Pentagon Exploring Brain Implants for Soldiers

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the technology development wing of the U.S. Department of Defense, is looking to install "black boxes" in soldiers' brains to help revive memory.
Since 2000, an estimated 280,000 soldiers endured brain injuries. If soldiers could be furnished with the device, the complex black box technology could potentially trigger memory and mitigate brain loss suffered in combat.
While DARPA, naturally, set its sights on military applications, implications for dementia and alzheimers patients stirs excitement. Geek predicts the neurotechnology "could become a key 'upgrade' for humans in the coming decades."
But even advocates admit the technology faces a long, uncertain climb. Especially since neuroscientists are still not sure how memory works. Bloomberg reports, "It's still far from certain that such work will result in a device."
While potential applications are exciting, they are limited. Geoff Ling, Deputy Director of DARPA's Defense Sciences office, explained to Bloomberg:
The DARPA initiative isn't designed to recover the type of memories used to recall a person's name. Instead, it would help wounded warriors recover 'task-based motor skills' necessary for 'life or livelihood.'
They hope the tax-funded implants will help patients remember how to do simple, everyday activities like "tie their shoes and perhaps eventually operate machinery or fly planes" Ling said.
DARPA has a history of sponsoring some weird technology. Think wall-climbing suits called "gecksin," inspired by geckos. But its research also helped lead to the Internet. It recently closed a contract with IBM for "self-destructing" technologies and launched a plan to "revolutionize web search."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The stuff that is coming down the pike is amazing and intimidating.
Adamantium could also benefit Alzheimer's patients.
Well, so could Unobtanium, but I don't see you mining any of that. Hypocrite!
What do I care? I don't have Alzheimer's. And those poor blue people. Plus, what do I care? I don't have Alzheimer's.
I read that headline as "Breast Implants" first.
"Dead or alive, you're coming with me."
Exactly what I thought when I read;
Who cares if they can remember their childrens' names? As long as the point-and-click 'I wish they were dead&8482;' interface still works.
As long as they try it on Lundgren and Van Damme first, I guess I'm okay with it.
Ah, the old unix 'kill' command finally implemented the way coders wished it could be.
-9
Nice. I was trying to.f8nd a way to work that.in.
If government is the only people willing to fund an idea, then there's a 99.9% chance that the idea sucks.
True enough, but what if the Gov't won't let anyone else fund it?
Didn't DARPA create the internet? Or was that Al Gore?
It was called ARPA at the time; yes, they were involved in some crucial aspects, though it can hardly be said that they "created" it.
Actually, I think it's government monopoly that keeps these ideas from getting funded for useful purposes. If they weren't busy stealing our money to fund the construction of drones for killing people, more effort might be put into developing them for use in delivery services. The incentives are just so perverse, that wasteful military toys are what we end up with.
Hopefully they can also wire these implants to bypass the pesky independent thought and sympathy centers in soldiers' brains.
I'm thinking the next step is to add robotic arms, like Dr. Octopus had. What could go wrong?
Nothing, nothing at all.
Oh, Hugh. Typical libertarian.
DIE KAPITALIST PIGDOG
Sawyer form Lost already got one of these. Now he's a combination of Sherlock Holmes and GI Joe.
Maybe we can pitch in and buy the plug one of them there DERPA brains.
"Oh shit, I had something for this..."
"Rabbit Klein?"
Archer: Is there anyway you can put that into Len Trexler's head?
Kreiger: *pauses* Well he'd suffocate...
Archer: Not the rabbit, idiot. The mind control chip!
You want to be a country singer, don't you, Serious.
Let's hope this works better than the Obamacare portal.
+1
Especially since neuroscientists are still not sure how memory works.
Neuroscientists...is there anything they know?
Of course, they used to know....
Brain and brain! What is brain?
E Plabnista!
Error, error. . .ster-i-lize.
Regardless of who funds this, the ability to interface a human brain with a machine will be evolutionary.
Humans able to control their environments via thought. Think of the possibilities.
I can't wait to be Borg. (minus the collective, of course)
Locutus d Anconia?
I have the hair for it.
Grow it out into a skullet.
The tech for that has been out there for some time. Atari tried it back in the mid-80's and the Air Force played with it for a while but it's kind of been forgotten.
Regardless of who funds this, the ability to interface a human brain with a machine will be evolutionary.
I feel the same way, except I dread the thought of how many liberties will be lost by the time we reach that point.
I would consider getting a brain implant if it came with laser beam eyes
Whaddaya mean I'm not kind?
Or porn.
I already know how this all works out =
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....c#t=03m23s
You know what else could mitigate brain loss suffered in combat? Not sending them into combat. It doesn't even cost anything and can be implemented immediately.
No, no, we tried that. They spend all their time complaining about 'not enough to do' and 'training is boring' and 'what ever happened to the communists?' - so we're working on the next best thing, which is just removing the brains altogether.
Would this technology allow Clint Eastwood to fly a top secret fighter plane?
He doesn't need to fly. He just squints and the bad guys turn around and fly home.
Da, but yoo must theenk in Rushian.