Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Free Speech Not So Free on BBC Free Speech Show

Matthew Feeney | 3.19.2014 12:35 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Coffee Lover/wikimedia
(Coffee Lover/wikimedia)
Youtube screengrab

A recent episode of the BBC show Free Speech featured a question from Asifa Lahore, who describes himself as "Britain's first and only gay Muslim drag queen." Lahore asked, "When will it be accepted to be Muslim and gay?"

Unfortunately, the BBC ironically decided that it would not allow the question to be discussed by the show's panel. The episode of Free Speech was being filmed at Birmingham Central Mosque, and presenter Rick Edwards said immediately after Lahore's question was asked:

"We were going to debate that question but today after speaking to the mosque they have expressed deep concerns with having this discussion here."

Watch below:

Shockingly, not a single member of the panel decided to force a debate on Lahore's question.

The BBC has understandably been criticized for its decision not to allow for the invited panel to debate the issue, with some viewers taking to Twitter to express their disapproval.

Writing in his blog at The Telegraph Dan Hodges says that the BBC should have ignored the mosque's concerns and broadcast anyway:

What was the presenter thinking of? What was the producer thinking of? What is the BBC thinking of?

If their hosts wanted to censor the content of the programme they had no business broadcasting from that venue in the first place.

But once they were there and broadcasting they should have carried on the debate, or pulled the plug live.

Writing at Breitbart London, Raheem Kassam said that the BBC's decision is the latest example of "how and why the BBC fails to do its job properly."

A BBC spokeswoman said that the Birmingham mosque didn't say any topics were off-limits when they offered to host the show, but that the mosque did receive threats after homosexuality and Islam were mentioned as one of the topics to be discussed during promotion. That reaction probably answers Lahore's question better than any of the panelists could have.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Illinois Mulls Requiring Prescriptions for Cold Medicine. Thanks Meth and the War on Drugs!

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

PolicyCivil LibertiesCultureWorldUnited KingdomIslamFree SpeechLGBT
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   11 years ago

    Is there a more useless profession than journalism?

    1. Tman   11 years ago

      System Admin for Reason?

    2. Free Society   11 years ago

      Is there a more barbaric religion than Islam?

      1. Paul.   11 years ago

        Scientology?

      2. Zeb   11 years ago

        Thugee?

      3. Brandon   11 years ago

        Statism?

        1. Paul.   11 years ago

          Winner.

  2. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

    Law?

    1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   11 years ago

      I like you Hugh. I will kill you last.

  3. Paul.   11 years ago

    It should also be remembered, as so many mainstream journalistic outlets reminded me after Ambassador Stevens was killed because of YouTube, that the rest of the world doesn't have a first amendment, so we should tone down our rhetoric and expectations.

  4. Paul.   11 years ago

    I'm guessing the moniker Free Speech is just something the producers cooked up to make the show seem edgy. Sort of like when a show is playing that booming music and the voiceover says stuff like "Nothing is out of bounds!" or "Uncut! Unedited!" or my other favorite "Too hot for TV!" while you're watching it on TV. It doesn't actually mean that 'nothing is out of bounds'...

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      "Free speech!...within limits."

  5. William of Purple   11 years ago

    They should let Jezza host this.

    1. Loki   11 years ago

      Let's see if the comments are working now...

      That would be one way to get Clarkson killed (I'm assuming you're refering to Jeremy Clarkson from Top Gear).

  6. Raston Bot   11 years ago

    those spineless Brits never disappoint.

  7. Free Society   11 years ago

    We can't have free speech because what if someone yells something vaguely gay in a crowded Mosque?

    1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

      "Flaming!"

  8. Drake   11 years ago

    Did they name the show ironically?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Final Vacation Frontier

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the August/September 2025 issue

The Government Sent '20 Police Officers' With Riot Gear To Rearrest D.C. Sandwich Thrower, Says Attorney

Billy Binion | 8.15.2025 4:51 PM

D.C. Sues Pam Bondi and the Trump Administration for Replacing Police Commissioner

Tosin Akintola | 8.15.2025 3:15 PM

D.C. Residents Are Right To Protest Unconstitutional Police Roadblocks

C.J. Ciaramella | 8.15.2025 2:57 PM

Intel Is Reportedly the Latest Company Trump Wants a Piece Of

Joe Lancaster | 8.15.2025 12:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!