Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Mozilla's Vice President: Trading Away Your Privacy

Todd Krainin and Paul Detrick | 6.1.2014 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Do you trust the National Security Agency or the Internal Revenue Service more than Google or Facebook? If so, you're not alone. A recent Reason-Rupe poll found that most Americans do not trust big tech companies. 

Mozilla's Vice President of Business and Legal Affairs, Denelle Dixon-Thayer, says "data hygiene" should be something every new or established tech company should be thinking about. Dixon-Thayer sat down with Reason TV at the 2014 South by Southwest Interactive Festival in Austin, Texas this year. 

The interview was originally published on April 24, 2014. Orginal write-up below:

Don't trust Facebook or Google with your personal information? You're not alone.

A recent Reason-Rupe poll found that when it comes to their personal info, more Americans trust even the National Security Agency or the Internal Revenue Service over Google or Facebook.

Mozilla's Vice President of Business and Legal Affairs, Denelle Dixon-Thayer, says "data hygiene" should be something every new or established tech company should be thinking about.

"Trust is our currency," said Thayer to Reason TV at the 2014 South by Southwest Interactive Festival in Austin, Texas. "If we don't have the trust of our users then we actually aren't going to be successful as a company."
Dixon-Thayer says big data companies need to be upfront with users about who has access to their data, how long their data is stored, and do what they can to inform users of government data requests.

"With data, may come a reward, but also a substantial risk," says Dixon-Thayer, who points out that if you keep information for a long time your company becomes open to subpoenas and NSA requests.

"It's just thinking about what that data can do for you and when does it lose its value to you," says Dixon-Thayer

In October 2013, Mozilla endorsed the USA FREEDOM Act, which would have amended the PATRIOT Act and ended dragnet collection of phone data while providing more oversight of surveillance programs and the FISA court. The bill is pending in the house judiciary committee.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reality Show President: Inside the White House PR Machine

Todd Krainin was a producer at Reason.

Paul Detrick is a former video reporter and senior producer at Reason.

PolicyNSAScience & TechnologyCultureCivil LibertiesGoogleFacebookPrivacy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    OT

    "Moreover, the power behind white privilege is its invisibility and the fact that its benefits are seamlessly integrated and interwoven into the fabric of institutions and systems that perpetuate from one generation to the next."

    http://www.startribune.com/opi.....23991.html

    1. PM   11 years ago

      If original sin didn't exist we'd have to invent it.

      1. Slammer   11 years ago

        I've never heard any of the 'white privilege' crowd even clearly define just what the fuck it even is. Let alone be able to explain how it works and the influence it has. It's like 'diversity'(not the evolution kind).

        1. Suthenboy   11 years ago

          From the quote in Notorious's post, it is nebulous by design. It is whatever they say it is at any given moment.

        2. Moogle   11 years ago

          I've been told directly by.a justice warrior that a homeless white guy living in a dumpster has more privledge than Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama combined.

          I've taken to calling it "Chrmical X"

    2. Corning   11 years ago

      seamlessly integrated and interwoven into the fabric of institutions and systems

      War on drugs

      Democrat party

      Teachers unions

      Local Protectionist bureaucrats and politicians that install regulations that prevent new competition against established players.

      Like these?

  2. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Surprising amount of hysterical huffing and puffing about the "prisoner exchange" for the soldier in Afghanistan.

    We apparently have completely rejuvenated al quaida's terror-making capabilities.

    Be afraid, America. Be AFRAID.

    1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

      Judging by the poisoning in the media reports, I wouldn't be surprised if three of the five get a bullet to the head after being released.

  3. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

    OT: Local hack writes disparaging editorial about local Koch refinery

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/a.....-books.php

    Turns out that hack's PR firm has been trying for years to get the PR account with same refinery to tout how environmentally wonderful it is.

    1. MJGreen   11 years ago

      But judging from its belching stacks and anti-utopian visage, one can figure out it is owned by the notorious Koch Brothers.

      Of course! It looks eeeeevil, so it must be owned by the Kochtopus!

      1. PM   11 years ago

        I like that they've taken to just coming out and openly admitting that's the extent of their analytical depth.

      2. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

        anti-utopian visage

        I laughed out loud at that.

    2. mr simple   11 years ago

      Koch Industries' corporate ethos is to pollute the American landscape with impunity.

      Why do they have to get their impunity all over the place?

      I feel sorry for peolle who read that and can't tell it's just a fact-free hit piece.

  4. Suthenboy   11 years ago

    "....more oversight of surveillance programs and the FISA court."

    So, more oversight from a secret court whose members, rulings and interpretations are secret. This fills me with confidence. It sure does.

    1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

      Oh it will be, Suthenboy. I assure you. We have top men working on it right now.

  5. Chumby   11 years ago

    If I can be assured that giving up some digital freedom will lead to toddlers getting burned by flash bang grenades, I'm in.

  6. Moogle   11 years ago

    Hey, but at least he didn't donate to Prop 8 so it's all good.

  7. Vampire   11 years ago

    Wtf is there a need for the USA FREEDOM Act?? And wtf was with the patriot act????

    Too bad there wasn't a piece of paper that politicians swore an oath to that said: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    Only then could govt be restrained and limited!!! Oh what an idea, parade around the phrase limited government, and maybe even write a document with all kinds of limitations for them there politicians....that wil surely?secure the blessing of liberty for every individual!!!

    Oh wait, they tried such a thing....and the result of the experiment....like all govt's are was and is chaos and failure.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

The Criminal Justice System Was Found Guilty in the Karen Read Trial

Billy Binion | 6.21.2025 6:30 AM

Obama Adviser Jason Furman on Biden, Neoliberalism, and Keynesian Economics

Nick Gillespie | From the July 2025 issue

The Federal Government Owns Too Much Land. Selling It Helps Rural Communities.

Jack Nicastro | 6.20.2025 5:37 PM

A Judge's Order Freeing Mahmoud Khalil Is Yet Another Loss for the Trump Administration's Immigration Agenda

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.20.2025 4:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!