Supreme Court Declines to Review 'Boobies' Ruling
On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court turned away a Pennsylvania school district seeking to prevent its students from wearing breast cancer awareness bracelets featuring the phrase "I ? Boobies." That denial leaves in place a 2013 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which ruled in favor of the students on First Amendment grounds.

The case arose in 2010 when several teachers at Pennsylvania's Eaton Area Middle School complained about the bracelets worn by several female students, arguing that the term "boobies" was disruptive and sexually suggestive. A ban on the bracelets soon followed, but two students refused to comply and were subsequently suspended for their "disrespect," "defiance," and "disruption."
In its 2013 decision, the 3rd Circuit sided with the students. "Because the bracelets here are not plainly lewd and because they comment on a social issue, they may not be categorically banned," the 3rd Circuit held. "Schools cannot avoid teaching our citizens-in-training how to appropriately navigate the 'marketplace of ideas.' Just because letting in one idea might invite even more difficult judgment calls about other ideas cannot justify suppressing speech of genuine social value."
As is customary, the U.S. Supreme Court offered no explanation for its refusal to hear the case.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...arguing that the term "boobies" was disruptive and sexually suggestive.
Funbags has the same number of letters, so it could have fit on the bracelets if boobies was a bridge too far.
I'm sure the school would be making the same argument even if the word "breasts" was used.
Duh, who doesn't like bewbs?
arguing that the term "boobies" was disruptive and sexually suggestive
"Did you hear those kids tittering about those bracelets? We must keep abreast of this development or it could get out of hand. Nip it in the bud or kiss discipline goodbye!"
"Go for the jugular!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mj6B4DtNyM
Bong hits 4 Jesus... Not enough social commentary?
Bong hits 4 Jesus
Uh, oh. This is one of the incantations that can summon a Tulpa sock.
Schools cannot avoid teaching our citizens-in-training how to appropriately navigate the 'marketplace of ideas.'
As far as I recall, this is pretty much accepted language in jurisprudence, but still: creepy. Fuck off slavers!
Well, all the kids are citizens-in-training. For instance, that cub scout who realized he brought his pocket knife to school, turned it in and got suspended got a real good lesson in trusting authority.
Easton, not Eaton.
Damn, you know those dudes are old when they pass up a chance to review boobies
Cancerous breasts are so sexy!
Score 1 for the tittersphere.
the U.S. Supreme Court offered no explanation for its refusal to hear the case.
every now and then, FYTW has a positive application. When 9 decidedly political animals think a case is bogus, it might be.
So "I ? Boobies" is protected free speech in one district, but the American flag isn't in another district. Seems odd, unless they are using different versions of the Constitution.
Well, y'know, displaying the American flag might lead to cultural non-Americans getting violent, so... FYTW.
Different courts.
Thank God for public schools, where we have a streamlined, efficient, centralized system that determines what constitutes legitimate speech by minors in a non-arbitrary way.
I sometimes lie awake wondering how awful things would be if, overnight, every student and school in the United States switched to a voucher system in which the school-student-parent relationship is determined by private contract and courts didn't dedicate their time to reviewing the constitutionality of bureaucrats banning I ? Boobies bracelets or t-shirts depicting guns.
Wondering if the ruling woukd have gone the same way if the school required uniforms?
Required uniforms saying "I ? Boobies"?
Banning all bracelets and jewelry.
Aww 🙁
Hey if it were up to me exposed boobies would be the uniform:)
. A ban on the bracelets soon followed, but two students refused to comply and were subsequently suspended for their "disrespect," "defiance," and "disruption."
Stop resisting!
2014 new bracelet & Wholesale Stainless Steel Jewelry Sets, women cheap fashion jewelry discount sales,Stainless Steel Jewelry Wholesale http://www.wejewels.com Is your best choice
2014 new bracelets, discount bracelet, discount rings, discount necklace, discount fashion jewelry women http://www.wejewels.com Is your best choice