Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Our Short National Cheese Nightmare Is Over: FDA Backtracks on Wood-Aged Cheese

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.11.2014 10:10 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Baynard/Wikimedia
(Baynard/Wikimedia)
Jon Sullivan/Wikimedia

Earlier this week, I posted about a potential Food and Drug Administration (FDA) crack down* on cheese aged on wood surfaces. It's a practice that's been going on for hundreds of years, and may be more sanitary than aging cheese on plastic. Cheesemakers, libertarians, and a whole bunch of others were rightly outraged, and began making this known. 

Well, good news: The FDA announced Tuesday that wood-aged cheese is safe. From Dairy Herd Management magazine:

The agency said it did not have a new policy banning wooden shelves in cheese-making, adding there was no requirement in recent food safety regulations requiring the agency to address the issue.

Well, okay, but is there an old policy or an old requirement? Because in January the agency cited several New York cheesemakers for using wooden shelves. Industry blog Cheese Underground said this was unusual, as the FDA has traditionally deferred to state policy on this; but the rollout of 2011's Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) has been compelling all sorts of weird new FDA meddling. 

When the New York Agriculture Department asked for clarification, Monica Metz, an official with the FDA's Dairy and Egg Branch, said the wooden shelves didn't conform to FDA "good manufacturing practice" regulations. But the FDA clarified Tuesday that it had never taken action against a cheesemaker based solely on the use of wood. It's just that these particular wooden shelves at these particular places were poorly cleaned.

Oh my. Has this all just been so much dairy industry hysteria? Or is the FDA backpedaling amidst the criticism? From the FDA's statement yesterday, it sounds to me like more of the latter.  

"In the interest of public health, the FDA's current regulations state that utensils and other surfaces that contact food must be 'adequately cleanable' and properly maintained," Lauren Sucher, an FDA spokeswoman, said in a statement.

"Historically, the FDA has expressed concern about whether wood meets this requirement and has noted these concerns in inspectional findings," she said. "FDA is always open to evidence that shows that wood can be safely used for specific purposes, such as aging cheese."

My takeaway from all this seems to be that the FDA isn't mulling some major push to end aging cheese on wooden surfaces. But if it comes across it in (routine?) inspections, cheesemakers may be cited. 

"Good for the FDA for backing down," wrote Forbes contributor Greg McNeal. "Although it's unfortunate that they are dodging accountability by claiming they did not change their policy." At Cheese Underground, Jeanne Carpenter thanked consumers for writing letters, signing a petition, posting on Facebook, and generally making "standing up for artisan food a main-stream American issue." The FDA's "back-stepping in both tone and message is welcome news for the hundreds of cheesemakers across the country who have invested their life savings in making premium artisanal cheese and aging it on wooden boards," she wrote.

* I despise this phrase, but I've yet to find a better alternative. Taking suggestions…

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason TV: In Praise of Psychedelics

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsNanny StateFDARegulationFood Policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (37)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

    * I despise this phrase, but I've yet to find a better alternative. Taking suggestions...

    Power trip?

    Malicious compliance?

    Neither really fits either.

    Blunder?

    I don't know.

    1. Drake   11 years ago

      Bureaucratic penetration?

      1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

        "The FDA has decided to bureaucratically penetrate..."

    2. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

      Things we do together.

    3. R C Dean   11 years ago

      Howsabout "aggression"?

    4. Cis Shitlord   11 years ago

      Normal course of action for the unaccountable scumbags in bureaucracy whenever they get bored or insecure? Too wordy?

  2. Shirley Knott   11 years ago

    Repression?
    Suppression?
    Jack-booting?

  3. antisocial-ist   11 years ago

    Fucking with?

    1. Geoff Nathan   11 years ago

      Drooling hysteria?

  4. creech   11 years ago

    Next up, targeting restaurants which serve you salmon on a cedar plank. Is there no end to the craven businesses which promote the food poisoning of their customers?

  5. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Crackdowm * I despise this phrase, but I've yet to find a better alternative. Taking suggestions..

    thugging
    force compliance
    statist-mongering
    becausefuckyouthatswhy-ing
    ragebonerban(ning)

    1. Jan S.   11 years ago

      I was leaning towards, "unbelievably incompetent and asinine intrusion" but I think I prefer your "becausefuckyouthatswhy-ing."

  6. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

    "regulatory enforcement clarification"

  7. Sevo   11 years ago

    "I despise this phrase, but I've yet to find a better alternative."

    Mission creep?

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Not technically. "Food Safety" was the buzzword under which the FDA was founded. So it's not an expansion beyond their original scope. It's just bad regulation within the original scope.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        UnCivilServant|6.11.14 @ 10:38AM|#
        "Not technically. "Food Safety" was the buzzword under which the FDA was founded."

        You're too kind. I don't think this had to do with food safety.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          Just because they don't know anything about food doesn't mean it wasn't related to food safety. They wrote bd regulation out of ignorance and arrogance. Consequences stemmed from it.

    2. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

      "The FDA has decided to mission creep on into cheesemaking..."

      I like that.

  8. Vampire   11 years ago

    FDA: We will need to inspect that wooden spoon you beat your kids with. They might get an infection from a splinter which could cause a splinter infection epidemic. We recommend plastic spoons to beat them with instead.

  9. flye   11 years ago

    Hyper-repressed

  10. cw   11 years ago

    First they came for the artisanal cheesemakers...

  11. derpules   11 years ago

    The FDA announced Tuesday that wood-aged cheese is safe

    1. derpules   11 years ago

      how do these assholes get funding??

      also, fucking squirrels.

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        how do these assholes get funding??

        First, they commit highway robber writ large, then they borrow ubgodly sums from whoever is willing to loan them funds.

      2. Vampire   11 years ago

        Try peacefully revoking your funds and also your consent to be governed. I doubt there would be a peaceful response.

  12. Suellington   11 years ago

    Nothing left to cut.

    1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

      Looks like the FDA cut the cheese.

  13. Sevo   11 years ago

    So they caved; so what?
    They still hold an arbitrary (un-elected) power to close down any food-processing business with the push of a key.
    Oh, and where is lefty-craig to tell us about how regulatory bodies analyze costs/benefits?

    1. Cis Shitlord   11 years ago

      Who?

  14. JW   11 years ago

    Never attribute to malice, as to what can easily be explained by incompetence *and* malice.

  15. lap83   11 years ago

    "Taking suggestions..."

    crime against all that is gouda and hole-y

    1. Jan S.   11 years ago

      ^This.

  16. Suellington   11 years ago

    First they came for the buckyballs and then they came for the cheese. They managed to get the buckyballs pulled but they couldn't stop the cheese.

  17. Zeb   11 years ago

    It has been my understanding (and experience) that wooden utensils and cutting boards are quite safe and better than plastic. The little grooves that knives make in plastic cutting boards are much better places for bacteria to colonize than those in wood.

  18. keithp   11 years ago

    I wish Ohio would backtrack on regulating wineries as a food safety problem. Ever hear of any food safety issues with wine? It doesn't exist but the Ohio Department of Agriculture chooses to regulate wineries as a food safety problem. This is unnecessary, duplicitous of sanitation regulation in Ohio Liquor codes and licenses, as well as discriminatory as wineries outside of Ohio do not have to comply with ODA regulations. For information or to take action on Ohio Senate bill 32, please see: http://www.FreeTheWineries.com or http://www.facebook.com/FreeTheWineries

  19. terrymac   11 years ago

    "Crackdown" is a single word, not a phrase. The only synonym I can think of at the moment would be "suppression."

  20. PatriotInTheOriginalSense   11 years ago

    Ham-fisted nannyish meddling?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!