Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Ukraine

Malaysian Plane Crashed in Ukraine—Who's to Blame?

Scott Shackford | 7.17.2014 12:22 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | GothPhil / photo on flickr
(GothPhil / photo on flickr)

A Malaysian Airlines passenger plane en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur appears to have crashed in Eastern Ukraine. Though the airline has only confirmed it has lost contact with flight MH17, Reuters has tweeted that a correspondent has seen the wreckage on the ground and bodies.

Here's the Associated Press story on it right now. It will obviously be updated as reports roll in, and we'll keep an eye out for news at Reason 24/7. A Ukraine adviser claimed on Facebook that the plane was shot down. Ukraine has stated that they are not responsible.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Obama Hits Russia With Big Sanctions, Putin Says Relations Near 'Dead End'

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

UkraineAirlinesMalaysiaRussiaAirports
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (221)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Seamus   11 years ago

    Malaysian Airlines is not racking up a good track record this year.

    1. Bam!   11 years ago

      Both 777 as well, which had a nearly perfect safety record before this year. Weird.

      1. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

        I'm not sure you can count getting hit by a missile against either the airline or the airplane manufacturer.

        1. kinnath   11 years ago

          I'm not sure you can count getting hit by a missile against either the airline

          Routing a commercial aircraft over an active war zone is probably not an acceptable practice.

          Someone in another thread said the airspace was closed to commercial operations. If so, Malaysian Airlines really fucked up big time.

          1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            I think it safe to say I shan't board a Malaysian Airlines plane now or in the future.

            1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

              I hear they have some really good deals right now. Do you guys insure them, BTW?

              1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                OOOH!

                Shit yeah.

                *Fires up Kayak.com*

                1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                  Ugh, Malaysia Air has no fare sales listed. THIS IS BULLSHIT.

              2. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

                I think we have exposure with them at more than one layer.... argh.

                1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

                  Thats $265 Million for the hull, and god knows how much more for victim compensation.

          2. tarran   11 years ago

            According to PPRUN, the air space wasn't closed.

            The UK and the US have put out a notice advising commercial traffic to stay away, but othe countries haven't

            Apparently a significant amount of air traffic between Europe and the Far East has been flying over the Ukraine.

            One of the guys on the forum even said that he flew over the area as a first officer on a 777 about 8 hours ago.

            It's kind of disconcerting. A Ukrainian military transport was shot down yesterday at about 20,000 feet (if I did the conversion right).

            According to the forum, pretty much all commercial traffic is now diverting around the area.

            1. WTF   11 years ago

              Do you really need an official advisory to know NOT TO FLY THROUGH A FUCKING WAR ZONE?!

              1. tarran   11 years ago

                Until the rebels got the vehicle mounted SAMs, it *was* safe, provided you stayed above 20,000 feet and kept your speed up.

                The more I read about the BUK system, the more I say WTF?

                1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

                  Until the rebels got the vehicle mounted SAMs,

                  But its the Russians who shot down a Ukrainian plane at 20,000 feet. According to early reports that I assume are not 100% reliable.

                  I see no reason to assume that its the Ukrainians who shot down the airliner.

              2. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

                Well obviously, some people do!

                1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

                  So it is my understanding it takes seriously military hardware and training to hit a 777 doing 600knots at 35,000. Those numbers are WAY to big for a shoulder mount. A REAL rocket is needed plus it would need to target the plane. That means someone was seeing it on radar...with its transponder screaming MHA777 or whatever...something is fishy.

          3. Agammamon   11 years ago

            The sorts of people who have the technology to hit an airliner (that isn't on take-off or landing) are the sorts of people who have the technology to discriminate between an airliner and an actual threat.

            As to who's fault it is - well that will be the fault of the usual suspect.

            Mr. "Who's got the deepest pockets".

            Its amazing all the shit he's responsible for.

            1. Brandon   11 years ago

              I assume it will be the Koch Brothers.

            2. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

              i must refresh since you post is more succinct, clear, and prompt.

            3. Seamus   11 years ago

              The sorts of people who have the technology to hit an airliner (that isn't on take-off or landing) are the sorts of people who have the technology to discriminate between an airliner and an actual threat.

              Tell that to those who died aboard Iran Air Flight 655 in 1988.

            4. DRM   11 years ago

              Generally, yes.

              But the Russian state media reported back on June 29th that the separatists had seized a Buk system. Which means there was a system able to shoot down this plane in the hands of stateless amateurs - at least, if you believe the Russian state media.

