Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

NSA Spurs Secrecy

Privacy protections

J.D. Tuccille | From the March 2014 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | cc
(cc)

Reacting to revelations about the National Security Agency's interception and storage of online data, Twitter announced in November that it is joining other tech companies in implementing "perfect forward secrecy."

While many Internet services already encrypt user communications and other information, this form of encryption separately encodes each session to ensure that snoops who break a code get access to only a snippet of data, not everything belonging to a user. Even when the government obtains a warrant for information, perfect forward secrecy has the potential to limit intrusions rather than providing a skeleton key.

Facebook also plans to implement perfect forward secrecy, and Google has had it in place since 2011. In its announcement, Google pointed out that "not even the server operator will be able to retroactively decrypt HTTPS sessions," meaning companies that implement the security cannot turn users' lives into open books, no matter the pressure they face.

Encryption technology does not shield companies from the obligation to respond to official government demands. But it can force surveillance into official channels, and it can reduce the amount of information collected.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 'We're Creating Our Own Evolutionary Next Step'

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyCivil LibertiesScience & TechnologyNSASurveillance
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (2)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Training Semarang   12 years ago

    thanks for these info. visit our web on Outbound Training Semarang.
    please comment to improvement.

    success for you all.

    PUSAT PELATIHAN SEMARANG

  2. alaamiah   11 years ago

    implement perfect forward secrecy, and Google has had it in place since 2011

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Don't Want ICE To Scan Your Face? Too Bad, You Might Not Have A Choice

Jacob R. Swartz | 11.3.2025 4:41 PM

Trump Says His 'Armed Conflict' With Drug Traffickers Does Not Involve 'Hostilities'

Jacob Sullum | 11.3.2025 1:50 PM

In Tariff Case, Trump's Attorneys Can't Decide if Foreign Investment Is Good or Bad for America

Eric Boehm | 11.3.2025 12:20 PM

Oklahoma's Obscenity Bait and Switch Could Ban Pride Parades and Public Drag Shows

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 11.3.2025 11:52 AM

Senate Investigations Find Medical Neglect and Other Human Rights Violations in Immigration Detention Centers

Autumn Billings | 11.3.2025 11:16 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300