NSA

PRISM: Don't Worry, We Only Track Your Email Address, Not Keywords

|

US Govt

Lawyers representing the government's intelligence services claim that PRISM, the mass surveillance program that mines data from major Internet communication companies, does not snoop on people based on "keywords like terrorism" and instead targets certain email addresses and phone numbers. Isn't that heartening?

Agence-France Presse (AFP) writes that "they told the hearing hosted by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board…that the NSA did not aim to scoop up all web transmissions, but that the surveillance was narrowly tailored to track or uncover terror suspects and other threats."

"We figure out what we want and we get that specifically, that's why it's targeted collection rather than bulk collection," a representative of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said about the program, "which focuses on foreign suspects outside the United States."

"Any time there is not foreign intelligence value to collection, by definition it will be purged," the National Security Agency's Rajesh De stated.

Unsurprisingly, another NSA representative "insisted that the American government and the NSA had acted within the law at all times," according to The Register.

The claims are suspect, given the proclivity of NSA officials to sometimes offer the "least untruthful" answer when questioned. And even if PRISM does not itself pay attention to keywords, that does not mean that one of the U.S. government's 21 other known mass surveillance projects, systems, and initiatives is not providing PRISM with deeper information on its targets. The NSA does, after all, employ "parallel construction," a tactic which Reuters decribed last year: "federal agents are trained to 'recreate' the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated."

The Guardian reported an apparent bombshell—that "testimony by Rajesh De contradicted denials by technology companies about their knowledge of NSA data collection"—but the paper has retracted that claim.

Edward Snowden spoke through a telepresence robot at a conference on Tuesday, assuring that "there are absolutely more revelations to come." Whether we're moving closer toward a sci-fi utopia or dystopia, I can't tell, but the fact that a robo-Snowden has already been unleashed seems like a good sign.

NEXT: The United States of Cigarette Smuggling

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. 1: ?
    2: Collect data
    3: Profit!

    Where ? = obtain warrant.

  2. Because they’ve been so forthright about everything up to this point!

    Christ, it’s the Government that Cried Wolf.

    They’ve been proven to be liars so many God damn times, who would believe anything they say about anything?

    …oh, right. Congress would.

  3. “Any time there is not foreign intelligence value to collection, by definition it will be purged,”

    As in, collection is a foregone conclusion. Only after collection and some level of evaluation will purge be considered.

    1. And by their definition, everything has foreign intelligence value.

      1. Curse. Your. Nimblefingers.

        1. Or I guess I could have read upthread first.

          1. Maybe if you weren’t so laconic…

            1. It would be faster if I just farted out 50 words instead of painstakingly crafting 10 words.

  4. it targets which emails based on what assumptions/evidence?

  5. By definition..

    Nice weasel word.

    1. Any time there is not foreign intelligence value to collection, by definition it will be purged

      Of course, what’s left unsaid is that all collected data has foreign intelligence value, and hence will be retained.

  6. Unsurprisingly, another NSA representative “insisted that the American government and the NSA had acted within the law at all times,” according to The Register.

    You know who else acted within the law at all times?

  7. I got through the first paragraph and quit.

    What is the point of listening to anything this government has to say? Everything they say is a transparent lie and they don’t give a shit if you know it, they lie shamelessly anyway. It’s like listening to a three-time felon behind bars.

  8. And he shall be Zenon
    And he shall be a good man
    He shall be Zenon
    In tradition with the family plan

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.