      2. A Frayed Knot   11 years ago

        To be fair, the anti-SAM system doesn't come standard on the 777

        1. Sevo   11 years ago

          Bet that option gets a lot more looks for the next orders.

      3. Sevo   11 years ago

        If it was a SAM, it's pretty certain that Boeing didn't design for that eventuality.

        1. WTF   11 years ago

          And the victim's families will sue them for not planning for that eventuality.

        2. Dweebston   11 years ago

          When will Congress acknowledge the scourge of SAM fatalities in our airways, and mandate countermeasures on all passenger planes?

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

            All planes must be Air Force One!!!

          2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

            Does any insurgency really more than 7 SAMs?

      4. Tman   11 years ago

        I don't think the 777 was outfitted with anti-SA batteries.

      5. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

        The 777 has still has a perfect safety record, as long as you don't have an Asian pilot.

        1. WTF   11 years ago

          LACIST!

          1. Almanian!   11 years ago

            He speak tluth!

        2. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

          Wasn't that Asiana flight a trip 7?

          1. Almanian!   11 years ago

            Oceanic Flt 815.....

          2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

            Yep. So egregious. The equivalent of me driving several hours, only to crash through my garage wall because I'm too tired to drive the extra 30 feet to my garbage door.

            I take my 3 year old to LAX to watch the planes land, and we stand right under the glide slope. Except when Asiana planes are coming.

            1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

              HA! You go to In n Out for plane spotting? I would like to go there sometime.

              And this walking path at Manchester

              1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

                It's a great spot. Early in the morning, A380s from Quantas, Emirates, and Korean Air all land within a few minutes of each other.

                There's another secret spot on the south side of the airport, but it's more scenic and less exciting.

                Added bonus: In N Out has meat on the grill at 9:20 and secretly opens at 9:30. I've never had a bad day start with a Double Double.

                I take it you are familiar with Princess Juliana Airport?

                1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

                  I take it you are familiar with Princess Juliana Airport?

                  Of course! 🙂

                  I'm not a beachy type person, though, so I doubt a vacay to St. Maarten is in the cards.

                  Lukla, however.....

    2. Dweebston   11 years ago

      At least we know where this one is.

      ...too soon?

      1. Jerry on the sea   11 years ago

        It's already on twitter.

        1. Dweebston   11 years ago

          Twitter: shelving decorum and beating me to the punchline since whenever Twitter came about.

    3. Seamus   11 years ago

      To lose one Boeing 777 may be regarded as a misfortune. To lose two looks like carelessness.

    4. XM   11 years ago

      If Russia is responsible for this, is this an act of war for either Ukraine or the US?

      There were 5 American passengers.

  2. Sevo   11 years ago

    AP has a Russian SAM shooting it down.

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      Isn't eastern Ukraine a war zone? Why would anyone fly a passenger plane through a war zone?

      1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        [insert Asian driving joke here]

      2. Los Doyers   11 years ago

        That's what an "aviation expert" was saying on Sky News, more or less why the hell the plane was flying over potentially dangerous airspace.

      3. Seamus   11 years ago

        Maybe because they foolishly assumed that the Ukrainians and rebels would stick to fighting each other and not try shooting down planes that were 30,000 feet in the air and not obviously engaged in military activities. What was the alternative? Engage in a costly long-distance re-route because of the *possibility* that one one the combatants would go all Fearless Fosdick and start acting like the Fairfax County SWAT team executing an arrest warrant on Salvatore Culosi?

  3. Bam!   11 years ago

    Fox News said this is the third plane to be shot down since Monday. A cargo plane and fighter jet were the other two.

  4. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

    we'll keep an eye out for news at Reason 24/7.

    Reason has its own news feed? Who knew?

    1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

      Huh. Must be something new?

    2. grrizzly   11 years ago

      But what do millennials think about it?

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        WE NEED A POLL!

        1. Dweebston   11 years ago

          Millenials need regular pollings.

          /jokepeoplemadelastweekprobably

          1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

            Nah, not even a little bit.

      2. Sevo   11 years ago

        "But what do millennials think about it?"

        Aw, Mom, don't bother me and make a sandwich!

  5. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

    We suspect Russian involvement!

    /Ghosts of Passengers of KAL Flights 007 and 902

  6. Jerry on the sea   11 years ago

    If Russia closes it airspace, how many commercial airliners still want to go over the Ukraine?

