Forced to Unionize: Is this Cesar Chavez's Legacy?


"Forced to Unionize: Is this Cesar Chavez's Legacy?" was produced by Zach Weissmueller. Approximately 8 minutes.

This video originally aired March 13, 2014. Original writeup is below.

"If Cesar were here today, he certainly wouldn't be supporting what's being done now, which is a union trying to impose itself on employees," says Dan Gerawan, co-owner of Gerawan Farms, one of the nation's largest producers of peaches, plums, and nectarines and a major employer of California farm workers.

Gerawan Farms and some of its employees are in the midst of a fight with the United Farm Workers (UFW) union, which claims to represent Gerawan's workers, despite not having collected dues or bargained on behalf of them for more than two decades.

After years of failed efforts to unionize California's migrant farm workers, a massive grape strike started in the small farming town of Delano sparked a movement leading to the rise of the UFW. The face of this movement was a man named Cesar Chavez, a man revered by labor historians as the bringer of "peace in the fields," who has roads, schools, and even holidays named after him. He's also the subject of an upcoming biopic starring Michael Peña.

But since then, much has changed in the agriculture industry and in labor politics. The UFW, which once boasted more than 50,000 dues-paying members, now claims fewer than 5,000. Yet with unionization in the industry on the decline, real wages have steadily increased. This might explain why many workers at Gerawan Farms have begun to protest—not against their employer, but against the union.

Gerawan Farms employs more than 10,000 workers a year—more than double the entire membership of UFW—and points to county employment statistics to back up claims that it's an industry leader in employee compensation. UFW won an election to represent Gerawan Farms' workers in 1990. The company and the union had a single bargaining session, and then UFW disappeared from the scene, according to Dan Gerawan.

The appearance of collusion between the ALRB and the UFW disturbed Gerawan management and infuriated many of the workers, who staged a protest in front of the ALRB offices in Visalia. In a move reminiscent of the famous Delano grape strike, some even travelled to Sacramento hoping to have their voices heard by Governor Jerry Brown, the very same governor who created the ALRB while in office 38 years ago to create "peace in the fields" and act as a neutral arbiter between companies, workers, and unions.

"Often what our employees tell us is, they don't trust the ALRB," says Gerawan. "They've cited Silas Shawver himself as someone they don't trust."

Following the protests, the ALRB finally granted the workers their election, to be overseen by ALRB and administered by Shawver. Prior to the elections, Gerawan Farms granted ALRB access to their facilities to conduct interviews and run private sessions to inform workers of their voting and unionization rights.

What were the election results? We don't know. Shawver has impounded the votes in an office safe, pending further investigation of the unfair labor practice allegations. He failed to provide a timeline for this investigation.

"What does that mean, to have an election and not count the votes?" asks Lopez. "Where is the right of the farm worker? Where is it?"

Lopez and her co-workers have filed a class-action lawsuit against the ALRB for failing to count their ballots. Gerawan Farms is also suing, alleging that mandatory mediation is unconstitutional. UFW continues to call for a contract to be imposed and, alongside ALRB, alleges that Gerawan has engaged in unfair labor practices.

"The main problem is in the ALRB office," says Lopez. "They are supposed to be neutral with us. But they are not. We can see that they are favoring the UFW organization."

Watch the above video for an inside look at this fight, and scroll down for downloadable versions. Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by Sharif Matar and Weissmueller. Approximately 8 minutes.

NEXT: Why Economists Overestimate Future Growth Just Like Politicians Do.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. In Jerry Brown’s defense, he did veto the Farmworker bill, which would have made it easier for the UFW to organize.…..s-20110629

    How messed up are California’s politics, when Jerry Brown is the voice of reason?

    As Attorney General (while Schwarzenegger was governor), he sued San Bernadino County (and all other counties by extension), forcing them to integrate global warming into their general plans and CEQA processes.

    Now he’s trying to do a balancing act between environmentalists, who are actively trying to drive farmers out of the central valley by starving them for water, and the UFW, which is pushing for higher wages–and their own union workers, too? Oh, and let’s not forget the farmers!

    How screwed up are politics in California, when you have to worry about what’s going to happen once Jerry Brown leaves office?

  2. Sounds like a pretty solid plan to me dude.

    1. Did you even RTFA, anon-bot? I thought you were one of us. At least your hated of the police can still be relied on..

  3. California is to the rest of the states what Venezuela is to the other Latin American countries.

    1. Dunno, Venezuela is more like a growth that, while unsightly, does not behave like the cancer of California, which seems to spread to otherwise healthy(-ish) areas.

      1. California is fully metastasized. It’s diaspora have colonies in the western states like Colorado and Texas and are actually affecting politics there.

  4. Gerawan Farms and some of its employees are in the midst of a fight with the United Farm Workers (UFW) union, which claims to represent Gerawan’s workers, despite not having collected dues or bargained on behalf of them for more than two decades

    It’s still Dar-al-Union and can never be surrendered to infidel capitalists.

  5. Didn’t they already post this article earlier?

  6. Methinks it is safe to postulate that were the vote positive in favor of the union those ballots would not be bundled up in a safe.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.