Poll: Even If Russia Invades Deeper Into Ukraine, 76 Percent of Americans Oppose Sending US Troops


White House

Tensions have been high between Ukraine and Russia since the latter annexed Crimea and has been flexing military muscle along the countries' shared border. The U.S. has asserted itself in the crisis, and a new Reason-Rupe poll finds that a 40 percent plurality of Americans do not approve of the way President Obama is handling the situation. Thirty-seven percent do approve of his handling. A large number of Americans, 21 percent said they did not know.

Libertarians may take heart that 58 percent of the 1,003 respondents said they do not want America to be involved in the crisis whatsoever–not economic sanctions, not military action. This may be indicative of wariness about adding a new chapter to America's legacy of international entanglements. 

Thirty-one percent think the U.S. should continue imposing economic sanctions on Russia, which has been the Obama administration's preferred tactic thus far. There has been debate about the effectiveness of sanctions. The BBC has noted that "sanctions are only partially successful about one-third of the time." Either way, Russia is causing its own economy some suffering: The high price tag of staging an invasion did no favors for the already weak rouble. 

Only eight percent of respondents considered sending military troops and assets to be the right course of action for America., seems particularly significant given recent developments. The Navy has already sent one destroyer ship to the Black Sea and Vice President Joe Biden has suggested further military exercises may take place in the Baltic. NATO, of which the U.S. is the largest supplier of both military personnel and funding, sounded the alarm this week that the build-up of 40,000 Russian troops along Ukraine's border could mean an invasion in as little as three days. 

Some Republicans have criticized Obama, suggesting that America has to take a harder line lest Vladmir Putin take further action. But, when asked, "If Russia attempts to invade additional parts of Ukraine, would you favor or oppose [sending US troops to Ukraine]?" non-interventionist sentiments remained high. Sixty-two percent of people polled would still be opposed to sending military aid and weapons. Though, when asked a similar question about stricter sanctions, 61 percent said they would approve.

Reason-Rupe also asked people to compare Obama's ability to manage foreign policy to former President George W. Bush's, and responses were mixed. Thirty-five percent believe that Obama is better, 32 percent believe he's worse, and 31 percent say the two presidents are about the same. These numbers reinforce an image that Obama has tried to fight against–that his administration's doctrine is, if not merely extension of his predecessor's, still equally ineffective. However, President Obama fared slightly better in his comparison with President Bush than he did when Reason-Rupe asked the question in September 2013 during the Syria crisis.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted March 26-30 2014 interviewed 1003 adults on both mobile (503) and landline (500) phones, with a margin of error +/- 3.6%. Princeton Survey Research Associates International executed the nationwide Reason-Rupe survey. Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results, detailed tables, and methodology found here. Sign up for notifications of new releases of the Reason-Rupe poll here.

NEXT: 43 Percent of Americans Say They'll Blame Obamacare for Health Care Premium Increases or Plan Changes Next Year

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I would hope so. How are there 24% of the country who thinks it is a good idea to go to war with Russia over Ukraine? Nothing against Ukraine, but I am not risking blowing up the world or getting into a no kidding conventional war to save them.

    1. Maybe word it more realistically: Are you willing to risk WW3 over what Russia is doing in Ukraine? Just get it out there.

      1. Considering how many nuclear weapons Russia and the US (I hope) still has, risking world war III is risking blowing up the world.

  2. As long as the Russians and their Cuban allies don’t invade a southern Colorado high school…

    1. Glutton!
      Skunk bear!
      Somethings not quite right here.

  3. Reason-Rupe also asked people to compare Obama’s ability to manage foreign policy to former President George W. Bush’s

    Wow, that’s a tough question. I guess due to the magnitude of the Iraq war, I’d say Bush, but this one certainly seems dedicated to torpedoing relations with friendly nations.

    Oh, and lobbing missiles.

  4. OT: I just saw a story that mentions (almost as an aside) that Bunny Mellon, Jackie Kennedy’s best friend, died on March 17th. I used to go to the estate she and her husband Paul Mellon had in Middleburg, VA because we had friends who lived and worked there. A few memories:
    Paul Mellon was so fiercely protective of the children there that he kicked Jackie-O off the property for the day for speeding down the road in her huge convertible.
    They had all the houses there built with bomb shelters in the basements.
    Mr. Mellon had the air strip there fly an A.N.V. battle flag just because he knew I would think it was funny they would fly it at all. (He was from PA, she was from NJ.)

  5. We should just give Ukraine back their nukes.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.