    1. Jerry on the sea   11 years ago

      -the.

  7. B.P.   11 years ago

    "A Ukraine adviser claimed on Facebook that the plane was shot down."

    I'm just happy that international diplomacy is being hashed out on Facebook. I wonder how many 'likes' that got.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      #whitehouse #diplomacy

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        #reset #smart

  8. Rich   11 years ago

    Given it's a missile attack, seems kind of a waste of ammo.

  9. Mike M.   11 years ago

    I hope it wasn't launched using Hillary Clinton's "reset button".

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      I really don't want to think about Hillary Clinton's "reset button".

  10. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

    http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MAS:MK

  11. A Frayed Knot   11 years ago

    From the twitters:
    @McFaul Russian GRU officer Strelkov admitting that he ordered the missile strike against the Malaysian jet.

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      Tom Cruise: DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED??!!

      Officer Strelkov: YOU'RE GODDAMNED RIGHT I DID!!

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        Nicely played.

        *British Open clap*

    2. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

      Strelnikov is back!

    3. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      Maybe I haven't been keeping up, but I thought the Russian story was that these were Ukrainian separatists and not Russian soldiers. Doesn't admitting that a GRU officer ordered the shoot put the lie to that story?

  12. Tman   11 years ago

    Looks like President Not My Fault might want to pick up the red courtesy phone and dial up some 1980's foreign policy.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      #IStandWithMalaysianAirlines

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        +nice

      2. WTF   11 years ago

        With accompanying sad face, of course.

        1. Almanian!   11 years ago

          Crying Gabby Giffords (facing the wrong direction) in front of a crying Statue of Liberty, surrounded by crying First Responders? (PBUT) with a setting, crying sun in the background. And some kittehs and puppehs, all crying.

          1. Brandon   11 years ago

            And the Statue of Liberty with Obama's face on it.

      3. MJGreen   11 years ago

        #DontShootOurPlanes 🙁

    2. Bam!   11 years ago

      He should have drawn a red line against shooting down passenger planes.

    3. Mike M.   11 years ago

      ROFLMAO. Good luck with THAT one.

      Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."
      Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

      March 26, 2016

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        I think that statement was actually from the past, not the future.

    4. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      What did we do when KAL007 was shot down?

      I forgot.

      1. Mike M.   11 years ago

        Wow, the JournoList got its talking points distributed FAST on this one. Very well done Davey boy!

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          WE NEED TO BLAME SOMEONE AND START A WAR LIKE IN 2002!

          1. Mike M.   11 years ago

            Hello there Dave Weigel of 2124 12th St NW Washington, DC 20009, phone number 202-261-2848.

          2. WTF   11 years ago

            Are you quitting on me? Well, are you? Then quit, you slimy fucking walrus-looking piece of shit! Get the fuck off of my obstacle! Get the fuck down off of my obstacle! NOW! MOVE IT! Or I'm going to rip your balls off, so you cannot contaminate the rest of the world! I will motivate you, IF IT SHORT-DICKS EVERY CANNIBAL ON THE CONGO!

            1. Aloysious   11 years ago

              Is there anything that quotes from FMJ can not make more funny?

              1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

                Ummmm....no!

          3. Sevo   11 years ago

            Palin's Buttplug|7.17.14 @ 12:59PM|#
            "WE NEED TO BLAME SOMEONE AND START A WAR LIKE IN 2002!"

            Go fuck your daddy, turd.

      2. Tman   11 years ago

        The Reagan Administration decided to allow worldwide access to the United States military's GNSS system, which was classified at the time. Today this system is widely known as GPS.

        The Reagan administration also pushed NATO to deploy Pershing II and cruise missiles to West Germany.

        There were other reactions as well.

        Do you want me to go on and embarrass you some more?

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          I thought NATO was only for pussies like Obama.

          1. Tman   11 years ago

            Obama doesn't even know what NATO stands for.

            Face it Shriek, your hero is WAY over his head and everyone on the goddam planet knows it.

            Let's just hope some cooler heads prevail.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

              Let me know when he starts a $1 trillion ground war against the wrong country.

              1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

                The big news wouldn't be Obama starting a war.

                The big news would be Obama going to Congress first.

                Of course, he'd probably Repub support, just like Bush got Dem support for Iraq.

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

              2. Sevo   11 years ago

                Palin's Buttplug|7.17.14 @ 1:12PM|#
                "Let me know when he starts a $1 trillion ground war against the wrong country."

