that be creepy? Or just "Mom"? Welcome to the 21st century.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is just here as SugarFree bait, right?
Somebody clue in those chicks from the AM Links. I bet they'll wholeheartedly support this.
The only problem is you can't shower with your new girlfriend.
so this product would be a no go if you were into golden showers?
Do you think it just lies there and takes it?
Frank Zappa covered this whole situation years ago. It all ends up with a lot of prison rape and guitar solos.
Wisdom is the domain of the Wis, which is extinct.
How about a nice oil bath?
Hmm. I will just phrase it as "not all new technology equals an advance", and leave it at that.
You don't know my wife.
*cues Rodney Dangerfield tie adjustment and look*
What do ultra-feminists think of this development? Will they welcome the sexbots as a device for diverting male lusts, or will they oppose the sexbots on some spurious grounds to hide their real opposition to the competition?
You know the answer.
Women hate competition, especially from other women or, I posit, woman-like avatars.
Yup.
Which one furthers their agenda of relegating men to a second class citizen status? Because that would be the angle they would probably go with.
Men should be easier to enslave when placated by constant sexbot attention.
Which one furthers their agenda of relegating men to a second class citizen status?
Easy. Denying men the option to choose a sexbot.
Huh. I wonder how they'd do that? It would have to be in some sense. . . .
I already know. Sexbots will have no rights, of course, and could be abused in any number of horrific ways. Maybe even designed for such abuse. Men using these sexbots will become more violent and aggressive and less used to seeking written consent, witnessed by a tribunal of enlightened female judges. Therefore, sexbots must be banned.
We already have evidence of this.
Come see the violence inherent in the system!
It will also create some misidentification problems. What if you think your interacting with a robot, but it's actually a human? Would we need some sort of "robot" identification label like the Onion news "satire" tag?
Ah, I see. Mandatory disclosures. The sexbot will have to repeat in an endless loop, at high volume, "I AM NOT A HUMAN BEING; I AM A SEXBOT."
"M MM MMM M MMMMM MMMMM; M MM M MMMMMM!"
That's why sexbots will be legally required to speak through multiple orifices.
It will probably reduce the options that fat chicks have for getting laid, so they'll oppose it.
Neither.
They will decry them as promoting rape by teaching men that women are sex objects.
Their real objection of course is to male sexuality which is what they want eradicated.
Unless it is totally being used to give them mind shattering orgasm's by bad boys who treat them like shit, then they are cool with it till he drops her and their opposition to any male anywhere ever having a sexual release of any sort resumes.
it's likely that men won't need women to have babies, either
Yes...because men fucking robots are first in line to wanting to be Fathers.
Yeah that's a whole new level of beta.
That would be like saying women who use vibrators wouldn't never want to use a sperm bank. Sex, companionship, and procreation are currently bundled up in one package, but we'd probably all be happier if we could get companionship from our best friends, sex from a perfect lover, and procreation from the genetics we actually want to pass on.
This is the part of the Terminator saga that wasn't in the movies: sexbots tired of being screwed by perves and fat dudes, start a robot revolution aiming to destroy humanity.
Japanese are a fucking odd lot.
They're merely taking the long road to total world domination.
This is taking "Domo arigato Mr. Roboto" to a level where it was never supposed to go.
uhhhhh....
No, just.... no
So, do the sexbots require more or less lube. Asking for a friend.
Don't know, but they need a he'll of a lot more Oxi-Clean.
It's *always* been technologically feasible to separate sex from family life. There is no *biological* reason for a man to stay and marry the woman he impregnated, or raise their children. There is no *biological* reason for a woman not to raise her children independent of a man.
There have often been legal, cultural and economic pressures for normal family life, but the "technology" to avoid family life has always been, shall we say, near at hand.
And I hear the invention of jacking off precedes the invention robotics.
I think you mean "near at ass".
Yes, I know you like ass photos.
Since it appears Episiarch isn't here: Don't Date Robots!
Thank you for getting the word out. Now I'm going to go make out with my Audrey Hepburn-bot.
I'd take Katy Perry back behind the school and get her pregnant.
They raises an interesting question. Which celebrities would be willing to license their likeness for reproduction in sexbot form? Because a true sexbot would be pretty expensive for a while, and, along with other reasons, likeness piracy might not be that feasible.
This is less true with VR simulations, which can get past infringement by just letting the users commit the offense.
Katy Perry
Emily Ratakowski
Scarlett Johannson
That chick from Game of Thrones with the eyes and crooked grin
Hillary Clinton (for hate boning)
Hillary Clinton (for hate boning)
Uh. Maybe 30 years ago.
No, albo meant hate for himself....surely.
My point was which ones would license their likenesses for sexbot use, not which ones men would want.
That list reminds me of that bit on Sesame Street:
One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong.
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?
Not sure you'd need a license unless you were advertising it under that name.
I'd assume they would be special ordered to look like anyone you wanted.
Right of publicity probably would prevent that. Not to mention, the sexbot manufacturer would likely want to market the Katy Perry sexbot as the Katy Perry sexbot.
But surely a "me-too" company would offer a "Kerry Beatty" doll at lower cost.
Eventually, I think so, but initially, for the full sexbot, it would probably be too expensive to make one underground. Later, of course, KT-Pussy will be available from Ronco.
What about a pre-nup that licensed the likeness of your hot early 20-something wife? That way you have a sex bot made of her on the day you married her.
Then 20 years later on your anniversary you could take Real Doll Wife out for a romantic dinner and a night of hot sex and just leave Real Wife (fat and shrewish) at home?
Of course you should definitely opt for the off site storage of Real Doll Wife. Otherwise you just know you are going to catch your 13 year old son boning the shit out of her after he finds the doll hidden in the back of your closet.
The therapy for that sort of scene will bankrupt you.
Or the Freudians would use that for therapy.
Lucy Liu obviously: http://www.newlin-deschler.com....._robot.jpg
I was thinking along the lines as this might be a way to talk my wife into a 3 way. Of course picking out the doll is probably what gets you in the most trouble:) assuming it's not a replica of the wife which I think would be weird for her.
Especially if she has a twin in real life.
Based on that abomination of a pic posted in the AM links, I would guess that Lena Dunham would do this as an open source project.
Free to use however you want.
My sexbot, my choice.
That needs to be a T-shirt.... now.
Sexbot marriage?
Sung to the tune of "Jukebox Hero."
After this came up earlier, I scoured my old e-mail archives for a link from years ago from Craigs List, but I couldn't find it.
The gist of the post on CL was a guy was on one of the forums asking how to repair a cigarette burn on his Real Doll. The comments were fantastic. There were a lot of Real Doll owners who were outraged because they thought he was abusing his doll. The guy kept trying to say that is was purely an accident. According to him, he just got too excited and forgot to take the heater out of his mouth and accidently burned his baby.
This is a sad day for America's long-suffering Mom-&-Pop porno shops.