Talk About Your City's History, Get Hit With Over $1,000 Fine in Charleston
Freedom of speech, for sure--just watch what you say in Charleston, South Carolina, if you are a rickshaw driver speaking of your city's history to your passengers.

Awful details from the Post and Courier:
It was a Charleston police sting unlike any other: An undercover cop dressed casually like a tourist taking a ride on a rickshaw.
The goal was to see if any of the downtown drivers were giving illegal speaking tours of the city's numerous sight-seeing spots.
One of them did, and it cost him a fine of more than $1,000….
As far as police see it, any retelling for hire about the city's past can be delivered only by a city-licensed tour guide, like those generally seen driving horse carriages or leading walking tours.
Charleston Police Sgt. Heath King said the sting was arranged after South of Broad residents complained that workers at the city's three rickshaw companies were giving unsanctioned rides through downtown neighborhoods….
For the sting, which took place in September but came to light only recently, police officers went on two rides offered by each of the three rickshaw companies operating in the city (six rides total) - "to make it fair," King said…
Of the six rides taken, only one of the drivers made the tour offer, King said….
When the ride ended about 30 minutes later, [rickshaw operator David] Criscitiello was approached by another officer and given a $1,092 "touring prohibited" ticket. The discussion between the undercover officer and the rickshaw driver during the ride was recorded with a hidden device….
Reason on the Institute for Justice's attempts to fight for the free speech of "unlicensed tour guides."
Hat tip: Logan Jackson
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck.
This is a great use of resources.
Officers went home safely. Nothing else matters.
We can assume that the undercover guy was armed during this because the deal might have gone bad.
Nothing left to cut.
"And to your right is City Hall, where..."
"$1000 fine, terrorist!"
But I was just telling folk how our kind and benevolent overlords in City Hall make sure only people who pay the city the right amount of money are allowed to talk about the city's history, sir!
Freedom means asking permission and obeying orders.
That's not really sarcasm anymore, now is it ?
When it comes to anything involving money changing hands, no. It's not.
I'd expect this sort of absurd shit in New York City or Chicago, but just goes to show that government assholes populate every part of this country.
Charleston is really super history obsessed.
Was his real crime the part of the tour where he pointed out the porcine-ovine love paddock?
The cops don't want that info getting out for sure. Add too much anxiety to the act of making sweet, sweet love to their wooly friends.
How do they know that the rickshaw guy wasn't just talking to pass the time?
The article said he made a "tour offer," I would like more information on how explicit this quid pro quo was.
How can this not be an overt violation of the 1st Amendment?
IANAL, but it is!
Because he was doing it for money, and because of the part of the Amendment that says "does not apply to commercial speech". What, your copy doesn't have that in it? You should probably trade it in for a new, court-approved version.
You mean the version that has the "compelling government interest" clause aka FYTW
Was he? Does he charge different rates based on whether he talks about the scenery during the ride?
Because books and newspapers aren't for sale?
I can almost sort of see an argument for regulating advertisements. Fraud might come into play there.
But how can you make the distinction between books and newspapers, which are for sale and really do get to publish whatever they want to and someone who wants to talk to you about something. Speech and press are treated identically in the 1st amendment.
Commerce Clause.
So I'm guessing this means that the Charleston PD has solved every real crime in Charleston. Right?
Why am I not surprised that the mayor of Charleston, Joe Riley, is a Democrat and has been re-elected every time since 1975?
Please tell me he looks like Boss Hog.
More like "What if Orville Redenbacher fucked Bill Gates?"
Protecting the community from the faceless Big Rickshaw.
with their impersonal pedals and bike tires... who do they think they are?
Down on the ground! Get the fuck on the ground, now! Hands behind your head! Lock your fingers! Spread your legs! Search'em Pete!
Just like we thought. A history book. You're goin' down, scumbag.
*high fives, commendations all around*
and we have descended into parody.
"Don't mention the war!"
You started it
the war on tourism, lol
illbehereallnight.com
Charleston is not the only city that does this. How does an ordinance of this sort not get laughed out of court on 1st amendment grounds.
I heard from a very reliable source that the people of South of Broad are involved in a neighborhood-wide sheep fucking ring.
I heard about that too. And my Magic 8 Ball confirmed that all signs point to yes.
There's a reason why South of Broad residents are known locally as SOBs.
Can you imagine being the cop on that beat?
Chief: Hey, Kowalski! Need you to go deep cover, we got a rickshaw driver giving unlicensed talk about city history.
Kowalski: *turns in badge*
Cops would have to be capable of shame for something like that to happen. Just reading here on a daily basis is all I need to know that cops have no shame.
I wonder if the rickshaw companies have some sort of license from the city, and therefore are protected from competition just like the "official" tour guides. Not that that makes any of the regulations OK, but if that is the case, I might have less sympathy for the rickshaw guys.
Why would the creation of government-sponsored oligopoly reduce your sympathy for the victims of the oligopoly?
Strangely, a lot of people feel this way. Take the Uber situation; I've definitely heard people say, "But those taxi drivers suffer under all those regulations, it's not FAIR that Uber would get to escape them."
aww... dammit. I love Charleston.
I suspect that you will find some regulation at least that stupid in any city of any size in the US.
That's a pedi-cab, not a rickshaw. The driver pulls a rickshaw as a horse would pull a cart, nothing to pedal.
This doesn't surprise me. Probably lots of folks in Charleston would agree with this. After all, "Charleston wants to make sure its colorful history is told correctly..." After all, it's at least the most important city on the East Coast! That town has an ego the size of San Francisco's...
Dark Charleston corner:
"U a cop?"
"I just crave history baby"
"I do New Deal $50. $100 for WWII, but no Hitler. I ain't that kind of tour guide.
So if a Charleston cop asks you "Who shot Abe Lincoln?," don't squeal.