                STFU, turd.

              3. WTF   11 years ago

                BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!11!!!!!!

              4. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

                You mean like the GOP? The OTHER statist warmongering party that no one on this list supports?

                This is almost as bad as when Nixon started that war in Vietnam. Oh, wait...

          2. WTF   11 years ago

            Sure you wanna quit playing, SHREEK? The game's always between you and getting called a cunt. That dropped eye of yours looks like the hood on a cunt to me, shreek. When you talk, your mouth looks like a cunt moving.

            1. Seamus   11 years ago

              I ain't gonna get in no gun fight with you, Hickok.

          3. Sevo   11 years ago

            Palin's Buttplug|7.17.14 @ 1:01PM|#
            "I thought NATO was only for pussies like Obama."

            Go lick Obo's ass, turd.

      3. WTF   11 years ago

        I bet you're the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you!

      4. Sevo   11 years ago

        Palin's Buttplug|7.17.14 @ 12:54PM|#
        "What did we"...

        8%, turd.
        And STFU, turd.

  13. West Texas   11 years ago

    I am supposed to fly west out of Istanbul to a meeting in Siberia in early September. The great circle route takes us just south and east of Crimea and over the sea of Azov. You know, where this shit happened today.

    I think I'm gonna reschedule that trip now.

    1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

      +1 risk management technique: avoidance

    2. Timon 19   11 years ago

      Don't you mean east out of IST?

  14. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Man, I knew I shouldn't have gone duck hunting in Ukraine this morning...

    *sneaks away from crash site*

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      + 1 Dick Cheney. You shot the plane IN THE FACE!

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        They'd better apologize to me, too, for imitating a duck and causing me to waste ammo.

      2. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        As long as the plane apologizes for getting in the way on national television we'll be good.

    2. WTF   11 years ago

      Especially since it's WABBIT SEASON!!

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        DUCK SEASON!!

  15. tarran   11 years ago

    If you want informed speculation by people in the aviation industry that isn't filtered into journaderp.

    Here is a good point to start reading:
    http://www.pprune.org/rumours-.....der-5.html

    1. John   11 years ago

      It was shot down at altitude. That means it was at thirty five or forty thousand feet moving over five hundred miles per hour. No shoulder fired missile is shooting down a 777 at altitude. This had to be either the Ukrainian or Russian military shooting it down by mistake.

      My question is why the fuck is an airliner flying over Ukraine? Cram a crowbar in your wallet and buy some extra fuel to fly over the Black Sea. Malaysian Airlines is quite a piece of work. First they fail to notice one of their pilots has become a bat shit insane Muslim and now they decide that it is a good idea to fly over a contested and unstable border of two countries with large air defense forces. Who the fuck is running that company? Obama?

      1. tarran   11 years ago

        The rebels have BUK vehicle mounted SAMS.

        Basic missile system specifications[edit]
        Target acquisition range (by TAR 9S18M1, 9S18M1-1)
        range ? 140?,
        altitude ? 60 m ? 25 km,
        Firing groups in one division ? up to 6 (with one command post)
        Firing groups operating in a sector
        90? in azimuth, 0?7? and 7?14? in elevation,
        45? in azimuth, 14?52? in elevation,
        Radar mast lifting height (for TAR 9S36) ? 21 m,
        Reloading of 4 missiles by TEL from itself ? around 15 min,
        Combat readiness time ? no more than 5 min,
        Kill probability (by one missile) ? 0.9?0.95,
        Target engagement zone
        aircraft
        altitude ? 15 m ? 25 km
        range ? 3?42 km
        TBM
        altitude ? 2.0?16 km
        range ? 3?20 km
        sea targets ? up to 25 km
        land targets ? up to 15 km.

        1. John   11 years ago

          And the rebels are pretty much an arm of the Russian Military. You knew it was some kind of air defense artillery. The plane is seven or eight miles above you traveling nine miles a minute. Talk about Kentucky windage. Oh, you have to have a warhead big enough to take down a plane that has a take off weight of what? Three hundred thousand pounds or so? That is a big warhead.

          That said the rebels would be a good guess since they likely don't have a lot of of communication with civil aviation authorities.

          1. Timon 19   11 years ago

            You really don't need much of a warhead to ruin a civilian jetliner with no idea what's about to happen.

        2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

          "NATO reporting name Grizzly"

          Ummmm...

          1. tarran   11 years ago

            The Russians have some really crazy missiles to deal with their lack of air superiority.

