Drivers License Suspensions Slamming the Working Poor for No Particular Good Reason in Florida


Tampa Bay Times columnist Steve Bousquet yesterday touches on a subject I wrote about here at Reason last month in my article "Petty Law Enforcement vs. the Poor": the way enforcement of laws relating to traffic and parking and moving on the streets, as people or in vehicles, can be heavyhanded and damaging beyond what the "crimes" in question should reasonably impose on most citizens, starting from something seemingly "minor" to something pretty much life-wrecking.

Bousquet writes on how quick his home state of Florida is to impose the potentially crippling, to the working poor, punishment of driver's license suspension. He hits you upfront with what that too-often means to the punished:

The state of Florida is in the business of driving people into poverty.

Don't take my word for it. Listen to House Speaker Will Weatherford, a Republican from Wesley Chapel, who couldn't believe how often the state suspends drivers' licenses: It happened to nearly 700,000 people last year…..

"If you go look at the data, they didn't pay a fine," Weatherford said. "They forgot to show up in court. They didn't pay their child support. There's this snowball effect. They lose their driver's license. Now they can't get to work. They get pulled over on a suspended driver's license. Now they go to jail. Now they owe $4,000. It creates poverty. It holds people down."

A total of 685,489 drivers in Florida had their licenses suspended in the fiscal year that ended last June. The law allows for a "business purposes only" license in some cases, but not for people who lose their licenses because they failed to pay fines.

And 167,000 of those suspensions had nothing to do with driving.

Failure to pay child support is grounds for suspension. So is a drug-related conviction, failure to appear in court on a worthless check charge and truancy by a minor. There are hundreds of kids under age 16 in Florida whose future licenses have been suspended because they habitually skip school, even though their licenses don't yet exist.

A new report by the Legislature's research unit, the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, found that more people received nondriving-related suspensions in the past year for failure to pay court costs than for any other reason….

As I wrote in my piece, it's a steady pattern of severe damage to the lives of the least well off in America that strangely gets little attention from most poverty activists and academics, perhaps because the solution is for the state to do less rather than do more.

NEXT: Detroit Council Clears Plan to Sue Blighted Property Owners

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Does Florida have a ballot initiative process like California? How about limiting DL suspensions to moving violations only?


    1. You expect sensible action from florida?

  2. strangely gets little attention from most poverty activists and academics, perhaps because the solution is for the state to do less rather than do more.

    Or because actual poor people are broke, can’t pay to play the game, and are too useful as props for the political class.

    1. If the poverty industry ever even came close to achieving its stated goals, it would have to shut down, and we certainly can’t have that.

  3. Shouldn’t this article be about getting the state out of the DL business altogether?

  4. So, back when I was poor, I lost my license for a DUI. OK, that’s fair enough. But, I needed to drive to get to the job sites (I was working construction, couldn’t really use public transpo with my tools, moving between different jobs on the same day, etc.)
    The biggest problem was that I needed to take anti-alcohol propaganda courses, and I simply couldn’t afford to pay for them every week. So the private company who was given this captive market kicked me out of the class, with no credit for the time I had attended, and I was SOL. But, since I needed to eat, I continued to drive. Since my plates were registered to me, and the Colorado police departments all use the auto-scan of the license plates, I would get pulled over for driving under revocation, which would increase the amount of time before I could get my license back by a couple of years!
    On top of that, even though the actual revocation time period had passed, until I renewed my license, I was still considered driving under revocation until i passed the damned class that I couldn’t afford until I could drive again!
    Meanwhile, the rich could simply pay and drive!

  5. So you don;t pay child support. Florida suspends your driver’s license to MAKE SURE YOU NEVER EARN MONEY TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT.

    Certainly one or two people in the legislature said this was idiotic. But in Democracy, the idiots are in charge if they are in the majority (and they always are).

  6. A driver’s license should be for ONE purpose only. To indicate that you know how to drive and obey the rules. Once you have one, it should NEVER have to be renewed unless you are in an accident or have 2 or 3 traffic violations. THEN, after age 65 or so, you should have to pass periodic tests to show you can STILL drive. That’s it. Simple, no?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.