            This is the one that made me shit my pants as a navy guy:

            I give you The P-700 Granit aka the SS-N-19 Shipwreck.

            Built by Chelomei/NPO Mashinostroenia, the bulging 10m missile has swept-back wings and tail, weighs around 7,000 kilograms and can be fitted with either a 750 kg HE warhead, a FAE warhead, or a 500 kt nuclear warhead. ... Maximum speed is believed to be between Mach 1.6 and more than Mach 2.5.[1] Range is estimated at 500 to 550?625 km.[2] The guidance system is mixed-mode, with inertial, active terminal guidance with radar and also anti-radar homing. Mid-course correction is probable.
            The missile, when fired in a swarm (group of 4?8) has a unique guidance mode. One of the weapons climbs to a higher altitude and designates targets while the others attack. The missile responsible for target designation climbs in short pop-ups, so as to be harder to intercept. The missiles are linked by data connections, forming a network. Missiles are able to differentiate targets, detect groups and prioritize targets automatically using information gathered during flight and types of ships and battle formations pre-programmed in an onboard computer.

            Shipwreck is a great name for that monster.

            1. John   11 years ago

              What should have made you shit your pants was what a single fifth rate power with a single obsolete fighter and one air launched cruise missile did to the HMS Sheffield. That was some amazing scary shit there.

              Then of course there is what one torpedo did to the Argentine ship the Belgrano or whatever it was. The general lesson is, "don't join the fucking navy".

              1. tarran   11 years ago

                The Argentines might have had obsolete fighters, but the naval squadron that launched the exocets were according to my information some top flight, shit-hot pilots.

                As the Red Baron remarked, "It's not the crate; it's the man" that is the secret to success.

                1. John   11 years ago

                  Yeah Tarran, but even if they hadn't been top rate, all they needed was one lucky shot.

                2. John   11 years ago

                  Tarran,

                  I have always read that had the Argentines not has the biggest dud ratio of any air force in history, the British fleet would have gone to the bottom. The British Navy got very lucky. The Army in contrast, once they got on shore were pretty amazing. They conducted a landing and overland march and land battle effectively entirely on foot. They had virtually no mechanized forces.

            2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

              That sounds almost too advanced for something that was designed before I was born.

          2. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

            needs an extra r.

            1. grrizzly   11 years ago

              Seems like a good time to take off to Alaska and blend in among my kind.

              1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

                VE VILL BE VATCHING U!

              2. Ivan Pike   11 years ago

                You might not want to stay too long.

                Hunt Details
                Hunt Number: RB601
                Regulatory Year: 2014
                Hunt Type: Registration
                Species: Brown Bear
                Legal Animal: One brown bear,except two (2) brown bears may be taken in Unit 19A. however cubs or females accompanied by cubs may not be taken at any time.
                GMU, Area
                19A, 19B, 21D, 24

                1) WHEN: Aug. 10 - June 30.

              3. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                Seems like a good time to take off to Alaska and blend in among my kind.

                You know, with the handle I was surprised you weren't a quintessential Silverlake bear.

                1. grrizzly   11 years ago

                  Yeah, the handle reveals something... but not what people assume. I consider it a success.

                  1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                    Furry?

                    1. grrizzly   11 years ago

                      Third strike and you're out.
                      No, there's no deep meaning, just bears are cool animals and I had to come up with something and misspell it cause the properly spelled handle was already taken elsewhere.

                    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

                      Now Jesse is disappointed.

                    3. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                      Fair enough, although I think that was only strike two.

                      I didn't want to pull over any other handles I'd used and ended up laming out with what I have now.

                      Are you going to get a chance to go to the Kodiak Archipelago?

                    4. grrizzly   11 years ago

                      We thought about it but we're flying to Brooks Falls instead. It's more logistically difficult to visit the Kodiak island.

                    5. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                      Brooks Falls has a couple of live bear cams (never expected to type that string of words in a G-rated sense).

                      The parks service site clips between a few of them but they've got a closeup on a bear fishing currently.

      2. Apple   11 years ago

        First they fail to notice one of their pilots has become a bat shit insane Muslim

        Wait, which one? Did I miss that part of the story?

        1. John   11 years ago

          The pilot of the missing plane to Japan was, yes.

    2. Dweebston   11 years ago

      It's all about keeping the accountants happy by taking the shortest possible route until it all goes wrong, like today. I doubt that you will be able to get an MH accountant to answer the phone right now. I hope they sleep well tonight.

      We can guess who pulled the trigger on that SAM: the goddamn accountants, that's who.

      1. John   11 years ago

        Mistakes happen. I seriously doubt they intentionally shot down the plane. It was a massive fuck up on their part. But there is a war going on. Massive fuck ups tend to happen a lot more often in places where there is a war than in places where there are not. That is why it is a good idea to avoid war zones when you can.

        Any airline that flies over Ukraine right now, other than ones that are taking off from there or Russia and thus are in direct communication with one or both sides is criminally negligent as far as I am concerned.

        1. tarran   11 years ago

          Until today, I had no idea that the rebels had vehicle mounted SAMs.

          MANPADS can't bring down a civilian airliner at altitude.

          The rebels got shiny new toys over the last week.

          They shot down two Ukranian military aircraft (a transport at high altitude and a fighter jet).

          My guess is that very few people outside the conflict zone knew things had changed...

          The rebels clearly have a weapon system that isn't paired with the proper C^3 I to use it properly.

          1. Sevo   11 years ago

            "They shot down two Ukranian military aircraft (a transport at high altitude and a fighter jet)."

            According to AP, those were AAM shots from fighters.

          2. John   11 years ago

            But even if the rebels didn't, the Russians and the Ukrainians do. Mistakes happen in tense situations. The US cruiser shot down that Iranian airliner in the Persian Gulf that time. You just don't want to be around when two countries are that close to the bring.

            1. Agammamon   11 years ago

              Because of a faulty IFF setting.

              1. tarran   11 years ago

                It wasn't a faulty IFF setting.

                The Aegis operators fucked up. They tried to cover their buts by claiming the Iranian A/C wasn't squawking Mode III (civilian) but Mode II.

                It was an utter, disgraceful lie. From the Fogerty Report

                Iran Air Flight 655 took off on runway 21 (heading 210 degrees true), was directed by the Bandar Abbas Tower to squawk IFF mode III code 6760, and began a normal climb out to assigned altitude of 14,000 feet for the flight, which lasted a total of 7 minutes before the plane was hit by the missiles from USS Vincennes. The pilot remained within the Amber 59 air corridor (20 miles wide, 10 miles each side of centerline), made a routine position report to Bandar Abbas departure control at approximately 0654Z, and was ascending through 12,000 feet at a speed of approximately 380 kts at the time of making his report....
                ...

                The data from USS Vincennes's tapes, information from USS Sides and reliable intelligence information, corroborate the fact that TN 4131 was on a normal commercial air flight plan profile, in the assigned airway, squawking Mode III 6760, on a continuous ascent in altitude from take-off at Bandar Abbas to shoot down.

                1. John   11 years ago

                  There was no excuse for that. If nothing else the radar signature and speed should have told them it wasn't an Iranian fighter. That and the dip shit submarine commander who decided to show off for the VIPS and do an emergency surfacing into a Japanese fishing boat are about lowest points for the Navy in my lifetime. It makes me really wonder how they are managing to put such fuck ups into such important positions. Don't you guys ever talk to the Army? You promote your ass kissing fuckups and send them to the Pentagon. You don't put in charge of anything where they could do any damage.

                  1. Warty   11 years ago

                    You promote your ass kissing fuckups and send them to the Pentagon. You don't put in charge of anything where they could do any damage.

                    I had never thought about it before, but the Peter Principle becomes really dangerous when weapons are involved, doesn't it?

                    1. John   11 years ago

                      Yes Warty, yes it does. Forget about a war, just doing training where you have people running around with weapons is pretty dangerous. The military has generally done a good job of keeping the real basket cases out of command slots. They still promote them. But they generally don't let them play with the toys, the Navy apparently excluded.

        2. Jon Lester   11 years ago

          Anytime Drudge and HuffPo run the exact same headline, skepticism is warranted.

          1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            Well-Manicured Man: "Trust no one, Mr. Mulder."

        3. Timon 19   11 years ago

          FWIW, Lufthansa and KLM routinely flew directly over Baghdad in the 2000s.

          They bumped their cruise altitude to 50k, but they still did it.

    3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      From what I gather from that link, due to the annexation, there were 2 conflicting air traffic control services in the area. That alone should be enough for airlines to route their flights elsewhere.

  16. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Oh, BTW:

    Who's to Blame?

    BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

    1. PBR Streetgang   11 years ago

      Koch Brothers, amirite??

      1. John   11 years ago

        How long before How the Kochs are responsible for the latest Malaysian Airlines tragedy. is up on Salon? The end of the day?

        1. Sevo   11 years ago

          "How long before How the Kochs are responsible for the latest Malaysian Airlines tragedy. is up on Salon?"

          Well, the daddy made all his money off the poor starving Soviet peasants, and now Putin!
          Do I have to connect all the dots for you?!

        2. PBR Streetgang   11 years ago

          Koch Bros. hoarding of international oil rights and supply chain control forces MAS to take shortest route over war zone. Alternatively, somethingsomething Koch Bros., oil in black sea, Cheney, Citizen's United, blahbalh its the Koch Bros. fault.

          1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            TRANS-CAUCUS PIPELINE!!! NO BLOOD FOR OIL!!! HALLIBURTON!!!!! BUSHITLER!!!!

    2. Dweebston   11 years ago

      Predicting a Salon.com editorial in the next few days: Bush's inability to solidify relations with the disintegrating Ukraine during his tenure precipitated this tragedy. The former president's obsession with Iraq and the middle east set back the reintegration of Baltic countries with the European Union by years, perhaps decades.

      Or somesuch.

  17. Almanian!   11 years ago

    What did "we" do about KAL 7? Who cares? Typical shrieking about shit no one else is even talking about. What a maroon.

    #TFT

    1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      WE NEED TO BLAME SOMEONE NOW!

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        I bet you're the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you!

      2. Don Mynack   11 years ago

        Yes, in the case of someone shooting down an airliner, we really do.

        Obama already threw a call to Vlad. Vlad is apologizing. He knows what's up.

      3. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

        Well, when a civilian airliner gets shot down and hundreds of people killed, don't you think someone should be held responsible?

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          He'll care after Jan 2017, Kochsucker.

        2. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

          Not if it may reflect badly or be difficult, somehow, for the Lightworker!

  18. Warty   11 years ago

    Why were the SAM crews on alert? Why did they think that a single large slow plane flying at 35,000 feet was a threat? Who set their rules of engagement? And why would the plane even fly over a war zone?

    A whole lot of heads ought to roll over this.

    1. tarran   11 years ago

      Commercial airliners fly at Mach .83 or 83% of the speed of sound for you groundhogs.

      1. Warty   11 years ago

        Slow.

        I was thinking they'd have to have mistaken it for a fighter jet, since I don't think any bombers are in action over there. I hadn't thought about transports, because I'm tarded. But still, what a bunch of idiots.

        1. John   11 years ago

          It they mistook it for anything, they mistook it for a military cargo plane. Or maybe they are just assholes who wanted to shoot down a commercial plane?

          1. Warty   11 years ago

            Reckless stupidity or reckless maliciousness, take your pick.

            1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

              Stupidly malicious recklessness?

        2. Timon 19   11 years ago

          .83 mach is not slow. Non super-cruise fighters usually fly in that neighborhood.

    2. A Frayed Knot   11 years ago

      The theory is that the rebels believed they shot down a UKR military transport.

    3. Jon Lester   11 years ago

      The proper Ukrainian military are mostly conscripts who have proven unwilling to fight their fellow countrymen. The Kiev regime has been building up a "national guard" of hastily-trained Svoboda and Pravy Sektor types. The federalists, by contrast, have plenty of willing, skilled veteran talent to draw from.

      Also today (though you wouldn't know it from the MSM), it's become clear that Kiev's SAM crews are hardly the only units performing badly.

  19. Jerry on the sea   11 years ago

    McCain: ?we don't want to rush to conclusions, but Ukraine does not have this capability.?

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      "we don't want to rush to conclusions, but I have concluded..."

    2. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

      Why is he on the teevee every time something happens, regardless of whether he has any "expertise" on the issue?

      There could be a tour bus crash in Nova Scotia, and McCain would be flapping his gums about it on my screen.

      1. John   11 years ago

        You have to get someone I guess. The other question is, why can't the media could shut the fuck up until they actually know what happened rather than pulling shit out of their ass? Every single time something happens, the media gets the story completely wrong because they are too lazy and impatient to get it right.

        1. Brandon   11 years ago

          Being first is more important than being right. Journalism 101, apparently.

  20. Jon Lester   11 years ago

    The Obama administration and Hillary's (and later John Kerry's) State Department made the scenario possible by sponsoring the overthrow of a democratically-elected regime, backing openly fascist elements in the process. This whole fiasco of a foreign adventure could and should have been avoided.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      Senator Lindy Graham? Is that you?

      1. John   11 years ago

        It is true. But modern Democrats are fascist. So, you really can't say it is surprising that they would like fascists in other countries.

        1. Jon Lester   11 years ago

          Hillary actually is the neocon favorite for 2016.

      2. Sevo   11 years ago

        Palin's Buttplug|7.17.14 @ 1:14PM|#
        "Senator Lindy Graham? Is that you?"

        Fuck you, turd. Where's the emails?

  21. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

    A Russian GRU officer had already taken credit for shooting down the plane on Twitter before it was realized the AN-26 he just shot down was a 777:

    http://thehill.com/policy/inte.....rn-ukraine

    1. John   11 years ago

      DOH!! Never go into combat with a Twitter account.

    2. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

      I don't see any reference to the Twee it question in that article.

      1. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

        Crap. It was there when I posted the link, but it got removed in a later edit.

        1. Drake   11 years ago

          Here

          http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8a7_1405620055

      2. Don Mynack   11 years ago

        You can find it here: http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/.....ign=buffer

    3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      Why in the fuck are the first words in that article "President Obama"? That's fucking ridiculous.

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        We live in a Lightworker-centric system, Mr. Beach.

    4. Jon Lester   11 years ago

      I'd be interested to know when the account was established and what previous tweets were sent from it.

  22. Bam!   11 years ago

    Seems like the woman holding this state department press conference wasn't really given any information.

    1. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      Did she say which YouTube video provoked the attack?

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        What difference at this point does it make?

      2. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        I lol'd

  23. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

    23 Americans on board killed.

    Ruh-Roh.

  24. Vernon Depner   11 years ago

    Eighteen years ago today,TWA Flight 800 blew up and crashed in New York. I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

      Dude, there are only 365 days in a year.

    2. Bam!   11 years ago

      158 years ago today, The Great Train Wreck of 1856 took 67 lives. Coincidence? That's what they want you to think.

      1. KDN   11 years ago

        Lizard people live for centuries. They just keep on shedding their human skins for new ones.

      2. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        That was most excellent, Bam! The cut of your jib....I like it.

  25. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

    Charlie Cooke and Dana Loesch just tweeted that Obama turned his press conference on the plane crash into something about Republicans not passing another stimulus. If true, that is insane. I can't tell if they're joking or not. Can anyone confirm?

    1. Bam!   11 years ago

      He didn't have a press conference on the plane crash. He had a scheduled press conference on other matters where he briefly mentioned the crash in his opening remarks.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

        Thanks, that's slightly better that what I thought had happened.

      2. Brandon   11 years ago

        So he had a scheduled press conference on Republicans not passing another stimulus, and plowed through it despite other developments?

        1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

          From what I saw, it was one of those rah-rah staged events, not a presser.

          1. Brandon   11 years ago

            That's what the O administration calls a press conference.

    2. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

      From what I saw it wasn't a press conference, it was a previously-scheduled event in Delaware and he only spoke about 2 sentences about MH17 before launching into his prepared speech.

      1. John   11 years ago

        In fairness, thinking on his feet is not something Obama is very good at. I am sure his staff was terrified that he even said two sentences that were not on the teleprompter.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

          I wonder what he said on the phone to Putin without the teleprompter.

  26. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    Future Salon headline:

    How White Privilege Shot Down Flight MH17.

    1. John   11 years ago

      MH17, 235 more victims or white racism.

  27. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    Looks like 23 Americans were on board.

  28. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

    BOOOOOSH! CHEMTRAILZ?

    http://www.khou.com/news/inves.....58691.html

  29. PBR Streetgang   11 years ago

    Does anyone know how likely/unlikely it is that Russian separatist would be able to learn how to effectively operate a BUK without training from the Russia military? Seems they've developed pretty lethal efficiency in a short amount of time.

    1. John   11 years ago

      When you have a Russian Special Forces guy there telling you what to do, it is easier than you think.

  30. AD-RtR/OS!   11 years ago

    Who's to blame?
    George Bush, obviously!

  31. World watchers   11 years ago

    Someone should send Barrack Hussein Obama a hash tag#### Thanks for a Tranquil world but he might not get it on the golf course!! So foolish America!!

    1. World watchers   11 years ago

      So much sorrow for the families of the lost.So much sorrow In this world

  32. Almanian!   11 years ago

    I thought that was the Snuke?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!